The High Court · 2025

12.Bantu Srinivas, S/o. Pitchaiah, Aged about 45 Years, Occ_ Aoriculture. FUo. Settipalem Village, Vemulapally Mandal, Nalgonda District.

13.Bantu Yadagiri, S/o.. Pitchaiah, Aged about 37 Years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Settipalem Village, Vemulapally [\4andal, Nalgonda District.

14.ltugu Saidulu, S/o..Late Bixam, Aged about 40 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Settipalem Village, Vemulapally tvlandal, Nalgonda District. .l

5. Orsu Ganesh. S/o .Venkataia.f' .4g"9 about 55 Years Jcc Agrlculture' R/o ' " ;;ilp;;;"Vitiaqe Vemulapallv Mandal' Nalgonda District ...RESPONDENTS PetitionunderArticle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe Circumstancesstatecintheaffidavitfiledtherewith,theHighCourtmaybe pleasedtoissueanilppropriatewrit'orderordirectionmoreparticularlyonein the nature of Writ o1 l\ilandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.6 in non-conductingtheinvestigationinCrimeNo.l0sof2024fc,rtheoffencesunder Section 441 , 3gO,44-" ,37g' 378' 393' 506' IPC' 156 (3) Cr'oCdated 11052024 andnon-lnitiatingtotakethenecessaryactionagainsttheR.espondentNos.Tto .1 5 who are trespassed into the agriculture land of the Petitioner and damaged the paddycropisillegal,arbltrary,unconstitutionalandviolationofArticlesl4,l5'21 and 300-4 of constitution of lndia and also violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the Respondent No.6 to conduct the investigation inCrimeNo'108of2.024fortheoffencesunderSection441390'447'379'378, 393, 506, lPC, 156 (3) Cr'PC and take the necessary action against the Respondent Nos 7 to 15 who are trespassed into the agriculture land of the Petitioner and damaged croPs lA NO: 1 OF 2025 petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.6 to conduct the investigation in crime No 10B of 2024 for the offences under Section 441 ,390,447,379,378, 393, 506, lPC, 156 (3) cr.p.c. and take the necessary action against the Respondent Nos. 7 to 15 who are trespassed into the agriculture land of the Petitioner and damaged crops pending disposal of the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondents No'1to6: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents No'7to15 : ft e C"r.t made the following: ORDER THE HON,BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR W.P.No. 7156 of 2025 ORDER Heard learned counsel for the .. .petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for the official respondent Nos.1 to 6, and with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at admission stage.

2. Having regard to the manner of disposal of the Writ Petition and the narure of lis involved, this Court is of the view that notice to unofiicial respondent Nos.7 to 15 is not necessary for adjudication of the present Writ Petition.

3. Shorn of unnecessary details, the case of the petitioner, in brief, is that though the respondents-authorities have registered a case against the unofhcial respondents No.7 to 15 herein ulde Cr.No.lO8l2O24 on 11.05.2024 for 'various offences, the authorities are not conducting investigation into the aforesaid crime registered and not filing charge sheet, which action of the respondents it is contended as highly illegal and arbitrary.

4. Per contra, learned Government Pleader appearing on behalf of ofhcial respondents submits that based on the complaint made 1 by the petition<:r herein, the authorities have registered a case uide Cr.No.1OB/2O2,1 on 11.O5.2024; and that thereafter the authorities have examined witnesses from 04. 7O.2O24 to 13.1 1.2024, and on completion of ,he investigation, have filed charge sheet in the afore said crimt: before the concerned Magistrate c,n 24 .O3.2O25 and the same is given SR.No.55512025, dt.O7.O4.2O2S.

5. Learned (.iovernment Pleader further submits t.hat since, the authorities haver completed investigation into the albresaid crime registered and Jraving filed the charge sheet, the petitioner cannot allege thc respoudents authori[ics not conducting an\/ investigation into the aforesaid crimc registered nor taking any zrction against the accused pcrsrons named therein.

6. I have takr:n note of the respective submissions made. 7 . Though tl- e pe li tioner by the present Wrir, Petition had leged inaction on the part of the respondents-eLuthorities nducting inr..estigation into the crime registered uide .No. lO8 /2024 on 1 1.O5.2024, since, the respondents-authorities onducting investigation into the aforesaid crirne registered filed a clLarge sheet on 24 .O3.2O25 before the concerned trate uid.e sR.No.555/202sdt.o2.04.2025, thrs Court is of 3 the view that the grievance of the petitioner in the present Writ Petition stands redressed and no further orders are necessary'

8. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed' No order as to costs. g . ConsequentlY, miscellaneous Petitions, if anY, Pending shall stand closed To,t SD/.K. SREE RA DEPUTY MA RTHY STRAR //TRUE COPY/' SECTION FFICER secretariat Buirding' secretartat' lij.j:i?'s,:L:3i[ta?aii3il,%Department'

2. The Director General of Police' Telangana State' Hyderabad' 3. The Superintendent of Police' Nalgonda' Nalgonda District' 4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police' Miryalguda Division' Nalgonda District 5. The Circle lnspector of Police' Miryalguda Rural Circle' Nalgonda District' ; ;" Station House Officer' Vemulapally Police Station' Nalgonda District T One CC to SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR' Advocate lOPUCl B. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME' High Court for the State of Telangana [OUTI o Two CD CoPies I BSK BS HIGH COURT DATED:0710412025 ORDER WP.No.7156 of 2025 t'ir- ij l, 1r( f.c J il3 APit 2025 I I a) t. o6,SPATCH i DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS af4 %v