High Court · 2025

19.N. Ravinder, .S t . Ne,:lya, Aged about 42 yearc, Occ. Govt Em1iloyee, HWO Gr-ll, Rl/o. B16hnr:rat,ally Village, Doma Mandal, Vikarabad f st, T.S. 20.T. Vijay Kuhar. Slr>. T. Ramsingh, Aged about 41 ye2115 Occ Govt Employi:e, llW() Gr-ll, Fl/o. Tirmulapur Village, Pulka()h('rla [,4andal, Vikarabad Dist, 21.C. Srisailam, Sk, Ci. Anantaiah, Aged about 38 years, Occ. (ior t. Employee, 22. C. Umender, Si/ ) (1. Ramdas, Aged about 42 years, Occ. (1o,4 Employee, HWO Gr-ll, RJo. [i rrp;rnapally Village, Dlproor Mandal, Vikarabad Dist., T.S- 23.8. Balraj, S/c. U t'en:aiah, Aged about 48 years, Occ. Govt Emlrloyee, HWO 24.J. Bhojendher ll'I f]hojanna, Aged about 38 years, Occ. (lo d Employee, F{,r Ho No. 3-15-3311, Rajram Nagar, Arnroor Nizambad, 25.P Sharada, D/o '. Vittal, Agedabout 36 years, Occ. Govt Emlrloyee, HWO 26.M. Pandari, Slo - akirya, Aged about 34 years, Occ. Govt Em1.,{oyee, HWO Gr-l l, R:/o. Balkiarl, ;helka Tahanda, Bachapally, Sangareddy, Telangana. 27.S. Shiva Kumar S,/o. S. Kumar,,Aged about 43 years, Occ tlo'h Employee, HWO Gr-ll, FJo. llrrayankhed, Sangareddy, Sangareddy Dist. Terlangana- 28. M. Sham Kumrr S./o. Ir/. Pochaiah, Aged about 43 yr-'e rs, Occ. Govt. Employee, UV/ lr Gcll, Fl/o. Yellareddy, Kamareddy. l(zrmareddy Dist, Telangana. 29.P. Paian Kumar l;/o. P. Laxman, Aged about 41 years, Occ '3o'/t Employee, 30.A. Srujana, ft/c. r\ Srujan, Aged about 38 years, Occ. Govt Emlrloyee, HWO 31 . V. Vanaja, D/r; . r . lilarsaiah, Aged about 38 years, Occ. Go\.1 Employee, HWOGr-ll, R./o S)rrngareddy, Sangareddy Dist, Telangana. 32. P. Krishna K.iran Skr. Venkatehswarrao, Aged about 42 ,,'e ar:,;, Occ. Govt Employee, l-lv/r:, G --ll, Rl/o. Sarapaka Vullage, Burgarnpalrad [\rlandal, Bhadradri Koth;a,Jt dern Dist, Telangana. HWO Gr-ll, RJo. l'( rmareddy, Kamareddy Dist, Telangana Gr-ll, R/o. Sidd pt:,, Siddipet District, Telangana. .,.P[:TITIONERS AND

1. The State cf -f :lartgana, Represented by its Principal l:lecretary to Government, U - Welfare Department, Secretariat BuildirLg, Hyderabad, Telangana Slate -lerlarrgana State. 2. fhe Cbmmissicre' of Backward Class Welfare, Hyderabad, 3. The ReportinE (l l'i :en'District BC Welfare Officer, Peddapally [)is:rict (Zone-l) 4. The Reportin,l (J t'i :en'District BC Welfare Officer, Adilabad Distriot (Zone-ll). 5- The Reporting C,1f cer/District BC Welfare Officer, Karimnagar D istrict (Zone-

6. The Reportin,g r)F'i :en'DD,, Hanumakonda District (Zone-lV). 7. The Reporting (f1 cer/District BC Welfare Officer, Nalagoncla D strict (Zone- r[). v). B. The Reporlin,g Oii;eriDD (FAC), Rangareddy District (Zone-\"rl). 9. The Reporting l)rficerr/District BC Welfare Officer, Mahatru bn agar District (Zone-Vll)' '! ' ...REsipoNDENTS Petition under l,'ricl€, 226 of the Constitution of lndia prayinl that in the circumstances stateC rr the affidavit filed therewith, the High Cc urt may be pleased to issue an aJ:;r'opriate Writ, order or direction, more partic.rlarly one in the nature of Writ or \1 rncamus, declaring the inaction of the Ftespondents in preparlng combined/common seniority list for pre-f\zlatric and plst Matric i_e., pre Ivratric HWOs Gr-, (Generar)'and pre Matric HWos Gr-, fFemale) and post Matric HWOs Gr-, (Generar) and post Matric HWOs Gr-, (Femare) without considering the objectios Zone wise, vide procgs.Rc.No. Al42gglzo23 dated'o3r02r2024 for Kareshwaram (Zone-r), procgs.Rc.No.Ar42gg),2023 dated.O3l02l2O24 for Basara (Zone_il), procgs.Rc.No. At43OOt2O23 dated.OJlO2i2O24 for Rajanna (Zone_,,), procgs.Rc.No. At43O1t2O23 dated.03l02/2024 for Bhadradri (Zone-tV), procgs.Rc.No.At43O2l2O23 dated'03r02r2024 ,or yadradri (Zone-v), procgs.Rc.No- Ar43o3t2o23 dated.03lo2l2O24 for Charminar (Zone_Vt), procgs.Rc.No. At43O4l2O23 dated'03/02'2024 for Joguramba (Zone-Vr), is as iregar arbitrary discriminat/ry and contrary to Articres 14' 16 0f the constitution of rndia, BC werfare subordinate service Rures, consequenry direct the Respondents to consider objections of the petitioners and issue a fresh seniority list for pre-Mar,c HWos Gr-ll without combining post_Matric HWOs Gr_ll lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 15i.cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in suoport of the puiition, in" Hrgn court may be preased to direct the respondents to not to finarize ffre counserrng as per the seniority rist provisionar lnter-se seniority tist or Hostet w-etiare otricer, Gr-, (Generar) and Hostet werfare officer, Gr-r iFemare)2""" *ir",Irio" pr*s; R;'N |,."itiz&irozs dated'0310212024 for xaLsrrwaram- t2"""-rl, procgs.Rc.No.Ar42ggt2o23 dated.03lo2l2024 for Basara fZl,"._fff,' procgis.Rc.No. At43OOt2O23 dated'031o212024 for -. Q6j2nns (.il procas.Rc.No. N4301t2023 dated.0310212,24 for BhadraOrt tZo,\u_iVl,"''pro"g. Rc. No.N43O2l2o23 dated.03t02t2o24 for yadradri '?io""-Vi,p-"g.. Rc. No.At43O3t2O23 dated.O3l02l2O24 for Charminar qZoniit,l - - "' '" Counsel for the petitioner: SRl. MD ARSHAD AHMED Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR SERVICES tll The Court made the following: ORDER I THE HON,BLE SIII JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO WR,I'[ IIETITION No. 7 766 of2025 ORDER: Learned co:ltsel for the petitioner has info ed the Court that the Wrir I) : tition has become infructuous i'r v ieu' of subsequent PI'o': :r dings )

2. In "i.' ' . ol the same, Writ Petition is disnris sed as infructuous. Ih':re shall be no order as to costs

3. As :r ;:qtrel, miscellaneous applications pen'1ing' if any, in this 'r[ rit I etiLion, shall stand closed' \ To, SD/-S. I}(ARJUNA RAO MALL SI$TA NT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ,\RSHAD AHMED Advocate R SERVICES lll ,High Court for One CC to SiRl \]D 1 Two CCs to GP = O 2 HYderabad [()l-.,-- 3. Two CD Copie i BIV GJP ,, SECTI(:)N OFFICER fi!31r,,, :r 'elansana at ,1 ! ) 1 yr!. S-'rr6 J 'j 0:t \ I rl,l5 ' ] "\ t ,l)1;g o1 .t i'\ ,{, -:/ HIGH COURT DATED:17 l03l2tt25 ORDER WP.No.7766 ol' 2025 DISMISSINGTHEWRITPETITIoNASINFRUCToUS WITHOUT CO"$TS e/'