The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstarces stated in the. affidavit filed in s 'rpport of the petition' the High Courl may be pleased to suspend the operation of the orders of the Learned singre Judge pzrssed in w.P' No. 6762 of 2021 ' dalei 23tO7t2024 pending disposal of the nrain Writ Appeal counsel for the Appellant: sRl P' S' RAJASEKHAR (SC.FOR TGPSC) Counsel for the Respondent No'1: MS' M' VANAJAKSHI Counsel for the Respondent Nos'2 to 5: SRI N' BHOOPAL REDDY wRtT PETITIoN NO.271 0F 202s Between: The Telanqana State Public Service Commission (TGPSC)' ^Rep s.ji*ii"v,'tl .r'r"i,j.'"r'r,,jiirrv, nvd"Eo'o' Telansan a State ii001 03' by its ...APPELLANT/RESPONDENT NO'2 in W'P' No'7028 ot2021 AND 1 lndoori Ashok Kumar, S/o: Sri L' Balaiah' Aged 39 years' Fl/o H No'74-31 5a-lofi, tGnriamarii, Mancherial District' ' ...RESPONDENT NO'1/PETiTIONER lN W'P' No'7028 o12O21

2. State of Telangana, Education DepqtTgl! Rep by its Principal Secretary' ' ii'i""ngr"J Seiiretariat, Hyderabad-500 022 3 Telanoana Residential Educational .lnstitutions Society ITREIS )' Rep by its - cnJiri,in. Mar;ab Tank, HYderabad' ...RESPONDEt'tT No'2 to 3/RESPONDENT No'2 to 3 in W'P'No'7028 ot 2021 IA NO: 20F 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in theaffidavitfiledinsupportofthepetition,theHighCotrrtmaybepleasedto suspend the operati':n of the orders of the Learned Single Judge passed in W'P' No.T02Bof2O2l,dated2g.04.2024pendingdisposalofthelmainWritAppeal. Counsel for the Appellant: SRI P' S' RAJASEKHAR SC FOR TELANGANA siliipueLrc sEilvlcE coMMlssloN(TSPSc) Counsel for the Respondent No'1: MS' M' VANAJAKSHI 4a Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Gp FOR EDUCATTON DEPARTMENT Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI N. BHOOPAL REDDY WRITAPPEAL NO:272OF 2025 writ Appear under crause 15 0f the Letters patent Appear preferred Against order Dated 23t07t2024 passed in wp.No.5904 0t 2021.on the fire of the High Court. Between: Telangana Public Service logllssion (JGPSC), Rep. by its Secretary, M.J Road, Nampally, Hyderabad, Telangana'Stat ...APPELLANT/RESPONDENT NO.1 in W.p. No.5904 of 2021 Mallam Gopal, S/o lsthari. Aged about.4g years, Occ. Teacher, R/o H.No.4_ 56, Vetvarthy Vilase, Vatisoioi lr,tinolr,'iljr[lniu"iiitri.t. AND

1. its secretary, DSS Bhavan Milb i;;[[ft;;il!a soo oza ...RESPONDENT NO.1/PETIT|ONER in W.p. No.5904 of 2O21 2- TelanganaSociar werfare, Residentiar Educationar rnstitutions societv Reo bv 3. Telanqana Minoritv Residential Educational lnstitutions Society, Rep bv its s ecreta ry 62se 6 t 1i 1 noro r.ro i o bil]il' siJ;' ru;it, r La ne Besid e s ha n ka r LaI Jewelers Banjara Hils Htdera-b; sir0'6i,i'"'"' 4. Mahatma Jhvotiba phr rre, fg.lan_gsna Backward classes, welfare Residential tnstitutions Societv. n"" ov iti Secri;il'ilSJ, E'frL, Masab Tank Hyderabad 500 0i8 5' Telangana Residentiar Educgtionar rnstitutions Society, Rep by its secretarv 4th Froor DSS Bhavan opp crricna r.re'iiii;lit"[a"ilro rank Hyderabad 500 ...RESPONDENTS lA NO: 2 oF 202s Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the orders of the Learned singre Judge passed in w.p. No. 5904 oI 2021, dated 2310712024 pending disposal of the main Writ Appeal. w;t' Counsel for the APPellant(s): SRt P. S. RAJASEKHAR, SC FOR TEI-ANGANA STATE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIoN(TSPSC) Counsel for the Respondent No'1: MS' M' VANAJAKSHT Counsel for the Respondent Nos'2 to 5: SRI N' BHOOPAL REDDY The Court Delivered the following: COMMON JUDGMENT & , I I THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HON'BLE SMT. WSTICE RENUKA YARA UIRIT APPEAL N os.270 271 AND 272 of 2025 COMM ON JUDGMENT (Per the Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justbe Sujoy paut): Sri P.S. Rajasekhar, learned Standing Counsel Telangana State pubtic Service Commission (TSPSC), for the appellant and Ms. M. Vanajakshi, learned counsel for respondent No. 1 in all the appeals.

2. Although, W.A.No.270 of 2025 is yet to be listed, on the submission of learned counsel for the appellant that this appeal is arso fired against the similar order as in W.A.Nos.27 I and.272 of 2025, this appeal is also taken up today itself for disposal along with w.A.Nos.27 r and 222 of 2025.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that in the present writ appeals, the impugned orders of learned Single Judge have been complied with and there remains nothing for adjudication. Therefore, he seeks to withdraw these appeals. 2 a\ The otner side has no objection Accordingly, these Writ Appeals are' dismissed as

5. withdrawn. Itlo costs. Interlocutory applications, if any pertding, shall also stand closed //TRUE COPY// SD/.M.MANJULA R DEPUTY REGISTRA ,.,I ", \. stcrtoru oFFlcE R to'.,. On" CC to Sri P. S. Raiasekhar (SC for T-G^PSC) IOPUCI i. 6;; dc i; M; M. Vana'iakshi, Advocate toP-qgl 5. 5;; 6ci; 5; N Bh;;;i Reddv' AdvocateloPucl ;. ifi dd io ir.r,,'cF toi scnoot Education' Hish c ' iJtingrnr. at HYderabadlOUTl 5. Two CD CoPies d,crthe Stateor TJ LSw '4.. ;* HIGH COURT DATED:0510312025 ---i=:1:: =:':.\ : ;-itlF- "ri1' a COMMON JUDGMENT WA.Nos.27O,271 and272 of 2025 e o o ti ri +* l[ 7 APi\ 204 .-/,' I i: r ..\ DISMISSING THE WRIT APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS b