The High Court · 2025

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court of Telangana at HYderabad Sri Gundlapallv Venkateswar Rao, S/o Late Manohar Ra.g' agqd about 55 ;;;;':'b";.Xj";;b, R7" H.No s+-sora, Plot No' '152' Kamalanagar b-oloiiv, vinr.thalipuiam, Ranga Reddy Dlstrict' ...Respondents/ComplainanURespondents in l'A'No'1 of 2O25 PetitionunderSection4S2ofCr'P'Cprayingthatinthecircumstances stated in ihe Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may ;;;l;r;"; t" call lor entire records in C C No 2541 oF 2017 on the file of the HL,iOr. Xl principal Junior civil Judge cum Addl. chief Metropolitan Magtstrate uin"l"nOirn"gai for the otf"n""t p'"nlth"bl" under sections 419' 420' 468' 471' of IPC and quash the same against the Petitioners' I.A. NOt 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 482 ol Cr'P C praying that in.the.9i1cynstln1s stated in ihe Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition' the High Court may be pleased to grant stay ot i,'in"' proceedings, in. CC No 2541 of 2017 on the -princiJrr 'Junior ci-vil Judge cum Additional chief fite of the Hon'ble xr the offences punishable under Metropolitan Magistrate at RajenaranaSul 1?t section 419, 420, 4o8. +zi'lJ ipC iicluding dispensing with the personal ;;;;;;r^"; of the petitioner pending disposal oi the above Criminal Petition' l.A.Nos 1& 2 of 202Ei l.A. NO: 1 oF 2025 Petition under section. 35g of BNSS praying that in the circum;tances stated in the Memor:rndum of Groundr or crilii'"i'petition, the High corrt may be preased to permit the. petitioner to o*rJ ir,t compromise and qu,sh the proceedings in c c No 254 1. of 2017 0n tne iite orine Hon,ote Xr principa, Junior Civil Judge cum Addt Chief A/etropof itr" f,rtrgi.irrie'at Rajendranagar. l.A. NO:2 oF 2025 Between: Sri Gundlapally r/enkatesw: rt%#":i"f*i,ffi [:tlflirlt,Hl3n?!t%ns?*:B:?,,, ...RespondenVComplainant AND

1. Gurram Bhoc,pal Reddy, S/o. Late pedda occ. Busineds nl" -'n.;-",r1,,:#"^^;:: L':llli? Keooy, ag-ed 63 years, Mandar,*,,n,*bih'B',fl"e"3,"#"""t1"it;.;'i&Tii;.'"%#"31il!o,a ' #:frtf,E:il"r'S:,.%ill Rep bv its Pubric Prosecutor Hish court or ...Petitioners/Accuserl No. 1 cli#ri1 Petition under Section ...RespondenURespo ldent .320(2) o,t CrpC, praying that in the circumst.nces stated in the Memoranr:_um or crounJ. l_utitj% the High Couri may "i be preased to comoou,d the offence rn-ci'r.r"'ii+r of 2017 0n the fire .f the Hon'bte Xr principar 'iunior. cirir-JuJgI lrri iooitionrt chief Metrop:ritan Magistrate at Rajendrarragar for the ori""n"e. ,no.r sections 41g,420,46g 471 of Indian penal Code and Lllow tne parfies-f"r.""IO ,n" compromise. This petition conring on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of -upon Grounds of Criminal petition anO ,i""r,ng the arguments of sri Lalith Jogi, Advocat,: for the petitioner ano the Additionar pubric proser:utor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of sri steven Jai Deep, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI INTER LOCU TORY APPLI CATIO N Nos .1&2o of 2O24 CRIMINAL PET TION N o.2996 IN/AND 12025 COMMO N ORDER ThisCriminalPetitionisfiledbythepetitioner-accused seeking to quash the proceedings against him in C.C.No 2541 of 2017 on the file of learned Xl Principal Junior Civil Judge-cum-Additional Chief tiletropolitan Magistrate at Rajendranagar' registered for the offences under Sections 41g,420,468 and 471 of IPC'

02. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner-accused as well as respondent No 2' that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition' the parlies have compromised the matter and accordingly' I'ANos1 & 2 of 2025 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to comPound the offences

03. Vide orders dated 29 08 2025' this Court directed the parties along with their respective learned counsel to appear before the Secretary' Hrgh Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana' Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a report' { { 2 04 pursuant to the above said dii"ectron issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretar-y, High Court Legal Services Committee, has rdentified ilre parties and submitted report dated 09 0g zo25 and the sanre are placed on record.

05. ln view of the above, l.A Nos l & 2 of 2025 are allowed. Consequenfly, this Criminal petrtion is allowed and the proceedings against the petitioner-accused in C.C.No.254'1 of 2017 on the file of learned XI principal Junicr Civil Judge-cum-Additional Chief lVetropotitan lVagistrate at Rajendranagitr, are hereby quashed. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, if ani, pending. shal stand closed SD/. A.V.S.PFIASAD DEPUTY REGIIiTRAR //TRUE COPYII \..- .tI SECTION Ot:FICER To,

1. The Xl Principal Junior Civil Judge cum Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Rajendranagar

2. The Vlll t\4etropr)litan Magistrate, Rajendranagar, Cyberabad 3. The Station Hor.rse Officer, Shamshabad Police Station, Cyberabad

4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Comm issione rate Hyderabad [OLIT]

5. One CC to Sri Lalith Jogi, Advocate [OPUC] 6. One CC to Sri Steven Jai Deep, Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CD Copies ABK/PSL Along with a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise i HIGH COURT DATED: 12t09t2121i COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.1 &2of 2O2S ln/And CRLP.No.2996 of 20;24 t /;.': 10 il[r 20ff '4. ALLOWING THE t.A.Nos.1 & 2 of 2O2S and THE CRIMINAL PETITION \10 t0\Dr IN THE HIGH COURT FOR TI-IE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD I.A.No of 2024 IN Crl.P.No. 2996 of 2024 Against C.C No. 2541OF 2017 (on the file of the Hon'ble XI principal Junior Civil Judge cum Addr. Chief Metropolitan Magrstrate at Rajendranagar) BETWEEN: Sri. Gundlapally Venkateswar Rao, S/ o. Late Manohar Rao, aged about 55 years, Occ: Advocate, R/o. H.No. 5-4-50 /8, plot No. 152, Kamalanagar Colony',Vanasthirlip uram, Ranga Reddy District. . . . Respondent/ Complainant AND

1. Gurram Bhoopal Reddy, S/o.Late Pedda Anantha Recldy, aged 63 years, Occ: Busines s, R / o. Brindava r.r colony, Ootpally village, Shamshabacl Mandal, Ranga Recldy District. ...PetitiorLers/Accused No. 1.

2. STATE OF TELANGANA Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court of Telangana at l-l.ydcrabad Respondent/ Respondent * \ May it please your Lordship I. Due to tht.advice o[ '}::, :;'"1'::, j ;:::; was fiied against the above said persons estiSation' That both tl crin.'-inal case is "'J'';H"n"Jj:f oF 2077 before the Ho''ble XI Judge cum Addl' Chief Metuopo'itan .*,r", :il J :ln'.::::. :,;::{ff clue to porice inrr no obje:ction u other ir-r C.C No Princrperl /unior a' "n' Magistrate u, or'"" sections 47s, 42o, rt;;::i:;,*,;:;": .:::"J*, 2 That the p,:titioner/Defacto Complainant has agreed to Respondent/Accusecl vvithdrart. the Case in C.C N,r fg41 or"ot"'the Jun or Civir rrrr" ".1,j"'::.i1" T::'"#:::;:,i Magistrate, at Rajenclranaga4, State of Tblangana unconditicnally.

3. That in view of the settlement reached betw will be s.rvetr ir tr," ^,.^.,._^-,."- . before the l{on, ',t-rween us no purpos(l prcceedings in C.C No. 2.i41 OF 201i, ;:,"'**t#fi::#::':';;:T:;; Gu\l

4. That the continuation of the criminal proceedings is coming in our way of living a peaceful life. Both de facto complainant and accused have closed the said issue once and for all and further no future claims will be entertained in respect of the said issue.

5. That the Petitioner/Defacto-cr.rmplainant has no objection for proceeding to close the matter.

6. Both the parties have agreed not to file cases against each other

7.That both the parties have settled their dispute amicably and entered compromise. The petitioner/De_facto complainant filed an afficlavit in the abovb petition to that effect. Therefore, both the parties pray that Flon'bre Court may be pleased to compound the offences in C.C No. 2541 oF zo17 before the Hon,ble XI Principal Junior Civil Judge cum Addi. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Rajendranagar, State of Telangana, in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsei for the De-factoComplainant Petitioner/De-facto Complainant. Counsel for the Respondent/Ac;cused Herpo,.,S"ffi.cused No. 1 Hyderabad I J