Urmila Devi v. The State of Telanganal' However' this Court directed the

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to pass an order to issue an appropriate writ, direction or order more particularly a wrii of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the third respondent in not considering the Representation of the Petitioners dated 1010212025 for sanction of temporary fencing and cattle sheds over the property of the Petrtioners over an extent of land admealuring i 2640 Sq. Meters in Survey Nos. '1 BiE situated at Khajaguda Village, Serilingampilly Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, as arbitrary, discriminatory, illegal, null and void ind without jurisdiction, and consequently direct the third respondent to consider the Representation dated 10t0212025 for sanction of temporary fencing and cattle sheds over the property of the Petitioners over an extent of land admeasuring 12640 Sq. Meters in survey Nos. 1B/E situated at Khajaguda Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, forthwith lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order to direct Respondent No. 3 to consider the Representation of the Petitioners dated. 1010212025 for sanction of temporary fencing and cattle sheds over the property of the Petitioners over an extent of land admeasuring '12640 Sq. lvleters in Survey Nos 18/E situated at Khajaguda Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, forthwith Counsel for the Petitioners: M/s. DIVYA RAI SOHNI Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3: SRI G. MADHUSUDHAN REDDY SC FOR GHMC The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN W.P. No.7O98 of 2028 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Assistalt Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development appearing for respondent No. 1 and Sri G. Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Starrding Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 4.

2. It is the specihc contention of the petitioners herein that HYDRAA has issued notice, dated 30. 12.2024 directing the petitioners to vacate the subject property within 24 hours. Petitioner frled a writ petition vide W.p.No.3ZOgg of 2024 challenging the said notice. Vide order, dated 31.12.2024 this Court set aside the said notice, dated 30. 12.2024 granting liberty to respondent Nos.2 to 5 therein to take fresh action, if aly, against the petitioners strictly in accordance with law by putting the petitioners on notice and affording them an opportunity of hearing. They shall also the consider the hnal t,...: notification issued by the competent authority earmarking FTL of Thoutoni Kunta and Bhagirathamma Cheruvu and (irection of the Division Bench of this Court in Mrs. L. KL, W.P.No.7098 of 2025 2 Urmila Devi v. The State of Telanganal' However' this Court directed the petitioner to remove the temporary fencing and tin sheds in the subject property within one (1) '"r'eek from the said date, failing which, liberty is granted to respondent No.3 therein i.e., HYDRAA to take action against the petitioners. It is also the specific contention of the petitioners that in

3. compliance with the said order, they have removed the temporar5r sheds and fencing. Thereafter, the petitioners tried to submit online application under TS-bPASS, with a request to grant permission to construct cattle shed and barricades with GI sheets in large interest to protect the animals from heat and safety to move freely within the above said premises' is not accepting. Therefore, they have submitted the Deputy representation dated 1O.O2-2O25 to Commissioner, Serlingampally, Circle, Hyderatiad physically' Despite receiving and acknowledging the said representation' the Deputy Commissioner, Serlingampally Circle, did not consider the same. Therefore, the petitioners hled the present writ petition. I, order, dated 23.09.24 in W.P.No.25702 of 2024 &' batch 3 KI-,J W.P.No.7098 of 2025 I I

4. Whereas, Sri G. Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3, instructions, would submit that in TS-bPASS portal there is a module accepting the said application. Petitioner has to submit application in TS-bPASS with respondent by duly uploading all the relevant documents by way of self certification and self declaration. On submitting the said application, respondent Nos.2 and 3 will consider the same.

5. In the light of the said submission, this Writ Petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioners to submit application under TS-bPASS seeking permission for construction of cattle shed etc., along with the relevant documents by way of self certification and self declaration. On lrling such application on satisfyin g pima facie title and possession of the petitioners over the subject property, respondent Nos.2 and 3 shall consider the said application. If the petitioners are not in a position to upload the said application in the said module, liberly is granted to the F*. l) petitioners to hle afresh writ petition, challenging the said action of respondent Nos.2 and 3. 4 KI, W.P.No.7098 of 2025 a) As a sequel, miscellaleous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// SD/.T. TIRUMALA DEVI EPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER The Principal Secretary lvlunicipal Administration and Urban Development Department Secretariat Hyderabad The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad N4unicipal Corporation, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad The Zonal Commissioner, GHMC, Serilingampally Zone, Hyderabad' One CC to tr//s. DIVYA RAI SOHNI Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRI G MADHUSUDHAN REDDY SC FOR GHI\IC IOPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR N/CPL ADMN URBAN DEV ,High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] Two CD Copies To, 2 3 4 5 6 7 KKS BS HIGH COURT KL,J DATED:0710312025 ORDER WP.No.7098 of 2025 1 ac S f.17 r:)ir c' UA , c o 2 6 APfl zoz5 (( '. C * a", , PATCH 60 DISPOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS L \. lA