The High Court · 2025
Case Details
2. Smt. Deepa Sahaia, Wo D Anil KumarRgddy' Age 27 years' Occ' - [;;.;;if;, R/o Fiat i'io +oz, 4th F]oor' N-For[une oaks Apartment' Prashanthi Hills Meerpet, Balpur ' Rangareooy ..'Respondent / Defacto Complainant Petition under Section 482 of Cr'P C praying that in the circumstances statedintheMemorandumofGroundsofCriminalPetition,theHighCourtmaybe pleased to quash the proceedings initiated against the petitioners / accused No. 1 to 8 in cc No. 84 of 2024 ( crime No. 140o12023 ) for the offences under section 498-4, 323, 506 R/w 34 of rpc and sec 3 and 4 of Dp Act on the fire of the Learned vl Addl lvretroporitan Magistrate cum vr Addr Junior civir Judge, Ranga Reddy at LB Nagar I As per the court order dt og 01 2o2s in r.A.No 2 of 2024 cause titre of Respondent No.'1 . preambre c.c.No.g4 of 2024 and para no.15 c.c No.g4 of 2024 is amended l l.A. NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under section 4g2 of cr.p.c. praying that in the ,lircumstances stated in the rVremorandum of Grounds of criminar petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedrngs in cc No. g4 of 2024 on the file of the Learned vl Addr Metroporitan Magistrate cum Vr Addr Junior civir Judge Ranga Reddy District at LB Nagar including appearance of the petitioners pending disposal of the above Criminal petition. I.A. NO: 3 OF 2024 Between: Smt. Deepa_Sahaja. Wo. D Anil Kumar Reddy. Aqe 27 years, Occ. Housewife. R/o Flat No 402., 4th Ftooi, N_F;;ir#O;is'Apartmenr, Prashanthi Hills lvleerpet, Balpur, nanlareOdy- - --' .-.petitioner / 2nd Respondent / Defacto Complainant in t.A.No.3 & 4 ot 2O24 I:.rnaL1?St Telangana, through pS Meerpet, Rep by pubtic prosecuror, High AND ..Respondent / Complainant in l.A.No.3 & 4 ot 2024 Deepa Anil Kumar, S/o. Buchi Reddy, Age 30 years, Occ. Softwa re Employee (A-1) Deepa Buchi Reddv. Household 1A-2) t't"'ma' wo S/o. Late D. tr/alla Reddy, Age 65 years, Occ. D. Buchi Reddy, Age 5g years, Occ. House Wife [131' Deepa Anitha, W/o. D Buchi Reddy, Age 52 years, Occ. House Wife (A-4) 1 2 J
5. I o 7 B o A1 to A4 are Resident of H.No. 2-3-204, Adarshnagar Colony, Nagole, Uppal [\ilandal, I\iledchal-Malkajgiri [\4ettu Mamatha, Wo. lvl. Raji Reddy, Age 27 years, Occ. Software Employee, R/o. H.No. 4-70 M.P. Patel Guda, Mangalpally Village lbrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy (A-5) Mg$u Ral Reddy, S/o. M. Anji Reddy, Age 41 years, Occ. Business, R/o. H.No. 4-70 M.P. Patel Guda, ManQalpall Village lbrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy (4-6) Thanmged_apally fi/ahender Reddy, S/o. T Janardhan Reddy, Age 29 years, Occ. Car Driver, R/o. H.No. 2-3-59/4, New Shanthi Nagar, Uppal Villag-e and Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri (A-7) Mogalapu Satyadurga, S/o. M. Suryanaruyana, Age 32 years, Occ.Software Employee, R/o. H.No.52-'1-32, Bhulokamantha Tempte Street, CMR Central, Vishakapatnam (Urban), P and T Colony (V.N/), Andhra Pradesh State (A-8, Friend of Al ) ...Respondents / Petitioners / Accused No 1 to 8 in l.A.No.3 & 4 ot 2024 Petition under Section 359 (6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the lvlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner /2nd Respondent /De-facto Complainant to compound in CC. No. 84 of 2024 (Crime No 1400t2023 of PS [Vteerpet, Rangareddy) pending on the file of Hon'ble Vl Addl. Nletropolitan lvlagistrate cum Vl Addl. Junior Civit Judge, Rangareddy, by compounding the offences punishable U/s. 498-4, 323, 506 R/w. 34 of IPC and Section 3 and 4 of D.P. Act. l.A. NO: 4OF 2024 Petition under Section 359 (2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record compromise in Crl.P.No. 3418 of 2024 and Quash proceedings against Petitioners/Accused No. 1 to 8 in CC. No.84 of 2024 (Cnme No. 140012023 of PS Meerpet, Rangareddy) pending on the file of Hon'ble Vl Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate cum Vl Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Rangareddy, by compounding the offences punishable Uis. 498-4, 323, 506 R/w. 34 of IPC and Section 3 and 4 of D.P. Act. l I l This petrtion coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Crrminar petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Sirdhar Bhuvanagiri, Advocate for the petitioners and the Additional public prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No 1 and of Sri C Hari preeth, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. The Court made the following Order : .i THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE I( LAKSHMAN CRTMINAL PETITI ON No. 3418 of2024 ALONG WITH I.A. Nos .3 AND 4 0F 2024 ORDER: Heard Sri Sridhar Bhuvanagiri, learned counsel tbr the petitioners, leamed Additional Public prosecutor appearing tbr respondent No. I and Sri C.Hari Preeth; learned counsel appearing fbr respondent No.2.
2. This apptication is filed under Secrion 482 of Cr.p.C ro quash the proceedings in C.C.No.84 of 2024 pending on the llle of VI Additional Metropolitan Magisrrate, Ranga Reddy Districr at L.B.Nagar. Petitioners herein are accused Nos. I to 8. The off-ences alleged against them are under Sections 498-4, 32j and 506 r/w 34 of Indian Penat Code and Seoions 3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. 1961.
3. During the pendency of the present petition, the parties have entered into compromise and, accordingly, respondent No.2 - r/e -/acto complainant flled I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2024 to pemit her ro enter into compromise, to record the compromise and compound 2 the of-tbnces by q uashing the proceedings against the petitioners - accused Nos. I to ,3.
1. The panies he rein have also tl led a memo stating that they have entercd into compromise in rvritin-e lirle Memorandurr-r of Understandrng (lbr shorrMOU') dated 03.08.2024. petitioner No. I and respondent No.2 decided to dissolve their marrrage by wav of obtaining decrec ol' divorce with mutual consent. Accordinglr'. they have already filed an apptication under Section l38 o1' Hindu Marriage Acr. 1955 t,kle O.p.No. t478 ol 2024 pending on tiie fi Ie of Addirronal I.'amily Court Judge, Ranga Reddy Distncl. wherein other tcrms are also specrtrcally mentioned.
5. Petitioners herein and respondent No.2 are present in the Court and they have filed copies of their ID. Both the petir.ioners and respondent No.2 confirmed about the terms of MOU. dated
03.08.2024. l{espondent No.2 specifically agreed to take all turther steps tbr closing of thc proceedings in other cnminal
6. ln vicw ol rhe same. l.A.Nos.i and 4 of 2024 are allowed Consequentll.. the criminal petirion is allowed and proceedings in C.C.No.{a ol 2024 pending on rhe file ol VI Additional ..'\ 3 Metropolitan Magistrate. Ranga Reddy District, L.B.Nagar, are quashed in terms of MOU dated 03.08.2024 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the criminal petition shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. N. SRIHARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR S ION OFFICER To, \ t
1. The Vl Additional Metropolitan lvtagistrate-cum-vl Additional Junior civil Judge Ranga Reddy District at LB Nagar
2. The Station House Officer, Meerpet PS, Rachakonda Dislrict 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad [OUT]
4. One CC to Sri Sridhar Bhuvanagiri, Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri Q Hari Preeth, Advocate [OPUCI 6. Two CD Copies I Along with the Copy of the Joint lt/emo of Compromise ] Vtugh J KD, HIGH COURT DATED:0910112025 ORDER CRLP.No.3418 of 2024 ALONG WITH l.A.No.3 & 4 of 2024 ir,.tE STA i4- $o +) c 0 5 f rl 2l; (:J t ? a * o€spA1 C,$ * ALLOWING THE l.A.No.3 & 4 of 2024 AND THE CRLP d 7 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD Crl.P.No 3418 AGAINST CC No. 84 of2024 of 2024 (on the file of vr Addr. Metroporitan Magistrate cum v_ Addr. Junior civir Judge, Rangareddy) Between:
1. Deepa Anil Kumar (A-1) S/o. Buchi Reddy, Age: 30 years, Occ: Software Employee,
2. Deepa Buchi Reddy, (A-2) S/o. Late D. Malla Reddy Age: 65 years, Occ: Household, .i
3. DeepaSatyam.rqa,{nt) Wo. D. Buchi Reddy, Age. 58 years, Occ: House Wife, ;
4. Deepa Anitha, (A4) W/o. D. Buchi Reddy, Age: 52 years, Occ: House Wife, 41 to 44 are Resident of H.No. 2:3-204, Adarshnagar Colony, Nagole, Uppal Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri.
5. Mettu Mamatha, (A-5) Wo. M. Raji Reddy, Age:.27 years, Occ: Software Employee, F/oi l.ryo: 4-7O M.P. Patel Guda, Mangalpalty Viilage lbrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy,
6. Mettu Raji Reddy, (4-6) S/o. M. Anji Rddtiy, Age: 41 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No. 4-7O M.P. Patel Guda, Mangalpally Village Ibrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy,
7. Thanmgedapally Mahender Red<ty, (A-7) S/o. T. Janardhan Reddy, Age: 29 years, Occ: Car Driver, R/o. H.No. 2-3-591A, New Shanthi Nagar, Uppal Village & Mandal, Medchat-Matkajgiri.
8. Mogalapu Satyadurga, (A-8, Friend of A1) S/o. M. Suryanarayana, Age: 32 years, Occ:Software Employee, R/o. H.No.52-1-32, Bhulokamantha Tempte Street, CMR Central, Vishakapatnam (Urban) P&T Cotony (V.M), Andhra pradesh Staie. ... petitioners/Accused No. 1 to 8 And
1. The State of Telangana, through PS Meerpet, Rep.by Public Prosecutor, High Court of TS. ...Respondent
2. Smt. Deepa Sahaja, Wo. D. Anil Kumar Reddy, Age: 27 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o. Flat No: 402,4tn Floor, N-Fortune Oaks Apartment, Prashanthi Hills Meerpet, Balpur , Rangaredciy . .. RespondenU De-facto Complainant 1l JOINT MEMO It is submitted that with the intervention of elders and well wishers, the Petitioners/A1 to A8 and the De-facto-Complainant have amicably settled the dispute in CC. No. 84 ot 2024 (Crime No. i'i00 of 2023 of PS Meerpet, Rangareddy) pending on the file of Hon'ble Vl Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate cum Vl Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Rangareddy. As the matter is compromised between the parties, this Hon'ble court may be pleased to pass such other order or orders as deem fit and prop er in the circumstances of the case and in the interest ofju stice. ^ndZ 2 d+l+- oner/AcCuse Petiti dNo. 1 ^=r--=A D2/,'-a<)db Petitioner/Accused No a t 5-- - -2f #,ftl"r]^.fif. *" . {ot tt-7-7', tu{'b- Petitioner/Accused No. 6 I r.A?-@p@ tioner/Accused No. 4 Peti on ccused No. 7 $lL;*L Petitioner/Accused No Wtt"truU( Petitioner/Accused No P+., for 2"' R Counsel espondent Hyderabad, Daled'. 12-08-2024 Counsel for Petiti oner/Accused No. '1 to B EsmEfiu6Dr+ffi
2. Smt. Deepa Sahaia, Wo D Anil KumarRgddy' Age 27 years' Occ' - [;;.;;if;, R/o Fiat i'io +oz, 4th F]oor' N-For[une oaks Apartment' Prashanthi Hills Meerpet, Balpur ' Rangareooy ..'Respondent / Defacto Complainant Petition under Section 482 of Cr'P C praying that in the circumstances statedintheMemorandumofGroundsofCriminalPetition,theHighCourtmaybe pleased to quash the proceedings initiated against the petitioners / accused No. 1 to 8 in cc No. 84 of 2024 ( crime No. 140o12023 ) for the offences under section 498-4, 323, 506 R/w 34 of rpc and sec 3 and 4 of Dp Act on the fire of the Learned vl Addl lvretroporitan Magistrate cum vr Addr Junior civir Judge, Ranga Reddy at LB Nagar I As per the court order dt og 01 2o2s in r.A.No 2 of 2024 cause titre of Respondent No.'1 . preambre c.c.No.g4 of 2024 and para no.15 c.c No.g4 of 2024 is amended l l.A. NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under section 4g2 of cr.p.c. praying that in the ,lircumstances stated in the rVremorandum of Grounds of criminar petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedrngs in cc No. g4 of 2024 on the file of the Learned vl Addr Metroporitan Magistrate cum Vr Addr Junior civir Judge Ranga Reddy District at LB Nagar including appearance of the petitioners pending disposal of the above Criminal petition. I.A. NO: 3 OF 2024 Between: Smt. Deepa_Sahaja. Wo. D Anil Kumar Reddy. Aqe 27 years, Occ. Housewife. R/o Flat No 402., 4th Ftooi, N_F;;ir#O;is'Apartmenr, Prashanthi Hills lvleerpet, Balpur, nanlareOdy- - --' .-.petitioner / 2nd Respondent / Defacto Complainant in t.A.No.3 & 4 ot 2O24 I:.rnaL1?St Telangana, through pS Meerpet, Rep by pubtic prosecuror, High AND ..Respondent / Complainant in l.A.No.3 & 4 ot 2024 Deepa Anil Kumar, S/o. Buchi Reddy, Age 30 years, Occ. Softwa re Employee (A-1) Deepa Buchi Reddv. Household 1A-2) t't"'ma' wo S/o. Late D. tr/alla Reddy, Age 65 years, Occ. D. Buchi Reddy, Age 5g years, Occ. House Wife [131' Deepa Anitha, W/o. D Buchi Reddy, Age 52 years, Occ. House Wife (A-4) 1 2 J
5. I o 7 B o A1 to A4 are Resident of H.No. 2-3-204, Adarshnagar Colony, Nagole, Uppal [\ilandal, I\iledchal-Malkajgiri [\4ettu Mamatha, Wo. lvl. Raji Reddy, Age 27 years, Occ. Software Employee, R/o. H.No. 4-70 M.P. Patel Guda, Mangalpally Village lbrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy (A-5) Mg$u Ral Reddy, S/o. M. Anji Reddy, Age 41 years, Occ. Business, R/o. H.No. 4-70 M.P. Patel Guda, ManQalpall Village lbrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy (4-6) Thanmged_apally fi/ahender Reddy, S/o. T Janardhan Reddy, Age 29 years, Occ. Car Driver, R/o. H.No. 2-3-59/4, New Shanthi Nagar, Uppal Villag-e and Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri (A-7) Mogalapu Satyadurga, S/o. M. Suryanaruyana, Age 32 years, Occ.Software Employee, R/o. H.No.52-'1-32, Bhulokamantha Tempte Street, CMR Central, Vishakapatnam (Urban), P and T Colony (V.N/), Andhra Pradesh State (A-8, Friend of Al ) ...Respondents / Petitioners / Accused No 1 to 8 in l.A.No.3 & 4 ot 2024 Petition under Section 359 (6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the lvlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner /2nd Respondent /De-facto Complainant to compound in CC. No. 84 of 2024 (Crime No 1400t2023 of PS [Vteerpet, Rangareddy) pending on the file of Hon'ble Vl Addl. Nletropolitan lvlagistrate cum Vl Addl. Junior Civit Judge, Rangareddy, by compounding the offences punishable U/s. 498-4, 323, 506 R/w. 34 of IPC and Section 3 and 4 of D.P. Act. l.A. NO: 4OF 2024 Petition under Section 359 (2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record compromise in Crl.P.No. 3418 of 2024 and Quash proceedings against Petitioners/Accused No. 1 to 8 in CC. No.84 of 2024 (Cnme No. 140012023 of PS Meerpet, Rangareddy) pending on the file of Hon'ble Vl Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate cum Vl Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Rangareddy, by compounding the offences punishable Uis. 498-4, 323, 506 R/w. 34 of IPC and Section 3 and 4 of D.P. Act. l I l This petrtion coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Crrminar petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Sirdhar Bhuvanagiri, Advocate for the petitioners and the Additional public prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No 1 and of Sri C Hari preeth, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. The Court made the following Order : .i THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE I( LAKSHMAN CRTMINAL PETITI ON No. 3418 of2024 ALONG WITH I.A. Nos .3 AND 4 0F 2024 ORDER: Heard Sri Sridhar Bhuvanagiri, learned counsel tbr the petitioners, leamed Additional Public prosecutor appearing tbr respondent No. I and Sri C.Hari Preeth; learned counsel appearing fbr respondent No.2.
2. This apptication is filed under Secrion 482 of Cr.p.C ro quash the proceedings in C.C.No.84 of 2024 pending on the llle of VI Additional Metropolitan Magisrrate, Ranga Reddy Districr at L.B.Nagar. Petitioners herein are accused Nos. I to 8. The off-ences alleged against them are under Sections 498-4, 32j and 506 r/w 34 of Indian Penat Code and Seoions 3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. 1961.
3. During the pendency of the present petition, the parties have entered into compromise and, accordingly, respondent No.2 - r/e -/acto complainant flled I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2024 to pemit her ro enter into compromise, to record the compromise and compound 2 the of-tbnces by q uashing the proceedings against the petitioners - accused Nos. I to ,3.
1. The panies he rein have also tl led a memo stating that they have entercd into compromise in rvritin-e lirle Memorandurr-r of Understandrng (lbr shorrMOU') dated 03.08.2024. petitioner No. I and respondent No.2 decided to dissolve their marrrage by wav of obtaining decrec ol' divorce with mutual consent. Accordinglr'. they have already filed an apptication under Section l38 o1' Hindu Marriage Acr. 1955 t,kle O.p.No. t478 ol 2024 pending on tiie fi Ie of Addirronal I.'amily Court Judge, Ranga Reddy Distncl. wherein other tcrms are also specrtrcally mentioned.
5. Petitioners herein and respondent No.2 are present in the Court and they have filed copies of their ID. Both the petir.ioners and respondent No.2 confirmed about the terms of MOU. dated
03.08.2024. l{espondent No.2 specifically agreed to take all turther steps tbr closing of thc proceedings in other cnminal
6. ln vicw ol rhe same. l.A.Nos.i and 4 of 2024 are allowed Consequentll.. the criminal petirion is allowed and proceedings in C.C.No.{a ol 2024 pending on rhe file ol VI Additional ..'\ 3 Metropolitan Magistrate. Ranga Reddy District, L.B.Nagar, are quashed in terms of MOU dated 03.08.2024 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the criminal petition shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. N. SRIHARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR S ION OFFICER To, \ t
1. The Vl Additional Metropolitan lvtagistrate-cum-vl Additional Junior civil Judge Ranga Reddy District at LB Nagar
2. The Station House Officer, Meerpet PS, Rachakonda Dislrict 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad [OUT]
4. One CC to Sri Sridhar Bhuvanagiri, Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri Q Hari Preeth, Advocate [OPUCI 6. Two CD Copies I Along with the Copy of the Joint lt/emo of Compromise ] Vtugh J KD, HIGH COURT DATED:0910112025 ORDER CRLP.No.3418 of 2024 ALONG WITH l.A.No.3 & 4 of 2024 ir,.tE STA i4- $o +) c 0 5 f rl 2l; (:J t ? a * o€spA1 C,$ * ALLOWING THE l.A.No.3 & 4 of 2024 AND THE CRLP d 7 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD Crl.P.No 3418 AGAINST CC No. 84 of2024 of 2024 (on the file of vr Addr. Metroporitan Magistrate cum v_ Addr. Junior civir Judge, Rangareddy) Between:
1. Deepa Anil Kumar (A-1) S/o. Buchi Reddy, Age: 30 years, Occ: Software Employee,
2. Deepa Buchi Reddy, (A-2) S/o. Late D. Malla Reddy Age: 65 years, Occ: Household, .i
3. DeepaSatyam.rqa,{nt) Wo. D. Buchi Reddy, Age. 58 years, Occ: House Wife, ;
4. Deepa Anitha, (A4) W/o. D. Buchi Reddy, Age: 52 years, Occ: House Wife, 41 to 44 are Resident of H.No. 2:3-204, Adarshnagar Colony, Nagole, Uppal Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri.
5. Mettu Mamatha, (A-5) Wo. M. Raji Reddy, Age:.27 years, Occ: Software Employee, F/oi l.ryo: 4-7O M.P. Patel Guda, Mangalpalty Viilage lbrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy,
6. Mettu Raji Reddy, (4-6) S/o. M. Anji Rddtiy, Age: 41 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No. 4-7O M.P. Patel Guda, Mangalpally Village Ibrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy,
7. Thanmgedapally Mahender Red<ty, (A-7) S/o. T. Janardhan Reddy, Age: 29 years, Occ: Car Driver, R/o. H.No. 2-3-591A, New Shanthi Nagar, Uppal Village & Mandal, Medchat-Matkajgiri.
8. Mogalapu Satyadurga, (A-8, Friend of A1) S/o. M. Suryanarayana, Age: 32 years, Occ:Software Employee, R/o. H.No.52-1-32, Bhulokamantha Tempte Street, CMR Central, Vishakapatnam (Urban) P&T Cotony (V.M), Andhra pradesh Staie. ... petitioners/Accused No. 1 to 8 And
1. The State of Telangana, through PS Meerpet, Rep.by Public Prosecutor, High Court of TS. ...Respondent
2. Smt. Deepa Sahaja, Wo. D. Anil Kumar Reddy, Age: 27 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o. Flat No: 402,4tn Floor, N-Fortune Oaks Apartment, Prashanthi Hills Meerpet, Balpur , Rangaredciy . .. RespondenU De-facto Complainant 1l JOINT MEMO It is submitted that with the intervention of elders and well wishers, the Petitioners/A1 to A8 and the De-facto-Complainant have amicably settled the dispute in CC. No. 84 ot 2024 (Crime No. i'i00 of 2023 of PS Meerpet, Rangareddy) pending on the file of Hon'ble Vl Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate cum Vl Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Rangareddy. As the matter is compromised between the parties, this Hon'ble court may be pleased to pass such other order or orders as deem fit and prop er in the circumstances of the case and in the interest ofju stice. ^ndZ 2 d+l+- oner/AcCuse Petiti dNo. 1 ^=r--=A D2/,'-a<)db Petitioner/Accused No a t 5-- - -2f #,ftl"r]^.fif. *" . {ot tt-7-7', tu{'b- Petitioner/Accused No. 6 I r.A?-@p@ tioner/Accused No. 4 Peti on ccused No. 7 $lL;*L Petitioner/Accused No Wtt"truU( Petitioner/Accused No P+., for 2"' R Counsel espondent Hyderabad, Daled'. 12-08-2024 Counsel for Petiti oner/Accused No. '1 to B EsmEfiu6Dr+ffi