Dhopathi Leeladevi v. The State of Telangana

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in --------7 the nature of wRrr oF MANDAMUS decraring the action of the respondents in not digitalizing and issuing the e-pattadar pass books and tifle deed in favour of the petitioner in respect of the Agricultural lands bearing Sy.Nos. 3s.ltN2 to an extent of Ac. 5-01 gts 3i2t2 exrent of Ac.5-01 gts 352/AA Ac. 4-00 , 3s2tEE Ac. 4_ 00,352t2, Ac. 2-05 gts 381/A Ac. 1-21 gts, 382/4 Ac 1_13, O86B/U Ac. g_35 gts 586lcl3t2 extent of Ac Q-35 gts totating an extent o( Ac,,24-36 gulrtqg vidg Khata No. l 13 situated at Sirisann?9udem (Dardepalti) village, patalr;rthi Mandat, Jangaon district is irreoar, arbitrary, contrary to thq Terangana Rrghts in Land and pattadar pass books Act, 1gZ1 (New Act, ZO20) and consequenfly direct the respondents to digitalize and issue e-pattadar pass books and tile fleeds ip favour of the petitiOner in respqct gf the above deqqribed lando. lA NO: 1 OF 21 Petition under section 1si cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petifion, the High court may be pleased to direct lhe rgspondgnts to digitatize and issue the e_patladar pass books gnd title deed in lavour of the petitioner in respeal qf the land bearing Sy.lios gS1tAt2, 352t2, 352tAA, 352tEE, 3S3tZ, 381/A, 3A2/A, 5868/U , 5B6tCt3tZ Khata f.,to. sitauted at girisannagudem (Dardspalli) village, palqkurthi Mqndal, {angqon district pen{ipg disposal of the Writ petition .t.13 Couns€l for the Petitioner : SRt N,$REENTVASA YADAV Counse! for the Rsepondents No.1tp4 : A$qT.Gp FOB REVENUE Counssl for the Rqspondents No.5,7&8:SRt pUTERU pRABHAKAR Qounsel for ttle Regpondents NO,6----:=- The Court made the following: ORDER -l THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.891L OF 2O2L ORDER: Heard learnecl counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned Assistarit Government Pieader for Revenue appearing lor the olficial respondents and learned counsel for the unolhcial respondents and perused the entire material on record.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this rvrit petition is filed by thc pel.itioner declaring the action ol the respondents in not digitalizing and issuing the e-Pattedar Pass Books and Title Deed in favour of the petitioner 1n respe ct of the agriculturai lands bearing Sy.Nos.351/Al2 to an extent of Ac.5-01 guntas, 35212 to an extent of Ac.5-01 guntas, 352/AA to an extent of Ac.4- OO, 352/trE to an extent ol Ac.4-00, 352/2 to an extent of Ac.2-05 guntas, 38 1/A to al extent of Ac.1-2 1 guntas, 382/alt \ an extent of Ac.1-13, 5B6B/U to an extent of o I I i 2 sr,J W.P.No,8977 of 2O21 \ Ac.O-35 guntas, 5g6/C/3/2 to all extent of Ac.O-35 guntas, totaling to an extent of Ac.24_36 gunta: uid.eKhataNo.113 situated at Sirisannagudem (Dardepalli) Village, palakurthi Mandal, Jangaon District as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the Tela,gana Rights in Land ard pattadar pass Books Act, 797 1 (New Act, 2O2Ol and consequentlv direct the respondents to digitalize and issue e_pattadar pass Books and Title Deeds in favour of the petitioner in respect of the suit schedule propert5z.

3. Learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue submits that without making proper application through oniine for correction of entries and issuing of pattadar pass Books and Title Deeds, the petitioner has submitted representation and approached this Court. If the petitioner makes proper application through online as per existing ruies, the respondents will consider the same and pass appropriate orclers as per the existing rrrles. I ''J 7 3 SK,J W.P.No.8917 of 2O21 Learned counsel for the respondent No'5 basing on 4 the counter submits that the petitioner filed a suit in O.S.No.130 of 2O2l on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Ju<1ge at .Jangoan lor partition and separate possesslon against the respondent Nos.S to 8 and pending suit, the petitioner hled instant writ petition and requested to dismiss the same. In view of the submissions made by both sides, 5. without going into merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner to approach appropriate authorities by filing appropriate application through online as per existing rules. Alter frling of such application, the respondent authorities are directed to pass appropriate orders as per the existing rules' These orders are not precluded to agitate their rights before the Civil Court in pending suit by the both contesting parties' However, there sha1l be no order as to costs' I 4 SIT,J W.P-No.8917 oJ 2O21 Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand ciosed. //TRUE COPY// SD/-L. VIJAYA LAXMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR S;ECT'I4r,FFICER To, '1 . The Principal Secretary Revenue Department' T S Secretariat' State of Telangana, HYderabad.

2. The District Collector, Jangaon District' Jangaon (Erstwhile Wqrangal District) 3 The Revenue Divisional Officet Ghanpur Station Revenue Division' Jangaon District,( Previously Warangal Ulslrrct)

4. The Tahasildar, Palpkurtlli Mandal' Palakurthi' Jangaon District' (Previously WarangPl District) 5 One QQ to SRI N.SREENIVASA YADAV' Advocate' [OPUC] 6.TwoCCstoGPFoRREVENUE,HighCourtfortheStateofTelangana. louTl '

7. Two CQ Copies wB9K B6 1 \ HIGH COURT DATED:1310312025 ) ORDER WP.No.8911 o12021 1f,e SrAl e J 2[ t ''' ?[25 C) -A ,'/ l OE ::-;. DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS @ 01 6 h I