The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.3, 4 and their sub-ordinates in interfering and trying to remove the fencing stones in respect of his Plot No.106, admeasuring 200 Sq.yds in Sy.No.36i24, situated at phase ll, Viriayak Nagar Colony, Gopanpally Village, Serilingampalty Mandal, Ranga Reddy Didtrict and threatening to dispossess the petitioner from his plot without issuing anf notice or without following due process of law, is illegal, arbitrary, violative or Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of lndia and consequenily direct the Respondent No.3,4 and their sub-ordinates not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in respect of his Plot No.106, admeasuring 200 Sq.yds, comprised in Sy.No.36/24, situated at Phase ll, Vinayak Nagar Cotony, Gopanpally Village, I I l} [ 33021 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 11609 oF 2022 Between: 1 Puwuri^Jayalakshmi, D/o. D.Krishna Brahmam, Aged 49 years, Ryo plot No.15, Gouthampuri Colony, Erragadda, Balanagar, Sanathnagar, RR-18.. ...PETITIONER AND I State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, T.S. Secretariat, Hyderabad. :2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District.

4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajendra Nagar Division, RR District. The Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ...RESPONDENTS D I Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the cirbumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.3, 4 and their sub-ordinates in interfering and trying to remove the fencing stones in respect of his Plot No.429, admeasuring 300 Sq.yds in Sy.No.36/A and 36/E, situated at Vinayak Nagar Colony, Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and threatening to dispossess the petitioner from his plot without issuing any notice or without following due process of law, is illegal, arbitrary, violative or Article 14, 21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the Respondent No-3,4 and their sub-ordinates not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in respect of his Plot No.429, admeasuring 300 Sq.yds, comprised in Sy.No.36/A and 36/E, situated at Vinayak Nagar Colony, Gopanpally Village, I l1 : Serilingampally tvlandal, Ranga Reddy District, without follov ing due process of law and without issuing notice. I lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circ rmstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court ma y be pleased to direct Respondent No.3 and 4 and their sub-ordinates not t,r interfere with the possession of the Petitioner in respect of her Plot No.42(, admeasuring 300 Sq.yds, comprised in Sy.No.36/A and 36/E, situated at Vitr ryak Nagar Colony, Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally [t/andal, Ranga Re<l ly District, without following due process of law and without issuing any notice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI C. VISWANATH Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR REVENUE Th'e Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.11609 of 2022 THE O3RD DAY OF DECEMBER 2025 Between: Duwuri Jayalakshmi The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, AND Department of Revenue, Secretariat, Hyderabad & Three others. ...Petitioner ...Respondents ORDER: Heard Sri C.Visu,anath, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents and perused the material on record.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner filed the present Writ Petition seeking to declare the action of respondent Nos.3 and 4 and their sub-ordinates in interfering with and attempting to remove the fencing slones in respect of petitioner,s Plot No.429, admeasuring 300 Sq.yards in Sy.Nos.36 lA and 36/8, situated at Phase II, Vinayak Nagar Colony, Gopanpaily Viliage, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District ancl threatening to /\ dispossess the petitioner from her p10t, without isst; eg a,y notice and without following due process of law, as illegal and ar bitrary. 3' Learned counser for the petitioner further sL bmits that while admitting the matter, this Court passed in1 r r im order dateci 07'03'2022 with a direction to maintain status quo : <isting as on that date untit the next date of hearing in respect of tht: subject property. However, in spite of lapse of more than three arL, I half years, the respondent authorities did not file a counter or i vacate petition denying the averments made by the petitioner in tht: writ affidavit. rn vier.r, of the same, learned counsel requested this O ,urt to aliow the writ Petition by directing the respondent authoritle r not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in respect to thr: subject property without following due process of law. 4' on the other hand, ree*ned Assistant Governr rent pleader for Revenue stLbmits that if the petitioner is in possessir n of the subject property, the respondents wil not interfere with the petitioner,s possession of the subject property, without followinp due process of law and requested this Court to pass appropriate order;. 5' In view of the srrbmissions made on either side, t ris writ petition is disposed ol directing the respondent authorities not .o interfere with the possession of the petitioner in plot No.42, , admeasuring 3o0 Sq.yards in Sy.No.36/A ald 36/E, situated at pt ase II, Vinayak I Nagar Colony, Gopanpally Viiiage, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without lollowing due procedure of law. There shall be no order as to costs.

6. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, SD/- M.OSM AS TANT S AN ALI BAI REGISTRA G ! //TRUE COPYII TION OFFICER To, ,1 The principal Sec Secreta na t,Hyde raba reta ry, State of Telangana, Department of Revenue, T.S. d :2. The District Collector Ranga Reddy District 13 the Revenue Divisional Officer Rajendra Nagar Division, RR District r4. The Tahsildar, Serilingampall 5. One CC to Sri C- Viswanath, 6. Two CCs to Gp for Hyderaba d [ouT] Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana, at YM Advocate IOPUC] andal Ranga Reddy District.

7. Two CD Copies TJ a HIGH COURT DATED:0311212025 ORDER WP.No.11609 of 2022 6' C; c-) ._) 0r; :11 + :.-: i I I l I I D SPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION wrrHour cosTs I ,p