M/s. ANI Technologies Private Ligited v. State of Telangana

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in tne atiOavit filed therewith' the High Court may be ;1";; l" Lsue a *rit, oro"ioiJit""tion particularly one in the nature of wRlT oF IiIANDAMUS declaring tn" i.!,!n"O Order bearing. n o'2D361 224Oo45 1 8M dated O4.1z.2124Annexue - r pr..JJ6V the RespondeniNo. 2 as same being illegal' in- ot principtes oi nli"ar ;'itice and contrary to the mandate, of i.r. "iorrtio" section 107 of the TGST nci oi to i..r" iny other appropriate writ or order as this proper to the facts and circumstances of the i"";ur" High Court ,ry o""J nt present case. 'nd lA NO: 1 OF 20it5 Petition ulder Section 1s1 cpc praying that in thr: cir-cunstances stated in the affidavit filec r11 the petition, the High Court may b: pleased to stay the operation a1d effect of the lmpugned olA bearing na. zl'361224004s18M daled 04.12,2i)2 4 [Annexure -11 passed by Respondent N,o. it "uOron_of counsel for the Petitioner: sRt SANDEEP SACHDEV REPRESE NTTNG FoR sRt. PRAVEEN K NAIR COUNSEI fOr thc RCSPONdENTS: SRI T. CHAITANYA KIRAN REPFIIESENTING FOR SRI SWAROOP CORILLA Speciat Govt pleader for State Tax WRIT PETIT ION NO:7863 0F 2025 Between: -I M/s. AN I soumva M. Havino its office at- 3rd floor, plot No. . 1, KPHEr Phase- S,-Opp. Forum Mail t"n",'rfyOLiiOu,iilran,:tana_ SOOOZ2 ec hnologies Pnvate Limited, Representec by its a ssociate director- 06?. anr 1063, Road No. ...PETITIONER AND 1 State ,lf Te lanoana. thror roh the Principal Secretary, )epartn ent of Revenue, 1_F---qq, Dr E ,R RmueorSr reiunsinJsei;"tri;i: i-i;E;rbe d, retansana_ 500022

2. Appellat! icint Commissioner of.state Tax, Hyderabad Rural Division, Sth floor, C.-'. rlomplex, Nampally, Hyderabad, Tdlangina- 5000r).1

3. Deputv Oorlrnissioner of State Tax, STU- 1 , Hyderabad Rura Division, Hyderabad, Telangana ,..IIESPONDENTS Petitiorr uncer Articre 226 of the constitution of ,rdia praying that in the circumstances st€ted in the affidavit fited therewith, the High rlourt maly oe preasea to issue a \^/ri1., crder or direction particularly one in the r-ratu.e of WRtf Of l'llllDuf\4us dec aring the rmpugned order beiring no.2.D36122,:.004546N dated 04.12.2024 (/rnnexue -1) passed by the Respondeni No. 2 as sam(: ueing illegal, in gross violatic)n o' principles of natural justice and contrary to the mindJte of section 107 of ihe TGST Act or to issue any other appropr ate wril or order as this Hon'ble High courl nay deed fit and propei to the iacts ard r;ircu,nstances of the present case. [A NO: 1 OF 2025 Petitior r rncrer section 1 5'l cpc praying that in the circums-ances stated in the affidavit fited ir s;upport of petition, inJ Hign court mav be pleased to stay the operation and effect of the rmpugned 0lA beari-ng no. zD361z2t.ooa546N datJ 04.12.2024 [Anner:rire -1]passed by Respondent Nd. 2 .the COUNSEI fOr thE PEtitiONCT: SRI SANDEEP SACHDEV REPRESENTING FOR SRI' PRAVEEN K NAIR counsel for the Respondents: sRl T. CHAITANYA KIRAN REPRESENTING FOR SRI SWAROOP OORILLA Special Govt Pleader for State Tax The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER l I THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUST.ICE SU'JOY PAUL AND THE HON'BLE SMT JTISTICE RENUKA YIJIRA WRIT PETITION Nos.7612 and 7863 OF ::2025 COMMOU9-BDE& (Per the Hon'bte the Acting Chief Jt stic< Sujoy paul) ' Srr ll andeep Sachdev, learned couns<:l r.epr rsenting Sri Praveen :(.Nair, learned counsel for the pet,tioner and Sri 1'. {Jh eiitanya Kiran, learned counse .epresenting Sri Swaroc p Oorilla, learned Special Governrrrent plt ader for the respondr;nl ,fitate Tax, for the respondents.

2. V/it.h tlre consent finally heard

3. Drurirrg the course of hearing, the pa-ties rt.ached to a consensl ts It is agreed that since the lea rne 1 Appellate Authorit'r rejected the appeal on the ground thE t rL e petitioner has not prccuced the original documents, il is agrr ed that the impugneC crder, dated O4.I2_2O24, may be sel asrde and the petitior:.e: rl ay be permitted to file the original do:urr ents.

4. Ir ,,ie rv of the consensus arrived at, the r-npt gned ord.er dated (Jz .lt'.2024 is set asrde. The petitroner s rall appear before r.h-^ -Appellate Aurhorit-r.. on 29.O4.2O21j at i LlO pM and shall p,rod u c:e the relevar-rt ori ginal docurnerLts before tfre 2 Appellate Authority. The Appellate Authority shall rehear the petitioner and pass a fresh order, in accordance with law.

5. Accordingly, the Writ Petitions are disposed of without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/-S. MALLI REGI A RAO SECTION OFFICER To, 1 . The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana- 50 F- 39, Dr. B.R. Arnbedkar oo22

2. Appellate Joint Commissioner of State Tax, Hyderabad Rural Division, Sth floor, C.T- Complex, Nampally, Hyderabad, Telangana- 500001

3. Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, STU- 1, Hyderabad Rural Division, Hyderabad, Telangana

4. One CC to SRl. PRAVEEN K NAIR Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP for STATE TAX, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

6. Two CD Copies KKS LS w 1, i HIGH COURT DATED:2310412025 \ \ J ,,i,, ,,,'<: // -)c .. ,') r\:t 't\. r lrlE S I,q, il fl ,turu 2925 -.:: - - /riCHt:O L-. ., ( i ) I )j .{ COMMON ORDER WP.Nos.7612 and 7863 ot 2025 DISPOSING THE WRIT PETITIONS WITHOUT COSTS qc"pfub #*