IFTH DAY oF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE v. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETI TION NO

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Oirect tlte,fsiironderf,s t6 consider the online application No.MU021400'108796 dated 1O/1112014, including the recent representation dated 06.02.2025, made by the petitioner fr:r succession/mutation of revenue records and issuance of pattadar pass books and title deeds in respect of land bearing survey Nos.45, 89 and . 111 admeasuring Ac.362.33 guntas situated in Malkapuram village, Choutuppal mandal in accordance with law, in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI E. MADAN MOHAN RAO, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI. M SRINIVAS Counsel for Respondents: SRI L. RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER I ... ,;t'iiou'Blg-Snr uustrcB c'v' BHASr(AR REDDY UTRIT PETITION No. 6643 of 2o25 ORDER: . It is stated that the petitioner is the owner and possessor of the agricultural land admeasuring Acs'362'33 guntas' situated in Sy.Nos.45, 89 and 111 of Malkapuram Village' Choutuppal Mandal, Yadadri-Bhongir District' It is further stated that all the revenue records depicted the nature of lands as patta lands and the name of petitioner's ancestors was recorded as pattadar. It is further stated that the petitioner has made various representations from the year 2O 14 sanction of Pouthi lzafa arld consequential amendment of the revenue records and issuance of pattadar pass book under the provisions of the Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, l97 l (for short "the ROR Act, l97l"l and the Rules made thereunder- The grievance of the petitioner is that even after receiving the said representations, the respondent .seeking a authorities did not consider the same.

2. Considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri L.Ravinder, Iearned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos' 1 to 3 and 2 CVBR, J Wp t:643 2025 w_tt]r.4heir c,rqsept, this writ petition is being disposed at the admission stage

3. Sri E.ltrladan Mohan Rao, learned Senior (lounsel, representing firi M. Srinivas, learned counsel for the pc:titioner, has submitte,l that when the representations mad(t by the petitioner have not been considered in terms of the ROR Act, 1971, the pctil_ioner was constrained to hle W.p_No.,3 7644 of 2O15 and this Court while disposing of the said writ perition on

19.1 1.2015, directed the Tahsildar to consider the petitiorier,s application orL its own merits and pass appropriate orders thereon in a,:<;ordance with law within a period s i:: weeks ,Qf from the datr: of receipt of a copy of the said order. I-earned Senior Counsel further submitted that even after the directions issued by this; Court, respondent No.3 did not consirler the petitioner's application by passing appropriate order. Hr:r.rce, the petitioner also submitted fresh representation duly en closing the orders of this Court with a request to dispose of the said application in terms of the ROR Act, l9Z l.

4. Sri L.ReLvir-rder, learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents has not disptrted the orders passed bv this Court in W.p.No.37644 of 201S, q.herein // / 3 CVBR, J Wp_6643 2025

4."' - S this Court specifically directed the respondents therein to consider the petitioner,s application and pass appropriate orders in accordance with the provisions of the ROR Act, 1971. Learned Assistant Government pleader further submits that the ROR Act, 1971 has been repealed and replaced with the Telangana Rights in Land and pattadar passbooks Act, 2O2O (for short "the Act 9 of 2O2O,,1, wherein a procedure has been prescribed for making appropriate application in Dharani Wgb Portal for granting succession / po uthi lzafa and consequential mutation and issuance of pattadar pass books and the petitioner has not suLrmitted the appropriate online a.pplication in Dharani Web portal so as to enable the respondent authorities to consider the same and pass appropriate orders.

5. In view of the above submissions, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of this writ petrtron, permitting the petitioner to make appropriate online application in Dharani Web Portal in terms of the provisions of the Act 9 o[ 2O2O and. also the circular instructions issued by CCLA within a period of two (02) weeks from today and on such application being submitted, the respondent authorities are directed to consider the same and pass appropriate reasoned orders and 4 CVBR. J Wp.-ri643_2025 com[Ernicate'Che same to the petitioner within a peric,cl of eight (08) weeks liom the date of receipt of such applicatrc,n. It is needless to observe that the respondent authorities are directed to examine all the documents relating to the subject iand and to provide personal hearing to the petitioner, if it is rrccesr;:rry.

6. With thr: above observations, this Writ petition is rlisposed of. There shall lte no order as to costs

7. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand clc,sed. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. MOHD. IS AIL ASSISTANT REGIS a' SECTION FFICER The District rlollector, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri district The Tahsildar, Choutuppal Mandal, Choutuppal, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri district One CC to Siri M Srinivas Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP For Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] Two CD Copies To, 1 2 J 4 5. MBC s 4:' s HIGH COURT CVBR,J DATED:r 1S1O31ZO}S / ( 5 ,J s1 6 STA re B 7 i,\AB 2i125 C 4 a t ntilipa.t ORDER wp.r.roi'oo 43 ot 2o2s DISPOSING OF WRIT PETITION WTHOUT COSTS @q'8 W