K.T.R. Reddy v. Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K. KIRAN MAYEE REP SRt K. RAMAMOHAN Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 1: SRI R. LAXMIKANTH REDDY, Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2to4: GP FOR HOME (Ap) Counsel for the Respondent No.s: GP FOR REVENUE (Ap) GP FOR HOME (TG) ./ , / / W.P. NO: 44455 OF 2016 Between: Bathula Sambasiva R Rlo.D.No.26-42-4O2,2 ao S/o. Kondalu, Aged about 38 years, Occ: Agent, nd Line, Nallakunta, Guntur ...PETITIONER AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Superintendent of Police, Khamrnam District, Khammam. 3. The Circle lnspector, Madhira Mandal, Khammam District. 4. Station House Officer, Madhira Rural Police Station, Madhira, Khammam District.

5. The Revenue lnspector, Madhira Rural, Khammam District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th Respondent in Registering a case in Crime No. 173 of 2016 on the file of the Madhira Rural Police Station, Khammam District for the alleged offence under Seclions 420, 272,273, 120 (B) rlw 34 of IPC without any material, without any lab report as illegal, unjust, arbitrary and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently set aside the same O: I OF 201 WPMP. NO: 54837 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pieased to stay all further proceedings in Crime No. 173 of 2016 on the file of the Madhira Rural Police Station, Khammam District for the alleged offence under Sections 42O, 272, 273, 120 (B) r/w 34 of IPC including the arrest of the petitioner, pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SR[. K. RAMAMOHAN Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1to4: GP FOR HOME (Ap) Counsel forthe Respondent No.5: cP FOR REVENUE (Ap) The Court made the following: ORDER I THI] HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION Nos.44401 & 44455 OF 2016 COMMON ORDER: These Writ Petition ate filed under ,\r-ticlc 226 of Consdrution of India seeking the following relietTs:- "...rssuc an appropriate \Vnt, Ordcr or Direction, morc particularlv onc in tht nature of Writ of lvlandamus declaring tlrc acti,,rr c,f tlrc 4'h Respondent in Registering a casc itr Crimc No.l7i of 2()16 r,rr thc filc of the il{adhira Rural Police Station. Khamrr-ranr Disttict tt,r thc allcgcd rrfiences under Sections 120, 272. 2 t-3, 120 (B) t7rs, -i'1 ol II)(- \r-ith{]ut nr1\' marcrial u,ithor.rt any lab report as rilcgal, un)trst, arbiuarr and r rolatitc ()f .\rriclc 21 of the Constitution of India and conscquc'ntlv set asicl<, rhc sarrrc and pass..." 2 Heard Mr.K.Kiran Mayee, learned counsel represenring N'[r.Rama Mohan, learned counsel for the pcriri()ner and \lr.R.Laxmikanth Reddy, learned Assistant (]overnmcnt Pleader tbr Homc appearing for respondent Nos.1 ro r[.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submirs rhat, challenging thc alleged illegality in the registration of Crime No. 173 of 2016 by, rcspondent No. 4, the present writ petitions have beerr t-ilcd sceking appropriate directions. \ 2

4. Learned Assistant Government Irleader for Flome, appearing for the respondents, submits that after due investigation, a charge sheet was filed in the said crime, which cuLninated rn C.C. No. 211 of 201,8 on the file of the learned Judicial Nfagistrate of First Class, Madhira. Upon complerion of trial, tl'rc case ended in acquittal on

29.03.2023. It is therefore contcndcd that, in view of such developments, the grievance raised in these rvrit petitions no longer survives for considerarion.

5. Having regard to the subnilssions adr.anced and in light of the subsequent developments rhat transpired during the pendency of these petitions, it is manitesr rhat nothing furthcr remains for adjudication. Accordingly, these t'rit pcritions stands disposed of as having become infructnous.

6. Accordingly, these Vrrit Pedrions are dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as t() c()sts. fu. t., J Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if shall stand ^ny, closcd. To, //TRUE COPY// SD/- N. SRIHARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER

1. One CC to SRl. K. RAMAMOHAN, Advocate [OPUC] 2 Two CCs to GP FOR HOME (AP) ,High Court for the State of Andhra 3. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME (TG) High Court for the State of Telangana, at Pradesh [OUT]

4. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE High Court for the State of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad [OUTI

5. Two CD Copies B[/ HIGH COURT DATED:2410912025 COMMON ORDER / THE S ( o() a * 13 rrB zuzr L .ra sGo WP.Nos.44401 AND 44455 of 2016 DISMISSING BOTH THE WRIT PETITIONS WITHOUT COSTS