✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court · 13 Apr 2007

The Book Mark Private Limited v. Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited, A Government of India Undertaking, Having its office

Writ Petition No. 4063 of 1998GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA

Case at a glance

Order date
13 Apr 2007
Bench
GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA

Outcome

Dismissed

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Dt.13-04-2007 GLV _______________________________ JUSTICE GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA

Judgment

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA Writ Petition No.4063 of 1998 Dated: 13-04-2007 Between:

1. The Book Mark Private Limited, (A company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956) and having its Regd. Office at 56/D, Mirza Ghalib Street, 2nd Floor, Calcutta –700 017 rep. by its Director Sri Prem Chand Kyal and another. ... Petitioners

1.

Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited, A Government of India Undertaking, Having its office at Visakhapatnam Steel Plant, Project Office Complex, Visakhapatnam, rep.by its Secretary and 6 others. ... Respondents ORDER: A representation is made on behalf of Sri V. Rajagopal Reddy, learned counsel for petitioners that the writ petition has become infructuous.

Operative part

2.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Dt.13-04-2007 GLV _______________________________ JUSTICE GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Companies Act, 2013.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 13 Apr 2007. The bench was GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 4063 of 1998). ← Search more judgments