✦ High Court of India · 15 Sep 2025

V.A. Balraj, S/o v. Anthony

Case Details High Court of India · 15 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
15 Sep 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,084 words

6. Kunta Gangadhar, S/o. K. Srinivas , ageQ about 35.years, Occ Sr'Assi*ant - tvtpoO MPF Jinnaram, Rio. H.No. 6-3-512, Shivaji Nagar, Sangareddy, Dist' SangareddY

7. Balamani, Wo. R. Yadgiri , aged about 50 years, Occ Ho.usewife Rio H'No f -i-1ari. Beside St. P'ious G'irls High School Ramnagar, Hyderabad'

8. Turupu Shravan Kumar, S/o. T Muthyalu , aggd a!gy! 4^6 years , Occ Auto - Oriv6r, Rio. H.No. 1-7-782t1, Beside St. Pious Girls High School , Ramnagar' Hyderabad. ...PETIT]ONERS AND 1 2 3 4 The State of Telangana Rep. by its Principle Secretary,, (Home Department), Secretariat, Hyderabad. The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad., - The Station House Officer, Chaitanyapuri Police Station,, Chaitanyapuri, Hyderabad. Kum. Dr.Jvothi. D/o. M. Krishna Murthy, aged 38 years, Occ Doctor, Rio Plot No.+, noai No.1, Green Hills Colony, Kothapet, Hyderabad' ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndr, circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the pleased to pass order or orders one in the nature of writ ot the action of 3rd respondent in registering FIR in Crime No 6 406, 120(B) IPC dt 0-3.12.2016 against the petitioners on .l 4th respondent as illegal, arbitrary, unco nstitutio na I and ; Cr.P.C. and the action of 3rd respondent in threatening to a - contest to the said alleged crime as illegal, arbitrary and vio rights guaranteed under Constitution of lndia under Artrr consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to arrest the p( t the above crime praying that in the ligh Court may be nandamus declaring >9 of 2016 Uls.42O, e false complaint of Jainst provisions of :st the petitioners in rtive of fundamental le 14 and 21 and tioners in context to l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WP|MP. NO: 5641 1 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the cirr .rmstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court nlr be ltleased to pass orders of Stay of all further proceedings including arrest of pr: tioners in respect of FIR in Crime No.659 of 2016 U/s. 420, 406, 120(B) tPC dt 03 12.2016 against the petitioners pending disposal of writ petition l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WVMP. NO: 1145 OF 20171 Between:

1. The State of Telangana Rep. by its Principle Secretary,, ( lome Department), Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad., - 3. The Station House Officer, Chaitanyapuri Police Station., )hattanyapuri, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONERS/RESPo \.IDENTS NO.1 TO 3 AND

1. Ravula Aruna, W/o. Ravula Shravan Kumar, 2. Ravula Yadgiri, S/o. late R. Ramaswamy 3. V.A. Balraj, S/o. V. Anthony, 4. Sai Kumar, S/o. Yadgiri, 5. Kunta Navneeta, W/o. Gangadhar, 6. Kunta Gangadhar, S/o. K. Srinivas , 7. Balamani, W/o. R. Yadgiri , .'n il *;

8. Turupu Shravan Kumar, S/o. T. Muthyalu , ... respondents/petitoner 9. Kum. Dr.Jyothi, D/o. M. Krishna Murthy, aged 38 years, Occ Doctor, Rio. Plot No.4, Road No.1, Green Hills Colony, Kothapet, Hyderabad. (R-9 is not necessary party to this petition) ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the interim order passed in W.P.No 45781 of 2016. D1.27.12.2016. Counsel for the Petitioners: M/S. G KULKARNI(NONE APPEARED) Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: SRI R.LAXMIKANTH REDDY, AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER :. -7.,:F E I I I I I i I I I i I I I I I ; i I I l I d THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE N.TUKI\ TAMJI WRIT PETITION No.45781 OF 2O1: ORDER: This Writ F'etition is iilecl under Ar li It: 226 of Constitutron ol tndia seeking the following relie I ". . Ia) /)rrs... (, rl('t t)t orders otrtz [tr llt(' ttQtllre oI Luril tt' ' cl, clontut tlr' u( ltott of .hcl re.spcntclertl rrr tt'tltslcnttcl FIR ttt r oi .)01()li, s .1 )(t. 1t)6, 120(tJ) IPC (lt. O.i 12.)Olbaqattst ti rt'sTtrttttl<ttl tts tLl<<tcti .)ir 1/re /,rls(' (t)nLl)laoLt oI ltlt r/r.'oir.\rilr/1lolr(,1 rtrttl rttlcLittst Trroui-siott.^ ol'( r-P C- (ttt(l llt t. n';1tr;tri|ttl ut 'lurttl(nii!(l la urest tlt( l)ctilioners irl co/11"r, trllt'ttt:tl crtttt,' trs r'let1rtl, atbitrQnl rutd uiokttiue oI liLnt ut: qltattQ tc(tl trrrrlr'r (lorr.stitation o[ ]ttlut utLtlt:r Ar1iclct I'l tt aar,rst,a/ra'/rilr/ Lltt,'r" tlLt'. 3tc1 resitortclt'r,l tlot to onesl tlt( :' (.ottctl lo lLta' (,1)t)t\' ('t-u]4e...' t lltt :;tutl i)l

2. None a1r1>cru'ec[ lbr the petitioners. f {

3. Hearrd Mr'.R.I-a-xmikanth lteddy, leartrt'r Assistzrnt (]overrrrnent I'L-'irdcr lor Home uppcaring [ol trslrorldctrts No.1 to 3

4. Learne<l Assistant Government Pleader :r Lltrnits that the petitioners zrlso preferred Crl.P.No.22(> i of 2017 . whcrebv (luirsh rn clrt of crime proceedings \ /c r( soLlght and this Ccrurf r.rrcle proceedings datecl 1O.06.2017 1r r<l cluashed 2 the crimc proceedings against the petitioners. Thus, nothing surwives in this petition.

5. Having regard to the submissions ald the contention of the petitioners that registered Crime No.659 of 2016 has been eflectively addressed by the order in Crl.p.226} ot 2077, nothing furthcr survives in this petition for adjudication. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed S infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. I I Sd/.M.NAGAMANI ISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII SECTION OFFICER To, 1 . One CC to Sri G. Kulkarni, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] TJ

3. Two CD Copies (n- PMK l HIGH COURT DATE D : 1 510912025 ORDER WP.No.45781 of 2016 ii 4 tit 2025 :( ,.j. i 'i DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS \ $- \1 1,t 6

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments