Tanneeru Venkateswara Rao v. Tanneeru Sridevi, Wo Venkateswara Rao
Case at a glance
- Bench
- SREENIVAS RAO
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 397, 401, 407
Judgment
Tanneeru Sridevi, Wo Venkateswara Rao, Occ. Household, R/o Teachers Colony, Kodad, Nalgonda District. Tanneeru Ravi Sai Teja, Sio Venkateswara Rao, Occ: Rep.-by.mother and Nitural Guardian Namely Respondent No-1, ie., Tanneeru Sridevi, The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., at Hyderabad ...ResPondents/Petitioners Petition under Section 407 of cr.P.c Praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of Grounds of Transfer criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to to transfer crl.R.P.No.4 ol 2013 on the file of the ll Additional Dist. Judge, Nalgonda at suryapet to this Honble court for being heard along with Crl.R.C.No.274 of 20'13 pending before this Honble Court' l.A. NO: 2OF 2013fiRCRLPMP. NO: 298 0F 2013) Petition under section 482 of cr.P .c praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to extend the interim stay granted on 25.06,2013 in Tr.Cd.P.No.
157 of 201 3 until further orders. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2013 ffRCRLPMP, NO : 179 OF 2013) Petition under section ao7() of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all fu(her proceedings in crl. Rp.No.4 ot 2013 on the file oi the ll Addl. Dist. Judge, Nalgonda at Suryapet pending the Tr.Crt.p. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of rransfer criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri Raja Reddy Koneti, Advocate for the petitioner(No representation) and the public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.3 and of Sri GVS t\4ehar Kumar. Advocate for the Respondent No.i (No rep resentation). CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 274 OF 2013 criminal Revision case filed under Section 397 and 401 of cr.pc against the order dated 27-12-2012 made in MC.No.21 of 2011 on the file oi- ine Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, at Kodad.
Between: Tanneeru Venkateswara Rao,^S/o Koteswara Rao, Occ. pvt. Employee, R/o H.No,687, Secretariat Colony, Sreeramnagar, [/anikonda Vi age Rajen6rrn"g* Mandal, Ranga Reddy Distriit. ...Petitioner/Respondent AND 1 2 3 Tanneeru Sridevi, Wo Venkateswara Rao, Occ: Household, R/o Teachers Colony, Kodada, Nalgonda District. Tanneeru Ravi. Sai Teja, S/o Venkateswara Rao. rep. by mother and natural g.ua.rdtan namely R.No.1, ie., Tanneeru Sridevi. R/o Tedchers Colony, Kodada, Nalgonda District, Res. No.2 is not necessary party. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its public prosecutor, High Court of A.P., at Hyderabad. ...Respondents counsel for the Petitioner: sRl RAJA REDDY KONETI(No represe ntation ). Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : pUBLIC PROSECUTOR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 : SRI GVS MEHAR KUMAR (No representatio n ). The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO Transfer Criminal Petition No.
157 of 2O13 AND Criminal Revision Case No.274 OF 2013 cOMMON ORDER When these matters were taken up for consideration on 16.04.2025, there was no representation on hehalf of the petitioner and therefore, to give one opportunity, both the matters were posted to 21.04.2025 and on 72'06'2025 also' there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner as well as respondents ald therefore, to give one more opportunity, both the matters were posted to 17 .06.2025 under the caption'for dismissal'.
2. In spite of the matters being listed under the caption 'for dismissal', today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner either physical mode or virtual mode' It appears that the petitioner is not having aly interest to prosecute these matters.
3. Accordingiy, the Transfer Criminal Petition and Criminal Revision Case are dismissed for non prosecution' As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- P.CH. NAGABHUSHAMBA DEPUTY REGISTRAR t 1 j SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,
The ll Additional Dist. Judge, Nalgonda at Suryapet 2. The Judicial First Class lvlagistrate, at Kodad. 3. Two ccs to the Public Prosecutor, High court for the state of Telangana at Hyderabad (OUT)
One CC to Sri Raia Reddy Koneti, Advocate [OPUC]
One CC to Sri GVS Mehar Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies ADK/PSLw n HIGH COURT DATED:1810612025 COMMON ORDER TRCRLP.No.157 of 2013 AND CRLRC.No.274 of 2013 t
1.., ). .i. --a: ,z1z - t,., .-': z,,..l.gt'- - - -.1^r --- i 2 3 AU8 205 ..'',,,! -., DISMISSING THE TRCRLP AND CRLRC FOR NON-PROSEUCTION g coPq.-b \k_ _ a<a\r
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.