SRI v. vs RAMANA

of the High Court ( Contempt of Court Rules 1980 ), wherein this Hon'ble Court was pleased to direct the Registry to initiate Suo Motu Contempt Proceedings against the above said contemnors for the negrligence and dereliction of dutbs on the part of tlre respondent authorities in implementation of the Order dt. 06- 04-2021 passed by the Court in W.P. No.8291 ot fr21. Counsel for the petitioner : THE ADVOCATE GENERAL i I i I I I I I. i j I I I I I i , I I I I t i : i ; I I I I I I I i I W.P.NO. 6616 of 2025 Between:

1. Pothakanoori Madhavi, D/o Late Venkata Chary, Aged about 45 years, Occ- Agricufture

2. Pothakanoori Satish, S/o Late Venkata Chary, Aged about 42 years, Occ- Agriculture,

3. Pothakanoori Swathi, D/o Late Venkata Chary, Aged about 40 years, Occ- Agriculture, All the above R/o Jangaon District Nellutla Village, Lingalaghanapur Mandal, Jangaon, ...PETITIONERS AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Jangaon District, Jangaon. 3. The Special Tribunal, Jangaon District, Jangaon. 4. Chitla Bhavanatha Reddy, S/o Laxma Reddy, Aged about 73 years, Occ- Private Employee, Rio H-No. 1-2-200121A, Domalguda, Hyderabad. 5. Koyyada Lingaiah @Lingam, S/o Sathaiah, Aged about 70 years, Occ- Private Employee, C/o Sri Sapthagiri Printers, SRT-311,312and 313, Beside lClCl Bank ATM, lndira Park Road, R.T.C. Cross Road, Hyderabad 6 Koyyada Ramchander, S/o Sathaiah, Aged about 6'l years, Occ- Retired Employee, C/o Sri Sapthagiri Printers, SRT-311, 312 and 313, Beside lClCl Bank ATM, lndrra Park Road, R.T.C. Cross Road, Hyderabad. ...RESPONOENTS Petitron under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one rn the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the 3'd respondent to dispose the Revisron Petition in Case No. E3l137gl2121 (erstwhih Case No.B2l156712017) in respect of the agriculture land i.e. Ac. 11.17 gts., in Sy.No. 31 1 situated at Nellutla Village, Lingalaghanpur Mandal, Jangaon District, as expeditiously with uninfluenced lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed rn support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct I I I I the 3rd respondent to dispose the Revision Petition in case No. E31137912O21 (erstwhite Case No.82l1567 t2O17) in rcspect of the agriculture land i.e. Ac- 11.17 gts.- in Sy.No. 31 1 situated at NeHutla Village, Lingalaghanpur Mandal, Jangaon District, pending disposal of the Main W.P. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI. V. V. RAMANA Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 'l to 3 : ASSISTANT GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 4 to 6 : The Court made the following COMMON ORIIER: I l i l ') HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY SUO MOTU C.C.No.1 OF 2o25 & W.P.No.6516 OF 2025 COMMON ORDER: W.P.No.66 16 of 2025 is filed seeking following relief: "...ple:rsed to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandarnus directing respondent No.3 to dispose the Revision Petition in Case No.E3l1379l2O2l (erstwhile Case No.B2l 1567 l20l7l in respect of the agriculture land r.e., Ac. I1.17 gts., in Sy.No.3ll situated at Nellutla Village, Lingalaghanpur Mandal, Jangaon District, as expeditiously with uninlluenced and to pass... " This Court in W.P.No.8291 of 2O2l dated

06.O4.2O2 L , directed thc Joint Collector, Jangaon, to forward the Revision Case No.1567 of 2OI7, which was preferred against the order of the Revenue Divisional Officer in File No ll71212016, dated 01.06.2017, to the Special Tribunal, Jangaon District, constituted under the provisions of the Tclangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 2O2O. Dcspite issuing the directions in W.P.No,829 | of 2O2I, rhe respondents have not disposed of the appeal even after lapse of two years from the initial orders and the said action on the part of respondents amounts to sheer negligence and dereliction of duties in irnplementation of the Court orders. To curb indifferent .11 ) attitude in implementation of the f-ourt orders, this Court constrained to exercise its powers to initiate suo motu contempt proceedings against the respondents and the salne was taken cogrrizalce as Suo Motu Contempt Case No. 1of2025 by the Tribunal has Learned Assistalt Government pleader for Revenue appearing for tJle respondents in Contempt Case has placed on record the letter addressed by the District Co.llector, Jangaon District uide Rc.No.Ea /Aa3/2025, 18.03.2025 and also enclosed the orders passed Special Tribunal in Case No.E3/ lBZg/2021, 14.03.2025, wherein the r'evision case liled by the petitioner was disposed of. It is furttrer stated that the Special conducted enquiry in terms of the orders passed by this Court on O2.12.2024, but however to decide the Jrb, conducting of survey of subject lands was necessary for proper and effective adjudication of the case and as such directed the surveyor to submit a report arrd there was a delay on the part of the surveyor for subrnitting the report, in terms of the directions issued by the Special Tribunal and the delay was caused only because of non_ furnishing of the report by the Mandal Surveyor in time to comply the orders of this Court. It is stated that there is no a:.? 3 willful or deliberate violation on the part of the respondents in imprementing the orders passed by this court and the delay was caused only due to technical reasons for non- furnishing of the Survey Report. Taking into consideration of aforesaid facts and as the Spe<;ial Tribunal has passed orders dated 14.Og.2O25, suo-moh) contempt case is closed and the writ petition is disposed of as no further orders are necessary. However, if the pedtioner is aggrieved by the orders passed by the he is at liberty to avail the remedies before the appropriate forum, in accordance with law. No Special Tribunal, costs. Consequently, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// Sd/- K. SREE RAMA MURTHY DEPUW REGISTRAR .()8" S OFFICER To,

1. The Principal Secretary, State of Telangana,Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad,

2. The District Collector, Jangaon District, Jangaon. 3. The Special Tribunal, Jangaon District, Jangaon. 4. Two CCs to Advocate General, Hrgh Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad.

5. One CC to SRI V. V RAMANA Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to Ass,stant G.P. for Revenue,Hrgh Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]

7. Two CD Cooies /c.- kul/eh \J/.1. -.') I I /.1 '. // \' ST A16 oA \,+\ 04[lJEM ti.l:--rrra r't' r': . -:a-/ -- ''' a.- '. rl :-'- ! "1 ;i, HIGH COURT DATED:19/03/2025 COMMON OROER suo MoTU c.c. NO. 1 0F 2025 AND WRIT PETITION No.6616 ot2O25 CLOSIN(; TIIE SIIO MO'I't: C.C]. AND DlsPostN(; or.- Tlrt. wRt't plt'l't-ItoN wtTHot't cos-ts *h{ b-4