✦ High Court of India · 25 Sep 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 25 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
25 Sep 2025
Length
1,350 words

Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that n the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, thr High Court may be pleased vacate the stay granted in MACMAMp No.3OC I t2a16 in MACMASR No. 1 47 241201 6 dated 1 1 .07 .20 1 6 ... F espondenUAppellant Counsel for the Appellant: SRI THOOM SR|N|VAS (SC FCI ISRTC) Counsel for the Respondent Nos 1 to 5: SRI VLADIMEER I :HATOON The Court made the following: JUDGMENT .,-,-, fi{*r=ffiE;tt :n-r."-J+''B7 / ycibdvoa'c n --r qlOI C HON'BLE SRI IUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA M.A.C.M.A. No.990 of 2077 LUDGEMENT The present appeal was referred to :-r.rk Adatat. On 13.09.2025, authorized representative of appettant /TGSRTC has appeared before Lok Adatat and srated that the TGSRTC has decided not to pursue.the present appeal and seeks to wrthdraw the appeat. Recording the said submissron, the Lok Adalat passed the award on 13.09.2025 and the matter was settled before the Lok Adatat. ln view of the same, the present appea[ is disposed of in terms of

2. the Award, dated 13.09.2025, passed by the Lok Adatat. There shatl be no order as to costs.

3. Registry is directed to annex the Lok Adaiat award copy atong with thii order. Miscettaneous petitions, if any, pending in this appeal shatl stand ctosed SD/- M JAWAHAR REDDY SISTANT REGIST //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Chairman Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum- Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad

2. Oie CC to Sri Thoom Srinivas (SC for TSRTC), Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri Vladimeer Khatoon, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD CoPtes ABK Yt- HIGH COURT DATED: 2510912025 JUDGMENT MACMA.No.990 ot 2017 /.;---' ,.,!'/,-3-,ll .,,< \- /'' a'\ :s 14 o 1 J 'a /ri76 * * F'l fCH DISPOSED OF IN TERMS OF AWARD PASSED BY LOK AI ALAT G'((A * . BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE \, .I FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD. [Under Section 19 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (Central Act)] Date: 13-O9'2O25 \ IC Es Present: 1. Hon'ble Justice Sri G.V. Seethapathy, q: :)o I t$$ I + ,/ 'q ea! Stl d' (Former Judge of e6twhite Andhra Pradesh High Court) Chairman

2. Sri K.Vasanth Rao, Advocate, Member M.A.C.M.A.NO .990 of 2O17 (Before the Hon'ble High Court) AGAINST M.V.O.P.No.341 of 2O14 (On the fite of the Chairman, Motor Accidents Ctaims Tribunat - cum - | Additionat Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad) Between:- The Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Rep. by its Regionat Manager, GH Region, Personal Department, JBS, Picket, Secunderabad. ....Appeltant/Respondent AND

1. Ajmira Gangamma, W/o. Late Dhanraj, Aged.about 30 years, Occ: House wife, R/o. H. No.2-15-7, East Marredpalty, Secunderabad.

2. A.Shaitaja, D/o. Late Dhanraj. Aged about 10 years, occ: Student, minor, rep. py her mother i.e. Respondent No.1 herein as naturat guardian and friend, R/o. H.No.2-1 5-7, East Marredpauy, Secunderabad.

3. A.Shitpa, D/o. Late Dhanraj, Aged about 06 years, Occ: Student, minor rep. by her mother i.e. Respondent No.1 herein as natural guardian and friend, R/o. H.No.2-1 5-7, East Marredpatty, Secunderabad.

4. A.Charan, 5/o. Late Dhanraj, Aged about 04 years, Occ: Student minor rep. by his mother i.e. Respondent No.1 herein as naturat guardian and friend, R/o. H.No.2-1 5-7, East Marredpatty, Secunderabad.

5. A.Chakramma @ Sakri, W/o. A. Lekya, Aged about 55 years, Occ: Househotd, R/o. H.No.2-15-7, East marredpalty, Secunderabad.

6. A.Lekya, 5/o. A.Mekya, Aged about 60 years, Occ: Nit, R/o. H.No.2-l 5-7, East Marredpatty, Secunderabad. ..... Respondents/Petitioners ) -) AWARD 1. This is an appeal fited by the Appettant(s) - Andhra )radesh state Road Transport corporation, chattenging the oider dated l;-09-20i5 passed iii M.V.O.P.No.341 of 7014 by the Chairman, Motor Accirl ,nts Ctaim Tribunat_ cum-l Additionat Chief Judge, City Civi[ Court, Secunde- bad.

2. Sri P.N.M.Chary, Law Office - The Autl-rorizec representative ot Appettan t(s)/TGSRTC has appeared and repres*nted t rat the Corporation decided not to pursue the present appeat and therefore rey are withdrawing the appeat. l. The said representation is recorded and the appeat is dir;r rssed as withdrawn, confirming the Judgment and Decree of the court/-i- ibunal betow. The amount, if any, remaining unpaid to the ctaimant(s) sh.t be deposited by the Corporation /TSRTC (s) within two months from the datr: :f receipt of copy of the award, atong with interest.

4. On such deposit, the Respondent/Ctaimant(s) rsr,are pe -mitted to withdraw his/her/their respective amount/s as per the avv rrd passed by the Tribuna[ /A"1ACT.

5. ln case, the parties subsequently come to know a >out filing of cross appeat/cross objection, they are given Liberty to ,eek recatI of this Order/Award.

6. Court fee paid on this appeal shatt be refunded. 7. No costs. LAW OF TGSRTE Bus Bh L-tvd Appellant(s)/Resp deht (s)t' na State Road Trans ort Cor ER-II &ve{l Telan rat:i )n ) CHAIRA4AN M BER * e AL SE8 -6ffit/ SYer c 01 I B )

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments