✦ High Court of India · 14 Aug 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 14 Aug 2025

Botta Prllhyusha D/o B.srinivas Reddy, Aged about 2g vears. Occ. lgftwqre Engineer, R/o H.No_4-24 o. Muthldrarefdy r.ri,rii, B,rLliE:6r;il: Chandramoulinagar, Guntur, Ap- 522 OO7. ' ...RESPONDENT/PETtTtONER/ACCUSED No. 4 The state of reranoana nep !v its pubric prosecutor, High court for the State of Telangana it Hyderabad. AND 1 2 ...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT Petition under section 320(6) of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition, the High court may be pleased to permit the petitioner / respondent no.2 to comcromise the case by recording the Memorandum of understanding dated 1g.07.20.2.d. l.A. NO:2 oF 2025 Petition under section 359(g) of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition, the High court may be pleased to record compromise and permit the petitioner and respondent no.2 to compromise in CC. No.24 of 2022. I I I This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri Abhirash sontake, Advocate for the petitioner and the pubric prosecutor (TG/Ap) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of sri p. Ramesh Babu, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER TH6 HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI l.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 in/a nd CRIMINAL PETITION No.3013 of 2024 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P-C. by the petitioner/accused No.4 to quash the proceedings against her in C.C.No.24 of 2022 on the file of the learned Xll Additional Metropolitan [/agistrate, Cyberabad at Kukatpally, Ranga Reddy District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420,406,506 of IPC and Sections 3,4, 5 and 6 of Prize Chits and Money Circulation Scheme (Banning) Act, 1978.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent No.2, that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 haUe been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound the I I offences.

3. Vide order dated 24.07.2025, this Court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a report. x

4. Pursuant to the above said direction issued cy this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has identified the parties anci submitterj a report, dated 07.08.2025 and the same is placed on record.

5. ln view of the above, LA.Nos.1 and 2 of 2021, are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal petition is allowed and the proceedings against the petitioner/accused No 4 in C.C.No.24 of 2022 on the file of the tearned Xll Additional fi/etropolitan lVlagistrate, Cyberabad at Kukatpally, Ranga Reddy District. are hereby quashed lVliscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed s D'' Adt idfioJYtSSA+[i[ ,^ I' J FECTIoN OFFIcER \ I 'l //TRUE COPY/' To,

1. The Xil Additionar Metroporitan Magistrate, cyberabad at Kukatpally, c Tho 1st Additional Senior Civil Judge-Cum-Chief Metropolitan Magistrate' - R.R.District. ni""si Reddy District at L B'Nagar' s.tneStationHouseofficer,MadhapurPoliceStation,Cyberabad 4 Two ccs to the pubric prosecutor, High court for the state of rerangana at Hyderabad lOUTl

5. One CC to Sri Abhilash Sontake' Advocate [OPUC] 6. One CC to Sri P Ramesh Babu' Advocate [OPUC] 7 Two CD CoPies (Along with a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise) HIGH COURT DATED:14tOBtzOzS COMMON ORDER l.A. NO: 1 AND 2 OF 2O2S IN/AND GRLP.No.3013 of 2024 ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION (+ C{rr ,.'' ,4Ar ,/' \' tl',] - -i i r' '"---".\' ''1 \ ,- 0t:iEP2025 \.' l MEMORANDUM OF CRL.P.M.P. FIL "-uqt') [rrq,\\- EDU/S6N OF€&R€)' (' IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT :: TryDERABAD FoRTHE STATEoFTELANGANA ;. }I ;- I.A. No. Of 2025 Criminal Petition No. 3013 of 2024 In Betweeni Botta Prathyusha D/o. B. Srinivas Reddy, aged about 28 years Occ. Software Engineer, I{r/o. H No. 4-24-6 Muthyalareddy Nagar, 8th Lane, Gunfur Chandramoulinagar, Guntur , AP - 522 0Oz AND .. Petitioner/ accused No. 4 ( The State of Telangana 1) Rep by Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad for thc State of Telangana C. Neelam Reddy, S/o. C Rameshwar Reddy 2) Aged 28 years, Occ. Private job, It/o. I{ No. /25 Peddavadugur Village and Mandal Ananthapur District, Andhra Pradesh .. Respondent/ Respondent .. Respondent/ Defacto complainant IOINTME MO 1) It is submitted that the Petitioner / accused no.4 herein filed the above Quash Petition seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C. No.24 of 2022 on the file or. court of the I Additional Senior\Civil Judge-cum-Chief Mekopolitan Magistrate, Rangareddy District at LB Nagar. The Respondent No. 2 has lodged the above case against the petitioner under Section 420, 406,506 IPC and 3, 4,5, 6 of prize Chits Money Circular Scheme (Banning) Act 1978, wherein the petitioner is figured as Accused No. 7 and the matter is pending. 2) It is submitted that at the instance of elders and well-wishers, all the parties including the De-facto Complainant, have come to a conclusion to settle the disputes by way of Memorandum of Compromise dated B Balt a e'tJe-e-[zru't Ar]q @ ii' ola.OZ.ZOZS entered both the parties i.e., petitioner/ accused no .,an complainant/ 2^d respondent to settle the disputes and to comp cases. Further the De-facto Complainant and Accused ag:.ecd to setfl matter. As such the complaina nt / la respondent is not having any objection to quash the proceedings in CC No.24 of 2022 pend,ingagainst the Accused no.4. Further a joint affidavit signed by pr:titioner and the defacto complainant is also filecl herewith for the kincl perusal of the Hon'ble Court. e I Hence this joint mcmo. Hyderabad, Date - 18.07.2025 Counsel for t petitior-rer/ acc usecl no. 4 hr-^-r* .-- U,s'- Counsel or the respondent no.2 -f ?, ?-Pnt (Botta Prathyusha) c )eeb* ACU ( C Neelam Reddy)

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments