Hyderabad High Court · 2025

... Respondent 2. M/s. Farmax lndia Ltd., A Company registered Registered under the Companies Act, '1956 and having its Regd. Office At Sy. No. 658, Bbwrampet (Vg ) - 500 043, Quthbullapu(M), Ranga Reddy District Rep. by its Managing Director, Mr. tt/t. Shririivasa Reddy S/o. Sri bnki Reddy, Aged about 43 years ' ...RespondenUDe-facto Complainant Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in Cr.No.66412013 lor the offences Under Section 406, 407, 415 to 42O, end 120(13) of C.l.D, Telangana State, Hyderabad. l.A. NO: 1OF 2025 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to post the above said Criminal Petition No.1968 of 2019, in the cause list for obtaining necessary orders a1 the Court below vide its orders dated; O210112025 has closed the RC.No. 01/2025 in Cr.No. 664/2Cj13 (ClD, Hyderabad) as "Lack of evidence", in the interest of justice, under the circumstances of the case. -''}::1{, -i:;:;l.:.,r ,/ l.A. NO: 2OF 2022 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petitiorr, the High Court may be pleased to extend the interim orders granted orr dt. 02.O2.2022 in Crl.P.No.1968 of 2019 and the interim order granted ear ier may be extended until further orders. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that tn the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased .to extend the interim orders granted of dt. O2.O2.2O22 in Crl .P.No.l96B of 2Ol9 which is going to be expired on lt. O2.O2.2C22 until further orders. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition. the High Court may be pleased to extend the interim orders granted on 09.12.2021 in Crl.P.No.'1968 of 2019 which is going to expired on 14.12.2021 until further orders. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2O2O Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition. the High Court may be pleased to extend the interim orders granted on 1l.OI).2O2O LA .No. 1 of 2O2O in Crl.P.No. 1968 of 2Olg which is going to be expired or 07.O4.2O2O until further orders. I.A. NO: l OF 2020 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the interim orders granted on 12.12.2019 in l.A.No.4 of 2OI9 in Cr1 .P.No.'1968 of 2Ol9 which is going to be expired on 06.02.2020 until further orders. LA. NO:4OF2019 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the interim orders granted on 16.10.20'19 lA No.3 ol 2O19 in Crl.P. 1968 of 2019 which is going to be expired on 11 .12.2019 until further orders. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2019 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the interim orders granted on 20.08.2019 in l.A.No.0212019 in Crl.P.No.196812019 which is going to be expired on 14.10.2019 until further orders. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2019 Petition under Section 482 of Cr,P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the interim order granted on 05.07.2019 as made in CRl.P.no. 1968/2019 until further orders. l.A. NO: I OF 20'19 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in Crime No- 664/2013 on the file of C.l.D., Telangana state, Hyderabad. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusin(:t the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri K R Koteswara Rao, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri E.Ganesh, Asst.b Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri N.Harinath, represented by R.ohini Smitha, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: ORDER : I I I I I I I I I ! i THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VEIru(X)PAT ' CRIMINAL PETITION No.1968 of 2OL9' ORDER: This Crimina-l Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by the ' petitioner/ accused No.4, seeking to quash the proceedings in Crime No.664 of 2Ol3 on the file of the Dundigal Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate for the offences under Sections 406, 407, 415 to 420 and 120-Et read with Section 34 of IPC and Section 156 (3) of Cr.P.C.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the subject matter in this case is investigated by the respondent police and charge sheet has been laid, hence seeks to dismiss this criminal petition as infructuous. r) )

3. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor by furnishing the instructions passed by the DSP, EOW, CID, Hyderabad would submit that the final report has been laid before the n 2 learned II Additional Judicial Magistrate ol First Ciass as lack of evidence'. Hence, seeks to dismiss thr: crimina-l petition as infructuous.

4. Ms.Rohini Smitha, learned couns(:)1 representing Sri N.Harinath, learned counsel for responrlent No.2 seeks liberty of this Court to the de-facto complairrant to work out the rernedies as available under law, if caus,: survives

5. Recording the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Public Prosectttor and request made by learned counsel for respondent No 2, this crimina-l petition is dismissed as infructuous with a liberty to the de-facto complainant to work out remedl.e s as available under law, iI cause survives.

6. Recording the submissions made by the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor and perusing Lhe case details, this C)ourt deems it appropriate to dismiss the criminal petition as infructuous. I I l i I I t i i I I I I i ;: , i I t t I I I I I I j I I i I I 3

7. Accordingly, this criminal petition is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall also stand closed. \ //TRUE COPY// SD/. L. LAKSHMI BABU DEPUW REGISTRAR ''EYorr,"=* SEC To, 1 2 3 4 5 The Vl Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Medchal, Rangareddy District The Station House Officer, Dundigal Police Station' Cyberabad' One CC to Sri. K R Koteswara Rao Advocate [OPUCI' Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana [OUT] Two CD Copies. yJR/sh HIGH GOURT DATED:191OG12025 ORDER GRLP.No.l968 of 2019 / \ /'",-:l f,' .< '- .t ,,i; ,1 [ SEP .0fr ..'r,...i,.,,t. DISMISSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITiON AS INFRUCTUOS. rt-P I