The High Court · 2025

The Mandal Educational Officer, Srirampur, Peddapalli District. The Commissioner of Police, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District. The Station House Officer, Jammikunta Town Police Station, Karimnagar District. tt Mekala Shyam Sunder Reddy, S/o: Raghupati Reddy' Aged about 59 years, Occ. Headh-raster, ZPHS, Tharapalli Viliage, Kalva Srirampur [\ilandal, Karimnagar District, Rl/o H.No.7-5-35/8, Employees Colony, Jammikunta, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction especially one in the Nature of writ of lt/andamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 3 in not taking any action against the 6th respondent for running the chit business without any valid licence and without any valid permission from the concerned authorities being a Government employee i.e. Headmaster of ZPHS, Tharapalli Village of Katva Srirampur [\ilandal, Perddapalli District as illegal and arbitrary and further declare the action of the respondents 4 and 5 in not taking any zLr tion against the 6th respondent in cheating the petitioner by not paying the c rit value amount of Rs.5,00,000/-to the petitioner despite of complaint d1.20101 L025 ai 2710112025 lodged by the petitioner before the respondents 4 an'j 5 against the 6th respondent registered vide FIR No.24 of 2025 is also iller al, arcitrary, uniust' unreasonable and against the principles of natural justice arr cons:quently direct the respondents 1 to 3 to take necessary action as per serv ce rul:s by directing the respondents 4 and 5 to take necessary action against tl e 6th respondent as per law in the inten:st of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the cit ;umst;rnces stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court ma / br: p eased to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to take necessary action as per s€r'/lce rules against the 6th respondent for running chit business without any i,:lid lir:ense or valid permission from the concerned authorities being a Govr:'nment employee i.e. Headmaster of ZPHS, Tharapalli Village, Kalva Srirampu lr4andal, Peddapalli District by following due process of law, pending disposal of 1le main writ petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition un<ier Section 151 CPC praying that in the ,l cunlslances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court nr y be pleased to direct the respondents 4 and 5 to take necessary action a'; per l:w against the respondent No.6 basing on the complaint filed by the 1r, titioner dt-20/01/2025 before the 5th respondent registered vide FIR No.24 of 2 O25 tt the interest of justice, pending disposal of the main writ petitron. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BALA MURALI Y Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 and 5: GP FOR HOMt: Counsel for the Respondent No.6:-- The Court made the following: OROER li, THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.6664 of 2025 ORDER: Heard Sri Y.Bala Murali, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for School trducation appearing for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.4 and 5, and perused the entire material on record.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner filed the present writ petitioner declaring the action of the respondent Nos.1 to 3 in not taking any action against respondent No.6 for running chit business without any valid license and va-lid permission from the concerned authorities, being a Government employee i.e., Headmaster of ZPHS, Tharapalli Village of Kalva Srirampur Mandal, Peddapalli District, Karimnagar and further declaring the action of the respondent Nos.4 and 5 in not taking any action against respondent No.6 in cheating the petitioner -*t : I I I I ! I I i .I 2 \l.- \ by not paying the chit va_lue amount of Rs...i l)0,0()0/- to the petitioner, despite filing complaint datcd 1O.01.2025 and

27.O1.2025 belore the respondent Nos.4 a-C 5 :rgainst the respondeut No.6 registered uide FIR No.24 t 2025 as illegal and arbitrarl, and consequently direct he r.espondent Nos.l to 3 to take necessa{/ action as per ;et-vir:e rules by directing the respondent Nos.4 and 5 lc take necessary a<:tion against rcspondent No.6 as per la$r.

3. Learned Assistant Go-rernment p r ad<;r for Schocl Education, basing on the counter.ali.davit. filed by respondent No.2, submits that the resporrrlent authorities after examining the report of the Inspcctor of police, Jammikunta and the letter addressed br the respondent No.2 and in exercise of powers conferred blr sub-rule (1)(clof Rule 8 of CCA Rules, 199 l, placed the r:spondent No.6 under suslrension uide Rc.No.783/1,,, l2Ot2S, dated 12.03.2025 and the disciplinary proceed r gs are pending against respondent No.6, therefore, the (, use in the writ petition does not survive and no further orrlers are required 3 to be passed in this matter, therefore, requested this Court to pass appropriate orders.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner did not dispute the submissions made by learned Assistant Government Pleader for School Education

5. Recording the aforementioned submissions made by either side, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. SD/. A.JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER at Hvderabad [OUT] 1 . One CC to Sri Bala Murali Y, Advocate tOPgCl i. i;; CCrio Cp tor Scnoot Education, Hign CoJrt for the State of Telangana' 3. iil'Cc 61h6-cp io|. Home, High Court for the State of Telangana' at HyderabadlOUTl 4. Two CD CoPies To, TJ TKS ,,. HIGH COURT DATED:0410812025 ORDER WP.No.6664 of 2025 17 )"t 7gi5 I' \. 9 -./ DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS; INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS g /,4 ,/1, ; I I ! I I l I I i l ) i