The High Court · 2025

Q Syryq_Chqlder Rao, S/o Kanaka Raju, major, owner of TVS Star Motor Cycle NO AP29A!.5833, r/o H.No 20-79, Ftat'No.302, Srrya eraOtra i.iitayam, Dayanandnagar, Malkajigiri, Hyderabad. ICICI Lombard General lnsuranqe__Company Limited, Nizamabad, represented by lts Branch M,anager, Branch Office, neaiSridevi Tatkies, Clt ii;i;--- --- Gomplex, 3rd Floor, Gandhi Chowk, Nizamabad, Nizamabad dibtrict. ...Respondents/ Respondents Counsel for the Appellants: SRI AZAR SRAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1: None appeared Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI K.AJAY KUMAR The Court made the following: JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF. TI},ANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAF R'EDDY M.A.C.M.A. No.457 of2Ol9 DATEz 0,4.12.2025 Between: Duddela Rckh:r and another Sri C. Sun'a Chander Rao and another. AND JUDGMENT: Pr t t ioners/ Appellants Resporr lents/ RcsPondents Pursuant to thc request madc by the learned <'r t trsel appearing for both the partics, the matter was referred to Lok Adatar ' )n L3 O9'2025, thc matter u,us se ttled before the Lok Adalat and an a\.,iII ( dated 13.09.2025 \ ras passed by the Lok Adalat. In vicw ol the above, the M.A.C.M.A is disposcr I of in tcrms of tl'rt' au'.rrd d:rtctl 13.O9.2025 passed by the Lok Adalat. Pencling misccllaneous applications, if any, shall tand closed Thcru' shall be no or<ler as [o costs. SD/- IV, JAWAHA R REDDY GISTRAR ..(t ST; STANT RE //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1 . The Chairman fvlotor Accident Claims Tribunal-Cum- Drs rict Judge, N izamabad.

2. One CC to SRI AZAR SRAVAN KUMAR, Advocate [OI'] JC] c-Jd- .

3. One CC to SRI K.AJAY KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD CoPies 5. Spar (Enclosing a copy of Award Passed by Lokadalat) NVB &, - fi-r SIAI r () g \\i'q luit L t * l)5:goaTC :::::-:=: HIGH COURT DATED:0411212025 JUDGMENT MACMA.N0.457 of 2019 MACMA DISPOSED OF INTERMS OF AIVARD PASSED BY LOK ADALAT -j rs t'r f, {2" . @ , BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD. [Under Section 19 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (Central Act)] -.: gNL SEA Present:1. Hon'ble Justice G.Sri Devi, Date:13-09-2025 t!ii o HIGH COL|NT 7: LOK ADA|JJ '* * :.i. ". I (Former Judge of High C6urt for the State of Telangana) Chairman

2. Smt. Nandita Guha, Advocate, Member M.A.C.M.A.No.457 of 2019 (Before the Hon'ble High Court) AGAINST M.V.O.P.No.56 of 2O14 (On the fite of the Motor Accidents Ctaims Tribuna[ (District Judge) At Nizamabad) Between:- 1. Duddeta Rekha, W/o. Duddeta Pothanna, Aged about 30 yrs, Housewife, R/o.H.No.4-145, Kanjar Vittage, Nizamabad MandaI and District.

2. Duddetat Potanna, S/o. D.Sayanna, Aged about 40 yrs, Labour, R/o.H.No.4-145, Kanjar Vittage, Nizamabad Manda[ and District. AND ... Petitioners/Appellants

1. C.Surya Chander Rao, S/o.Kanaka Raju, Major, Owner of ryS Star Motor Cycte No.AP29AL5833, R/o.H.No.20-79, Ftat No.302, Surya Prabha Nitayam, Dayanandnagar, Matkajigiri, Hyderabad.

2. lClcl Lombard Genera[ lnsurance Company Limited, Nizamabad, Represented by its Branch Manager, Branch Office, near Sridevi Tatkies, City Ptaza Comptex, 3'd Ftoor, Gandhi Chowk, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District. ...Respondents/ Respondents Counsel for Appettants/Ctaimants : Sri Azar Kishan Rao, Advocate, Representative of lnsurance Company : Sri Mohammed Abdut Shabbeer, Senior Manager - Legat Ctaims Counse[ for lnsurance Company : Sri K. Ajay Kumar, Advocate This appeal having been referred for setttement before this Lok Adatat and after hearing the Learned Counsel for the parties and atso the parties, the fottowing award is passed: AWARD Compensation Awarded by the Tribunal Rs.3,90,000/-(Rupees Three [akhs ninety thousand onty) with costs and interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of petition titt the date of deposit or reatization. l t Compensa tion Awarded (Setttement Reached) in the Lok Adatat - SER t $,1fsl,xi i+t'::. i State o1\ Th is is an appeat ftteci by the Petitioner: , :ta,mjr,ts agq-ieie,t s,) order passed in MVOp No.56 of ZO14 by, l-e Motor Accidents Ci; Tribunal (Principat District Judge) At Niza rabad. ..\ ,s' ^F' , -'.. ,\ o ( $o \ appeared before the Lo( 'Petitioner/ Claiman t Nos.1 l-egat Servtces Authority, londentNo.2 lnsurarrce Srr Mohammed Abdut Shabbeer, Senior l,\i rrager-Legat Ctaims for t Respondent Nos.2- lnsurarice Company ha Adatat and represented that the Appettart & 2 have appeared before the Distrjct Nizamabad. It is reported by the R<,: Company that during the pendency of thi: r1>peat, they have mu[ualty entered into conrpromise and setttecj the matter. As per the setttement, the Appettants / petitioner s I r,re agreed to receive an amount of Rs.2,50,000/- (Rupees Two lr<hs fjfty thousand onty) towards fu[[ and final setttement of .-he i ctaim in addition to r.he amount atready deposited and the lnsura-r:r: Company has agreed to pay the same towards futt and final :etttement of the ctaim. Accordingty, compromise is recorded and r re Award is passed before the Lok Adatat. ln view of the above said settlement, tr I Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the above said amoun: within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of t ris Award, after deducting the amount that was deposited, if any. ln tr r event of default or delay in making such deposit, the Ctaimants/A tpettants are entitted to ctaim interest at7.5%per annum as awaT(( c by the Tribunat. Apportionment of Compensation, if any The apportionment between the Apps Iant/ Petitioner/ C lai m a n t Nos.1 and 2 shatt be made as per the appc -rionment determined by the Tribunal in M.V.O.P.No.56 of 2014. Additional Direction (s ): 2- 3 The Appettants / Petitioners are entitted to the refund of cr rrt Fee paid in this case. The.amount atready deposited by the lnsurance Company, i any, shatt be given credit to. soon after deposit by the rnsurance company, the Appettart ,petitioner/ctaimant No.'l and 2 are permitted to withdraw their entire share amo, ts without furnishing any security. ln token of consent for the above setttement and award, I re parties and their counsel have signed this award in our presence. ln terms of the compromise arrived at between the parti,:, this case stands disposed of. #":;+-r: )d1 .al-,? -id,k_i Applicant (s) IDENTIFICATION REPORT J-.Jll&l ii.: ': ',' * " t,(! 'l !ir,1i'l-' i'l+"Ir*r\t)' Respondent (s) -a {= t r-r ' .: I l,' 1.t t-' Jt' ) ,' )" D'84r, u'Y'51) ct- oI 9 ( GENERAT O'SURAIICE c.sr GooI BR, CODT rEf- xc. 2 a i-l TI 5l i' )/ ,r-.., o z, * t* ::;j' Counsel for applica ,/ Counselfor respondent (s) u{*" CHAIRMAN "1 q* e'..\ ,t\ MEMBER HIGH LOK o T * RT ;i *) State 011 rtdo'Dist 0 eryrces NTZAMABAD I