Smt.B.Sugunamma, Wo: late Yadaiah v. The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Nalgonda District, Nalgonda
Case at a glance
- Bench
- P SAM KOSHY, PRINCIPAL DISTRICT
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. The rvrit petition is, accordingly, disposed of as having become infiuctuous. There shall be no order as to costs Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. SDI.N. SRIHARI osrelR RE DEPUTY IIRUE COPY'I SECTION OFFICER istrrct' Nalgonda' '"tq1i?itt'ffi tlwii::-n'r:hf'")':ffi *: TJ LS…
Judgment
Cause title
Smt.B.Sugunamma, Wo: late Yadaiah, Aged about 38 years, Rl/o H.No.279, S.C.Colony, ltilarriguda, Nalgonda. AND 1 z The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Nalgonda District, Nalgonda. Smt.K.S.Swaroopa, W/o: P.Rajendra Kumar, aged about 44 years, Occ: Attender, Special Mobile Court cum Judicial lr,4agistrate of First class Court Nalgonda District, Nalgonda. ...PETITIONER
RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of lt/landamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the 1"t Respondent in issuing the Proceedings Dis. No.4016120111A1 , Dated 1 1 .07 .2O11 in so far as promoting the 2nd Respondent herein to the post of Record Assistant is illegal and arbitrary and consequently set aside the same. LA. NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP. NO: 25954 OF 2011) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Proceedings issued by the 'l st Respondent Dis. No.4O16i20111A1, Daled 11.07.2011 in so far as promoting the 2nd Respondent herein to the post of Record Assistant. Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT. K. UDAYA SRI Counsel for the Respondent No.1; SRI N. PRAVEEN REDDY (SC FOR TS HC) Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI M. V. RAJA RAAM The Court made the following: ORDER , i I THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND TIIE HONOT]RABLE SRI JUSTTCE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA l
ORDER:
(per Hon'ble Sri Justice P.Sam Koshy) W.P.No.21322 OF 2011 Heard Ms. K.Udaya Sri, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. N. Praveen Reddy, leamed Standing Counsel for the High Court for respondent No.l and Mr. M.V.Raja Ram, leamed counsel for respondent No.2. Perused the record.
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pending the writ petition, supplementary revised gradation list was published on 17.06.201 1 and put'suant to the revised gradation list, the petitioner has also I been promoted in the year 2022. Neither the revised gradation list dated 17.06.201 1 is under challenge in the present writ petition or in any other writ petition nor is the subsequent promotion given to the petitioner being challenged by the petitioner claiming from any earlier date.
[n view of the same, the present writ petition also by efflux of time has rendered infructuous. I 2 --
The rvrit petition is, accordingly, disposed of as having become infiuctuous. There shall be no order as to costs Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. SDI.N. SRIHARI osrelR RE DEPUTY IIRUE COPY'I SECTION OFFICER istrrct' Nalgonda' '"tq1i?itt'ffi tlwii::-n'r:hf'")':ffi *: TJ LS \H- HIGH COURT DATED:0710412025 ORDER WP.No.21322 ot 2011 1nr'- S 1,17 (' o^ ?.o \ 0 1 l{Ar 2025 v a I \ S DA'i llrl DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION AS HAVING BECOME INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS (P 4 1\ 2h @
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.