✦ High Court of India · 03 Jan 2025

1. V.SEETHARAM v. 1. Tie State of Telangana

Case Details High Court of India · 03 Jan 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
03 Jan 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,014 words

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of MANDAMUS by declaring the action of the respondents in not preparing the ...RESPONDENTS *77 seniority list of Senior Assistants on Zonal Basis as per the orders in 0.A.No.3109 of 2009 and batch dated 26.8.2016 and Government Memo daled 4.4.2017 and further going ahead with promotion to Sub-Registrar Grade-l category as illegal and arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents to prepare seniority list of Senior Assistants as per the orders of the A.P. A*ninistrative Tribunal dated 26.8.20'16 and Government [tilemo dated 4.4.2017 before effecting any further promotions to the category of Sub-Registrar Grade-l ) l.A. NO: 3 OF 2017 (WPMP. NO:44220 OF 20171 Between: t 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 S.Laxma Reddy s/o S.Malka Reddy, aged 33 years Sub-Registrar, Grade-II Working as SRO, Devarkonda, Nalgonda District P. tvlad h usuda n Reddy s/o Narayana Reddy, aged 40 years Sub-Reglstra r, Grade-II Working aS SRO, Champapet, Ranga Reddy District V.Jyothi, w/o G, Ravi Aged 40 yea rs Sub-Registrar, Grade-II Working as SRO, lvlothkur, Nalqonda District B.Suresh s/o Venkataswamy, aged 38 years Sub-Registrar, G rad e-II Working as SRO, Gadwal, Mahboobnagar District E. Rajasekha r Reddy s/o Sathi Reddy, aged 35 years Sub-Registrar, Grade-II Working as SRO Kapra, Malkajgiri District -J.Surender, s/o Ayanna, aged 38 years Sub-Registrar, Grade-II Working as SRO Shadnagar, Ranga Reddy District D.Sangeetha, d/o Kondal Rao, aged 40 years Sub-Registrar, Grade-II Working as SRO, Ramannapet, Yadadri-Bhongir District N.Vijay, s/o Ven katesha m Aged 37 years, Sub-Registrar Grade-Il sRo, Va llabhna ga r, Ivledchal- t\4alkajgiri District -.-.-;.>-- 13 q) Md. lahangir, s/o Rasheed Aged 37 Yea rs, Sub-Registrar Grade-II SRO, K;katpalli. Mahboobnagar District /

10. G. Palani Kumari w/o Kishore Kumar, aged 41 Years Sub-Registrar Grade-II wortind at SRO Abdullapur, Ranga Reddy District

11. Y.Vanaja Kumari w/o G.Anil Kumar, aged 40 Years Sub-Registrar Grade-II Wortini at SRO Saroornagar, Ranga Reddy District

12. Ch.Raghu Vardhan s/o Goverdhan Das Sub-Registrar Grade-II Working at SRO Medchal , Medchal District

13. P.Rama Devi d/o Satyanarayana, aged 38 Years Sub-Registrar Grade-II Wortin{ at SRO Toopran, Sangareddy District i I .i t4 1 2 3 4 G.Sandhya Rani w/o G.Yugandhar Rao, aged 40 Years Sub-Registrar Grade-II Wortin{ at SRO Huzurnagar, Suryapet Distrlct .. ImPlead Petition ers/ R. Nos' 6 to 19 V.Seetharam s/o Bheemla, aged 41 Years Occ: Sub-Registrar Grade-Il Ghatkesar, Medchal District lY. Ravikanth, s/o Late M'Nallanna Aoed 44 vears, Occ: Sub-Registrar Grade-II Vinathalipuram, Ranga Reddy District V.Madhusudhana MurtY, s/o Late Krishna Murty, aged 60 years Retd. Sub-Registrar Grade-II r/o D.No. 7-5'1831D7, Laxminagar Colony Mahboobnagar District K.Vinod Kumar, s/o ShangaraPPa, aged 60 Years Retd. Sub-Registrar Grade-II r/o C/o D.No.-7-5-183lD1, Laxminagar Colony Mahboobnagar District Writ Petitioners t1 9tz 6 7 8 9 I I t 'ii t l 9a The State of Te,angana Represented by its Principal Secretary to Revenue ( Reg lstration -I) Department Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad The Commissioner and inspector General of Reqistration & Stamps, State ot Telangana t\4.l. Road, Hyderabad The Deputy Inspector General of Registration & Stamps, Hydera bad P.S.Ranga Pra sad s/o P.Ch. Satyanarayana Occ: Sub- Registra r Grade-II 14a hboobnaga r D istrict Syed Hafeezuiddin, s/o Moinuddin Occ: Su b- Reg istra r Grade-II O/o The S u b- Reg istra r Office Vallabnagar, R.R. District (Respondent Nos. 4 and S are not necessary parties to this writ petition) .. Respondents Respondent Nos ,/ section 151 cpc praying.that in the circumstances stated in ,n" ,nto?Ti?,,5;der #Ei#,s,",,;Ht,..T5,"J,::,4:.i:l,l*,ffi ?yl,,fi"J#TI*.35,f.",1i; Counsel for the petitioner: SRl. R V MALLIKARJUNA RAO Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: Gp FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4&5: _- The Court made the following: ORDER I HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.29199 OF 2017 ORDER: Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous

2. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequet, lA No.3 of 2017 (lmptead Petition) and other miscetlaneous apptications, if any pending, shatt stand ctosed. SDI A. PRATHIMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to SRl. R V MALLIKARJUNA RAO Advocate [OPUC] 2.TwoCCstoGPFoRREVENUE,HighCourtfortheStateofTelangana

3. Two CD CoPies KKS w t) , t'X., I I J |'q'.-- { o+ 1 HE S;T (,^ \I I 0 7 fiAS 2[i5 i\ - \.? \rt..r,^- \-- _\il-:, , -} // *.t(n '..j/' HIGH COURT DATED:0310112025 ORDER WP.No.29199 of 2017 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS 6 l*( \ €

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments