The High Court · 2025

The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad. Mr. Deepu Achutan Menon, S/o K.N.Achutan, Aged about 40 Years, Occ. Business, resident of NSL Sushanla, B 707 , KPHA-sth Phase, Hyderabad - 500072 .Respondent No.1 ...Respondent No.2/De-Facto Complainant Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for records in connection with Crime No. 338 of 2021 on the file of Miyapur Police Station, Cyberabad and quash the same against the Petitioner/Accused Company and the persons named in the complaint . l.A. NO: 2OF 2021 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct stay of all further proceedings, including arrest of Directors, Managers, subsidiaries ol the Petitioner company and the persons named in the Complaint, in connection with Cr.No.338l2O21 ot Miyapur Police Station Cyberabad, pending disposal of the criminal petition before this Court. l.A. NO: 'l OF 2024 Petition under Section 482 of Cr,P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petitir'n, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the stay granted in Crl. P. No.27611.2021 on the file of this Court order Datec 6 .4.2021 . l.A. NO: 2OF 2024 Mr. Deepu lrchutan Menon, S/o K.N.Achutan, Aged atout 40 Years, Occ. Business, re,sident of NSL Sushanta, B 7O7, KPHB-stl- Phase, Hyderabad - 500072 ...Petitioner/De-Facto Complainant in LA.Nos.2 & 3 OF 2024 AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad. ...Respondent No.1 in l.A.Nos.2 & 3 OF 2024 2 \din1a Construction Company lndia Private Ltd., HavinS its registereC office at Plot No. 291\, Road No.5, Aditya Mansion, Jubilee Hils, Hyderabad-500033, $epresented by its Executive Director, Mr. Thota S rtyanarayana S/o. Sri. Thota Rama Rao ...Respondent No.2/Accused in l.A.Nos.2 & 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 320(6) of Cr.P-C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner /Complainant to compound offences in FIR No. 338 of 2(),21 of PS Miyapur in Crl.P.No. 2761 oI 2O21 in the interest of Justice. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 32O (2) ot Cr.P.C praying that rn the circumstances stated in the affidavit and Joint Memos the High Court may ce pleased to Record the Compromise between Petitioner/Defacto Complainant and quash the FIR No.338 of 2021 of ['S Miyapur by compounding the offences; in CRLP.No.2761 of 2021 in the interest of justice. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the argu nents of Sri S.Ram Reddy, Advocate lor the Petitioner and the Sri E.Ganesh, Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of .Sri Krishna Swamy, Advocate representing Ms Pragathi Mandapalle, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER 1 I l THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUG{OPAL I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2o24 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.276l of 2O2l COMMON ORDER:- The Criminal Petition is hled seeking to call for the records in conncction with Crime No.338 of 2027 on thc flle of the Miyapur Police Station, Cyberabad and quash the same against thc petitioner/accused Company and the persons named in the complaint.

2. Heard Mr.S.Ram Reddy, Iearned counsel for the pctitioner, Mr.E-Gancsh, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No. 1-State and Mr.Krishna Srvamy, learned counsel representing Ms.Pragathi Mandapalle, Iearned counsel for respondent No.2 appearing on-line. \ \

3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the pctitioner and unoffrcia] respondent No.2, in one voice, submitted that both the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2024 ace filed sccking to compound the offences and to set aside the impugned order. ._/ -)

4. As p,61 thg reporL dated 17.06.2025 of thr. ,:lr:cretary, IJigh Court Legal Services Committec, both the parlies were duly identified by their respective counsel and statec that thev have willfully en tered into compromise.

5. In vi,:w of the settlement arrived at bctwec t thc parties no purpose wtu.ld bc ser-ve d in keeping the proccr:riings pending. Having re1;ard to rhc cnabling provision of Stection.32O of Criminal I)rocedurc Code permission is acr.r r.ded and the compromis,: is recordcd.

6. Accordingly, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2024 Lnd Criminal Petition No.2761 of 2O2l are alloned. ResultanLh. rlrime No.33g of 2O2l on thc file oi the Miyapur police Stzrrirn, Cyberabad registered againsL thc pe titio n cr/ accuscd stands ( I. itshed. Miscellaneous petitions, if ernv pending, ir the Criminal Petition, sherll sLar-rcl closcd. //TRUE COPYII - h.s A$S REENIVASA REDDY STANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER ,l To, 1 . The Principal .,unio r Civil Judge-cum-Vlll Additi o I Metropolitan Magistrate, 2 3 Cybera House Officer, Miyapur Police Station, Cyberabad Kukapally, The Station Two CCs to the Pu blic Prosecutor, High Court for the Stete of Telangana at Hyderabad lo One CC to Sri One CC to Ms Pragathi Mandapalle, Ad UT] S.Ram Reddy, Advocate loPUCl vocate [OPUC] 4 5 ,,6. Two CD Copie S 8), NVB/gh (Alongwith Joint Comp:onrise Memo) HIGH COURT DATED:1810612025 COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.2 And 3 OF 2024 ln/And CRLP.No.2761 of 2O21 )€ .) o ,J 1ti ctT zru[ t;, ( ; ,/ ALLOWING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION AND lA.Nos.2&3OF2024 ! I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I IN TI{E FIIGFI COURT OF FOR THE STATE OF TELANAGA AT HYDERABT\D cRL P NO 2/61 0F 2021 Berween: Aditya Consrrucriorrs Conrl,,rrry privrre Lrmired, (In F-lR No. l3g/:01 Ln.n,lnn.d as Aditya Constnrcrion Managemenr) Having office ar Plor No. 29lr'1, Road No.5, Aditya ivlansion, .[ubilee Hills, Hyderabad-50003 3, Represented by irs Er+e*$r.e I)ir !.cror Mr. T. forla-reorgaan.a ftni rcd h peritioners And

1. The Stare o[ Telangana Rep. by Station Ilous,: ()lfrc.,r Miyrp.,r Po Ircc Srul r,-. ii Through PubIic I,r,rict irl or High Coun of 'Ielalqan,r IJy r1..r .rb,r..i

2. Mr. D.:epu Achuran lvleuoir, S/o K.N.AchLrrao,;\gi-l ,rb.rLrr ,il ).rlrs, C)cc: Busrness. I{cs:.1, rr: oi: \Sl. i11il1 11111. B 707, I(PI-IB--i,r, plr:r.-.. I 1.,,-1, .rirrcj i:_,.f72 Complainant Respondent No.1 ... Respondenr No.2/ Dc-facro a)i NT lyl[\,iO Ftt_Iif) BY THE PARTIES It is lespccrfLrll'., .ubnrirLecl rh;rr ilLrrilq rhe pendency of che proceedings, the Petirioners aril iire ill.s;,3n1:rrr No.2/clc-tacro complainant, decided to end rheir cLspures ;rnil sertie the sanrc an.ricably. In pr.rurn.. of the amicable seLtlentcnr, rlic Ii:sprirnr,icrir Nr;.2 rs iully s,rLisiied with rhe saicl setdement and is no lonqer ill..r:.jrad rir i)ur\Llirg .rn1, criminal proceedings against the Petitioncrlt:r 'r;:.'l ir.,.itL.sp,.Li,..r \.,.1 lt..r.cin hrti aLo agreed and assured to close all rhe p:,r-..iiirrg; .Lg.rinsL rlLc pcLitroner herein by fonr".r,,ng to quash the procee dinss in IilR No jlll c,t lnl I in p.S. Miyapur tor alleged offences unde r Scci ion 4ll,.lCS,.i06, _iOr.r r.c,.rrl *iLh l+ of ind ian penal Code and Section 5 o['fclangen,r {'r )rr'.r i()n ol l)q 1r, ,r11.11 , cI I]rnanci.rl Establishments Act, 1999 I *l,n 'l a ) lt is submirred that in view ol rhe stltrlemeut betr'veen thr I ':ritLoners and the Respondent No.2, the conrinuation o[ the proceedrngs in 1" t No ]18 of 2021 of ptott" of Lavi' I rrrce rhis Hon'ble in P.S. Miyrpur is nothing U" 'i"t jurisdicrion ur -lcl Section 482 of r"""tit i' Court nay be pleased '" Cr.P.C, anrl quash the proceedings in questton' ''fterent It is therefore r(sPectfully prayed that thrs Hon'ble- coun .o"rpo"na the oflences in FIR No 338 o{ 2021 in P S' lr'[ryaprLr LrnCer Section 42C,4C8,406,506 rc'rd with l4 oi Indi;rn PcLr:l C Protec .ion of Deposir:o.s o[ [rin;r,:tal Esrablisir nrc nr: :i:.i,,r*",r^ ,t'r. roit p-....ti:rgs rn FIR No l38 of 2021 in P S Miyapur ihi' Hon'blt court may deem fit and prope: .,, a.. o,- o.d",, oItlrecrseandintheinterestofjusticearrdgoodconsctclrce. ^,, r ay be Pleased to r r alleged olfences , 1, anci Section 5 of r,eL, 1999 :nd quash . rl prss sLrch other L rhe circitmstances c n,., n,. I f&(f, f .,1, i o n " \ ,,\ P r 110 nil r \I Co,-tns [or e esPo ndenr No. 2 ---r ) t an LN i I t i t I I I I I I I '