Smt.Janga Kamala v. The State of Telangana
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Registering Authority
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Section 7 1 of the Registration A<1 ' 1 908 reads S follows Reasons for refusal to register to be recorc ed - (1) Every Sub-Registrar refusing to r( I ister a doctrment' except on the ground that the propel t ' to which…
Judgment
Smt. Janga Kamala, Wo Satyapal Reddy, aged about 57 years, Occ Household, Ryo. H.No.1-9-1 138/A, Shankar Nagar, Beside Hanuman Temple, Hanumakonda' warangal District ...pETrroNER AND
#1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Stamps and Registration Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
#2. The District Registrar, Registration and Stamps, Ranga Reddy District. 3. The Sub-Registrar, Stamps and Registration, Shamshabad, Ranga Reddy District ...RESP'NDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent No. 3 in refusing to receive, register and release sale deed in respect of the Open Plot No.278, admeasuring 611 Sq.Yards or 510.79 Sq. Meters in Survey No.103/43, SRI MANARUPA MEADOWS situated at Shamshabad Village, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without any reason as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and contrary to the provisions of Registration Act 1908 and also contrary to the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court and consequently direct the r€spondent No. 2 and 3 to receive, register and release the sale deed presented by the petitioner in respect of the above said property by following due procedure. lA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to receive, register and release thr: sale deed presented before the 3rd respondent in respect of the Open Plot No.2 78, admeasuring 611 Sq.Yards or 510.79 Sq.Meters, in Survey No.103/4 I "SRl fVANARUPA I\4EADOWS" situated at Shamshabad Village, Shamsh: raci Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B.MADHU SUDHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondents: Ms. T.SWETCHA, AGP FOtl STAMPS AND REGISTRATION The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BT,E SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION No.6458 oF 2026 2"d MARCH,2026. Between: Smt. Janga Kamala AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Stamps and Registration Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and 2 others. ORDER: . . . Petitioner . . Respondents With the consent of both the parties, this Writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself. 2, Heard Sri B.Madhusudhan Rao, iearned counsel for the petitioner and Ms.T.Swetcha, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration appearing for the respondents
#3. Aggrieved by the action of respondent No.3 in refusing to receive, register and release the Sale Deed presented by the petitioner in respect of subject property i.e., Open plot 2 No.278, admeasuring 611 sq' yards (or 510' / ) sq meters) in Survey No.103/43, Sri Manarupa Meadcvs' situated at Sharnshabad Village, Shamshabad Mandzl Ranga ReddY District, the petitioner filed the present Writ : rtitlon Learned Government Pleader submirs' 4 respondents will follow the procedure Section 71 of the Regi'stration Act' 19O8 t.hat the official cori emPlated under
#5. Section 7 1 of the Registration A<1 ' 1 908 reads S follows Reasons for refusal to register to be recorc ed - (1) Every Sub-Registrar refusing to r( I ister a doctrment' except on the ground that the propel t ' to which it relates is not situated within his sub-dist ict sha1l make an order of refusai and recorded his rer; ons for such order inhisBookNo.2,andendorsetlrt:rvords..registration refused" on the document; and' ot-r I pplication made by any person executing or claiming rl rder the document' shall, without payment and unnec'es ;ary delay' give him a coPY of the reasons so recorded' (2) No registering ofhcer shall accr:1r document so endorsed unless ar I provisions hereinafter contained' directed to be registered' for registratlon a until, under the the document is 3 In view of the above submissions coupled with the 6. provision under Sectio n 7l of the Registration Act, 1908, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Registering Authority to receive ald process the document sought to be presented by the petitioner in respect of the subject property, subject to the petitioner complying with the provisions of the Registration Act, 1908 as well as the Indian Stamp Act, 1899' It will be open to the Registering Authority to refuse the document presented before him, if he has any objection, duly reasons ln support of such decision and assigning communicate the said decision to the petitioner' It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case as to the entitlement of the petitioner to get the subject document registered. Miscellaleous petitions, if any, pending shall stard closed. There shali be no order as to costs' //TRUE COPY// Sd/.C.DEEPIKA A SISTANT REGIST SECTION OFFICER De artment, Secretariat, 1 . The Principal Secretary, Stamps and Registratio Hvderabad, State of Telangana. T6e District Registrar, Registrati The Sub-Regisfrar, StamPs and District. o;e aC to SRI B.MADHU SUDHAN RAo, Advocate [oPUC]^ i*o ccsi" opFon srnups AND REGISTRATIoN, High court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT] Two CD Copies on and Stamps. Ranga Reddy District. Registration, Shamshabad, Ranga Reddy To 2 3 4 5
#6. PSK. PMK hL HIGH COURT DATED:0210312026 ORDER WP.No.6458 of 2026 ,11 il-iE.s 14 .\) { a) o d ) t \ 1 ,l ,ii tr)! ,l _o,.\ C,I t DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ( Itl \ $
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Registering Authority
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Registration Act, 1908; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151; Indian Stamp Act, 1899.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.