High Court · 2025

1 The State Of Telangana, Through its Public Proseculor, High Court for the 2 State of Telangana at Hyderabad. Lingani Ravinder, S/o. L. Narsaiah, Aged about 35 Years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o.4-80lF, Chebarthy Village, Markook Mandal, Siddipet District. ...RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to QUASH the proceedings in SC/ST No.22 Of 2024 On the file Of lll Additional District And Sessions Judge, At Sangareddy as the same is untenable either on facts or under law; l.A. NO: 2OF 2025 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to STAY all further proceedings pursuant to SC/ST No.22 Of 2024 On the file of lll Additional District And Sessions Judge, At Sangareddy For The Offences Under Sections 324,323,504, 506 RA// 34 lPC, And Sec.3 (1) (R) (S) (G), 3 (2) (v A) of Sc ST PoA Act 2015 ; |A.NOS.3 &40F 2025:. BETWEEN: Lingani Ravinder, S/o. L. Narsaiah, Aged about 35 Yez rs, Occ. Agriculture, R/o.4-80/F, Chebarthy Village, Markook Mandal, Siddipet District. AND ...PETITIONERS/RESPONDENT NO.2 II{ BOTH PETITIONS State of Telangana at Hyderabad.

1. The State Of Telangana, Through its Public Prosecut( r, Hrgh Court for the 2 Bichoti Narayana Singh, S/o B. Arjun Singh, Age. 22 "rears, Occ . Student, R/o. 4-6, Jagadev Pur Mandalam, Chebarthy Village, 'vledak District 3 Bichoti Yuvaraj Singh, S/o. Arjun Singh, Aged ab,out 22 years, Occ. Student, R/o. 4-6, Jagadev Pur Mandalam, Chebarthy Village, Medak District 4 Bichoti Jamuna Bhai, Wo. Arjun Singh, Aged abcut 37 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Chebarthi Village of Markook Mandal Siddipet District. 5 Badhura Dhara Singh, S/o. Rajendar Singh, Aged about 28 years, Occ Household, R/o. H.No. 1-36, Mirjaguda, Janwada, Rarrga Reddy District. 6. Nomvar Ravindar Singh, S/o. Rajasingh, Aged about 30 years, Occ. 7 Muthrima Deepak Singh, S/o. Suraj Singh, Aged abou 24 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Mirjaguda, Janwada, Ranga Reddy L)istrict. Private Job, R/o- Mirjaguda, Janwada, Ranga Reddy i)istrict. LA. NO: 3 OF 2025 .,.RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS IN BOTH PETITIONS Petition under Section 359(6) r/w 528 of BNSS lrraying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of C rimrnal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to PERMIT the Petitioner to record the compromise and QUASH the proceedings in SC/ST No.22 of 2024 on the file of lll Additional District And Sessions Judge, At Sangareddy For The Offenr;es Under Sections 324, 323,504, 506 RA /34 lPC, And Sec.3 (1) (R) (S) (c), 3 (2) (VA) Of SC Sr POA Act 2015 as the same is untenable either on facts or uncer law; l.A. NO: 4 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) r/w 528 of BNSS p raying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of C riminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to record the Compromise and QUASH the proceedings in SC/ST No.22 Of 2024 On The File of lll Adrlitional District And Sessions Judge, At Sangareddy For The Offences Under iections 324, 323, 504, 506 RA / 34 lPC, And Sec.3 (1) (R). (S) (c), 3 (2) (V A) of SC ST PoA Act 2015 as the same is untenable either on facts or under law; This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the lr/iemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the argume,nts of Sri K Arjun Reddy, Advocate appearing on behalf of Sri K DHARAM Slt{GH ,Advocate for the Petitioners and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Addl. Pr.rblic Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and Ms.T.Neelima Reddy, A lvocate appear for the Respondent No.2; The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO I.A.Nos.3 &,4 of 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETI?ION No. 3427 of2025 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhitha, 2023 (tor short the 'BNSS) seeking quashment of proceedings in SC/ST No.22 of 2024 oo the file of III Additional District and Sessions Judge, at I Sangareddy.

2. Heard Sri K. Arjun Reddy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri K. Dharam Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners/ accused Nos. 1 to 6 and Ms. T. Neelima Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No.2 / de facfo complainant.

3. Learned counsel for respondent No.2/ de facfo complainant submits that both the parties have settled the disputes outside the purview of the Court and they frled applications uide I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 to record compromise and by virtue of the said compromise, the proceedings in SC/ST No.22 of 2024 may be quashed. Accordingly, both the parties and learned counsel on behalf of both the parties appeared before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana on

25.03.2025 for identilication. \ I l. 2

4. In view of the above said submissionlr, this Criminal Petition is allowed in terms of compromise i md proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 6 in SC/ST No.22 of 2024 on the file of III Additiona,l District and Sessions Judge, at Sangareddy are hereby quashed. Miscellaneous applications, pending if z,lry, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// I SD/. MOHD. I1EPUTY REG ISMAIL ISTRAR .\- SECTION OFFICER \, l l l /. l To, .1. The Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Sangareddy 2. The il Addt District & Sessions iJOg", SJng.lJoaV 3. The Station House Officer, frllr*oofip.S , SiJaipet Distr ct 4. One CC to SRt. K DHARAM STNGH Adv;;t.'fbpUCt 5. one CC to rvs r Ne"IIi |Sqov no*""t" Dplct 6. rwo ccs ro pUBLrc pRosEcu,rcic,;is'; b;r; at Hyd:rabad (oUr) 7. Two CD Copies (Alongwith a coov of Joint Memo of Compromise) vr vvrrrv.rrr VSM/gh ',4 't' I''r HIGH COURT I DATED:0910412025 u Ttlf 5 ):{ r) 7 o r) 1:r JLil 2025 f I o -;;z ORDER !A.NOS.3 &4oF 2025 IN/AND CRLP.No.3427 ot 2025 ALLOWING THE IA.NOS.3 & 4 OF 2025 A.ND THE CRIMINAL PETITION 6 \r 1 2 THE STATE OF TELANGANA, Through its Public prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. LINGANI RAVINDER S/0. L. Narsaiah, 19ed 1b_o!'t 35 years, Occ: Agricutture, R/ o.4-BO / F, Chebarthy Viilage, Markook Mandal, Siddipet District. .:.RESPONDENTS/ DEFACTO-COMPLAINANT No.2 to 7 1. The petitioner herein had lodged a complaint against the Respondent No.2 and 3 before the p.S. Markook, Siddipet. The police had registered a crime with FIR No.II/ZOZ4 dated 30.01.2 024 under Sections - 324,323,504, 506 r/w 34 IpC,3 (1) (r). (s), SC ST pOA ACT 2015, against the petitioner Nos.1 and 2 for the areged offences. AFter due investigation the police has filed Charge Sheet with SC/ST No'22 0f 2024 0n The Fire of III Additionar District And sessions Judge, At Sangareddy For The Offences Under Sections 324, 323,5O4,506 R/W 34tpc,And Sec.3 (1) (R).(S) (c),3 (2) (V A) Of SC ST pOA Act 2015 and have added the names of Respondent Nos.4 to 7.

2. The petitioner submits that the Respondent No.2 ,3 herein and the petitioner had set,ed the matter amicabry. pursuant to the above settlement, he agreed for the withdrawal of all the allegations made therein as such liable to be quashed. v r) iL'g=-.^ u: et fulL L, ?4-1-\ iG?

3. It is submitted that this Hon'ble court is fully empowered to exercise its discretion to invoke section 528 of B.N.S.S and requires the above crime in the circumstances of the case and ir the interest of I ustice.

4. That in view of the above compromise, this Hon,t le Court may be pleased to QUASH the proceedings in SC/ST No.22 Of 2024 On The File of III Additional District And Session:,; Judge, At Sangareddy For The Offences Under Sections 322:.., 323, SO4, s06 R/W 34 tPC, And Sec.3 (1) (R). (S) (G), 3 (2) (V A) of SC ST POA Act 2015. It is therefore prayed that this Hon,ble Ccurt may be pleased to record the Compromise and eUASH the ploceedings in SC/ST No.22 Of 2024 On The File of III Additionat District And Sessions Judge, At Sangareddy For The Offences Un,Jer Sections 324, 323,504, 506 R/W 34 IPC, And Sec.3 (1) (R'. (S) (c), 3 (2) (V A) Of SC ST POA Act 2015 as the same is unt,:nabte either on facts or under law and pass such other and further orCer or orders as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of th:: 6659 6n6 1a the interest of justice. Hence the Joint Memo. ,l w L' 8''-['t--- I t-b-' l S ^, D at@t z' \ I 13 J" r'*L*) PETITIONER NO.2 PETITIONER NO.3 r tu*: .{ PETITIONER NO k' t D €C ff.-L! cerinorueR ruo.pfi' PLACE: HYDERABAD DATE:04.03.2025 COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER P NO.1 w PETTTTONER NO.q d \ COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NO.2 l_. ?-""'L,','.-'' RESPONDENT NO.2