Boddu Narasaiah, Aged about 79 years v. The State of Telangana

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, declaring the action of the respondent no.3 in passing rejection order vide reference No. 8,17912024 dated 04-10-2024, with regard to the correction of entries in revenue records in relating to petitioner's land missing survey number i.e., Survey No. 141134,land admeasuring Ac. 2.15 guntas, situated at Adivimazid Village, Mulugu Mandal, Siddipet District, without following due procedure of law, as illegal, arbitrary, in violation of the Article 14,21 and 300-4 of Constitution of lndia besides in violation of Principle of natural justice and consequently to set aside the impugned order dated 04-10-2024, vide order 8,17912024, passed by the respondent no.3, thereby direct the respondents to issue Patta Passbooks in the names of the petitioners after correcting the revenue records. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section I 5'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned order dated 04-10-2024, vide order B.17912024, passed by the respondent no.3, thereby direct the respondents to issue Patta Passbooks in the names of the petitioners after correcting the revenue records pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: M/S. B. SHIRISHA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No.7128 of 2o.25 ORDER: This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following relief '....1o issue a urit of mandamus or anA other appropiate utrit order or direction declaing the action of the respondent no 3 in passing rejection order vide reference No. B/ 79/ 2024 dated 04.1O.2O24 Luith regard to the conection of enties in reuenue records in relating to petitioners land missing surueg number i.e.Surueg No.141/ 34 land admeasuing Ac.2.15 guntas situated at Adiuima.zid Vtllage, Mulugu Mandal, Siddipet Distnct without following due procedure of law as illegal, arbitrary, in uiolation of the Articles 14, 21 and 300A of Constitution of India besides in uiolation of Principle of natural justice and consequentlg to set aside the impugned order dated. 04.10.2024 utde order B/79/2024 passed bg Lhe respond.ent No.3 thereby direct the respondents to issue Po a Passboolcs in the names of the petitioners a.fter correcting the reuenue records..."

2. Considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the respective parties and perused the record

3. It is stated that the petitioners are the owners and possessors of land admeasirring Ac.2.l5 guntas in Sy.No. l4l134 situated at Adivimazid Village, Mulugu Mandal, Siddipet District, and rheir narnes are recorded in the revenue records and they are also issued 1-B (ROR) certificate in respect of the subject lands under the provisions of the Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 (for short Act, 1971J. It is further stated that when the said extent of land is missing in the Dharani Portal, they t I I 2 have submitted an online application seeking correction of the entries in the revenue records, but the said application has been rejected uide reference No.Bl79l2O24, dated O4.IO.2O24 stating that on verification of the revenue records, the subject land to an extent of Ac.2.05 guntas are recorded as patta in the pahanis for the year 2010-11 and as per LRUP pahani in Sy.No. 141/34 to an extent of Ac.2.O5 guntas showing as house sites, and since the applicant has applied for missing survey number to an extent of Ac.2.15 guntas, which is not matching in the revenue records, it is not recommended for missing survey number. The grievance- of the petitioners is that since the 1-B (ROR) certilicate issued in their favour reveals that they are the pattadars to an extent of Ac.2.O5 guntas, instead of conducting detailed enquiry as to whether the said extent is available on ground possession or not and whether the same is matching with the sub-division records, the respondents have erroneousiy came to a. conclusion that the said lands have been described as house sites in the pahanis maintained under the LRUP.

4. Since the impugned rejection order dated O4.1O.2O24 reveals that the land claimed by the petitioners is in occupation of house sites even though the petitioners narnes are mentioned as pattadars J in the 1-B (ROR) certihcate, the said issues are required to be examined only after examination of the elaborate evidence.

5. In view of the above, this Court is of the opinion that ends of juStice would be met, if the petitioners are relegated to approach the competent civil Court if they are having titie as pat[adars over the subject property and after obtaining necessary orders, they are entitled to make an application seeking correction of the missing extents in the revenue records.

6. With the above observations, this writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed' sD/- A RAo ISTANT REGISTRAR '.MALLTKARJUNA //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER tng, The State of 1- The Principal Secretary (Revenue), Secretariat B Telangana, Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Siddipet District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO), Siddipet Division, Siddipet District 4. The Tahasildar, Mulugu Mandal, Siddipet District. 5. One CC to M/s. B. Shirisha, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana, at 7. Two CD Copies Hyderabad [OUT] To, TJ PSK FT. I I HIGH COURT DATED:0710312025 ORDER WP.No.7128 of 2025 oe 1 H E S,r-4 I4: ( o o .L (n ( i 2 5 Jtt!'l [m :;l -:' // / -r.' DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS .q(d 10 w