Prem Singh v. Sfate of Bihar and anothe/ scrupulously. However
Case at a glance
- Bench
- JUWADI SRIDEVI
Outcome
Disposed of
this criminal petition is disposed of directing the Police concerned to
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. ln view of the above, without going into merits of the matter, this criminal petition is disposed of directing the Police concerned to proceed with the investigation in the above crime after issuing notice under Section 35(3) of BNSS (Previously Section 41-Aof Cr.p.C.) to…
Judgment
Cause title
Prem Singh, S/o Hari Singh, aged about 31 years,. Occ Business' Rl/o H- No' 5- b4:'R*i;"h;ilei rnanaa,-i{igdareanctravalf*imits, of Kalher Revenue Mandal' S;h";dA; District, tetangiii Stat". (the FIR not disclosed his full description, origiial narire of the petitioner is Amgoth Prem Singh) ..Petitioner
/Accused No.2 AND ' l.TheStateofTelangana, Rep.byitsPublicProsecutor't1igt.'.Cg"tBuildings' Hyo"tro-iO fnroug6 S.H.O. P.S. Sirgapur, Sangareddy District' 2. AriaVasu Radha Krishna, s/o.Venkata Ramesh, aged abou.t 33 years, occ - ijijiiti,l*, rio. Eot No.t s, vtaltixarlun Nagar Colony' Bharath Nagar'- "'RelpondenUComplainants k""irr*,'nJo"rruio,l"idnginiSiate' - .. PetitionunderSection52SofBNSSprayingthatinthecircumstancesstated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminai Petition, the High Court may be pi"i."a to quash the proceedings in FIR No, 8 of 2025 dated 17-O2-2025 on the file of s.H.o., p.s. sirgapur, .slngareddy District against the Petitioner/Accused No.2. t.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 PetitionunderSection52BofBNSSprayingthatinthecircumstancesstated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminai PLtition, the High Court may be of alt- iurtrer proceedings in FIR No' 8 of 2025 dated pi"u.LO to gr"nt \iiZ-ZOZS 5n the fite ot e.S. Sirgapri, S"ngar"tdy District including arrest of the p"titio*rnc"rsedNo.2tillthedisposaloftheMainQuashPetitiqn' "t"y This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of GroundsofCriminalPetitionanduponhearingtheargumentsofSriGDineshPatil, AdvocateforthePetitionerandtheMr.JithenderRaoVeeramalla, AdditionalPublic Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of None appeared for the' Respondent No. 2. The Court made the following: ORDER 7 I
ORDER:
HON'BL.E SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI CRIMINAL PETITION No.3192 ot 2025 Petitioner, who is arrayed as accused No.2, in Crime No.8 of 2025 of P.S. Sirgiapur, Sanga Reddy District, registered for the offences under Sec:tions 318 (4) and 316 (2) rlw.3 (5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 20113, is seeking to quash the proceedings against
Heard Sri G.Dinesh Patil, learned counsel for the petitiofr'er and Mr. Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public \ Prosecutor appearing for the State and perused the rer; ord I t
Though this petition is filed for quashing the proceedings in the crime, during the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has sought for directions to the. Police to proceed with investigation by issuing notice under Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) (Previously Section 41-A of Cr.P.C ) to the petiticner.
Operative part
ln view of the above, without going into merits of the matter, this criminal petition is disposed of directing the Police concerned to proceed with the investigation in the above crime after issuing notice under Section 35(3) of BNSS (Previously Section 41-Aof Cr.p.C.) to 2 the petitioner and they shall also follow the guidelines of Hon, ble Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar v. Sfate of Bihar and anothe/ scrupulously. However, the petitioner shall submit his defense and co-operate with the lnvestigating Officer as and when required by furnishing information and produce all relevant documents/ material required for the purpose of the investigation and the Investigating Officer shall consider the same before filing appropriate report before the learned [\/agistrate concerned lVliscellaneous application pending, if any, shall stand clos d. s9/ . N. CHANDRA SHE R RAO ASSISTANT RE ISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
The Judicial First Class Magistrate at Narayankhed. 2. The Station House Officer, Sirgapur Police Station, Sangareddy District. 3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. (OUT)
4. One CC to Sri G Dinesh Patil, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies DL o ' 12ota; 8 scc zz; / / I d \ T ) C 1i E S fr.,'e a 0 5 t:.i ?025 :z \, \it HIGH COURT DATED:05/03/2025 ORDER CRLP.No.3192 ot 2025 CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISPOSED OF o {
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: this criminal petition is disposed of directing the Police concerned to
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 35(3); Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.