High Court · 2025

petition under rie:tion 151 lcpc pr.ying tnat iri tne ciroumstanr:es stated in the affidavit fited in support of the petition, the High court may be )leased to stay the further processi of Rt:Q dated 18-05-2015 by permitting the peti'iorer to submit the Applicaiion / Bid as per RFQ dated 18-05-2015 by processing thr' Application /Bid oi the Petitic,ner l:eing urlinfluenced by the inrpugnedi conc itirins in RFQ, pending disPosal c-,f tl- e 1 r resent Writ Petition LA NO: 2 OF 2015(W PI\! P. NO: 3244 0F 2015 Petition unc:er Sr':rlion 15 the affidavit frled -l .rrrPort of receive the additic nal .n lterial p CPC praying that in the circ tne peiition, ine H;gn counl pers in W.P.No .\6122 at 201 f umst rn .)es stated in may brr pleased to 5 Counsel for the Petitio'rer: SRll A LAXMAN counset for the Respr:'roents: bRl N SREEDHAR REDDY (dc ron TGNPDCL) The Court made the lo rwing: ORDER HO ,BLE MRS USTICE UR PALLI NANDA R E I o F 15 ORD ER: Heard' behalf of the Standing Cou respo ndents. l o l,tl etitiine l el fQf lT i. E11, learried ,.1 . and Sri N.S apPearrng on Reddy, tearned NPDCL, ppeaHng on behalf of the l I I c i,l ie6dhar tll. II, c ur see kin f er as 1 l { l I l 2 t er a rJl!-dsli I I t o s U e a n p r o p n a t I t rd,o t U o r 4 d t o n n a)d a P I ICt f I n a c e I prosp ctive Eidd e n e a n U a r e t h e Upk I d rto be H pa rt icu 1a y mention di 15; 05 e reg io n RFQ d ted 18 g the b) tm ugjned condit n naP 15 of sup lyo Due D te the R c) declarifrg t should i I h?ve e Ag reer,,lent/Tra ns PGCIL for the qua which is co-terminus w rrom (oo, nartic{tarlv ith the PSA mentiondd I er br d irectioii f I\4andam us: requiring the the Southern e 1.1.1 of the bmmencement days ffom Bid lause 1. 1. 1 of icant/bidder Access ment with the Bid and (at least) B yea rs in Clause 2.2.1 of "a) d ated i lega . r'lit:ar/ and princ pltrs ::f natur;al justice

18.0 5. 20 1 5 aoainst 1 AS d) and r rlrr;e,-uentlY fldentS to allo /i '-he d irect the ResPo it the APPlic tio'A/Bid as Per FlFQ Respond 3nt and further Peti:io ler l petiti:n(ri,o subln date(1 r E. {l 5.2015 to r Tc ( e:,:i tfre nOntication/BiP I ignorir; c! 3 imPugned condition$' ,[' It is rePres,:n:ed by

3. of the petitioner thal the cause of action in th7 Present writ )etition does not survl'/e ''or adjudication any more. i appearing on behalf learned couri ilI .!,

4. Bringing lh<r said submission appearing on b elra lf o the petitio petition is dismisr;ed as ifructuous. learned counsel I I I record, the writ l i, Ho vrle, er, there shall be no order as to ( osits. Asa .;r ruel, the miscellaneous pel-iliorls, if a n'/, pending ir tii \^''r t Petition shall also stand closed, To, z .) KKS GJP One CC to SFtl One CC to SR,. Two CD Copies //TRUE COPY' I I I l I o..,.'lf (;';'AYSfAf *. SEOTION bFFICER LAXI\,,I A N Aflvocate tOpUCl r,t SREEDHAR REDDY (Sc FO I h rcrunocll l loPUCl I I I i I irf{i: "' .1j I 'l I I -t I I HIGH COURT DATED:03'l02i2t)25 ORDER WP.No.16122 ot 2015 ( q J o L) ftiu : t 4 ,(. 2]t rrii i 2[25 i 01:5;,p 19 { sO y 2 ^+ .I'F DISMISSING AS INFRUCTLIC)US WITHOUT COS-TS E WRIT PETITIQN