Criminal Appeal No. 3568 of 2025 · Telangana High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous applications, i:' any, shall stand closed. Sd/- P. CH: TIAGABHUSHAMBA qT:PUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER i To, Hvderabad. 1 The lV Addl. Chief JudicialMagistrate, Nampally, Hyderabi, td 2. The Station House Officer, Amberpet…
Judgment
Cause title
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETIT ION NO: 3568 OF 2025 Between: S.!a-!! Glguse, s/o Shaik Mahoob Age 34 yrs Occ. pvt Job Rl/o H.No.2_3_ 474141110131 near Kareema Masjid, Akash Nagar Amerpet, Hyderabd ...Petitioner
/Accused No.2 AND lfe ptat_e of Telangana, , through Amberpet police Station, Vikarabad District, Rep. by the Public pros-ecutor foi the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. ..RespondenUComplainant Petition under section 480 & 483 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bait in Cr No 761 of 2O2i, dt.21t12ti\Z4 u/s. 8(c) rlw 22(ci and 27 ot NDPS Act 1985 on the fire of the Amberpet police Station, Hyderabad This Petition coming on for hearrng, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri pRUDHVI RAJ MUDUNURI, Advocate for the petitioner and the public prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent. The Court mad6 the following: ORDER j I i i I i I I , ! l l I : THE HONONOT'RABLE SRI JuSTICE J. SRET}NTVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.3568 of 2o25,
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearrng, learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission of t.lris Court to withdraw the criminal petition.
Permission is accorded.
Operative part
Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous applications, i:' any, shall stand closed. Sd/- P. CH: TIAGABHUSHAMBA qT:PUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER i To, Hvderabad. 1 The lV Addl. Chief JudicialMagistrate, Nampally, Hyderabi, td 2. The Station House Officer, Amberpet Police Station, Kaclriguda Divn, 3 Oire CC to SRI PRUDHVI RAJ MUDUNURI, Advocate [OPUCI 4. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the Stale of Telangana at 5 Two CD Copies Hyderabad [OUTI SM/gh w HIGH COURT DATED: 18103t2025 \ \ ORDER CRLP.No.3568 of 2025 / ,/ /' :.' ii,; J (\ 1Hl: Srr/ (j J 1 3 JUN 2025 \"^ DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN THE CRIMINAL PETITION g@P?"[ ts*
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — ss. 480, 483; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.