The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of lVlandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents after due receipt of the representation dated 02.02.2025 is illegal arbitrary contrary to the provisions of lhe Constitution of lndia and Article 300-4 and consequently direct the respondents stop the proposal of laying a road between agricultural lands in Sy Komidi Veera Reddy Sy Nos.4 1B/B,4191A, and 419/8. 420A13 for admeasuring Ac. 5.24 guntas existing crop is the maize ( B) Uppu Tirupathi in Sy No.287lB/2, for admeasuring Ac. 2.07 guntas (C) Uppu Kumar Sy No. 285/1 , to an extent of Ac. 1.32 guntas, ( D) Uppu Rajaiah Sy No. 284lA, to an extent of Ac. 3.21 guntas 2B4lCl1 to an extent of Ac. 0.08 guntas ( E) D Ramulu Sy No. 1041111 to an extent of Ac. 0.0450 guntas Sy No. 105/1 , to an extent of Ac. 0.2550 guntas Sy No. 1 0711 , to an extent of Ac. 0.2950 guntas total Ac. 1 .'1 I guntas (F) Gada Padma Sy Nos. 40Bl1l1 to an extent of Ac. 0.29 guntas, 409/AA, to an extent of Ac. 1 13 guntas, 409111112 to an extent of Ac. 0.1125 guntas, 4OglFt2,to an extent of Ac. 0 1350 guntas, 41OlABl1t2' to an extent of Ac 0 0325 guntas total extent of Ac. 2.30 guntas ( G) Singarapu Raja Mouli Sy No' ggtAt3lltl to an extent of Ac. 0.10 guntas Sy No 99B 11 to an extent of Ac. 1.20 guntas total Ac. 1.30 guntas ( H) Singarapu Rajitha Sy No 99/4/1 ' to an extent of Ac 3.20 guntas ( l) Gada Uma Devi Sy No 409BA to an extent of Ac 0 38 guntas, Sy No. 409F I 1t212 to an extent of Ac 0 02 guntas total extent of Ac 1.00 guntas ( J) Gada Rama Devi Sy No 409BA to an extent of Ac 0 38 guntas Sy No. 409CA to an extent of Ac 0 15 guntas' Sy No' 409 F1112 to an extent of Ac. 0.24 guntas Sy no. 41OlABt2 to an extent of Ac 0 032 guntas total to an extentofAc2.00guntas(K)GadaRajiReddySyNo40B/li3totalextentofAc o.2gguntasMamidalapallyVillageManakonduruMandal'KarimnagarDistrict(K) KommidisammiReddysyNo4lBcAc.2.0gguntas,Mamidalapallyvillage IManakonduru Mandal, Karimnagar Dlstrict' IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings with existing crops for proposal of laying a road between agricultural lands in Sy Komidi Veera Reddy Sy Nos4lB/B' 419 A- arit 41918' 42OAl3 for admeasuri ng Ac 5.24 guntas existing crop is the maize i 13) Uppu Tirupathi in Sy No. 2B7lBt2. for admeasuring Ac.207 guntas ( c) Uppu Kumar sy No.2B5l1 , to an extent of Ac. 1.32 guntas, ( D) Uppu Rajaiah Sy No' 284lA', to an extent of Ac. 3.21 guntas 284lC/1 to an exlent of Ac 0'08 guntas (E) D Ramulu Sy No 10a/1/1 to an extent ofAc 00450 guntas Sy No' 105/1 ' to an extent of Ac. 0.2550 guntas Sy No 107/1 ' to an extent of Ac 0 2950 guntas total Ac. 1.19 guntas (F ) Gada Padma Sy Nos. 408/1/1 to an extent of Ac 0.29 guntas, 409/AA, to an extent of Ac 1 ' 1 3 guntas' 4ogl1l1l2 to an extent of Ac 0.1125guntas,4OglFt2,toanextentofAc0'1350guntas'410lABl112'loan extent of Ac. 0.0325 guntas total extent of Ac 2 30 guntas ( G) Singarapu Raja Mouli Sy No. 99/A/3/'1l1 to an extent of Ac 0 10 guntas Sy No 99B /1 to an extent of Ac. 1.20 guntas total Ac 1.30 guntas ( H) Singarapu Rajitha Sy No 99/A/1 , to an extent of Ac. 3 20 guntas ( l) Gada Uma Devi sy No 409BA to an extent of Ac. 0.38 guntas, Sy No 409F t 112t2 to an extent of Ac 0 02 guntas total extent of Ac. 1 00 guntas ( J) Gada Rama Devi Sy No 409BA to an extent of Ac. 0.38 guntas Sy No 409CA to an extent of Ac. 0.15 guntas, Sy No 409 F/1/2 to an extent of Ac. 0.24 guntas Sy no. 410lABl2 to an extent of Ac. 0.032 guntas total to an extent of Ac. 2.00 guntas (K) Gada Raji Reddy Sy No. 408/1/3 total extent of Ac. 0.29 guntas Mamidalapally Village Manakonduru Mandal, Karimnagar District (K ) Kommidi Sammi Reddy Sy No.418 C Ac.2.09 guntas, Mamidalapally Village trlanakonduru lrilandal, Karimnagar District, pending representation dated 02 02.2025 through registered post and sarre was rebeived on 05.02.2025 by the respondents herein forthw,th, pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI K.BUCHI BABU Counsel for the Respondents No.1,4to6: GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY Counsel for the Respondents No.2,7to10 : GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents No.3 : GP FOR AGRICULTURE The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN UIRTT PETITION No.7889 of 2025 ORDER: Heard Sri K. Buchi Babu, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Mines & Geolory. Perused the record'

2. Petitioners are claiming that tJrey are the villagers of Mamidalapally village, Manakonduru Mandal, Karimnagar District. They are also having lands in tJle said village. They are eking out their livelihood by way of ture. : c 1

3. According to the petitioners, 11s respondent 1S osing for laying road between agricultural fields of titioners. They have submitted representation O2.O2.2O25 to the respondent Nos. 1 to 10 with a t to take action against 1 1ff respondent and stop proposal of laying of road in the agricultural pite receiving and acknowledging the same, f I '! KI,J \v 1,.No.7889 of2025 2 respondent Nos.l to 10 did not act upon the sarne. Aggrieved b1' the said inaction of respondent Nos. 1 to 1O, petitioners filed the present writ petiti.,on.

4. Perusal of the record would reveal that the claiming that they have sent petitioners aIe representation to respondent Nos. 1 to 10 including the Mines Department with a request to take action against llth respondent for proposed laying of a road in the agricultural frelds. To prove tJ:at they are the owners of agriculture lands, petitioners have filed copies of the latest pattedar pass books and tifle deeds.

5. In the writ affidavit as well as representation dated O2.O2.2O25, petitioners have contended that 11th respondent proposed irrigation quarry lppalapally-II Venavalka Maldal, Karimnagar District and the said proposal is disturbing the environment and tJle proposed. works at Bhonagiri canal work without perrnission of respondent authorit5r by suppressing the real fact that it is inconvenient for the environment and existir.rg crops in E. KL,J W.P.No 7889 of 2025 -) the agricultural helds, farmers, cattle, other alimals in the locality and more particularly polluting the water of the locality. It is totally damaging the environment. Thus, it appears that grievance of the petitioners is only against 1lth respondent who is a private respondent. If 11th respondent 1S illegally proposing to lay road, petitioners have to take steps in accordance with law by approaching competent civil Court. In the writ aIfidavit I and in the said representation, petitioners have not ' stated any violation by the 2nd respondent more particularly violation of Mines Act, 1952 and Telangala State Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1966. Therefore, they cannot claim that they have submitted representation dated O2.O2.2O25 to Mines Department and file the present writ petition alleging non- consideration of the said representation.

6. In the light of the a-foresaid discussion, petitioners failed to make out any case to maintain the present writ petition and this writ petition is liable to dismissed and .l I KT,J w P.No-7889 of2025 4 accordingly dismissed. Liberty 1S granted to the petitioners to take steps to avail a_lternative remedies including filing of a suit before the r:ompetent civil Court. There shall be no order as to costs. 7 As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed. To, \ //TRUE COPYII SD/.K. AMMAJI F'IJTY REGISTRAR SE.CTION OFFICER

1. One CC to SRI K BUCHI BABU, Advocate. [OpUCj 2. fwo CCs to cP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGy, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]

3. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

4. Two CCs to GP FOR AGRICULfURE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

5. Two CD Copies. BSK BSw I I HIGH COURT DATED:1710312025 ORDER WP.No.7889 of 2025 EH S IA 1*()( o o ? 4 tpd Zr;n ( t' > i. i' .l F1) ra' DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS @ a4 + l:r