Smt K. Parimaiamma (O Prameela, Wo Sri K Mallesh v. Sri M Yadharah
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
both the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed as
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 77. In the result. both the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed as 2 infrucfuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending in these petitions, if any, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// ASSIS Sd/- T. JAYASREE r/$Nr REGISTRAR rI sEcrr ON OFFICER…
Judgment
Smt. K- Parimalamma , Prameela, Wo Sri K Occ. Housewife, R/o.Chatrinaka, Hyderabad. Mallesh, Aged about 39 years, 1 AND 1 2 2 4 5 o ...Petitioner/Pla intiff t Sri M. Yadhaiah, S/o.Sri Venkat Narsaiah, Aged about 63 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Urkonda village and fVlandal, Nagarkarnool, Sri Venkat Narsaiah, S/o Sri M Yadhaiah, Aged about47 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Urkonda village and Mandal, Nagarkamool. Smt.M. Shantamma, Wo Sri M Yadhaiah, Aged about 57 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Urkonda village and Mandal, Nagarkarnool. Sri M. Shiva Kumar, S/o. M. Yadaiah, Aged ibout 33 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Urkonda village and Mandal, Nagarkarnool. Smt. M. Kalyani, D/o Sri tVl. Yadhaiah, Aged about 29 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Urkonda village and Mandal, Nagarkarnool. Sri Md. Thajuddin, S/o Sri Hazi Kareem, Aged about 36 years, Occ. Business, R/o. Urkonda village and Mandal, Nagarkarool. ...Respondents/Defendants lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in O.S. No 291 of 2007 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kalwakurthy, pending disposal of the Civil Revision Petition. CIVIL REVISI ON PETITI ON NO:117 5 0F 2019 Petition under Anide 227 of the constitution of rndia aggrieved by the order dated 31-10-20'r8 passed in r.A.No.594 of 2018 in o s. No. iil ot zooi on tn" ir" of the court of the principal Junior Civil Judge at Kalwakurthy Between: Smt K. Parimaiamma (O Prameela, Wo Sri K Mallesh, Aged about 3g years, -tiya"iiO"A ' Occ- Housewife R/o Ch-atrinaka AND 1 3 4 5 6 ... Petitioner/Pla intiff -liri"ri["rnoof Sri M Yadharah, S/o.Sri Venkat Narsaiah, Aged about 63 years, Occ_ Agricu tture, R/o U rkonda viltage a nd Mino'ri Sri Venkat Narsaiah, S/o Sri IVI yadhaiah, Aged about 47 years, Occ_ Agricutture, R/o Urkonda vilage and wfJnJa[ f.frliif, rrnool Smt.lVl Shantamma. Wo Sri M yadhajah, Aged about 57,years, Occ_ Agriculture, R/o. U rkonda viilage and rr,f Jniri] f.rrdiii.-arnoof Sri M. Shiva Kumar, S/o. M yadarah, Aged about 33 years, Occ_Agrbllture, R/o. Urkonda village and Nrandal. ttagrr"k"rnoJ-'-" '' smt lvl Kalvanr. D/o sri ,vr yadhaiah Aged abour 29 years, occ- Agricurture, Rio Urkond'a vrilage and lrrtrnojr, r.ragii[ri.-n66i"'-" ,' sri lt/ld. Thaiuddrn S/o Sri Hazr Kareem Aged about 36 yeard. occ_ Business, R/o. Urkond'a viilage and Mandat Nagaika";;ol""'' "" .. Respondents/Defenda nts IANO: 1OF2 019 Petition under Section r 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the-affidavit fired in support oj the petitron, it',i iigh court may be preased to stay ill l.rThg, proceedings in O S. No 291 of 2OO7 Jn tne rite oi*," Frrliprr'J,.i,.,,o,, civil Judge, Kalwakurthy pending disposar of the civil Revision petition. Counsel for the petitioners in both CRps : Sri S Ashok Anand Kumar Counsel for the Respondents No.6 in both CRps : Sri K Srinivas The Court made the foilowing: COMMON ORDER THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI CI\.IL REVISION PETITI ON Nos. 1187 & I 175 of20l9 COMMON ORDER: C.R.P.No.1187 of 2019 is filed by the petitioner aggrieved by the order dated3l.10.20l8passedinI.A.No.595of2018ino.S.No.29tof2007bythe leamed Principal Junior Civit Judge, Kalwakurthy' \ c.R.p.No.l175 of 20lg is filed by the petitioner aggrieved by the order
#2. dated 31.10.2018 passed in I.A'No'594 of 2018 in O'S'No'291 of 2007'by the I , leamed Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kalwakurthy'
#3. No represenlation by the leamed counsel for the petitionet'
#4. Heardtheleamedcounselfortherespondentsinboththepetitions.
#5. Leamed counsel for the respondents reported that both the C.R.P.Nos.ll87mdirll5of20l9werearisingoutofo.S.No.29lof2017and thesamewasdismissedbythetrialcourtandthatboththecivilrevision petitions would become infructuous '
#6. Recording the said submission of the leamed counsel for the respondents' the CRPs are dismissed. \_
#7. In the result. both the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed as 2 infrucfuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending in these petitions, if any, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// ASSIS Sd/- T. JAYASREE r/$Nr REGISTRAR rI sEcrr ON OFFICER To, .1 . The Principal Junior Civil Judge at Kalwakurthy. 2. One CC to Sri S Ashok Anand Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri K Srinivas, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies ADK/gh e. '1 HIGH COURT DATED:0410212025 COMMON ORDER CRP.No.1187 AND 11tS of 20,1g ./'i.' ".t ;t.1, { ,/, , Ii_a z ,21 lilAR 2ff25 t DeS"ATCB .:.o v z 3 s DISMISSING THE BOTH CRps AS TNFRUCTUOUS / / I
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: both the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Telangana High Court, on 31 Oct 2018. The bench was PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL, PRINCIPAL JUNIOR, CIVIL, JUNIOR CIVIL, PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIT.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.