The High Court · 2025

B. Smt.Chandramani W/o BramhaYYa, Aged 55 years, Occ:HYousehold, D. No.6- 1- 1 5 2, Sh iva ra m Pa lllY, Rajendranagar, District R. R. 9 Smt.Sugunamm Age:51 years, O D.No. Chinna Re Jagadgiri Gutta, a W/o Narayana Chary, cc:Household R/o ddy Nagar, Ku th bu lla ou r (M) District R.R. Smt. D^aivamma W/o Narayan Chary, Age 50 years, Occ: Household C/o. Nagabushanam Chary, |^Ti;i.?- t I.t bowrrpura, Hyderabad.

0.6/2, behind kurma bhavan, _D-evendramma W/o Raghava Chary, Smt Age 50 years, Occ: House-hold D.No. Balapur (V), -.- r -,/ Saroornagar (M), District R.R.. \ \

72. Nagabushnam Chary S/o purushotham Chary, Ag.e:66 years, Occ: Retired ernpfopy"", D.No.23-5 I 1O6/2, behind kr;;;ir;;" inside Gowlipura. Hyderabad. 13. Smt.Saroojam ma w/o.Rangam Aged 61 years, occ:Flo.use6otJ D.No.23_5_561. opp:Sutrhan Shahi potice st"iio",'clliriiura, uyderabad

14. Smt.prameela Wo Brahmaiah, \9ed- +6 year4s, Occ:Household, C/o Nagabhushnam Cha_ry o.rvo]Z:_s_r rooZz, Beh ind Kurma Bha va n, Inside Co*f ipriu^,"ff Vdera bad. f.Jan-ga Chary S/o Late K.Laxmana Charv , Age:66 years, Occ: Retired Erpfoy".,''' D.No.1B-5-37, outside Laldarwaza, HfOeraOaO. I5.

16. K.Suvarna w/o Late K.Venkata Chary Age:40 years, Occ:Govt. Employee, 17. K.Swapna D,ro Late K.Venkata Chary, Age : 23years, Occ: Ffiouswife

18. K.lalandar Chary S/o Late K.Venkata Chary, Age 21years, Occ: Student,

19. K.Karthik Chary S/o Late K.Venkata Chary, Age:18 years. 16 to19 resides in D.No-18-3-496/31/A, Rajanna Bowli, Aliyabad, Hyderabad. 3 I '20. K.Tukaram Chary S/o Late K.Laxmana Chary Agei42 years, 'Occ:Business, D.No. lB 5 37, Outside Laldarwaza, Hyderabad.

21. Smt. K.Shakunthala Bai W/o Late K.Keshava chary (died L.Rs,) 22. K.Vikrama Chary S/o Late K-Keshava Chary Age : 57 years, Occ: Business, Z5 K.Venkata Chary S/o Late K.Keshava Chary Age 50 years, Occ: Doctor,

24. K.Ravindra chary S/o Late K.Keshava Chary. Age 49 years, Occ: Business, D.no. 5-86, Post Office Lane, Fathenagar, Hyderabd, 25 )(; Smt.Karuna W/o leeva Ratnam Chary, D/o Late Keshava Chary Aged 55 years, Occ:Household, D.No.2.E, Pragathi Sandhya Appartment. Opp:VUDA Park, Vizag, Smt.Sukanya D/o K.Keshava Chary D/o Late Keshava Chary Age:50 years, Occ:Household. D.No.94 HIG,Kukkatpally Colriny, Behind Malaysia Township, Hyderabad. 27 . Smt.Lavanya W/o Hanumanth Rao. D/o K.Keshava Chary, Age:50 years, Occ:Household, D.No.203, Budhapurnima Apartments, Begamp€t, BS Maktha, Hyderabad.

28. Smt.Kamalamma W/o Late RamamurthyChary, Age:76 years, Occ: Household, D.No.5-95, Balapur (V), Saroornagar (V), Dist:R.R

29. Smt.Aruna'W/o Namdev, D/o Late K.Ramamurthy Chary, Age :46 years, Ocfc:Household R/o 5-95, Balapur (V), Saroor nagar (M), R.R.District.

30. Smt.Ratna Kumari V!/o Pentaiah D/o Late K.Bhaskara Chary Age about 58 yers, Occ: Hoiusewife, D.No.4O=52l1, Vasanth Vihar Colony. Moula Ali, Hyderabad'

31. Smt.K-V.Laxmi W/o Late K.Prakaash Chary, Agei47 years, Occ: Housewife,

32. K.Rajini D/o Late K.Prakash Chary, Agei29 years, Occ: Nil, ,l i-/+ J.] K.Dinesh K Age 28 yea umar S/o rs, Occ: Nil 34. K.Radha Krishna S/o Late K.prakash Chary, sh Chary, Late Age:27 years, Occ:Nit,

35. K.Rohan S/o Late K.prakash Chary, ,, Age l9 years, Occ:Nil, 30 to 34 resides D.No. 23l5/1143, Gowtipura, Hyderabad.

36. Smt.K.Shashikata W/o Late Bala Mukunda Chary, Aged about 55 years, Occ: goiusewife. 37. K.Venkatakrupa Chary-S/o Bala Mukunda Chary, Aged about 41 years, Occ,p"t,i.prov'n!!, 38. K.Srinivasa Chary S/o Late Bala Mukunda Chary, Aged abour 36 years. o..,prf.E.p]ii"u", 39' K.Harish charv Aged about 34 years, O.c;Srsin;s, '"" . !{o Lare.Eala Mukunda Chaiy,

40. Smt.p.Madhar, Aged about 44 years, o.., Horr"ilii"I," y1:^p.Shiva. Kumar, D/o Late Bata Mukunda Chary

47. :[:i*il1?f"[1"r:,::Ti,irishna D/o Late Bara Mukunda Charv (Ail R/o H.No.18_6_102, c;ii-pr.u, Hyderabad).

42. Bhas.kara Chary S,zo Late Venkata Charv (died as per LRs.30, q: J jo j"'"'q \-,,o, y 43. Smt.lanakamma Wo Late K.Bhaskara.Chary (Died) 44 ( M ), R. R. Disrricr. i[!'iJ:i? {i;iiiJ6?.,T""Tf*9,:".y D/olate K Bhaskara chary, R/o D. No. 4_ 48 / 2-, nrrnu.grJu]i*u.oolnugu, 45. K.Venkata Chary S/dr Late Bhaskara Charv Aged about 47 years, Occ:Business 46. K.Murali Chary S/o Late Bhaskara Charv Aged about 4 5 years. Occ: R,,.i.,o.1 - "' , R/o D.No. I_91, Batdpur(V),-- -"-, sa roornagar( Manda l), R_ R. District. (Respondent No.3, 4, 22 to 2i ui,a oZ to +O u." necessary) Others are nol necessa r y ... Respondents/Defenda n ts n t i i lA NO: 1 oF 2025 Petition under Section 151 of C P'C ' praying that in the circumstances stated ln the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to suspend the orders passed by the Xlll Additional District Judge' Ranga Reddy District at L.B'Nagar in l-A.No.175 of 2)24in O S No-161 of 2005 dated 2810112025' Counsel for the Petitioner :SRl VIJAY B. PAROPAKARI Counsel for the ResPondents : NONE APPEARED The Court made the following :.ORDER 7 ORDER TH H N B I STI EP. M o HY VI R VI I P I ON o.7 4 2 5 Heard Mr. Vijay B. paropkari, rearned counser for the petitioner. 2' The present is a civir Revision petition which has fired been by the petitioners under Articre 227 0f the constitution of India assailing the order dated 2g.01 .2025, in I.A.No. 175 of 2024 in o.s.No.161 of 2005, passed by the xIII Addr. District and Sessions Judge, R.R. District at L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad.

3. Vide the impugned order; the Trial Court dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner herein under Order VI Rule 17 of the Civir procedure code, 1g0g. The said order vI Rure 17 petition has been dismissed by the Trial Court primarily relying upon the judgment of the Ailahabad High court in the case of Firoz Uddin and Others vs._ Anwar Uddinl. t

4. From the pleadings what is clearly culled out is that, here is a suit which was fired in the year 2005 and the evidence of 12023 SCC Online A 3OOs : (2023) 1sg 4B 5:) the parties stood closed as early as in the year 2023' It is at the fag end of the trial that the Order VI Rule 17 petition has been filed bY the Petitioner seeking for amendment of the Plaint' The amendment precisely sought for is to show the boundaries of the suit schedule ProPerties' 5. Having considered the submissions and also the amendment that has been sought for, this Court is of the firm viewthatsinceitisonlyaSuitforpartitionfromthe defendants, -referring to the boundaries of the suit schedule properties could be inconsequential at this stage when it has reached its fag end and whether the petitioner is entitled for partition in the suit schedule properties or not is still to be decided. The aspect of identification of the boundaries would or may occur in the event if the Suit is decreed in favour of the petitioner and the decree is sent in for execution' This Court sees no reason why the petitioner would not be having the liberty to take appropriate t"to"'" available under law for the said purpose at that stage, if at all, if it is required' The right of the petitioner to that extent stands reserved'

6. In view of the same, this Court does not find any strong case made out by the petitioner calling for an interference to the impugned order passed by the Trial Court. The Civil Revision Petition accordingly stands dismissed.

7. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending if any. shall stand closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/- M. NAGAMANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR \ I SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Court ot he Xlll Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad.

2. One CC to SRI VIJA| B. PAROPAKARI Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CD Copies Pcsd/PSL HIGH COURT DATED:2010 6t2O2S ORDER CRP.No.794 of 2O2S -1- .1'-.,t \ 1 l'4 (-r v/i'. 2 5 IIJE 206 ") \. DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION