V. Komuraiah, S/o v. lllaiah, Aged about

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondents in not treating the services of petitioner as regular one in last grade post from date of initial appointment by denying to pay legitimate living wages for actually working as full time sweeper for all purposes on par with regularly engaged last grade employees in respondent department as per High power committee report of 1st respondent dt.07.10.1996 in violation of Article 14, 16,21,39 .(d), 43 AND 300 (A) of our Constitution by not implementing Section 13 and 15 of Minimum Wages Act,'l 948 and provisions of Equal Remuneration Act, 1 976 inspite of - abolition of the bonded labour as per Act 1 976 in treating rt or bonded labour by paying pittance wage of Rs.5,200/- e r illegal and u ncon stitutio nal and prays to call for the offic i service conditrons, seniority and sanctioned posts of con:i last grade posts in ZPPIMPP schools in our state along v, i e petitioner as slave en as unjust, unfair, I records relating to rgent sweepers and h the steps taken in implementation of High Power Committee report in D.O.Lr. r dt.07.10.1996 and prays to direct the respondents herejn t: the petitioners as regular one in last glade, post from the, appointment of petitioners by applying the principle laid Court in the case of Prem Singh Vs State of U.P. (2019 (1) S WP No. 33936 of 201 1 and Batch Cases dated 02-05-201t TS (DB) and in W.A.No. 483 of 2O21 daled 05-08-2O21 , bz by the. Honble Supreme Court in C.A. No. 1254 of 20'18 r\ 03-201 8 in the case of Netram Sahu Vs. State of Chattisc i Appeal No.1254 of 2018, dated 23-03-2018 lo reckon cc petitioners for computation of qualifying service to grant of other retirement benefits on retirement of petitione -: consequential monetary benefits in the last grade post J engaged last grade employees of the respondent dep: periodical increments, as revised from time to time will granting 100 % compensation as per principle laid by Ape < Union of lndra Vs. Avtar Chand in C.A. No. 3416 - 3445 Cases dated 19-02-2019 (ALD 3 of 2019 SC 32) by ar principles of the Honble Apex Court under Article 141 of o t >.41513/Estt V/A2-1, treat the services of J2-05-2018 of initial ,y the Honble Apex CC 516), followed in (2020 (4) ALD 379 sed on principle laid rex Court. dated 23- rh AND Anr. in Civil ltingent services of ension, g ratuity and by releasing all r par with regularly tments, along with arrears of pay by Court in the case of )f 2010 AND Batch rlyino the aforesaid Constitution by this Honble Court in the case of petitioners. lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ( ircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cotr t may be pleased to direct the respondents herein to pay the wages of full t me sweeper to the petitioner as paid to colleague full time contingent swe I )ers working in the Panchayat Schools in Karimnagar and other districts as 1er Proceedings No. 12771A812015, dated.07.10.2015 and Proc.No.A3/1 731201 t, dt.25.1O.2021 , in last grade time scale revised from time to time with per c Jical increments on .,* '/ implementing in similarly situated case in l.A.No.1/2018 in W.P.No.841812018, dt.15.03.20'1 B same by the 1st respondent in G.O.l\.ils.No.155, daied.22.03.2021 by treating the petitioners similar to them not as dissimilar as per the principal laid by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in C.A.No.6260-6261 of 2021 , d1.26.10.2021, (2021 (6)ALD 285(SC) and pass such order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI CH.GANESH Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3: GP FOR SERVICES Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI K.PRADEEP REDDY, SC FOR ZPP The Court made the following: ORDER 7 HON'BLE MRS. JUSTTCE SUREPALLI t\I, \NDA WRIT PETITION No.7983 of 202! ORDER Sri Ch. Ganesh, learned counsel appearing I r behalf of the petitioner seeks leave of this Court for withdrawal of the present writ petition. Considering the said submission made l)' the learned counsel on record appearing on behalf of the pett oner and duly bringing the said submission on record, the \\ rit Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order" a: to costs. The miscellaneous applications, if any pendir g, shall stand closed sD"'M' osMAN ALI BAlc AS! ISTANT REGISTRAR __-14 \ I //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1 J One CC to SRI CH.GANESH, Advocate IOPUC] One CC to SRI K.PRADEEP REDDY, SC FOR ZPP [(] rUCl Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES, High Court for th: State of Telangana a1 Hyderabad [OUT] .'..

4. Two CD CoPies BSR TKS fi^s- t I I HIGH COURT DATED: 1610912025 ORDER WP.No.7983 of 2023 :{!-':t, 'ir ':it '']...r r r:, ^ i'. 19 [I[ rm '.':, i. I ,,. ,,{ !s .\ DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT GOSTS @,, lo\ts-1'(