The High Court · 2025

Counsel for the Appellant :Sri N Praveen Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAAS.No.203 Ol= 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated3l-03-201 1 madeinO.P.No.42 of 2011 onthefileof thecourtof theSenior Civil Judge, at lAlanaparthy. Between: G_.olla Bokkalaiah, S/o.Kistanna, age 72 yeas Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, PebbairMandal,Wanaparthi Distric[. AND The Speci?l Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the r\ppellant :Sii'N Praveen Reddy Counsel for the llespondent : GP for Appeals 27 LAAS.No.234 OF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07 lo4l201 I made in o.P.No. 1 24 0f 201 0 0n the file of the court of the senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. Between: 1 2 3 4 Purnakanti Bokklaiah, S/o.Kistaiah, age 54 years P.Gattaiah, S/o.Bokkaiah, age 34 years Laxmi, Wo.Sreenu, age 44 yearc P.Nagaraju, S/o.Bokkalaiah , age 34 years, All Occ- Agriculture, Rl/o. Ngarala Villag-e, P-ebbairMandal,Wanaparthy District. AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. Appellants/Claimants ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellants :Sri N Praveen Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAAS.No. oF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 16-09-2016 made in O.P.No.3S ot 2016 on.the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. Between: 1 . A.Lacha Goud, S/o Buddaiah Goud, aged 76 years 2. A.Parmeswar Goud, S/o Lacha Goud, aged 34 years 3. A.Narender Goud, S/o Lacha Goud, aged 32 years 4. Komari Balaiah, S/o Veeraiah, aged 74 years 5. Chakali Narasimha @ Ganapuram Narasimha (died) per LRs-, No Address 6. M.Chilukamma,, Wo Late Buchanna, aged 65 years 7. Chakali Narasimha @ Ganapuram Narasimha (died) Per LRs.,, No Address 8. M.Narasimha, S/o Bichanna, aged 39 years 9. Komari Narasimha, S/o K.Chinna Balaiah, aged 65 years 10.Golla Venkatasiash, S/o Sayanna, aged 60 years 28

11. M.Laxmi Devamma(died), per LRs., 12. B.Raghupathi Reddy, S/o Late Gafta Reddy, aged 68 years 13. M.Krishnaiah, S/o Late Kistasiah, aged 58 years 14. M.Venkataiah, S/o Late Kistaiah, aged 60 years 15. M.Shivaiah, S/o Late Kistasiash, aged 55 years 16. M.Govindu, S/o Late Kistaiah, aged 40 years 17. M.Pedda Gattaiah, S/o Late Chinnaiah, aged 68 years 18.M.Bokkalaiah, S/o Late Kistaiah, aged 60 years l9.A.Narsinrha Goud, S/o Late Anjaneyulu Goud, aged 40 years 20. S.Ramal:rishna Rao, S/o Narasimha Rao, aged 60 years 21.Komari Vallamma, Wo Balaiah, aged 79 years 22. D.Chinan Kistanna, S/o Late D.Blaiah, aged 63years 23. D.Rangaswamy, S/o Late D.Balaiah, aged 57 years 24.D.Peeda Kistanna, S/o Late Jabbaraiah, aged 68 years 25. Komari Eralaiah, S/o Late Veeraiash, aged 74 yeas 26. Komari E,oya Srinivasulu, S/o Kistanna, aged 40 years 27. K.Thirupataiah, S/o Balaiah, dged 42 years 28.Lacha Goud, S/o Buddaiah Goud, aged 76 years 29.B.Laxmi Reddy, s/o Bal Reddy, aged 40 years 30. B.Balasuamy, S/o Late balaiah, aged 65 years 3 t. B.Sai Re,Jdy, S/o Bal Reddy, aged 38 years 32. G.Shankeramma, Wo Late Buddaiah, aged 65 years 33. B.Ramulamma, Wo Swamy Reddy, aged 68 years 34. Komari Ravi, S/o Late Pedda Kukkanna, aged 55 years 35. B.Bhavanth Reddy, S/o Bheem Reddy, aged 62 years 36. K.Narasimha, S/o Chinna Kukkanna, aged 56 years 37. Charakonda Jayamma, Wo Narasimha, aged 48 years 38. K. Laxmi, Wo Komari Shekar, aged 49 years 39. B.Ram Reddy, S/o Bheem Reddy, aged 58 years 40. G.Kurum;anna (died), per LRs., 41. D.Boya Chinna Kistdnna, S/o Late Balaiah, aged 63 years 42. K.Chennamma, Wo Late Beesanna, aged 48 years 43. K.Pentanrrha, W/o Late K.Narsimha, aged 56 years 44. B.Rathna Reddy (died), per LRs., 45. K.Kurumaiah, S/o Cheviti Balaiah, aged 46 years 46.K.Chinna Balaiah, S/o Pedda Buchanna, aged 68 years 47. H.Bokkalaiah, S/o Kistaiah, aged 60 years 48. H.Santhaiah, S/o Yellaiah, aged 65 years 49. K.Ayyanna (died), per LRs., t 29

50.S.Devamma, Wo Buchanna, aged 61 years 51. M. Mallaiah (died), Per LRs., 52. K.Shankaraiah, S/o Balaiash, aged 59 years 53. B.Venkateswar Reddy, S/o Bal Reddy, aged 60 years 54.Chennamma, W/o K.Balaswamy, aged 66 years 55. B.Megha Reddy, S/o Gatta Reddy, aged 68 years 56.Arolla Suiatha, D/o Late Narsimha, aged 36 years 5T.Ganapuram Radha, Wo Kistaiah, aged 34 years 58.G'anapuram Nirmala, Wo Krishnaiah, aged 40 years 5g.Ganapuram Venkataiah, s/o Late Narsimha, aged 42years 60.Ganapuram Laxmi Devamma, Wo Late Narasimha, aged 70 years (Appellant - - ttoJ.S'0 to 60 are the LRs. Of Appellant No'5) 61.Arolla Sujatha, D/o Late Narasimha, aged 36 years 62.Ganapuram Radha, Wo Kistaiah, aged 34 years 63.Ganapuram Nirmala, Wo Krishnaiah, aged 40 years 64.Ganapuram venkataiah, s/o Late Narasimha, aged 42 years 65.Ganaouram Laxmi Devamma,,Wo Late Narasimha, aged 65 years (Appellant - - lrtos.61 to 65 are the LRs of Appellant No.7) 66. Sunitha, D/o Late Gall Reddy, aged 38 years 67.Jagan Reddy, S/o Late Gall Reddy, aged 56 years 68. Prabhakar Reddy, S/o Late Gall Reddy aged 54 years 69. Bal! Reddy, S/o Late Gall .Reddy, aged 58 years (Appellant Nos'66 to 69 are the LRs of APPellant No.11)

70.G.Laxmi Devamma, Wo Late Kurumanna, aged 68 years 71. G.Srinivasulu, S/o Late Kurumanna, aged 48 years 72. G.Chennaiah, S/o Late Kurumanna, aged 46 years 73.G.Shivudu, S/o Late Kurumanna, aged 43 years (Appellant Nos'70 to 73 are the LRs of APPellant No.40)

74.Beesam Pedda Manemma,, wo Rathnas Reddy, aged 68 years 75. Besasm Nagi Reddy, s/o Late Rathna Reddy, aged 48 years 76. Sujatha, D/o Late Rathna Reddy, aged 45 years 77. Srilatha, D/o Late Rathna Reddy, aged 38 years (Appellant Nos'74 to 77 are

78.Golla Rang3mma,D{9 lateAyyanna, aged 41 years (Appellant No'78 is the the LRs of APPellant No.44) LR of ApPellant No.49) Tg.Chilukamma, Wo Late Buchanna, aged 65 years 80.Sharadha, Wo Late Maltaiah, aged 36 years 81. Shirish a, Dlo Late Mallaiah, aged 36 years 82. Gayathri, D/o Late Mallaiah, aged 37 years (Appellant Nos'79 to 82 are the LRs of APPellant No.51) All are agriculturists and R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District 30 AND The Special [)eputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, War aparthy District. ...Appel lants/Claimants ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellants :Sri N Praveen Reddy Counsel for the Respondent: GP for Appeals LAAS.No.21l OF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order ald decree dated 31/03/201'l made in O.P.No.4 of 2011 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at \l/anaparthy. Between:

1. Bijja Laxmi, Wo. Balaram, age 52 years, 2. Janaki, D/o.Balaram, age 35 years, All Occ- Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AND The Special Ereputy Collector, Rajiv Lifi lrrigation Scheme -Phase- ll, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellants :Sri N Praveen Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAAS.No.212 Oa' 2025 Appeal un,Jer Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08-04-2011 made in O.P.No.170 ol 201O on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at !\fanaparthy. Between:

1. Komari Kurmaiah, S/o.Pedda Kistanna, age 66 years 2. Suvarna, D/o.Kurmaiah, age 39 years All Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal,Wanaparthy District. AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants .fl. -{r.1'" *1 i I 3l ...ResPondenUResPondent Counsel for the Appellants :Sri N Praveen Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAAS.No.213 OF 2025 dated 07_* _zotffi;J;il o.p.r.ro.iss'oi'2010 o,i*," ii" oitn" court of the senior Cirif lrOge, at WanaParthY' AppealunderSection5lglL.A.Actlsg4aggrievedbytheorderanddecree Between:

1. Chintakunta Shanthaiah' S/o'Yellaiah' age74 years 2 c Krishna..qU:f".*"tn,rJlffxl1ffi*oxifiit lSft:? Ngarala Village' PeDDalrMaIr(rartYYqlrqre'1"' -'- o" occ: Agricurture' R/o ...Apperants/craimants AND I:Efff "',fi lff#i*.r'8'S,?ls{ , Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll' Pebbair' at RespondenUResPondent Counsel for the Appellants :Sri N Praveen Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAAS.No.214 OF 2025 on tt"-ir" ofttt court of the senior AppealunderSectionslg!L.A.Actlsg4aggrievedbytheorderanddecree dated 07to4t2o1ri""o"il'-6'p'r'ro'rab'oDoro Cirif tuOge, at WanaParthY' Between: I f"?i: t' l[l[3F3Ba"'/i'Ii[3'' Balaiah, XSe-71.Y.ears Occ' Agriculture' Ri/o' WinaParthY District' ...ApPellanUGlaimant AND , Raiiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll' Peb'bair' at I:Ef"H"'lfi lP;tiiv.r'BIs,?13{ ...ResPondenUResPondent Gounsel for the Appellant :Sri N Praveen Reddy Gounsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAAS.No.215 oF 2025 32 Appear under section 54 0f L-A. Act 1gg4 aggrieved by the order and decree 2bii #il; fire of the court of the senior datd 0z-04-21)11 made in o.p.No.'r8s Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. "; Between:

1. Komari llalaswamy, S/o.Balaiah, age 75 years ' [;:]:',:'uil3::,"JIt?":ift"'#:iwjlr",oxn_?i"]!ffi[r A,,occ: Asricu,ture, R/o ...Appellants/Ctaimants AND il8fff",,0j,?r"fjiyrfs',1,::iff Rajiv Lift rrrigation scheme-phase{, pebbair, at ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellants : Sri N praveen Reddy Counset for the Respondent : Gp for Appeals LAAS.No.21 60F20 25 Appeal untter Section 54.of L-A Act-1gg4 aggrieved by the Order dated 07-04-201 ' made in o.p.No.186 0f 2010 #inu nr" of the court of the senior d""r." Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. "nd Between:

1. K.Tirupatheriah, S/o.Balasivamy, age 55 years '[nt"]:'E#li[A:,":'&:f lf, :Xtfl ,yn"X6"X.r/3fl AND i,i"f ',occ:Asricurture,R/o ...AppellanUClaimants I!3 Pf Wl"Tglltr"B,,:T3,1, Raj iv Lift r rrisation scheme-p hase- il, pebba ir, at ...RespondenURespondent JJ Counsel for the Appellants :Sri N Praveen Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAAS .No.217 OF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Orderand decree dated oaio+tzol1 made in o.p.No.168 of 2o1o on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at WanaParthY- Between:

1. Boya Sripuram Buchanna, S/o.Gattaiah' age 64 years 2. Shivamma, D/o.Buchanna, age 34 yqqrl All Occ. Agriculture' R/o' Ngarala Village, PebbairMandal,Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Glaimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, at Pebbdir, WanaParthY District. ...Respondent/ResPondent Counset for the Appellants :Sri N Praveen Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAAS No.218 OF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order-and decree dated oiioqtzotl made in o.p.No.136 of 2o1o on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at WanaParthY. Between:

1. Balakistaiah, S/o.Narsimha, age 74 y93ls-Occ: Agriculture, R/o' Ngarala Village, PebbairMandal,Wanaparthy District'

2. Narasimha, S/o.B"lakistaiah, age 5!. YQa.rs Occ: Agriculture, R/o' Ngarala Village, PebbairMandal,Wanaparthy District' AND The SpecialDeputy Collectbr, Rajiv Lift Irrigation Scheme-Phase-t!, Pebbair, at Pebbdir, WanaParthY District. ...RespondenUResPondent ..APPellants/Claimanb Counsel for the Appellants :Sri N Praveen Reddy Counset for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAAS.N 219 0F 2025 34 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree daledoT-04-2o'1 'l madeino.P.No.179of 20l0onthefileof thecourtof thesenior Civil Judge, at VVanaparthy. Between:

1. Komari Ravi, S/o.K.Kukkanna, age 54 years, 2. Komari Raju, S/o.Kukkanna, age 49 years, 3. Komari Suresh, S/o.Kukkanna, age 46 years 4. Komari Shankar, S/o.Kukkanna, age 44 years, All Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, PebbairMandat,Wari'aparthi Distiict. AND The.Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-phase-ll, pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellants :Sri N Praveen Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAAS.No. 220 OF 2025 Appeal under section 54 of L.A. Act 't894 aggrieved by the order and decree dated 02-06-20't'l made in o.p.No.146 ot 2011 on the file ofthe court of the senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy Between: B.Mega1leddy,-$/o Gatt3 Reddy_, Age 7.8 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, PebbairMandat,WanaparthyDistrict. . AND The.Special Dr:puty Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-phase_ll, pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanerparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant ... RespondenURespondent Counsel for the l\ppellant :Sri N Praveen Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : Gp for Appeats 35 LAAS No.22l OF Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated oT -04-201 l made in o.P.No.'t 73 0f 20l 0 0n the fi le of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at WanaParthY. Between: '1. Chennamma, w/o.Kavali Beesanna, age 54 years 2. Narsimha, S/o.Kavali Beesanna, age 34 years All Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o. Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal,Wanaparthy District. AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lnigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellants :Sri N Praveen Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAAS .No.226 OF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 16-09-2016 made in O.P.No.37 of 2015 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. Between: Bala Swamy, S/o Balaiah, Aged about 65 years, Occ : Agriculture, R/o Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal,Wanaparthy District. AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant :Sri N Praveen Reddy Counset for the Respondent : GP for Appeals 36 LAAS.No.237 OF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.20 l0 made in O.P.No.4'17 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at'u1/anaparthy. Between: Suthari Venkatswamy, S/o. Buchanna, aged 65 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift irrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for ther Respondent : GP for Appeals LAAS.No. 238OF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03/03/20'10 made in O.P.No.418 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at \Nanaparthy. Between: Suthari Ravi, S/o. Buchanna, aged 53 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Mllage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AND The Special )y.Collector, Rajeev Lifl lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Nppeliant: Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAAS.No.239 OF 2025 37 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03-03-2010 made in O.P.No.392 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. Between: Yugendhar, S/o. Venkataswamy, aged 35 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Villbge, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-l!, Pebbair, District. ...AppellanUClaimant .RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant :Sri Ravula Shankar Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAAS.No.?4O OF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in O.P.No.411 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. Between: Suthari Savaraiah, S/o. Chinna Gattaiah, aged 85 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift Irrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. .AppellanUClaimant RespondenURegpondent Counsel for the Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : Gp for Appeals 38 LAAS.No.?41 CtF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated O3tO3t2O'10 made in O.P.No.444 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at \A/anaParthY. Between: G.Naveen, Si/o. G. Sundaraiah, aged 38 years, Occ : Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ...AppellanUClaimant ... RespondenURespondent Counsel for ther Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Gounsel for ther Respondent : GP for Appeals LAAS.No.242 OtF 2O25 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in O.P.No.381 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at \Vanaparthy. Between: G. Anandu, S/o. Chinna Buchanna, aged 51 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, rfistrict. ...AppellanUClaimant RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant :Sii Ravula Shankar Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals * 39 LAAS.No.243 OF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in O.P.No.445 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. Between: Gunti Maralaiah, S/o. Kondanna, Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanapa aged 55 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala rthy District. AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ...AppellanUClaimant RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP'for Appeals LAAS.No.248 OF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 0310312010 made in O.P.No.451 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. Between: Sreenivaslu, S/o. Anjaneyulu, Age 57 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. Nagarala AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ...AppellanUClaimant RespondenURespondent Gounsel for the Appellant : Sri V Manohar Rao Gounsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals 40 LAAS.No.249 OtF 2025 Appeal urider Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Orderand decree dated O3iO3l2O10 made in O.P.No.391 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at VUanaParthY. Between: Kadukuntla V'enkatswamy, S/o. Ranganna, qgeQ 63 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbaii Mandal,.Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ... RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant :Sri Ravula Shankar Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAAS.No.2S0 OF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated O3tO3l2O10 made in O.P.No.430 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at VVanaparthY. Between: G. Gopi, S/o. G. Venkataswamy, aged 35 years, Occ : Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Villagd, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-!1, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appeltant :Sii V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals 4t LAAS.No.2SI OF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03/03/2010 made in O.P.No.378 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. Between: Gunti Pedda Bauchanna, S/o. Balaiah, Aged 73 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebb'air, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant ... RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant :Sri Ravula Shankar Reddy Gounse! for the Respondent: GP for Appeats LAAS.No.2S3 OF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03/03/2010 made in O.P.No.429 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. Between: Gunti Venkataswamy, S/o. Gopanna, aged 60 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals 42 LAAS .No.256 OF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in o.P.No.453 0f 2009 0n the file of the court of the senior Civil Judge, at lVanaparthy Between: Cheerla Laxmanna, S/o. Jambulaiah, aged 95 Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Dis years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o trict. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special l)y.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenuRespondent Counsel for the Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAAS.No.297 OF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03/03/2010 made in O.P.No.456 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at VVanaparthy. Between: Rajesh, S/o. Venkaswamy, Aged 45 years, Occ. Agriculture, Nagarala Village, Pebbair Man,lal, Wanaparthy District. AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant ...RespondenuRespondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals 43 LAAS.No.298 OF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in O.P.No.448 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. Between: S. Nagesh, S/o. Anjaneyulu aged 73 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ...AppellanUClaimant ... RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAAS.No.301 OF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in O.P.No.400 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. Between: Vemmula Ramu Village, Pebbair lu, S/o Rangaiah, aged 60 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Mandal, Wanaparthy District AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift Irrigation Scheme,Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ...AppellanUClaimant ... RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant :Sii V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals 44 LAAS.No. oF 2025 Appeal urrder Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03t03t2010 made in O.P.No.312 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at VVanaparthy. Between: Gunti Nagesh, S/o. Kistanna, Ag9 5_7 ygars, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ...AppellanUCIaimant ... RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAAS.No. oF 2025 Appeal urrder Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in O.P.No.323 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at VUanaparthy. Between: V. Shekar, S;/o. Ramaswamy, age 60 years, Occ : Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant ... RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAAS.No.305 OF 2025 45 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03/03/2010 made in O.P.No.316 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy Between: Praveen, S/o. Bhujangam, age 40 gars, Occ : Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP.for Appeals LAAS.No.306 OF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in O.P.No.318 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. Between: Vishnu, S/o. Bhujangam, age 42 years, Occ: Agriculture R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AND The Special Dy.Gollector, Rajeev Lifi lrrigation Scheme, / Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals 46 LAAS.No.307 ()F 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.20'10 made in O.P.No.313 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. Between: Gunti Sailu, S/o. Yenganna, age 85 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Manda[, Wanaparthy District. AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for thr: Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for thr: Respondent : GP for Appeals LAAS.No. oF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.20,l0 made in O.P.No.350 of 2009 on the file of the court'of the Senior Civil Judge, at vl/anaparthy. Between: A. Vidyasaltar, S/o A. Chendrayudu, age 47 years, Occ. Agriculture R/o. Nagaraia Viliage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for thr: Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for thr: Respondent : GP for Appeals 47 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in o.P.No.321 0f 2009 0n the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. S.Krishnaiah, S/o. Sayanna, age 55 years, Occ: Agriculture R/o. Nagarala Villarge, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant D The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals 7Iil,B Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in O.P.No.371 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy Gunti Buchanna, S/o. Laxmaiah, age 80 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant D The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals 48 I Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in O.P.No.324 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. V. Nagesh, S/o. Ramaswamy, age 53 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Peblrair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. D The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. .AppellanUClaimant RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP for Appeals Appeal urder Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03/03/20'10 made in O.P.No.330 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at \A/anaparthy. M. Anil Kumar, S/o. M. Narasimhulu, age 53 years, Occ : Agriculture, Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ..AppellanUClaimant The Special )y.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals 49 LAAS.No.313 OF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03-03-2010 made in O.P.No.334 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. Between: G. Suresh, S/o.G. Munakar, age 53 Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy D years, istrict. occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ...AppellanUClaimant ..,RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAAS.No.314 OF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 0310312010 made in O.P.No.356 of 2OOg on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. Between: A Kistanna, S/o, Chinna Buchanna, Age 80 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ...AppellanUClaimant ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appeltant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals 50 LAAS.No.315 OF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in o.P.No.315 0f 2009 0n the file of the court of the senior Civil Judge, at VVanaparthy. Between: Krishnaiah, .S/o Bhujangam, age 50 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. Nagarala AND The Special I)y.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy )istrict. ...AppellanUClaimant ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAAS.No.3I6 OF 2025 Appeal urrder Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03-03-2010 made in O.P.No.365 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy Between: M. Manyamlionda, S/o. M. Ramanna, age 65 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagara16 Vill:rge, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AND The Special [)y.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy l)istrict. ...AppellanUClaimant ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals 5l LAAS.No.317 OF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 'l 894 aggrieved by the Order apd decree dated 03.03.2010 made in o.P.No.310 0f 2009 0n the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. Between: Gopal, S/o. Kistanna, age 60 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o' Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counset for the Respondent :GP for Appeals LAAS.No.318 OF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in o.P.No.342 0f 2009 0n the file of the court of the senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. Between: Gunti Ravi, S/o. Laxmanna, age 45 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUGlaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll' Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counse! for the Appellant :Siri V iianohar Rao Counset for the Respondent : GP for Appeals 52 LAAS.No.321 OF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 't894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in O.P.No.373 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at VVanaparthy. Between: G. Venkatsuramy, S/o. G. Buchanna, age 55 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant ... RespondenURespondent Gounsel for the Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAAS.No.322 OF 2025 Appeal urrder Section 54 oI L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated O3lO3l2O10 made in O.P.No.322 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Vt/anaparthy. Between: Vemula Ramaswamy, S/o. Pedda Ranganna, age 90 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift Irrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellantlClaimant ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals { 53 LAAS.No. 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03-03-2010 made in o.P.No.353 0f 2009 0n the file of the court of the senior Civil Judge, at WanaparthY. Between: A. Ravi, S/o.Pedda Bichanna, age 53 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counset for the Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counset for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAAS.No.324 OF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in o.P.No.332 0f 2009 0n the file of the court of the senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. Between: G. Gunti Munakar, S/o Laxmaiah, age 73 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair' Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals 54 LAAS .325 F 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A' Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order-and {ecr9e UateO OilbSlZOl0 made in O.P.No.349 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at \VanaParthY. Between: Chandrayu Village, Pe du. S/o. Pedda Buchanna, age 70 years, Occ: Agriculture Nagarala btriir Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll' Pebbair' Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenUResPondent Counsel for the Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAAS .No.326 I AppealunderSection54ofL.A.Actlsg4aggrievedbytheorderanddecree OateU od-b3-2010 made in o.P.No.346 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at'A/anaParthY. Between: G. Krishnairrh, S/o. Pedda Gopanna, aS9 7p. years, Occ: Agriculture' R/o' rlig jilti Viiiise, Pebbair Mandai, Wanapahhv District' ...AppellantlClaimant AND TheSpecialDy.Collector,RaleevLiftlrrigationScheme,Phase-ll,Pebbair' WanaparthY District. ...RespondenUResPondent Counsel for thr: Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counse! for the Respondent : GP for Appeals I 55 LAAS.No.327 OF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order-and decree dated o3iogl2o10 made in o.P.No.337 of 20og on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at WanaParthY. Between: Vemula Gopa!, S/o. Ramakistaiah,.499.6.0.y.ears, Occ: Agriculture, R/o' Nagarala Village, Petibair Mandal, Wanaparthy District' ...ApPellanUClaimant AND The Special WanaparthY Dy. Collector, Raj-eev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ... RespondenUResPondent Counset for the Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAAS.No.328 OF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order-and decree dated Oi.Og.ZOt0 made in O.P.No.311 of 20Og on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at WanaParthY. Between: G.Vishnu, S/o. Gopal, age 43 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District- ..AppellanUClaimant AND The Special WanaParthY Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Distrlct. RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appetlant :Sri V Manohar Rao Gounsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals 56 LAAS.No.329 CrF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in o.P.No.341 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at lA/anaparthy Between: G.unti Ramesh, S/o. Laxmanna, age Villalge, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Distiict. -40 y-ears, Occ: Agriculture, R/o.. Nagarala AND The Special lfy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, phase-ll, pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeats LAAS.No.330 OF 2025 Appeal under section 54 of L.A. Act 1g94 aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03.03.201 c made in o.P.No.351 of 2009 on the file of the court of the senior Civil Judge, at V/anaparthy. Between: fl,..Bal [ajy, S/o.-Chend.rayudu, age4.0 y.ears, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbrrir Mandal, Wanaparth'y District. AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, phase-ll, pebbair, vvanapanny L,tstnct. ...AppellanUClaimant ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the ,Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for the llespondent : GP for Appeats 57 LAAS .No.331 OF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Orderand decree dated 0i.03.2010 made in O.P.No.372 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. Between: G. Sreenu, S/o. G. Buchanna, age 53 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Villarge, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appella$ :Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAAS.No.332 OF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 'l 894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03/03/2010 made in o.P.No.345 0f 2009 0n the file of the court of the senior Civil Judge, at WanaparthY. Between: G. Raiu, S/o. G. Bheemudu, age 45 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Villagei, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. .,.RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals 58 LAAS.No.333 OF 2025 Appeal urrder section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 made in O.P.No.339 of 2009 on ine file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at VVanaParthY- Between: S. Satvanna S/o. Mashanna, age 5!. years' Occ Village, Pebb air Mandal, Wanaparthy L'lstnct' Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala ...AppellanUClaimant AND The SPecial DY.Collecto WanaiarthY District. r, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair' ...RespondenUResPondent Counsel for ther Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for ther Respondent : GP'ior Appeals LAAS.No.334 CtF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-20 r 0 made in o.p.No.34g of 2009 on ine fire of the court of the senior Civit Judge, at'A/anaParthY. Between G. Gooal. s/o. Narayana, age 43 years, occ: Agriculture, R/o' Nagarala Village' peOOair Mandal, Wahaparthy District ...AppellanUCIaimant AND The SPecial DY.Collector WanaiarthY District. , Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, ... RespondenUResPondent Counsel for th,e APpellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for th'e Respondent :GP for Appeals t r1 59 LAAS.No.33S OF 2025 Appeal under section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the order and decree dated o3lo3t2o10 made in o.p.No.366 0f 2o0g on fne file of the court of the senior Civil Judge, at WanaParthY. Between M.Venkatswamy, S/o. M. Ramanna, Agg. 61,-Y.9,?1"' Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, wanaparthy Lllstnct. Occ: Agriculture, R/o. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special DY.Collector WanailarthY District. , Rajeev Lift lirigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, ..RespondenUResPondent Gounsel for the Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAAS.No.336 OF 2025 Appeal under section 54 ol L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the order-and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in o.P.No.328 0f 2oo9 0nthe file of the court of the senior Civil Judge, at WanaParthY. Between: M.Narasimhulu, S/o. M. Kistanna, ?ge-qq years, Occ : Agriculture, R/o' Nagarala Viiiage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...APPellanUClaimant AND The Special WanaparthY Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ...RespondenUResPondent Counsel for the Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao .i Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals * 60 LAAS.No.337 CtF 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in O.P.No.364 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at tNanaparthy. Between: M.Ramanna S/o. Narasimha, age 95 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Villdge, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for ther Appellant : Sri V iianohar Rao Counsel for th€, Respondent : GP for Appeals LAAS.No.338 C'F 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03/03/2010 made in O.P.No.326 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at \Vanaparthy. Between: M. Ram Chandraiah, S/o. M.Kistanna, age 75 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Vill,age, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AND The Special l)y.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy l)istrict. ...AppellanUClaimant ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals 6l Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03/03/2010 made in O.P.No.352 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. 'it A. Ven Nagarala Village, , S/o. Pedda Buchanna, 57 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Mandal, Wanaparthy District. D The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, / Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District .AppellanUClaimant RespondenURespondent Gounsel for the Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals No.340 OF Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in O.P.No.347 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. G. Narayana, S/o. Pedda Gopanna, age 70 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase- ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ..RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent :GP for Appeals 62 LAAS.No.341 CtF 2025 Appeal uhder Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and dated O3iO3t2O10 made in O.P.No.343 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Civil Judge, at ly'Uanaparthy. decree Senior Between: G. Krishnaiah, S/o. G. Laxmaiah, age 55 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Villdge, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-!1, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant ..RespondenURespondent Counsel for ther Appellant :Sri V Manohar Rao Gounsel for ther Respondent : GP for Appeals The Court deliv'ered the following: COMMON JUDGMENT THE HON'BLE SRI IUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HoN,BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA 1 2t I 217 L 1 L

339. 340 AND 341 0F 2025 CoMMoNIUDGMENT:(PerHort'bleSri}usticeAbhinandKumarShavili) Since the issue involved in all these apPeals is one and the same, all these appeals are being hearrl and disposed of by way of this common judgment.

2.HeardSriV.ManoharRao,SriN.PraveenReddy, Sri Ravula Shankar Reddy and Sri ? Venkateshwar Reddy, learned counsel for the appellants-claimants and the learned Government Pleader for Appeals appearing for the respondent'

3. Learped counsel for the appellants had contended that the lands along with structures belonging to the appellants were acquired by the Government for the purpose of irrigation projects' Learned counsel further contended that the State Government has ..- ,| r '':--...--.,-....--..-*-* ---{ 2 AKS,J & ETD,J L.A.A.S.No.29 of 2025 & batch issued C;.O.Ms.N0.234, dated 15.1,0.1993, ordering enhancement of compenliation by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land A,:quisition Officer for acquisition of the house sites and structurr:s for Srisailam Project, and a Division Bench of this Court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 has taken a decision that the said G.O. applies to all other irrigation Proiects also and accordingly, allowed L.A.A.s.No.4 of 2076 aide iudgment, dated 15.09.2022, enhancirrg the market value by two mo.re times (1+2) than the value fbred by the Land Acquisition Officer with all consequential benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act.

4. Learned counsel for the appellants had further contended that fotl,rwing the said judgment, dated 15.09.2022, the very same DivisiorL Bench has disposed of L.A.A:S.No.125 of 2015 and batctU aide conrmon judgment, dated 27.09.2022. Aggrieved by the said conunorr judgment, dated 27.09.2022, the State has carried the matter to the Honourable Supreme Court by filing S.L.P.(Civil).No.28925 of 2024 and the same was dismissed by the Honourable Supreme Court uide order, dated 17.09.2024, r( i J AKS,J & ETD,J L.A.A.S.No.29 of 2025 & batch confirming the common judgment, dated 27.09.2022. Therefore, following the judgment, dated 15.09.2022, rendered in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 201,6 and also the common judgment dated

27.09.2022, rendered in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2A15 and batch, the present appeals also deserve to be disposed of by enhancing the market value by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer with all consequential benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act.

5. Further, learned counsel for the appellants had fairly conceded that the appeals are filed with delay of nearly 4000 to 5000 d.ays, as admittedly, the appellants are Poor farmers and illiterates, and therefore, interest may be denied for the delay period in preferring the appeals.

6. Learned Government Pleader apPearing for the respondent did not dispute the same.

7. In the present cases, the lands were acquired for the purpose of Rangasamudram Balancing Reservoir and Priyadarshini ]urala 4 AKS,J & ETD,J L.A.A.S.No.29 of 2025 & batch Project. Admittedly, except for the delay, the rest of the issues in the prese)nt appeals are squarely covered by the judgment, dated

15.09.2022, rendered in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 20'I..6 and also the common judgment, dated 27.09.2022, rendered in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch, which was confirmed by the Honourable Supreme Court ai,Ce order, dated 17.09.2024, in S.L.P.(Civil).No.28925 of

2024. Therefore, this Court is of the view that all the appeals can be disposed of in terms of the aforesaid judgments, dated

15.09.2022 and 27.09.2022,by enhancing the market value by two more tinres (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer

8. Ac<:ordingly, all the appeals are disposed of in terms of the judgment, dated 15.09.2022, rendered by this Court in L.A.A.S.NIo.4 of 201,6 and also the common judgment, dated

27.09.2022, rendered by this Court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch, b1' enhancing the market value by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer with all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land r 5 AKS,J & ETD,J L.A.A.S.No.29 of 2025 & batch Acquisition Act. However, it is made clear that the appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period in preferring the appeals. Miscellaneous Applications, Lf. any, pending in these appeals shall stand closed. Tl'rere shall be no order as to costs. ,/,, To, //TRUE COPY,, SD'. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. The Senior Civil Judge, Narayanapet District 3. One CC to SriV- Manohar Rao, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri N. Praveen Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri Ravula Shankar Reddy, Advocate IOPUCI 6. One CC to Sri s. Venkateshwar Reddy, Advocate [oPUC] - - . 7. Two CCs to GP FoR APPEALS, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

8. Two CD CoPies ADK/gh W 64 HIGH COIJRT DATED:21110412025 r"ir: Q ii. 2 1 SEP 2IE! * o =i 3t 170- 171- 172_ 173. 75-177.178. f86. 188. 195. 197.19A. 1 .202.203.234.235. 1 awt 1 1 1 150 1 1 1 3t 217 21 21 301 3FE 7 zf,g 1 3 DISPOSIN G c :l OSTS E LAAS s THE HON'BLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M.G. PRTYADARSINI L.A.A.S.Nos.125. 144.27O and 356 of 2O15.62 and 68 of 2O21 COMMON JUDGMENT : (per Justice G. Sri Devi) The hs in this batch of Appeals preferred by the claimants pertain to common acquisition proceedings and therefore, they are heard together and being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. Heard learned counsel for the claimants and Sri D.Kiran, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent. Perused the material available on record.

3. The present acquisition was for the purpose of submergence of Priyadarshini Joorala Project/ancillary projects under Priyadarshini Joorala Project. This Court uide judgment, dated L5.O9.2O22 has already elaborately analysed the evidence and considered the identical issue raised in these appeals in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016. Both the counsel have not disputed the factum of commonality of the evidence and the issue in these appeals and in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2[l6,wherein this Court has allowed the appeal enhancing the market value by two more 2 times (,.'..+21 than the value fixed by the L.A.O. with all other consequential benefits as stipulated under the amended Act.

4. Therefore, following the judgment passed by this Court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016, dated 15.09.2022 and for the reasons 'stated therein, all these appeals stand disposed of by enhancing the market value of the acquired land by two more times (l+21 than the value fixed by the L.A.O. with all other consequential benefits as stipulated under the amended Act. No order as to Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI JUSTICE M.G. PRIYADARSINI

27.09.2022 gkv/tsr Note: Office to append a copy of the:judgment in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 with the present judgment. B/o gkv/tsr .{t THE HON'BLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M.G. PRTYADARSINI L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2O16 COMMON JUDGMENT : (per Justice G. Sri Devi) . This appeal is preferred by the claimants seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by the Senior Civil Judge at Narayanpet (hereinafter referred to as "the reference Court") in L.A.O.P.No.47 of 2OL2, dated 19.03.2013. By the impugned order, the reference Court has awarded the market value for the houses/structures of the claimants one time more (1+1) than what was awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer in Award No.S+ of 2O1 1, dated 10.11 .2OLL-

2. The houses and structures of the claimants situated in Anugonda Village, were acquired by the Government for the purpose of submergence under Priyadarshini Joorala Project, by issuing draft notification under Section a (1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short "the Act") on O9.O9.2OO9. After due enquiry, the Land Acquisition Officer has passed an award. on 10.11 .2OlL fixing compensation for houses, structures and open places on the basis of prevailing rates as on the date of notification relying upon the valuation lixed by the requisition authority, Irrigation Department. The claimants having reieived the compensation under protest, sought for reference to the civil Court under Section 18 of the Act, seeking 2 GSD,J&MGP,J Laas 4 2016 enhancernent of compensation. By the impugned order, the reference Court has enhanced the market value one time more (1+1) than what was awerded by the Land Acquisition Officer. Seeking further enhancernent of compensation, the claimants preferred the present appeal.

3. He,rrd the learned counsel for the appellantsfclaimants and Sri D.Kiran, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Appeals. Perused the mater:ial available on record.

4. Thr: main contention of the learned counsel for the claimants is that even under the Government Orders i.e., G.O.Ms.No.234, dated

15.10. 1993, marked as Ex.A6, the Government has passed orders granting compensatton 7+2 times for the houses/structures acquired in respect of Srisailam Project. It is submitted that inasmuch as the present acquisition of the houses/structures of the claimants also for the purpose of irrigation project i.e., Priyadarshini Joorala Project, Ex.A6 is r:qually applies to the case of the claimants and therefore, the learned counsel seeks to enhance the market value of the compenszrtion 1+2 times than what was awarded by the L.A.O.

5. The, Assistant Gpvernment Pleader for Appeals would submit that the i.O. covered by Ex.A6 was issued in respect of Srisailam project and whereas the present acquisition pertains to Priyadarshini t s-! 3 GSD,J&MGP,J Laas 4 2016 Joorala Project, for which no specific G.O. was issued by the Government and therefore, Ex.A6 cannot be taken into consideration. He further submits that as seen from Ex.Al, the reference Court, in respect of earlier acquisition in O.P.No.611 of L999, has enhanced the market value by one time more than the value fixed by the L.A.O. As seen from Ex.A2, this Court in A.S.No.3375 of 2OOO has confirmed the market value fixed in Ex.Al. Even the Apex Court, as seen from Ex.A3, has dismissed the appeal confirming the fixation of the said market value by the reference Court. Therefore, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Appeals, relying on Ex.A3, submits that the market value fixed by the reference Court is based on evidence and needs no interference by this Court.

6. A perusal of the record discloses that in respect of the earlier acquisition proceedings pertaining to Gaddampally H/o. Anugonda Village, the reference Court has passed orders in O.P.No.29 of 2OO4 and Batch, dated 23.OL.2OO6 enhancing the market value by one time more than thp value fixed by the L.A.O. The said order was marked as Ex.A10. Inasmuch as the present acquisition proceedings relates to the adjacent village covered by Ex.A10, the reference Court relying on Ex.AlO has fixed the .rnarket value by one time more than the value fixed by the L.A.O. The record further discloses that the Government has issued orders on 15.10.1993, which was marked as Ex.A6, 4 GSD,J&MGP,J Laas 4 2016 ordering firr enhancement of compensation two times more (1+2) than the value tixed by the L.A.O., in respect of the acquisition of structures that were acquired for the purpose of Srisailam Project. Although the learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that this project is entirely different one and the said G.O. covered by Ex.A6 which was issued for Srisailam project cannot be applied in the absence of any specific G.O. issued for the present project, this Court is not inclined to accept the said contention for the reason that the present acquisition proceedings also pertains to Irrigation purpose. Even the other contentior:. of the learned Assistant Government Pleader that under Ex.A3, tht: Apex Court has confirmed the earlier fixation of market value by r,:ference Court by one more time (1+1) than the one fixed by the L.A.O. and therefore, the present enhancement made by the reference ,lourt which is in tune with Ex.A3 cannot be disturbed is also unsustainable for the reason that Ex.A6 issued by the Governme:rt granting l+2 has not been brought to the notice of the Apex Court. 7 . It is relevant to refer clause (ii) of Ex.A6, which specifies t!;rat "the market ualue of the structures inctuding well which has been treated as structure L,g the Land. Abquisition Officer in his award.; and. house sites shall be firced. at three times the ualue (1+2) d.eterrnined. bg tlrc Land. Acquisition Officers." Even though Ex.A6 pertains to the acquisition 5 GSD,J&MGP,J Laas 4 2016 proceedings in respect of Srisailam Project, the benefit thereof cannot be denied to the present appellants on the mere ground that the present proceedings pertaining to a different project. After all, both the acquisition proceedings are for the purpose of irrigation projects. Therefore, basing on Ex.A6, this Court is inclined to enhance the market value by two more times than the value fixed by the L.A.O.

8. In the result, the appeal is allowed enhancing the market value by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the L.A.O. with all other consequential benefits as stipulated under the amended Act. There shall be no order as to'costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI JUSTICE M.G. PRTYN)ARSINI

15.o9.2022 gkv/tsr 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THTRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA L.A.A.S. No. 29 of 2025 Between:

1. . B. Rathna Reddy, S/o Gatta Reddy - Died per LRs 2. B. Nagi Reddy, S/o Rathna.Rq{lV' agqp 5^5. y1s' Ngaraia Villag6, Pebbair Mandal,Wanaparthy District' All are Agriculture, R/o .Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Cg[eclor, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbdir, WanaparthY District. ... ResPondenUResPondent Appeal under S'bction 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 0g-04-2011 made in O.p.No .41 of 2011 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at WanaParthY. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent- rc:dC&s'*t 2 This Cout doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-20?-2 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.l\1o.125 0f 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer;

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the t>laimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 4954 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That therer shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. ,/TRUE COPY// SD'. MOHD. ISMAIL PUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK M. *&-di g {:t!) w E .6^ *f:j i;{} ., 3 HIGH COURT DATED:2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.29 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL o c 4 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTYTHIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHTNAND KUMAR SHAVILI D THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA OF Golla Anianeyulu, S/o Ayyalaiah, aged 78 yrs Ocr: Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village P;bbdir Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ..APPellants/C la imants D The special Deputy collector., Rajiv Lift lrrigation scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbdir, Wanaparthy Distric{ ...RespondenUResPondent Appeal under section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the order-and decree aatea si.bs.zol1 made in O.P.No.18 ot 2011 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at WanaParthY. Thisappealcomingonforhearinganduponperusingthegroundsofappeal, the order and Decree of the Lower court and the. material papers in the suit and upon hearing the arguments of sri v Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and'hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-og-2o22renderedbythiscourtinL.A.A.S.No.4of2016andalsothe common Judgment, dated 27 -09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 5

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the arnended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the clerimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay periodof4g65daysinpreferringtheappealasspecificallyorderedbythis Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there r;hall be no order as to costs in this appeal' i I ,,TRUE COPY" SD'- MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge' at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD CoPies ADK N/ d ,*' t l.; !*d 6 HIGH COURT DATED:231A412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.30 of 2025 DISPOSINCi OF APP (] s 7 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY 9F APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA D .3{ iR Between:

1. Golla Bakkanna, S/o Balaiah, aged 63 yrs 2. Golla Bal Raju, S/o Bakkanna, Aged, 34 yrs 3. Golla Kuru Nagarala Village S/o Bakkanna, aged 33 yrs All are Agriculture, Rl/o District ir Mandal, WanaPa rthy ...APPellanGIClaimants AND The Pebbair, I Dep Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll' Pebbair' At District. .RespondenUResPondent Appeal under Section 54 of L'A' Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order-and decree dated 02.06.2011 made in O.p.flol+S ot 2Oll oritne fite of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at WanaParthY. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal' the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the. material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao' Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent' This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 . That the appeal be and'hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L'A'A'S'No'4 of 2016 and. also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 8 3' That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under ther amended Land Acquisition Act; 4' That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 4904 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That thert> shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPYII SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR OFFICER To,

1. The Senicr Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Ccpies ADK W s$F F ai, * ,*y..: . 17u I; 9 HIGH COURT DATED:23111412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.:31 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS 1 $ I I I I I I i l I I-| 10 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI D THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.NO.4o 0F 2025 Bala Raju, S/o Uppari Village, Pebbair Mandal Appanna, Aged 49 yrs, Occ: Agriculture, R/o Ngarala ,Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/C la imants D The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08-04-2011 made in O.P.No.36 ot 2011 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the-material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; ,/ 11

3. That thr> appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 4958 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That the:-e shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. ,/TRUE COPY// SD/- MOHD PUTY REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK M { $i, w th. t? HIGH GOURT =2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.40 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL HOUT COSTS 1 s L3 INTHEHIGHcoURTFoRTHESTATEoFTELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THEHoNoURABLESMTJUSTIGETIRUMALADEVIEADA LAAS.NO.5o 0F 2025 Between: Telugu Narsimha, s/o Ng.gaiah, Age_d. 99.ytt., occ: Agriculture, R/o Ngarala V'il6d;, Pebbair Mandal, W-naparthy District' ...Appel lantslGlaimants AND The Special DePutY Collector Pebbair, WanaParthY District. , Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, at ...RespondenUResPondent Appeal under section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the order-and decree dated 31t0312011 made in o.p.No.g of 2011 0n the file of the court of the senior Civil Judge, at WanaParthY. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal' the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent' This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: ,i

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the iudgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No j25 of 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; L4

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under thr: amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period ol' 4900 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. ,,TRUE COPY'/ SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL PUry REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK W n rlit, ?"3 .$ t, 15 HIGH COT'RT DATED:2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.50 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS I t6 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDE WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAYILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI Between: l.Balakistaiah(DIED),S/oNarsimha-sinceDiedperLRsAppellantsNo.2and3 2. Narsimha, S/o Balakistaiah, aged 50 yrs 'B3lilXll;,y'i;:sl1[f::'fr];i,%?3'1'I'vff3:'FllJl?;"ffi ',#:?',"":'#l District. ...Appellants/Claimants EIII' Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At District. ...RespondenUResPondent AppealunderSection54ofL.A.Actlsg4aggrievedbytheorderanddecree dated 07.b4.201 1 made in O.P.No.136 ot 2010 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at WanaParthY. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal' the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Declee as follows: 1 . That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated Ls-Og-2}2zrenderedbythiscourtinL.A'A'S'No'4ot2016and.alsothe common Judgment, dated 27-Og-2O22 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch ; 17

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by lhe Land Acquisition Officer;

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period ol' 4966 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. ihat there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. /,TRUE COPYII i SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL III=GIFIiETITT SECTION OFFICER To, 'l.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK W t 1 I lr,5l w ii., 18 HIGH COURT DATED:2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.53 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT GOSTS $ *'' L9 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENry THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTIGE ABHTNAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVL.EADA rles.uo.Sz or zozs Between: Laxmi Narayana, . S/o Pentaiah-Died Narayana, Age 35 Yrs.., Occ. .Agricu Mandal,WanaParthY District. per LRs K.Mogulamma Wo Laxmi iture, R/o Ngaiala Village, Pebbair ...APPellants/Glaimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll. Pebbair, At Pebbdir, WanaparthY District. ...ResPondenUResPondent Appeal under section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the orderand decree dated oiio+tzo,l1 made in o.p.No.175 of 2o1o on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at WanaParthY- This appeal corning on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal' the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch ; 20

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2)than,the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 3' That the appellants shall be entifled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act; 4' That the r:laimant be and hereby is not entifled to craim interest for the deray period of 4g61 days in preferring the appeat as specificaryordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPYII To,

1.The Senior C)ivil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK W- SD/- MOHD. ls[/tAtL REGISTRAR OFFICER t'4 {st",y:"" ,.r &r n i. 1 ' 4J, ,." w 2l HIGH COURT DATED t2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.li7 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS I 22 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENW THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FME PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA .NO.59 oF 2025 Between

1. Uppari Appanna (Died), Died per LRs Appellants 2 to 4 2. Chandraiah, S/oAppanna, aged 56 yrs 3. Balaraju, S/oAppanna, aged 50 yrs t 5:iffi,'ift":i%ffif"1{}}?fry3,1ir1;: Arr are Asricurture, R/o Ngarara Vi*age, AND ...Appellants/Claimants I:B#f",i?:r"ff"1yrr"3',llf"T Rajiv Lift rrrigation scheme-phase-r, pebbair, at ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. dated 08-04-2011 made in O.p.No.34 Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree of 2011 on the file of the court of the Senior . _ This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the order and Decree of the Lower court and the materiar papers in thg suit and upon hearing the arguments of sri v Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appeilants and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 1' That the appear be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 ot 2016 and arso the common Judgment, dated 27_Og_2O22 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ot2015 and batch ; 23

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer;

3. That tht: appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entifled to claim interest forthe delay period of 4893 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court wtrile condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. ,,TRUE COPY// SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL EPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senio. Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK W t .: I !

4.''i) :! 24 HIGH COURT DATEDi2AA4l2025 n ECREE L.A.A.S.No.59 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT GOSTS $ 25 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry F|VE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEV! EADA D Between:

1. B. Krishna Reddy, S/o Gatta Reddy-Died per LRs Appellants 3 and 4 " ' "2. B. Thirupathi Reddy, S/o Krishna Reddy, age 55 yrs . B. Mannemma', W/o Krishna Reddy, age 70 yrs . B. Thirupathi Reddy, S/o Krishna Reddy, age 46 yrs. All are Agriculture, Rl/o 3 4 Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal,Wanaparthy District. D The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. .Appellants/Claimants Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08-04-201'l made in O.P.No.40 ot 2011 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advobate for the Appellants and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgm'ent dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 ot 2O16 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ot20'15 and batch; 26

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer;

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under th€) amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period ol 4893 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. ,/TRUE COPY'/ SD'- MOHD. ISMAIL PUTYREGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK W n n Aii,# t .-, 27 HIGH COI'RT DATED:2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.60 of 2025 DISPOSINI3 OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS 1 ,)r, $ 28 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FME PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA , LAAS.No.63 OF 2025 Between:

1. Gollavala Chinna Narasimha, S/o Balaiah, aged 74 yrs 2. Bandalamma, D/o G. Chinna Narasimha, aged 39 yrs. All are Agriculture, R/o Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal,Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ... RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07-04-2011 made in O.P.No.197 of 2010 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and'hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 20:16 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No 125 ot 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 29

3. That the, appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under thr-'ameoded Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 4951 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court wl'rile condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. ,/TRUE COPYII SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK M 4 ie.-'!il 1 \ I ,:'.' &iI I 30 HIGH COURT DATED:23rc412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.fi3 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS \ v % 31 IN TI'IE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.64 OF 2025 Between

1. Dovasipally Chandraiah, S/o Bakkanna - Died as per LRs-Appellant No.2 ( already on record)

2. Dovasipally Gattdiah, S/o Chandraiah. aged 52 All are Agriculture, R/o Ngarala Pebbair Mandal,Wanaparthy District ..Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase'lL Pebbair at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07-04-201 1 made in O.P.No.178 of 201 0 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment.dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ot 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 32

3. That th() appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the, claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period c,f 4966 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPYII SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL D PUTY REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Oopies ADK W .{Tr{?":J t. '* d,$tr I "?, .'li1:,- ,\:-f , 33 HIGH COURT DATED i2:!10412A25 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.64 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS $ 34 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SR! JUST]CE ABHINAND KUMAR S*AVlLl AND \..- THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EAPA. LAAS.No.73 OF 2025 Between:

1. Gollavala Shankaramma, Wo Buddaiah, Aged 59 yrs., Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

2. G. Kurmaiah, S/o G. Buddaiah, Aged 44 yrs., Agriculture, R./o Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

3. G. Ramudu, S/o Buddaiah, Aged 38 yrs., Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

4. G. Gattaiah, S/o G. Buddaiah, Aged 37 yrs., Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree datd O7lO4l201'l made in O.P.No.141 of 2O1O on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming onfor hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Ddcree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. v 35 This Court doth Orderr and Decree as follows: 1 . That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-Os-2022 rendered bv this court in L'A'A'S'No'4 of 2016.:* 1"1t',: common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court rn L.A.A.S.No.12l5 ol2015 and batch; value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value

2. That the -Marl(et 3. That the app'ellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated 4. That the clairnant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 4961 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and under the amended Land Acquisition Act; frxed by the Land Acquisition Officer:

5. That there slrall be no order as to costs in this appeal' ,ITRUE COPY" SD'- MOHD. ISMAIL EPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior C;ivil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD CoPies ADK N. JT

4.4 w l:j 36 HIGH COURT I 23fit412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.,73 of 2025 DISPOSINGi OF A l D L WITHOUT COSTS 37 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENW THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUTI,IAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No. 83 OF 2025 Between: Ramanjaneyulu, S/o.Kistanna , Age 51 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o.New Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03-03-2010 made in O.P.No.407 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and thei material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ot 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 38

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 5291 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That the'e shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. /,TRUE COPYII SD/- MOHO. ISMAIL UTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD C:opies ADK W t ,+ A.Ti w t;f; 39 HIGH COURT E 2 I 28 Dl=Glil=t- L.A.A.S.No.83 of 2025 G c OSTS L{ 1 s \ 40 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENW THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHTNAND KUMAR SRAWLI AND \--\- THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.84 OF 2025 Between Venkatesh, S/o.Kistanna, Age 51 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o.New Ngarala Village, PebbairMandal,Wanaparthy District ...AppellanUClaimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03-03-2010 made in O.P.No.405 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-Og-20? rendered tiy this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-Og-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer;

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act; 41

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period o1'5291 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. ,/TRUE COPY// SD'. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD C:opies ADK W 4 t 9 ,d 4li r;. t I 42 / HIGH COURT DATED i2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.84 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS ' $ "ry 43 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI ANO THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.86 OF 2025 Between: S.Kurumurthy, S/o. Krishnaiah , Age 48 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o.New Ngarala Village, PebbairMandal,Wanaparthy District. ...Appe!!anUClaimants AND The Special Deputy Pebbair, Wanaparth Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, at y District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03-03-2010 made in O.P.No.355 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the.appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgm'ent dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 ol 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ot 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 44

3. That thr) appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That ther claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period crf 5361 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. ,,TRUE COPY'/ SD'- MOHD. ISMAIL EPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Seni,rr Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD tlopies ADK N, 3x'r-f1. e?; ,&a'Unxt; 45 HIGH COURT DATED:2i110412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.Nrc.86 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS ' 1/ 46 lN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENW THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.89 OF 2025 -\ Between: B.Nagi Reddy, S/o.Bal Reddy , Age 50 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o.New Ngarala Village, PebbairMandal,Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03-03-2010 made in O.P.No.520 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and thd material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 . That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batbh;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than.the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 47

3. That the, appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under thr: amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period o' 5366 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPYII SD/- MOHD. ISMA]L TY REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK ,W : t. n ,.l-' {..". -{'. 48 J HIGH COURT DATED i2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.NoI.89 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS ( 49 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENW THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.97 OF 2025 Between: Gunti Man Ngarala Vi yamkonda, S/o. Narayana , Age 75 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o.New llage, PebbairMandal,Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03-03-2010 made in O.P.No.393 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered dy this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 ol 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition fficer;

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act; 50

4. That ther claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period crf 5367 days in prefering the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. /,TRUE COPYII SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL EPUW REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Oopies ADK W t .lsi {-J, rlt : ?. A;J). .tsi,: -f',i}tr t 51 HIGH GOI'RT DATED:23,10412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.97 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS ,$ 52 tN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRt JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.101 OF 2025 Between:

1. Govindla Kurmaiah (DIED), S/o Balaiah - since Died per LRs-Appellants 2to 5

2. G. Srinivasulu, S/o G. Kurmaiah, aged 46 yrs 3. G. Chennaiah, S/o G. Kurmaiah, aged 40 yrs 4. G. Shivudu, S/o G. Kurmaiah, aged 36 yrs 5. G. Laxmidevamma, Wo G. Kurmaiah, aged 59 yrs Appellant No.2 to 4 already brought on record All are Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Clai mants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenUResPondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree .l made in o.P.No.144 0t 2010 0n the file of the court of the senior dated 07-04-201 Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the order and Decree of the Lower court and the material papers in the suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. ------7 53 This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the commor Judgment, dated 2Z -09-2022 rendered by this ,court in L.A.A.S.No.125 oI 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (.t+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer;

3. That the appellants shall be entifled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entifled to claim interest for the delay period ol' 4961 days in preferring the appeal as specificafiy ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. /,TRUE COPYII SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL EPUry REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Cr>pies ADK W HIGH COURT 54 DATEDT23 t04t2O2S DECREE: L.A.A.S.No.101 ot 202i DISPOSING OF APPEAL WTHOUT COSTS 1 sD q I 55 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDE WEDNESDAY, THE TWENW THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI D THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: 114 Golla Venkataiah, S/o Balaswamy, aged 49 yrs Occ. Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. .Appellants/C laimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-H, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ..RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated03-04-20'l'l madeinO.P.No.156of 2010 onthefileof thecourtof theSenior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sii Ravula Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-Og-2O22 rendered bi this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 o'f 2015 and batch ;

2. Thalthe Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer;

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act; 56

4. That th,l claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period r:f 4973 days in prefening the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That therre shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPYII SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL UTY REGISTRAR TION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK N. n ;, ^ti |3: / 'w ''J 57 HIGH COURT DATED:2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.114 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL 3 c 3 s 55 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE TiI=Fl=I$I THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUTI'IAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Golla Venkataiah, S/o Balaswamy, aged 49 yrs Occ. Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. .Appellants/Claimants ENI' The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lnigation Scheme-Phase-H, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. RespondenURecpondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08-04-20'1 1 made in O.P.No.156 ot 2010 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material paperc in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Ravula Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-Og-2O2?- rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 ol 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ot2015 and batch;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Ac4uisition Officer;

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act; 56

4. That thr: claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 4973 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That the,re shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPYII SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL iI=GIFfiPlfi OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Oopies ADK N- Afi t. {. , *:.1: t 57 HIGH COURT DATED:2310U2025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.114 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS I v 58 !N THE H]GH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENry THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE IT{I{III THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.1't f . Bathini Ramudu, S/o Komaraiah, aged 68 yrs

2. Devamma D/o B. Ramulu, aged 39 yrs All are Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-PhaseJl, Pebbair. at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08-04-201 1 made in O.P.No.I 17 of 2010 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Ravula Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 ot 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -O9-2O22 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ot 2015 and batch ; 59

2. That tht: Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than'the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer;

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 4973 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. PUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFF]CER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ^DK Ui/ Aii w f L;.r. , '-J 50 HIGH COURT -t I :2310412025 D=Glil=ti A.A.S.No.116 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL 3 c ) 61 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENW THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE f il=FI=NIl THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI I THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EAOA LAAS.No.119 OF 2025 B. Yellamma, Wo Govindu Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy aged 64 yrs Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o Nagarala Village District. ...Appellants/Claimants D The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-PhaseJl, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08/04/201 1 made in O.P.No.1 05 ot 2010 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon'perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Ravula Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.'125 ol2015 and batch;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 62

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the ,:taimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period ol 4g73 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That therc: shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPY" SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK W t :\ i $4 w 63 HIGH COUR ATED:23/0412025 DECREE .A.A.S.No.{19 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL 3 (] o 64 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDE WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA D LAAS.No.122 OF 2025

1. Boya Shankaramma, Wo Kukkanna, aged 79 yrs 2. Balaswamy, S/o Kukkanna, aged 59 yrs 3. Gopal, S/o Kukkanna, aged 52 yrs. All are Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08-04-201 1 made in O.P.No.166 ot 2010 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Ravula Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgrnent dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 o12015 and batch; 65

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer;

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 4972 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That therr: shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. SD'. MOHD. ISMAIL EPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK w ( AIA'ff i I 65 HIGH COURT I D :23//0412025 DECREE S.No.l22 ot 2025 o G c s $ 67 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Betureen: '1. Gundam Bichanna, S/o Chandraiah, aged 64 yrs 2. G. Bokkalaiah, S/o G. Bichannaiah, aged 36 yrs, All are Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Claimants NIII] The Special Pebbair, Wa Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lnigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, at naparthy District. .RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08/04/2011 made in O.P.No.101 ot 2010 onthefileof the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decrbe of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Ravula Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 . That the appeal be and hereby is disposed oJ in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 ot 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than'the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 58

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 4972 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. /,TRUE COPYII s LIOHITFTITMI REGISTRAR OFFICER To,

1.The Senio' Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK M, n ,.1,; w 69 / HIGH COURT DATED t2:110412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.123 of 2025 ISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT ISOSTS 1 y>q 70 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDE WEDNESDAY, THE TWENW THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA No. Sharakonda Balakistaiah, s/o Pedda Balakistaiah, aged 84 yrs occ. Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District' ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, at Pebbair, WanaParthY District. .,RespondenUResPondent Appeal under section 54 of L.A. Act 1 894 aggrieved by the order decree dated Oti-b4-2011 made in O.P.No.121 of 20't0 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at WanaParthY. -and This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the order and Decree of the Lower court and the material papers in the suit and upon, hearing the arguments of sri Ravula shankar Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP foi Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-Og-2O22 rendered by this court in L.A-A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.'125 ol2015 and batch:

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer;

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act; ---.-r - ---7 7L

4. That the ,:laimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 4972 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That then: shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPY'/ SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK M- *?; w 72 HIGH COIJRT DATED:2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.N o.124 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF AP 3 c ( 73 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENry THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSANDAND NA/ENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONqURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA 1 .9aru Chander, S/o Chinna Naganna, a.ged 34 yrs Occ: Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wana[arthy DEtrict. .Appellants/Claimants The.special Deputy corrector, Rajiv Lift rrrigation scheme-phase-il, pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...Respondent/Respondent Appeal under section s4 of L.A. Act 1g94 aggrieved by the order and decree dated0S-04-2011madeino.p.No.100 ot20looriltrefiteoftn"corrtortt;s;;ior. Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the order and Decree of the Lower court and the material papers in the suit and upon hearing the arguments of sri Ravula Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows : 1- That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and arso the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ot2015 and batch; 2- That the Market varue is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer;

3. That the appellants shall be entifled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act; 74

4. That ther claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 4978 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. /,TRUE COPYII SD'- MOHD. ISMAIL PUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK W 4 Aii 1# .5. ..{. '- . 75 / I HIGH COURT DATED i2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.128 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS g .i{ 75 IN THE HIGH COU RT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRU n 129 Between: .t. Bova Karrenna, S/o Pentaiah, Aged 60 yrs., occ: Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Virrige, peobaii Mandal, Wanaparthy District'

2. Mahesh, S/o Boya Karrenna, Aged 3-Q yrs , Occ: Agriculture' R/o Nagarala Vittage, Pebbair lVlandal, Wanaparthy District' ...Appellants/Claimants D The Special Pebbair, Collec{or / Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair' at District. ;TN AppealunderSection54ofL.A.ActlSg4aggrievedbytheorder.anddecree aateo oribalioll made in o.p.No.160 0f 2010 0n.the file of the court of the senior Civil Judge, at WanaParthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal' D""ru. of the Lower court and the material papers in the suit and the order upon hearing the arguments of Sri Ravula Shankar Reddy' Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Appe.als for the Respondent' "nd This Court doth Order and Decree as follows

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 1s-og-2o22renderedbythiscourtinL.A.A-S.No.4of2016andalsothe common Judgment, dated 27 -Og-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch ; 77

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition fficer;

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That thr: claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 4978 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPYII SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL PUTY REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senicrr Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK W .2 ab' B Fe' . i:)' 78 HIGH COURT DATED:2310412025 ttr{TiI{i L.A.A.S.No.129 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL 3 c o a ,u 79 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.134 OF 2025 Between:

1. Keshapaga Bala Mashamma, Wo Late Beesanna, aged 84 yrs 2. K. Bokkalaiah, S/o K. Beesanna, aged 54 yrs 3. K. Bhanu Kumar, S/o K. Beesanna, aged 34 yrs, All are Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 0810412011 made in O.P.No.103 of 2010 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeat, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Ravula Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-Og-2O22 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.Noj25 of 2015 and batch ; 80

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than ihe value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer;

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to ctaim interest for the delay period of 4902 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPY/' SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL sEcTtoN 9FFICER To,

1.The Seniot Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Crlpies Afu\ ADK It n 'v w ! 81 HIGH COI.' ATED:23/0412025 CREE A,S.No.134 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL c :l Q*' u1/ 82 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA ATH WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT . THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA D

1. Chakali Savasaiah, S/o Gattaiah, aged 84 yrs 2. Chakali Rangaswamy, S/o Sa varaiah, aged 54 yrs, All are Agriculture, Ri/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants D The Special Pebbair, Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, at District- Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08-04-2011 made in O.P.No.161 of 2O1O on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Ravula Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L-A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the commor Judgment, dated 27 -Og-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ot2O15 and batch;

2. Thal the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 7 83

3. That th. appefiants shafl be entitred to ail statutory benefits as stipurated under the amended Land Acquisition Act; 4' That the claimant be and hereby is not enti*ed to craim interest for the deray period of 4902 days in preferring the appeal as specifically order€d by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. ,/TRUE COPY// SD/- MOHD. TION OFFICER To,

1.The S-erior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Cc,pies ^DK w ( n r. $.4 It' ' :l:,- ,, .. ,.i-, 84 HIGH COURT DATED:2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.{35 ot 2025 ISPOSING OF APPEAL o (] I 85 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT I WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FME THE TTONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUTUIAR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T]RUMALA DEV] EAOA 137 0F

1. K. Pentamma, Wo Late Chennaiah, aged 54 yrs 2. K. Lokesh, S/o Chennaiah, aged 33 yrs, All are Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ..Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-PhaseJl, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.2011 made in O.P.No.149 ol 2010 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decaee of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Ravula Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -Og-2022 rendeied by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 85

3. That tl^re appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That th,: claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period rf 4902 days in prefening the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. ,/TRUE COPYII To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Oopies ADK SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL TYREGISTRAR OFFICER L\ U .5'--:-.''. ..t *ii w I a7 HIGH COURT DATED:2310412025 EI=GIII:Ti A.A.S.No.137 ot 2025 G o Q OSTS ," .d 88 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT WEDNESDAY, THE TWENW THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI D THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTTCE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.l S.Krishnaiah, S/o. Syanna, Age 52 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o.New Ngarala Village, PebbairMandal,Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUCtaimants D The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order ahd decree dated 03/03/2010 made in O.P.No.321 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material paperc in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 ot 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch;

2. Th4t the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer ; -.----------_-- 89

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory'benefits as stipulated under thr> amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period ol'5361 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. ,/TRUE COPYII MOHD. ISMAIL UTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK M. I +!5:..:, ,' a. SP; w F ''.i' i I 90 HIGH COURT D i23rcU2025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No ,142 of 2025 DISPOSINGi OF AP D L WITHOUT GOSTS U) b lY 9t !N THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUi'IAR SHAVILI AND \ THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVIEA}A LAAS.No.149 OF 2025 Between

1. Bhagyamma, D/o Balakistaiah, aged 44 yrs Occ. Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District

2. Narsamma, D/o Balakistaiah, aged 42 yrs Occ. Agriculture, FVo Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ...Respondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07 lO4l2O1 1 made in O.P.No.1 37 of 2O10 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Oider and Decree as follows : 1 . That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 ot 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch; 92

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer;

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under thr: amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period o1' 4972 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPY// To,

1.The Senio' Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2.Two CD Copies ADK W SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR SECTIONl OFFICER , -rq.-f-:".i, ,^ n $$ w 1 't -/ :: r':i . -!it r' 93 rJ $I i, HIGH COI.'RT DATED:23104l,2425 DECREE L.A.A.S.N(). 149 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS 1 "L $ 94 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTTCE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.150 OF 2025 Between: Bala Krishnaiah, S/o.Ranga Swamy, Age 40 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o.New Ngarala Village, PebbairM-ndal,Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll' Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... ResPondenUResPondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03-03-2010 made in O.P.No.404 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -Og-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ot 2}15and batch ; ,I

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer;

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act; 95

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 5367 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court wl^rile condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPY'/ SD'. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR OFFICER -\.- To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK M ,- '"e. i :' I ,b) n {ii t; i', 96 I : I i l ;i l! HIGH COIJRT DATED i2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.150 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS ( g 97 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI J USTICE ABHINAN D KUIUIARSHAVI EI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA D LAAS.No.156 OF 2025 1 2 3 4 5 6

7. Anjanna (died) L.Rs. Smt. Venkatamma, Wo. Late Anjanna, aged about 70 years. Satya Reddy, S/o. Late Anjanna, aged about 50 years. Smt. M.Jayalaxmi, D/o. Late Anjanna, aged about 40 years. Smt. Nirmala, D/o. Late Anjanna, aged about 35 years. Smt Santhoshi, D/o. Late Anjanna, aged about 33 years. Smt. Maheshwari, D/o. Late Anjanna, aged 30 years. (All are Occ- Agriculture, R/o. Anugoncla Village, Makthal Mandal, Narayanapet District). ...Appellants/Claimants EITD The Special Deputy Collector -cum -Land Acquisition Officer, PJP, Gadwal, Jogulanba Gadwal District now presently Special Deputy Collector, Makthal, Narayanapet Diskict. .RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 26.06.2012 made in O.P.No.13 ot 2O1O on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Narayanapet District. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri S Venkateshwar Reddy, Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows : 98 1 . That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch ;

2. Thal the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by thetand Acquisition Officer;

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the, amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the olaimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 4524 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That then: shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. ,,TRUE COPY/' SD'- MOHD. R;ICll SECT]ON OFFICER To, 'l.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Cocies ADK ry It f't:- k! .) t. Aii w f's:.,.,f,} 99 HIGH COURT DATED:2310412025 DECREE A.A.S.No.156 of 2425 DISPOSIN(3 OF APPEAL HOUT COSTS g, * 100 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT . THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA D LAAS.No.158 OF 2025 Narayana Reddv, S/o. Buddanna, aged about 70 years. Occ. Agriculture, R/o' Anugbnda Mllag-e, Makthal Mandal, Narayanapet District- ...AppellanUClaimani D The Special Deputv Collector-cum-Land Acquisition Officer, PJP, Gadwal, Joguldnba Gadwal-District now presently Special Deputy Collector, Makthal' Narayanapet District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 26.06.2012 made in o.P.No.15 0f 2010 0n the file of the court of the senior Civil Judge, Narayanapet District. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri S Venkateshwar Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-Og-2O22 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -O9-2O22 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 7 101

3. That thr: spp"1;"n," shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under tl'e amended Land Acquisition Act:

4. That ther claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period c,f 1043 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPY'/ SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL PUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD C:opies ADK M .4{:- (i a *b; w J ,.,: Y, '!Ji 102 HIGH COURT DATED i2.il04t2025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.1SB of 2025 DISPOSINGi OF APPEAL WTHOUT C]OSTS q 103 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA . LAAS.No.I61 OF 2025 Between: 1 2 3 4 Sanjeeva Reddy S/o. Basavappa, (died as per LRs. 2lo 4 to be brought on record) Narsingamma, Wo. Late Sanj-eeva Reddy, aged about 71 years, S. Brahmananda Reddy, S/o. Late Sanjeeva Reddy, aged about 51 years. S. Venkat Reddy, 9/o. Late Sanjeeva Reddy,aged about 46 years. (All are Agriculturists, R/o. Anugonda Village,Makkthtal Mandal, Narayanapet District). ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector-cum-Land Acquisition Officer, PJP, Gadwal, Jogulanba Gadwal now presently Special Deputy Collector, Makthal, Narayanapet District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under $ection 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 26.06.2012 made in O.P.No.12 ot 2010 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Narayanpet. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the- arguments'of Sri S Venkateshwar Reddy, Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the 7 104 common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this .court in L.A.A.S.I\o.125 of 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by r:he Land Acquisition Officer;

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated , under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period o1'4515 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appea!. ,/TRUE COPY// SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR OFFICER To,

1.The Senio. Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK M/ 105 HIGH COI'RT DATED:2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.161 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS u 1 g 106 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI D THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.170 OF 2025 Between: Papi Reddy, S/o.Balakrishna Reddy, age 85 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o.New Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal,Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. denURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act '1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-2011 made in O.P.No.84 ot 2011 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the'material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; to7

3. That ther appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 4988 days in prefening the appeal as specifically orderdd by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. /,TRUE COPYII SO/. MOHD. ISMAIL TY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER -C To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD C,rpies ADK W t *'i w ! fx, ,: 6 'pi 1 108 / HIGH COURT DATE i2:,310412025 D DECREE L.A.A.S.No.170 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS 109 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA D 171 0F

1. Balamashi, S/o.Jarnmanna , ige 72Years. 2. Ashok, S/o.Balamashi age 40 years All are Occ: Agriculture. R/o NoW Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...ResPondenUResPondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-2011 made in O.P.No.128 ot2O11 on thefile of the courtof the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy This appeal cqming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decrce as follows : I . That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4, of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ot 2O15 and batch ; 110

2. That th,-. Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer;

3. That th,e appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under ttre amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That thc) claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 4982 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. that there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPY// s IFI,MM PUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK Id '*. n 1 D- -) a Lr' I! j,,w r ,*rI.: :i, t 111 HIGH COURT DATED:2310412 B DECREE L.A.A.S.No.171 ot 2025 3 o G c 1 s 1,/ 772 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENry THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry rrVE'' "'- PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE AND THE HON OURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEV] EADA ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILT

1. B.Raghupathi Reddy, S/o.Chinna Gatta Reddr 2. B.Santhosh Kumar R, egriiiiirle,'ii'/o. ivJi'*s",rr" vliiJg", Fl[[rii;;/d"[1fl:""?8",ff:rs, occ: ng,.i;,;iii,.6.,'niil'i& i;""d.:vd rP,,'&",?:rJly,:ll:,[::fl1;"+r".ffiars, occ: ' R,5"tu"i:ifJ"Hty,r ff g:B[:ff'[;j *:tC"t]i"ll vears, oc: Agricu,ture, ..Appellants/Claimants Collector, District. Rajiv Lift lnigation Scheme-phase_ll pebbair, at ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 oJ L.A. Act 1g94 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31t03r2011 made in o.p.trto.t sa ;i2il;";'ti[ fire of the court of the senior Civil Judge, at Wanapdrthy. This appear coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appear, the order and Decree of the Lower court ano'ttre irateriat papers in the Suit anct upon hearing the arguments of s,ri N. praveen neaav, Advocate for the Apperants and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. 113 This Court doth Order and Decree as follows : 1 . That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-202'.2 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.Nc.125 o12015 and batch;

2. That the llarket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer;

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the :rmended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entifled to claim interest for the delay period of 4988 days in preferning the appear as specificaily ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there :thall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPYII SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL TY REG ECT]ON OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK tt4 HIGH COURT DATED:23104l,2025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.172 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS 775 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI D THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EAOA LAAS.No.173 OF 2025 Smt. B. Satyamma, Wo.Venkat Reddy, age 75 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o.New Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal.Wanaparthy District. ..AppellanUClaimant D The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31/03/201 1 made in O.P.No.130 ot 2011 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and thd material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows : ,l

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 ot 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than.the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer;

1.16

3. Ihat the aopeilants shall be r under the arnend., , ]_']'l 4. That the oe entitled to all stati Land Acquisition Act; utory benefits as ",",,nunouo s ;:*l*,':1,,g,:ffi r::;*ffr:::ff ;l costs in this appeal. //IRUE COPYII sD^ To, ; H::"J3ffi:,J,Judse, at wanap arthy ADK N/ OFFICER I .1 I \ I Ali, I$ * I1:I, ':'l 117 , HIGH COURT DATED i2310412025 D EGREE L.A.A.S.No.173 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL UT C}OSTS 118 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE NT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUTIIAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.I75 OF 2025 1 2 3 4 V.Buchi Reddy, S/o.Narsimha Reddy, age 70 years, Devamma, D/o.V.Buchi Reddy, age 50 years Narsimha Reddy, S/o.V.Buchi Reddy, age 40 years Ranga Reddy, S/o.Buchi Reddy, age 35 years, All are Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o.New Ngarala Village, PebbairMandal,Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase.ll, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31 -03-201 1 made in O.P.No.91 ot 2O1 1 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Appeals for the ftespondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ol2O15 and batch; _--.7 119

2. That the lVlarket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by tl",e Land Acquisition Officer;

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of .4982 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court whit: condoning the delay; and

5. ihat there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. /,TRUE COPYII SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER ( To,

1.The Senior,3ivil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK W i ', n Aft w 1 ! 1 i |9... ,*9.1 ',-tL,, a ].20 ? C HIGH COURT DATED i2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.175 oI 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT C]OSTS g )r 2V 12L IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA D LAAS.No.177 OF 2025

1. G. Krishna Reddy, S/o.Late Bheem Reddy, age 82 years, 2. G.Vishnuvardhan Reddy, S/o. Krishna Reddy, age 55 years 3. G.Rajavardhan Reddy, S/o.Krishna Reddy, age 50 years, All are Occ. Agriculture, R/o.New Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants D The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ' ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-201 1 made in O.P.No.7S ot 2011 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch ; 722

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by ihe Land Acquisition Officer;

3. That the appeltants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under thr: amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for.the delay period ol' 5003 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. ,/TRUE COPYII SD'- MOHD. ISMAIL PUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK & t1 : \, A4 : & (' .>,, 123 HIGH COURT DATED:2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.N <r.177 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS , 124 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENW THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.178 OF 2025 Between:

1. Smt. Vangur Anasuyamma, Wo.Late Laxmi Reddy, 80 years 2. V.Balakrisna Reddy, S/o.Laxmi Reddy, age 64 years 3. V. Mutyal Reddy, Slo.Laxmi Reddy, age62 years 4. V. Bhaskar Reddy, S/o.Laxmi Reddy, age 57 years 5. V. Raghava Reddy, S/o.Balakrishna Reddy, age 40 years, Al! 'are Occ: Agricul-ture, R/o.New Ngarala Village, PebbairMandal,Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-2011 rnade in O.P.No.82 of 2011 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments sf Sri N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the I ! ! I L25 common Judgment, dated 27 -09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 oI 2015 and batch ;

2. That the lt4arket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by thr: Land Acquisition Officer;

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 21988 days in preferring the appeal as specifically orderqd by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPYII SD/- MOHD. REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK W 1 3 J., ,i Aii .l t. e,: l i:;, . 726 HIGH COL'RT DATED:23 t04t2025 DECREE L.A.A.S.N o.1TB ot 2025 l 3 F HOUT COSTS 127 IN THE HIGH COURT AT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRt JUSTTCE ABHTNAND KUtr(AR SltAVtLr ..., THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TiRUi'ALA AND Between: .No.185 OF 2025

1. Golla Bokkalaiah, S/o.Kistanna, age 60 years, 2. Boya Kumari Balaiah, S/o.Veeraiah, age 58 years 3. Boya Kumari Chennamma, Wo.Kistanna, age 64 yrs 4. Boya Kumari Maddamma, Wo.Narsimha, age 45 yrs 5. Boya Kumari Thirupathaiah, S/o.Balaiah, age 44 years 6. Doddi Pedda Kistanna, Wo.Jabbaraiah, age 48 yrs 7. Golla Govindu, S/o.Kistanna, age 59 years 8. Golla Kirshnaiah, S/o.Kistanna, age 56 years 9. Golta Shivudu, S/o.Ksitanna, age 53 yrs 10.Golla Venkataiah, S/o.Kistanna, age 50 years 1 1 . Golla Gattaiah, S/o.Chinnaiah, age 60 years 12. Golla M.Chilakamma, Wo.Bichanna, age 56 years 13. Golla Narasimha, S/o.Bichanna, age 54 years l4.Chakali Yerra Narsimha, S/o.Kistaiah, age 60 years 15. K,parvathaiah, S/o Gattaiah, age 55 years. All occ: Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Mllage, PebbairMandal,Wanaparthy District. ..Appellants/Claimants EIIT. The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ..RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 16-09-2016 made in O.P.No.23 of 2015 on the file of the crurt of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. 124 This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and l)ecree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing th-. arguments of Sri N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Ap,peals for the Respondent. This Court doth ()rder and Decree as follows : 1 . That the erppeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 r6ndered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in 1.A.A.S.N,c.125 oI 2015 and batch ;

2. That the l/arket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than.the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer;

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the irmended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entifled to claim interest for the delay period of 11997 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court whikr condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. /,TRUE COPY// SD'- MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR To,

1.The Senior Oivil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK W 4 #'.fi! :t \, n :-. *b) w :i7,t 129 ./ / HIGH COURT DATED i2310412025 DEqREE L.A.A.S.No.186 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT I3OSTS 1 17 130 !N THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.188 OF 2025 Between: Golla Narsimha, S/o.Bichanna , age 44 yeas Occ. Agriculture, R/o. .Ngarala Village, PebbairMandal,Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-2011 made in O.P.No.54 oI 2O11 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments Sri N Praveen Reddy, of Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals fot the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows 1 . That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ot2015 and batch;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 131

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as 'stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That thr: claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 4628 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That the:re shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. ,/TRUE COPYII SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK N/ I I B. ) $,ii t* i, .. '* ,'., 1 L32 / HIGH COIJRT DATED:2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.188 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS {,t 133 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWEITd-Y THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUTTIALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.195 OF 2025 Between: Golla Venkataiah, S/o.Kistanna , age 66 years Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, PebbairMandal,Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act '1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 3'l-03-2011 made in O.P.No.S1 ol 2011 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-Og-2O22 rendered dy this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 ot 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Offic,er;

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act; 134

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 4992 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court wrile condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPYII SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL qEPUW REGISTRAR . \-_\ secrott oFFrcER \ \, I To,

1.The Senic,r Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD C)opies ADK W d 1 ^Ce."fr"_ !r ! &. r! 1 t r '"t'' w Fq , \ 135 / HIGH COI.'RT i231A412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.195 of 2A25 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS g 136 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENry THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT . THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.197 OF 2025 Between: Bova Komari Chennamma, Wo.Late Kistanna, age 65 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, PebbairMandal, Wanaparthy bistrict. ..AppellanUClaimant AND The.speciql Deputy Coltector, Rajiv Lift trrigation Scheme-Phase-ll. pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-2011 made in O.P.No.44 ol 2011 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arglrments of Sri N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2O16 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.Noj25 of 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 137

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 4987 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPY// SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR ____< SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Seni<lr Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK W d .t- {' I , \, q"ri-'3 . , -.t'' a. '* d.l& w :). * ;t," 138 HIGH COIJIRT DATED i23,10412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.197 of 2025 DISPOSING OF AFPEAL WITHOU]T COSTS $ 139 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR S-I'IAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.I98 OF 2025 Between K. Parvathaiah, S/o.Gattaiah, Pebbair Mandal,Wanaparthy Age 49 years Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, District. .AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-2011 made in O.P.No.56 of 2011 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2O16 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch ; 140 2- That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer;

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to alt statutory benefits as stipulated under thr: amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period o* 4987 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. ihat the,e shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPY// SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK M- , .16. {?- rj', n Lb) ,1, |,r'_ :7..t 147 HIGH COIJR DATED:2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.198 ot 2025 o :l G c 3 g u, * L42 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENry THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVTLI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.l 99 0F 2025 Between Doddi Pedda Kistanna, S/o.Late Jabbaraiah , age 74 years Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, PebbairMandal,Wanaparthy Di5trict. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-2011 made in O.P.No.47 of 2011 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows

1. That the-appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.Noj25 of 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; L43

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the, claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 4987 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPY// SD'. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senir>r Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK V I : ! j k4 ': :Y , -{*._ -t3., 1 744 HIGH COIJRT DATED:2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.199 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT'COSTS ?v 745 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA No.202 OF 2025 Between Golla Govindu, s/o.. Kisl?nna, a.ge p.0. ygars occ. Agricurture, R/o. Ngarara Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanafartiy District. !v'rYvrrv'v' '. \'v' - AND ...AppellanUGlaimant The.Speciql Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-phase-lt, pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-2011 made in o.P.No.48 of 2011 on-if,e file of ihe court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon.perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the'material papers.in the Suit and upon hearing the ar$uments of Sri N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the,Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 2z-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.12S ot 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; L46

3. That the ilppellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the ;amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of .{993 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. ,/TRUE COPYII SDI. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK M. I *q2'. i ! A4 w €e, ;ffr 1' 147 HIGH COURT DATED:2i,3t04t2025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.202 of 2O2S DISPOSING OF APPEAL UT COSTS L48 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENry THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHTNAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: .G,olla Bokkalaiah, S/o-Kistanna,..age.z2. years occ: Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, PebbairMandal,Wanaparthy District. ..AppellanUClaimant AND The,Speciql Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-lt, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-2011 made in O.P.No.42 of 2011 on the file of ihe court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and thd materiat papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as foltows :

1. That the appeal be and'hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and. also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 749

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the arnended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the clerimant be and hereby is not entifled to craim interest for the delay period of 41193 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there s;hall be no order as to costs in this appeal. /,TRUE COPY'/ SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR OFFICER To,

1.The Senior rlivil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD CoPies N. ADK ..-.t I T .F *-t;*"yf n t., \ w *,r _:,: r.f.iF.l, ., r'Yr,# i 150 ) HIGH COURT DATED i2310412025 DEGREE L.A.A.S.No.203 of 2025 DISPOSINGi OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS 159 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND I(uITAR€HAVILI AND THE HoNouRABLE sMT JUsncE TTRUMALA DEvrldnoa LAAS.No.211 OF 2025 Between

1. Bijja Laxmi, Wo. Balaram, age 52 years, 2. Janaki, D/o.Balaral, age 35 years, All occ- Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy" District ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift Irrigation Scheme -Phase- ll, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 3110312011 made in O.P.No.4 of 2011 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-A9-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 160 3' That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under ther amended Land Acquisition Act; 4' That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 5001 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the detay; and

5. That thenr shail be no order as to costs in this appear. //TRUE COPYII . MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK M/ f_ 161 , HIGH COURT DATED i23rc412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.Jtlo.21 1 of 202:5 DISPOSIING OF APPEAL WITHOTIT GOSTS ./ :: r1 :i I 762 !N THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENW THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA D LAAS.No.212 OF 2025

1. Komari Kurmaiah, S/o.Pedda Kistanna, age 66 years 2. Suyarna, D/o.Kurmaiah, age 39 years All Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal,Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/C laimants D The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Peb.bair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08-04-201 1 made in O.P.No.170 ot 2010 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this 'court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; -------7 153 3' Thilt the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated uncler the amended Land Acquisition Act; 4' Thzrt the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay pertod of 4994 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Cor-rrt while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shail be no order as to costs in this appear. //TRUE COPYII SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR \, SECTION OFFICER --=: To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2.Two CD Copies ADK w I 1 ! ..t {laj t* a- :5 ' - ""u. t t 764 HIGH COIJRT ATED:23/0412025 DECREE L.A.A.S. N tt.21 2 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL o rQ \ $ 1 165 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI D THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.2i3 OF 2025 Between

1. Chintakunta Shanthaiah, S/o.Yellaiah, age 74 years 2. C.Krishna Kumar, S/o.c. Shanthanna, age 49 years All Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, PebbairMandal,Wanaparthy District. .Appellants/C laimants The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ndenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07-04-2Ol 1 made in O.P.No.1 33 of 2010 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -Og-2O22 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch ;

2. Thal the Market value is enhanced. by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 156

3. That the, appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under thr: amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period oi'5004 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPY// SD'. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK W i ,€f.4-_ (.1 n &/t, f.' r,. 167 HIGH COURT ATED:2310412025 D{Tt{i L.A.A.S.No.213 ot 2025 I G c 168 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENry THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TTRUMALA DEVI EADA D Between: .No.2l4 K.Chinna-.Kukka!na, S/o.Yerra. Balaiah, Age 14 years Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Mllage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparth! Distriit. ...Appellant{Claimant NIT' The.Speci-?l Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-phase-ll, pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07 l04l2ol 1 made in o.P.No. 140 of 2o10 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the order and Decree of the Lower court and the material papers in the suit and upon hearing the arguments of sri N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be andlhereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 ot 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ot2015 and batch;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 169

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 5004 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court u,hile condoning the delay; and

5. That thr.'re shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPY// SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL PUTY REGISTRAR --'7 SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senir:r Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Oopies ADK I n sr; w ' '{" {r. l +.;.1 I t70 HIGH COURT DATED:2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.214 ot 2025 ISPOSING OF APPEAL o c 171 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE 2il=Fl-[ll THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA

1. Komari Balaswamy, S/o.Balaiah, age 75 years 2. Komari Ramakrishna, S/o.Bdlaswamy, age 45 years, AII Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, PebbairMandal,Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants D The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. .RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated0T-04-2011 rnadeinO.P.No.'t85of 2010 onthefileof thecourtof theSenior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming_on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments.of Sri N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows : '1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 ol 2O16 and also the 7 L72 common Judgment, dated 27 -09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S No.125 of 20'15 and batch;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer;

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 5004 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPY'/ SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL UTY REGISTRAR N OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK 4/ d n \ d,li k& ''. , t L73 HIGH COURT DATED i2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.215 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT GOSTS $( L74 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDE WEDNESDAY, THE TWENry THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE EIiI=Ff{IIi , THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA D LAAS.No.216 OF 2025 Between:

1. K.Tirupathaiah, S/o.Balaswamy, age 55 years 2. K.Shiva Kumar, S/o.Balaswamy, age 45 years, All Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, PebbairMandal,Wanaparthy District. ..AppellanUClaimants D The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-PhaseJl, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. .RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dald07-04-201 l madeinO.P.No.'l86of 2010onthefileof thecourtof theSenior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds bf appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 ot 2O16 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 o't2015 and batch;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; L75

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for'the delay period of 5004 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. ,/TRUE COPYII SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL TY REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK N/ -ai!....ft " r{r t A.B' w I I fi,il 176 HIGH COI.JRT DATED:23,10412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.Na.216 ot 2025 IIIFIEESIN OF APPEAL G 3 c o s t aL/ t' t77 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT . THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA NE! ?Iil,B '1. Boya Sripuram Buchanna, S/o.Gattaiah, age 64 years 2. Shivamma, D/o.Buchanna, age 34 years All Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, PebbairMandal,Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants The Special Deputy Collector Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. , Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, at ..RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree daled O8iO4l2O1 1 made in O.P.No.168 of 2010 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the order and Decrbe of the Lower court and the material papers in the suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-Og-2O22 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2O15 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 178 3' That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act; 4' Trat the claimant be and hereby is not entifled to claim interest for the delay pc'riod of 4994 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Crturt while condoning the delay; and

5. Ttrat there shail be no order as to costs in this appear. //TRUE COPY// MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR OFFICER To,

1.The .Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK M,- 4*.:ra ..t A"rr;v 1 'r. .,) P - ":.. , . tt . 779 HIGH COURT DATED:2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.N o.217 ot 2025. DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS \,1 $ ?1' \ 180 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENryTHIRD DAY OFAPRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TTRUMALA DEVI EAOA LAAS.No.218 OF 2025 Between:

1. Balakistaiah, S/o.Narsimha, age 74 years Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, PebbairMandal,Wanaparthy District.

2. Narasimha, S/o.Balakistaiah, age 53 years Occ: Agriculture, Ri/o. Ngarala Village, PebbairMandal,Wandparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Peb.bair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 071041201 I made in O.P.No.136 of 2010 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Deciee as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 ol 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this 'court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ot 2015 and batch ; 181 fixed by,the Land Acquisition Officer; 2' That the Market varue is enhanced by two more times (1+2)than the vatue 3' That the appellants shall be entitled to ail statutory benefits as stipurated 4' That the' claimant be and hereby is not entifled to craim interest for the deray period of 4ggg days in preferring the appear as specificary ordered by this Court wtrile condoning the detay; and under ttre amended Land Acquisition Act;

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. SD/. ISMAIL TRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPYII To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies U- ADK ( d n B A,'iis 'a, 182 HIGH COURT DATED:2310412025 \ DECREE L.A.A.S.No.218 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL W|THOUTCOSTS g 183 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR S}IAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.219 OF 2025 Between:

1. Komari Ravi, S/o.K.Kukkanna, age 54 years, 2. Komari Raju, S/o.Kukkanna, age 49 years, 3. Komari Suresh, S/o.Kukkanna, age46 years 4. Komari Shankar, S/o.Kukkanna, age 44 years, All Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o. Ngarala Village, PebbairMandal,Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-PhaseJl, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...ResPondenUResPondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggriev.ed by the Order-and decree daled Oi-04-201 1 made in O.P.No.179 ot 2O10 on'the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal' the order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Appeals for the:Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch ; 744

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer;

3. That the appelrants shall be entifled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entifled to claim interest for the delay perio,J r>f 4995 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Courl while condoning the delay; and

5. That th€rre shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. SD/. MOHD. ISMA]L EPUTY REGISTRAR /,TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER Z To,

1.The S^enir:r Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two Cl) Oopies ADK W t n *tr w :. .. ' '.i ,.1 I 185 HIGH COURT DATED:2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.219 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS g 186 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT WEDNESDAY, THE TWENry THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE EiI=FI=NII THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No. 220 OF 2025 Between: B.Mega Reddy, S/o.Gatta Reddy, Age 78 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, PebbairMandal,Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant D The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ..,RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 02-06-201 1 made in O.P.No.146 ot 2011 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upori perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 ol 2O16 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendeied by this court in L.A.A.S.No.'125 ol 2015 and batch;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; L87

3. That tlre appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 4940 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court rryhile condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. ,/TRUE COPYII SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK ry/ t -JF "f:, Lil n ! Ltt, w f.t., - .r?, . r - ,;., i. & 188 HIGH COURT I=i i2310412025 DEGREE L.A.A.S.N 0.220 ot 2025 G OF APPEAL WITHOI.'T c g, 189 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVIL] AND \- - THEHONOURABLESMTJUSTTCETTRUMALA.Q_EYLEjDA 1oF 2025

1. Chennamma, Wo.Kavali Beesanna, age 54 years 2. Narsimha, S/o.Kavali Beesanna, age 34 years All Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal,Wanaparthi District. ...Appellants/Claimants ETITJI Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, at District. Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07-04-2011 made in o.P.No.'t73 ot 2010 on the flle of the court of the senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the order and Decr€e of the Lower court and the material papers in the suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows : 1 . That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 ol 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this ,court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; L90 3' Ttrat the appellants shall be entifled to ail statutory benefits as stipurated under the amended Land Acquisition Act; 4' Th;at the claimant be and hereby is not entifled to craim interest for the deray period of 4ggg days in prefe,ing the appear as specificary ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. sD/- //TRUE COPYII To,

1.The Serrior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies W ADK SECTION OFFICER i I I .) ! Ait. w &' :-. . , i 191 HIGH COURT DATED:23l,0412025 DECREE L.A.A.S. Il o.221 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WTHOUT COSTS , Ll { t92 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERA WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABH D K]I,I7IilSITiVIIII AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: Bala Swamy, S/o Balaiah, Aged about 65 years, Occ : Agriculture, R/o Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal,Wanaparthy District. ..AppellanUClaimant The Special Deputy Pebbair, Wanaparth Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair at y District. ..RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act '1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 1 6-09-2016 made in O.P.No.37 of 2015 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows : 1 . That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 193 3' That the appellants shall be entifled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act; 4' That the claimant be and hereby is not entifled to claim interest for the delay period of 3012 days in preferring the appear as specificary ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. Thert there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPYII i SD/. To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2.Two CD Copies v-' -! "q ADK W, SECTION OFFICER n i ,t c..*; B .{r. .. i -"t t*, , 794 HIGH COURT DATED:23/,0412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.226 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS Dq 151 tN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry F|VE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR STIAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TTRUMALA DEV1 LAAS.No.234 OF 2025 E{DA B n "J"" 1. Purnakanti Bokklaiah, S/o.Kistaiah, age 54 years 2. P.Gattaiah, S/o.Bokkaiah, age 34 years 3. Laxmi, Wo.Sreenu, age 44.years 4. P.Nagaraju, S/o.Bokkalaiah, age 34 years, All Occ- Agriculture, Rl/o. Ngarala Village, PebbairMandal,Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/CIa imants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 071041201 1 made in O.P.No.124.of 2010 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and' also the common Judgment, dated 27 -09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch ; 752

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed b1r the Land Acquisition Officer;

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act; 4' That thr> claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 4995 days in preferring the appeat as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. in ttner" shail be no order as to costs in this appear. //TRUE COPYII SD'. MOHD. ISMAIL TY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2.Two CD Copies ADK W -aF?-f?. rit I { AS w 't .8^ . yf"i \ 153 7 HIGH GOIURT DATED:2t310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.23 4 of 202i DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUTCOSTS $ 754 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.23S OF 2025 Between:

1. A.Lacha Goud, S/o Buddaiah Goud, aged 76 years 2. A.Parmeswar Goud, S/o Lacha Goud, aged 34 years 3. A.Narender Goud, S/o Lacha Goud, aged 32 years 4. Komari Balaiah, S/o Veeraiah, aged 74 years 5. Chakali Narasimha @ Ganapuram Narasimha (died) per LRs., No Address 6. M.Chilukamma,, Wo Late Buchanna, aged 65 years 7. Chakali Narasimha @ Ganapuram Narasimha (died) Per LRs.,, No Address 8. M.Narasimha, S/o Bichanna, aged 39 years 9. Komari Narasimha, S/o K.Chinna Balaiah, aged 65 years 10. Golla Venkatasiash, S/o Sayanna, aged 60 years 1 1. M.Laxmi Devamma(died), per LRs., 12. B.Raghupathi Reddy, S/o Late Gatta Reddy, aged 68 years 13. M.Krishnaiah, S/o Late Kistasiah, aged 58 years 14.M.Venkataiah,'S/o Late Kistaiah, aged 60 years 15. M.Shivaiah, S/o Late Kistasiash, aged 55 years 16. M.Govindu, S/o Late Kistaiah, aged 40 years 17. M.Pedda Gattaiah, Slo Late Chinnaiah, aged 68 years 18. M.Bokkalaiah, S/o Late Kistaiah, aged 60 years lg.A.Narsimlia-Goud, S/o Late Anjaneyulu Goud, aged 40 years 20.S.Ramakrishna Rao, S/o Narasimha Rao, aged 60 years 2l.KomariVatlamma, Wo Balaiah, aged 79 years 22.D.Chinan Kistanna, S/o Late D.Blaiah, aged 63years 23. D.Rangaswamy, S/o Late D.Balaiah, aged 57 years 24.D.Peeda Kistanna, S/o Late Jabbaraiah, aged 68 years 25. Komari Balaiah, S/o Late Veeraiash, aged 74 years 15s

26. Komari Boya Srinivasulu, S/o Kistanna, aged 40 years 2T.K.Thiruoataiah, S/o Balaiah, aged 42 years 28. Lacha Goud, S/o Buddaiah Goud, aged 76 years 29. B.Laxmi Reddy, s/o Bal Reddy, aged 40 years 30. B.Balaswamy, S/o Late balaiah, aged 65 years 31. B.Sai R,eddy, S/o Bal Reddy, aged 38 years 32. G.Shanl<aramma, Wo Late Buddaiah, aged 65 years 33. B.Ramulamma, Wo Swamy Reddy, aged 6g years 34. Komari llavi, S/o Late pedda Kukkanna, aged 55 years 35. B.Bhavarnth Reddy, S/o Bheem Reddy, aged 62 years 36. K.Narasimha, S/o Chinna Kukkanna, aged 56 years 3T.Charakonda Jayamma, Wo Narasimha, aged 4g years 38. K. Laxmi, Wo Komari Shekar, aged 49 years 39. B.Ram Fleddy, S/o Bheem Reddy, aged Sg years 40.G.Kururnanna (died), per LRs., 41. D.Boya Chinna Kistanna, S/o Late Balaiah, aged 63 years 42. K.Chennamma, Wo Late Beesanna, aged 4g years 43. K.Pentanlma, Wo Late K.Narsimha, aged 56 years 44. B.Rathner Reddy (died), per LRs., 45.K.Kurumiliah, S/o Cheviti Balaiah, aged 46 years 46. K.Chinna Balaiah, S/o pedda Buchanna, aged 6g years 47. H.Bokkaliliah, S/o Kistaiah, aged 60 years 48. H.Santhaiah, S/o Yellaiah, aged 65 years 49. K.Ayyanna (died), per LRs., 50.S.Devamtna, Wo Buchanna, aged 61 years 51.M. Mallaierh (died), Per LRs., 52. K.Shankaraiah, S/o Balaiash, aged 59 years 53. B.Venkaterswar Reddy, S/o Bal Reddy, aged 60 years 54.Chennamrta, Wo K.Balaswamy, aged 66 years 55. B.Megha lleddy, S/qGatta Reddy, aged 6g years 56.Arolla Sujatha, D/o Late frlarsimha, aged 36 years 57. Ganapurarr Radha, Wo Kistaiah, aged 34 years 58. Ganapuram Nirmala, Wo Krishnaiah, aged 40 years 59. Ganapurarn venkataiah, s/o Late Narsimha, aged 42 years 60. Ganap^urarn Laxmi Dgyamryg, wo Late Narasimha, dged 70 years (Appellant Nos.56 to 60 are the LRs. Of Appellant No.S) 61.Arolla Sujatha, D/o Late Narasimha, aged 36 years 62.Ganapuram Radha, Wo Kistaiah, aged 34 years 63. Ganapurant Nirmala, Wo Krishnaiah, aged 40 years 156

64. Ganapuram Venkataiah, S/o Late Narasimha, aged 42 years 65. Ganapuram Laxmi Devamma, Wo Late Narasimha, aged 65 years (Appellant Nos.61 to 65 are the LRs of Appellant No.7) 66. Sunitha, D/o Late Gall Reddy, aged 38 years 67.Jagan Reddy, S/o Late Gall Reddy, aged 56 years 6S.Prabhakar Reddy, S/o Late Gall Reddy aged 54 years 69. Ball Reddy, S/o Late Gall Reddy, aged 58 years (Appellant Nos.66 to 69 are the LRs of Appellant No.11)

70.G.Laxmi Devamma, Wo Late Kurumanna, aged 68 years 71. G.Srinivasulu, S/o Late Kurumanna, aged 48 years 72. G.Chennaiah, S/o Late Kurumanna, aged 46 years 73.G.Shivudu, S/o Late Kurumanna, aged 43 years (Appellant Nos.70 to 73 are the LRs of Appellant No.40)

74. Beesam Pedda Manemma,, Wo Rathnas Reddy, aged 68 years 75.Besasm Nagi Reddy, S/o Late Rathna Reddy, aged 48 years 76.Sujatha, D/o Late Rathna Reddy, aged 45 years 77.Srilatha, D/o Late Rathna Reddy, aged 38 years (Appellant Nos.74 lo77 are the LRs of Appellant No.44)

78.Golla Rangamma, D/o Late Ayyanna, aged 4'l years (Appellant No.7B is the LR of Appellant No.49) T9.Chilukamma, Wo Late Buchanna, aged 65 years 80.Sharadha, Wo Late Mallaiah, aged 36 years 81 . Shirisha, D/o Late Mallaiah, aged 36 years 82.Gayathri, D/o Late Mallaiah, aged 37 years (Appellant Nos.79 to 82 are the LRs of Appellant No.51) All are agriculturists and R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District AND ...Appellants/Claimants The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, at Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 16-09-2016 made in O.P.No.3S of 2016 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N Praveen Reddy, Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows : L57 1 . That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch ;

2. Thal the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer;

3. That th€, appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period or' 30'12 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. /,TRUE COPYII SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL SECTION OFFICER To, 'l .The Senio, Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK )6/ d .:. liil, f i.. i.. t 158 HIGH COIJRT DATED:2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.235 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS $ 1V 195 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTTCE T]RUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.237 OF 2025 Between: Suthari Venkatswamy, S/o. Buchanna, aged 65 years, Occ. Agricullure, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaamant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift irrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy Diskict. ...ResPondenUResPondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 04.03.2010 made in O.P.No.417 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at WanaParthY. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri v Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A-A.S'No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -Og-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.'125 ot2015 and batch;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; I 7 196

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the c;laimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 5404 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. SD'. MOHD. ISMAIL TY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY'/ SECTION OFFICER <- To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK W L97 r' HIGH COURT DATED:2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No,.237 0f 2025 DISPOSINIG OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS 4 ( 198 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No..238 OF 2025 Betuveen: Suthari Ravi, S/o. Buchanna, aged 53 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme-, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved'by the Order and decree dated 0310312010 made in O.P.No.418 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arluments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows ,t

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and. also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; I 7 199

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 5404 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That therre shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. ,/TRUE COPY'/ SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL EPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senicr Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2.Two CD rlopies W ADK 6 .! Ats. w E. '{"f. 1 t 200 / / HIGH COI.JRT DATED i2:110412025 DECREE L.A.A.S. Nr).238 of 2025 DrsPosrNG oF APPEAL WITHOUT ISOSTS I 20L IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENry THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVII:| AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No .239 0F 2025 Between: Yuqendhar, S/o. Venkataswamy, aged 35 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o' Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ..APPellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme" Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...ResPondenUResPondent AppealunderSection54ofL.A.Actlsg4aggrievedbytheorderanddecree OateO Oi-be-ZO.l0 made in O.P.No.392 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of sri Ravula shankar Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment lated 15-Og-2O22 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No. ot 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09'2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ot2015 and batch;

2. Thal the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; ---7 202

3. That th,a appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under ttre amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period q;f 5404 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court wlrile condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal' SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR /,TRUE COPY" ON OFFICER To,

1.The Senirlr Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2.Two CD Oopies ADK W I *' n B-. .i SB w , rJ. . 5".' { ! 203 HIGH COIJRT DATED:2310412025 rf{Tt{i A.S.No.239 of 2025 DTFIEIOEil G 3 c g 20,4 ]N THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA D OF Suthari Savaraiah, S/o. Chinna Gattaiah, aged 85 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o' Nagarala Mllage, Pebbair Manddl, Wanaparthy District. . ...AppellanUClaimant NE The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector District. , Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, ...RespondenURespondent AppealunderSection54ofL'A.Actlsg4aggrievedbytheorderanddecree dated 0i.b3.2010 made in O.P.No.41 1 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at WanaParthY This appeal cbming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the order and Decree of the Lower court and the material papers in the suit and upon hearing the arguments of sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Qrder and Debree as follows : 1 . That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -O9-2O22 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ot2015 and batch; .,7 205

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer;

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That ther claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period c'f 5409 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. ihat there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPYII SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR - SECTION OFFICER ---- To, l.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK M. ,ti4-.r{?. r,t \ I ,n # .t \. &.^ .."i;i \l 206 HIGH COURT ATED:2310412025 itT{Tt{E L.A.A.S.No.240 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL (l o $ 207 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENry THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUi'ALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.24'| OF 2025 G.Naveen, S/o. G. Sundaraiah, aged 38 years, Occ : Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. D The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...Appe!!anUClaimant .RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03/03/2010 made in O.P.No.444 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows : '1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ot2015 and batch;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 208

3. That the appellantS shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the <:laimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 5404 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. ,,TRUE COPY" SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK W d -lF #: :t +, F ,,* ei,i' w ."fl ,.tli , ;t.. I ! 209 HIGH COI,JRT DATED:2310412025 DECREE A.S.No.241 of 2O25 ISPOSING OF APPEAL HOUT GOSTS \ \ 270 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.242 OF 2025 Between q Anandu, s/o. chinna Buchanna, aged 51 years, occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Disirict ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, phase-ll, pebbair, District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order d""r." dated 03.03.2010 made in O.P.No.381 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. "nd This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the'material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Ravula Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereOy is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No .125 ot 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+21than .the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 2t1

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under ttre amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 5409 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. ,/TRUE COPY// SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL =I UTY REGI ECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK W- I A 4i. t-l w ..t:t..; ;,.,>:, 2LZ HIGH COIJRT DATED:2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.Na.242 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF HOUT C:OSTS \ 273 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.243 OF 2025 Between: Gunti Maralaiah, S/o. Kondanna, aged 55 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o- Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, WanaparthY District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in O.P.No .445 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at WanaParthY. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the. material papers in thq Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be andrhereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 1S-O1-2O22 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch i

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 2!4

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amr:nded Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the clainrant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay periodof5404daysinpreferringtheappealasspecificallyorderedbythis Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shirll be no order as to costs in this appeal' SD'- MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR ,ffRUE COPY" SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Cirril Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD CoPie's ADK W t -r,' n .t irb; F., .' {:{.1; ' 215 HIGH COIJRT DATED:2:310412025 DEGREE L.A.A.S.N o-243 ot 2025 DISPOSIhIG OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS a 276 tN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABH]NAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.248 OF 2025 Between: Sreenivaslu, S/o. Anjaneyulu, Age 57 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenuRespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03/03/201 0 made in O.P.No.451 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and thd material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 2L7

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 5404 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. /ITRUE COPY'/ SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL PUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER 7 To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK M/ d .iF "f::- r1'l .,i-' : t I A"$g .: ' ,*1i ,.: I 218 a / HIGH COIJRT DATED:2:110412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.248 of 2025 DISPOSINC} OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS I g 279 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT WEDNESDAY, THE TWENry THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ?iI=FFIIIT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI D LAAS.No.249 OF 2025 Between: Kadukuntla Venkatswamy, S/o. Ranganna, aged 63 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. Respondent/Respondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03/03/2010 made in O.P.No.391 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and thd material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Ravula Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows : 1 . That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and. also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ol2015 and batch;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 720

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the ermended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the cl,aimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 5409 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there :;hall be no order as to costs in this appeal. t D. ISMAIL PUTY REGISTRAR OFFICER /,TRUE COPYII To,

1.The Senior Crvil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copir:s ADK W /I -i.. r) v Ari k# f. 22L HIGH COURT DATED:23l,0412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.Na.249 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT GOSTS 222 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENry THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT . THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI D THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA TTVF, Between: G. Gopi, S/o. G. Venkataswamy, aged 35 years, Occ : Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant D The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. denURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03/03/2010 made in O.P.No.430 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the! material paperc in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows : I

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -O9-2O22 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.'125 ot2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 223

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entifled to claim interest for the delay period of 5404 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court wtrile condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. SD/- trrOHD. ISMAIL i'\ U SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY" To,

1.The Seniol Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK M- 4 *. A:/t: B f, {r g:l l - ,:), a 224 HIGH COURT DATED:2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.250 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT I3OSTS 1q $ 225 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDE WEDNESDAY, THE TWENW THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE PRESENT . THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEV] EADA D 1 Gunti Pedda Bauchanna, S/o. Balaiah, Aged 73 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Dishict. ...AppellanUGlaimant D The Special Wanaparthy Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Dishict. .RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 18% aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03/03/2010 made in O.P.No.378 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and thd material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Ravula Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows : .l 1 . That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ot2015 and batch;

2. fhat the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 7 225

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the: amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for'the delay period of 5404 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That therr: shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. ,/TRUE COPY// SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR I OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK hy ,l I .Far '! .tt i'ii qt' 227 HIGH COURT DATED:2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.251 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL o (] 1 'v) 224 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENW THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRlJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.2S3 OF 2025 Between: Gunti Venkataswamy, S/o. Gopanna, aged 60 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03/03/2010 made in O.P.No.429 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and thd material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arEuments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and-Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 ot 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ot 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 229

3. That the appellants shall be entifled to all statu under th€ amended Lancl Acquisition Act; 4. That the r:laimant be and hereby is not entifled to period of s4o4 days in preferring the appeal court while condoning the delay; and _ 5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. ttory benefits as stipulated interest for the delay ;pecifically ordered by this ", ..,",, TK::* !rrL,o,oFF,;; //TRUE COPYII To, l. H,X?",i 8ir!i'rr J udse' at wanapa rthv ADK ry- n 4 ,F-f:- { r:;i E* \ *+, r t 230 / HIGH COIURT DATED t2:3l,04l,2025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.253 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS 23t IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDE WEDNESDAY, THE TWENry THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ?if*I{rll THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Cheerla Laxmanna, S/o. JambUlaiah, aged 95 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant D The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. .RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in O.P.No.453 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon.perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-Og-2O22 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ol 20'15 and batch;

2. Thal the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 232

3. That thr: appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That ther claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 5404 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL UTY REGISTRAR ON OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD ()opies ADK W t F Al{,w ! 233 HIGH COIJRT DATED:2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.256 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS ( 234 ]N THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE ABHINAND KUttlAR SHAvlLil AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA 7oF Raiesh, S/o. Venkaswamy, Aged 45 years, Occ. Agriculture, Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Diskict. ...AppellanUClaimant D The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Orderand {ecree dated 03/03/2010 made in o.P.No.456 0f 2009 0n the file of the court of the senior Civil Judge, at WanaParthY. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the order and Decree of the Lower court and the material papers in the suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellants and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A-A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ot2015 and batch;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 235

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the c:laimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 5419 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court whil= condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPY" SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK 4!. 236 HIGH COURT DATED:2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.N o.297 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT .COSTS I g 237 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry F|VE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI . S. Nagesh, S/o. Anjaneyulu aged 73 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy Dishict. ..RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in O.P.No.448 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon'perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 ot 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 oI 20'15 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 234

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for.the delay period of 5406 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court wtrile condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. ,,\ SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR EEPUW 't--- \ \ l\rj i I SECTTON OFFTCER U //TRUE COPY// To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Cr>pies ADK N/ I ..lF "f: .il I i;r' t\ f'r t$ "r-. I 239 I ( \l \ HIGH COT.,RT DATED i12310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.Ilo.298 of 2025 DISPOSINIG OF APPEAL UT q ( .f) 240 !N THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SKIAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUST]CE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.301 OF 2025 Between: Vemmula Ramulu, S/o Rangaiah, aged 60 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme,Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in O.P.No.400 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and thd material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows : 'l . That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 oI 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ol 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 7 241

3. That th') appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That lhe claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay perioo cf 5408 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That the'e shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. ,/TRUE COPY" SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL PUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD C,rpies ADK 4V -t 'Y.. 1, :;i ?,* * .i, 242 HIGH COI'RT D ATED i'.131104l,2025 DEGREE L.A.A.S.lrlrl.301 of 2025 DISPOSING OF l WITHOU'T COSTS 'r) $ 243 !N THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry F|VE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR LI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.303 OF 2025 Gunti Nagesh, S/o. Kistanna, Age 57 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. D The Special Wanaparthy Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ...AppellanUClaimant Respondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03/03/2010 made in O.P.No.312 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papersi in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows : t

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated '15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 ol 2016 and. also the common Judgment, dated 27..09-2022 renderbd by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; -7/ 244

3. That ther appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under th: amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 5410 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court rrvhile condoning the delay; and

5. That tlrere shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPYII SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL UTY REGISTRAR OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies WADK 6 I t {t) B +.:;; ! 245 HIGH CO,URT DATED:21310412025 DECREE A.A.S.Nlo.303 of 2025 DISPOSINIG OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS 246 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY T!-IIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No Between: V. Shekar, S/o. Ramaswamy, age 60 years, Occ : Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant ETII' The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ..RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in O.P.No.323 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Dedree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2O15 and batch ; 247

2. That th,3 Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer;

3. That th,= appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under ttre amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That lh€r claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay periocl c,f 5410 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. /,TRUE COPY// s MOHD. ISMAIL EPUTY REGISTRAR \i SECTION OFFICER I To,

1.The Seniol Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Crtpies ADK W ,.$!{ "f: L;, !:?) w t 248 HIGH COIJRT DATED:12310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S. t'1o.304 ot 2025 DISPOSITIG OF APPEAL OUT COSTS I $I 249 ,N THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR vtLt THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TI AND oF 2025 Praveen, S/o. Bhujangam, age 40 gars, Occ : Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. D The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. .AppellanUClaimant .RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03/03/2010 made in O.P.No.316 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows : I

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 ot 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ot 2O15 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times ('l+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; - ---'-/' 250

3. That the appellants shall be entifled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That tht: claimant be and hereby is not entifled to claim interest for'the delay period of 5410 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPY// SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL UTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER ( To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK W n t.

4.ii w 257 HIGH CO,LilRT 1 ATED:2,310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.N|o.305 of 2025 DISPOSINIGi OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS I g 252 tN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA D Vishnu, S/o. Pebbair Mandal, D rs, Occ: Agriculture R/o. Nagarala Village, ...AppellanUClaimant The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, / Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in O.P.No.318 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ot2015 and batch;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2fthan the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 253

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act:

4. That :he claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay periorl of 5410 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court wlrile condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal.. ,,TRUE COPY'/ . MOHD. UTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Serrior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK W 4 -,c(5:. f! n **; w -) r- b:,.: 1:. t 254 HIGH COURT DATED:2li 10412025 DI=rcIFf{E L.A.A.S.No.306 ot 2025 DISPOSITTI(} OF APPEAL WITHOUI'(}OSTS 255 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI D THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA .N Gunti Sailu, S/o. Yenganna, age 85 years, Occ: Agriculture, R:/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ..ApPellanUClaimant The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. . RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in O.P.No.313 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows : ,l

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 ol 2016 and'also the common Judgment, dated 27 -09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 256

3. That the erppellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under thra ;1ms.6ed Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period o1' 5'410 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there r;hall be no order as to costs in this appeal. ,/TRUE COPY/' iit, SD'- MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR ) SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior C vil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Cc pir-.s ADK M/ .) ! *i+ w ,s 'i'I.. ';.t t 257 HIGH GOIJRT DATED:2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.llo.307 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS u) $ 258 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT WEDNESDAY, THE TWENW THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUTTIALA DEVI EADA D LAAS.No.308 OF 2025 A. Vidyasagar, S/o A. Chendrayudu, age 47 years, Occ. Agriculture R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. D The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in O.P.No.350 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and thei material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.'125 ot2015 and batch;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 7 2s9

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under ttre amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That th€| claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay periocl of 5410 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL _ .-_-_1_ SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD C,rpies ADK M ! i,li $ F. ':::.-, 260 HIGH COIJRT I ATED:123/0412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.308 ot 2025 " DISPOSIN(3 OF APPEAL THOUT.COSTS I $ 26L IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENry THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRt JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.309 OF 2025 Between s.-Krishnaiq!, s{o. s.ayq11a, ag9. 5!. yQars, occ: Agriculture R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Disirict. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, phase-ll, pebbair, District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in O.P.No.321 of 20Og on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as foilows .1

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-og-2o22 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; l. ! -7 262 3- That tl'e appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under tlre amended Land Acquisition Act; 4- That thr: claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay periorl of 5410 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR OFFICER //TRUE COPY'/ To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK A. t a '].' fi\tiz kB I t 263 HIGH CO{.'RT DATED i2:310412025 DECREE: L.A.A.S.ltlo.309 of 2025 DISPOSII{G OF APPEAL WITHOUTCOSTS * 264 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA ATH WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT , THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI ENI' THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Gunti Buchanna, S/o. Laxmaiah, age 80 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant ENTj] The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. .RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in O.P.No.371 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows : '1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 ot 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -Og-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ot2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 265

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entifled to claim interest for the delay perioc cf 5410 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Courl while condoning the delay; and

5. That::here shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPY// SD'- MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER I To,

1.The Senicr Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CEt C:opies ADK ry. 266 / HIGH COL'RT DATED:2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.I!1 0 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL UT S 267 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry F|VE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR stfAVltt- AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.311 OF 2025 Between: V. Nagesh, S/o. Ramaswamy, age 53 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ,..AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in O.P.No.324 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material. papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered 6y this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer;

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory beneflrts as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act; 268

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 5410 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Cour':while condoning the delay; and

5. Thirt there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. SD'. MOHD. ISMAIL PUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// l I SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Ser ior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2.Two CD Copies ADK W d 's'f: *l .., \.,'' 'l* I .{ ';. ', ."; r t 269 HIGH GOURT DATED:2310412025 DECREE: L.A.A.S.No.311 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT GOSTS 4 s 270 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINANO KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.312 OF 2025 Between: M. Anil Kumar, S/o. M. Narasimhulu, age 53 years, Occ : Agriculture, Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03/03/2010 made in O.P.No.330 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arQuments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows : 1 . That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 ot 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -O9-2O22 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 27L

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated unde'the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That tht: claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 5410 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court wlrile condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. ,/TRUE COPY// SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL PUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD C,rpies ADK W. n ,iia i':t w t! g *lr I, ,,-., , 272 HIGH GICURT DATED:2.310412025 , - DECREE L.A.A.S.l{o.3 12 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS \ b 273 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENry THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EAOA LAAS.No.313 OF 2025 Between: G. Suresh, S/o.G. Munakar, age 53 years, occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Mllage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Raieev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenUResPondent Appeal. under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03-03-20'10 made in O.P.No.334 of 2OOS on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao; Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals fol the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows 1 . That the appeal be andl hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -09-2022 rendered by this court in L-A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch;

2. Thal the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; --7 274

3. Ttrat the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay perio,J of 5410 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That lhere shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL PUTY REGISTRAR ,,TRUE COPY// --:> SECTION OFFICER To, 1-The S,:nior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two C:D Copies ADK W ,$ AP' w &r" ,:-!:i.j 275 HIGH CI)URT DATED:2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.313 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT GOSTS .. \( ,y1,\s 276 IN THE H]GH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD UilEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TTRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.314 OF 2025 Between: A. Kistanna, S/o. Chinna Buchanna, Age 80 years, Occ: Agriculture, Nagarala Village, Pebbair Manda l, Wanapa--rthy Dislrict. R/o ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, phase-ll, pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03/03/2010 made in o.P.No.356 of 2009 on the file of the court of the senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon.perusing the grounds of appeal, the order and Decree of the Lower court and the material papers in the suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No,4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ot2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 277

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated underr the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 5410 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Coun: w'hile condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. T'TRUE COPY// SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL ^qEPUW REGISTRAR '\\ \-- | \"1 \.j secrror,r oFFrcER '----7 To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD'Copies ADK W n A'i; i f 278 / / HIGH COTJRT DATED i11310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.ltlor.31 4 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL o UT GOSTS { 279 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENWTHIRD DAY OFAPRIL TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FIVE EIil=Fl=UII THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABH]NAND KUMAE SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI E,[-DA D LAAS.No.3 15oF 2025 Between: Krishnaiah, .S/o- Bhujangam, age 50 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. D The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, phase-ll, pebbair, Wanaparthy District. .AppellanUClaimant ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in o.P.No.315 of 2009 on the file of the court of the senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows : 1 . That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 ot 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch; 280

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer;

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated unde'the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That tht; claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay periort of 5410 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court wlrile condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. sD/- trroHD. tsM EPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY" SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Crrpies ADK W 4 :\ Ai|j w t:.'I

5.: E: 281 HIGH COURT DATED:2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.ilo.31 5 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS $ 2az IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA ATH WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUilIAR SHAV]LI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI D LAAS.No.316 OF 2025 M. Manyamkonda, S/o. M. Ramanna, age 65 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. D The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ..AppellanUClaimant ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03-03-2010 made in O.P.No.365 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and thd material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ot 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 283

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated unde,r the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 5410 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Courl w'hile condoning the delay; and

5. That lhere shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. SD/- MOHD. lSMAlL TY REGISTRAR /TTRUE COPY/' SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Serrior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK 4 ! 4ii YP 'n:. L., h 284 HIGH COURT DATED:2310412025 DECREE: L.A.A.S.lNo.31 6 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUI'COSTS . ')^ 285 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENry THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.3'|7 OF 2025 Between: Gopal, S/o. Kiptanna, age 60 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lfrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in O.P.No.310 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 2Z-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ot2015 and batch;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 286

3. Thert lhe appellants shall be entiled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That tlrs 6;216rn1 be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 5410 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Cout rvhile condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL D PUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Serric,r Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two Ct) C:opies ADK W :qfi :,: 1' *. ^'- 287 HIGH COURT DATEtI:,2310412025 f / ) DECREE L.A.A.S,,No.31 7 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS 1 g 288 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND -_ THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUilIALA DEVI EADA Between: LAAS.No.318 OF 2025 Gunti Ravi, S/o. Laxmanna, age 45 years, Occ Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in O.P.No.342 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds 9f appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ot 2015 and batch :

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; -- / 289

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That th,= claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay perio,C r:f 5410 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Courl while condoning the delay; and

5. That Lherre shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. /TTRUE COPY/' SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Serrior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies W ADK $ii i,s 290 HIGH COURT DATED:2310412025 DECREE: L.A.A.S.No.318 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS 1 291 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUST]CE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.321 OF 2025 Between: G. Venkatswamy, S/o. G. Buchanna, age 55 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant ANO The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in O.P.No.373 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upori perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows : ,t

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 292

3. That tl're appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That thr-. claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay periorl of 5410 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court wlile condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPYII SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL EPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK M, I 1 n :i':!, Ef' l.l 293 HIGH CICURT D TED:2.310412025 TI{TT{+ L.A.A.S.|{ o.321 ot 2025 DISPOSI]{G OF AP WITHOUI'ISOSTS 294 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SEAVIL] AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.322 OF 2025 Between: Y9m!rl" Ramaswamy, S/o. Pqdda Ranganna, age 90 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o.NagaralaVillagd,PebbairMandal'Wanaparthiyolstrict. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, phase-ll, pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03/03/2010 made in o.P.No.322 of 2009 on the file of the court of the senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Dedree as follows : '1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ot 2015 and batch ; 295

2. That: the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixecl by the Land Acquisition Officer ;

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated unde,r the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 5410 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Courl while condoning the delay; and

5. That :here shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. /,TRUE COPY/' \ SD'- MOHD. ISMAIL EPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Ser,ior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK U. 4 -8'! f-'; r.r -) A,!l F :t 296 HIGH COURT DATEE| :2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.N o.322 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOL'TCOSTS v 297 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDE WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.323 OF 2025 Between: A. Ravi, S/o.Pedda Bichanna, age !3 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant D The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...Respondent/Respondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03-03-2010 made in O.P.No.353 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 ot 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ol 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 298

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated underr lhe amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 5410 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Cogrt vrrhile condoning the delay; and

5. That thr-'re shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPYII SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL PUTY REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Serrior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two Ct) Copies ADK ryy 299 HIGH COURT DATED:2:1104l,2025 DECRET: L.A.A.S.No.323 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF AP,PEAL WITHOUT COSTS \ ( 300 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTTCE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA slTr'_Ll LAAS.No.324 OF 2025 Between: G. Gunti Munakar, s/o Laxmaiah, age_f3 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Viif"g", Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District' ...AppellanUClaimant AND The special Dy.collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, WanaParthY District. ... RespondenURes Pondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Orderand decree dated oi.bg.zor0 made in o.P.No.332 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at WanaParthY. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of sri v Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent' This Court doth Order and Decree as follows : .r

1. That the appeal be and'hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 1S-Og-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; a 301

3. That lh€r sppsllsnls shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under th: amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That tlre claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 5410 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and 5" That ttre'e shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPY// SD'- MOHD. ISMAIL PUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Serrior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two C[) Oopies ADK M 4 : t. n w'' 1 302 HIGH COTJRT DATED:12it10412025 DECREE: L.A.A.S.No.324 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOU COSTS g ) 303 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSANDAND TWENry FiVE P:I{T{fI . THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA ABHI NAN D KUMAdEE-AVILI LAAS.No.325 OF Chandrayudu, S/o. Pedda Buchanna, age 70 years, Occ: Agriculture Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant EIIT' The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ..RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree daled 0310312010 made in O.P.No.349 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arEuments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows : t 1 . That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 . rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ot 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times ('l+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 304

3. That th,' appellants shall be entifled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That lher claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay periocl c'f 54't0 days in preferring the appear as specificaily ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That the'e shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. /,TRUE COPY// SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL D PUry REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy f. Two CD Copies 4- ADK \ t\Ft B ) ! p, 305 HIGH COURT DATED:2l3lO4l2O25 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.325 ot 2025 DISPOI}ING OF APPEA HOUT COSTS 305 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRTJUSTTCE ABHTNAND K_UMAR SHAVIL| AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALNEVI<ADA Between G. Krishnaiah, S/o. Pedda Gopanna, age 75 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. D The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ..AppellanUClaimant Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act '1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03-03-2010 made in O.P.No.346 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and thd material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arEuments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 307

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That lher claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay periocl c,f 5410 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That tlrere shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPY'/ SD'- MOHD. ISMAIL REGIS SECTION OFFICER -1 To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK 4y .f-1"1 .;t A\. w I 308 HIGH COURT DATED:2:310412025 DI:Glil=fi L.A.A.S.No.326 ot 2025 DISPOSINGi OF APPEAL WITHOUT GOSTS I eV Y 309 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERA WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL , TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT . THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR S+NVid - AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.327 OF 2025 Vemula Gopal, S/o. Ramakistaiah, Age 60 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AppellanUClaimant The Special Wanaparthy Dy. Collector, Raj-eev Lift lrrigation Scheme, PhaseJl, Pebbair, Dishict. . RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03/03/2010 made in O.P.No.337 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and thd material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows : 1 . That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 oI 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -Og-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ot 2O15and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 310

3. That thc) appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under th,-. amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 5410 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court wh ile condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL UTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER \ U To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Cr>pies ADK ry/ { ,.er! '4:: ..1 ,) Ale w r,, a " I 311 HIGH COURT D D :2310412 25 I -=.t u CREE L.A.A.S.N o327 ot 2025 DISPOSIN G :l r) G I 3t2 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry F|VE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA D Between: G.Vishnu, S/o. Gopal, age 43 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. .AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in O.P.No.31 1 of 2009. on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -Og-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 7 313

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the r;laimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 5410 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and S--That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPY// ^SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL oFAVw REGTSTRAR i\''J- vsEcTroN oFFrcER To,

1.The Senior Oivil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK ry. -- n ^t \}. ! d" 314 HIGH COIJRT DATED:2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.328 ot 2025 ISPOSING OF APPEAL (] g 315 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR S!+AVI[+ AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.329 OF 2025 Between Gunti Ramesh, S/o. Laxmanna, age 40 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in O.P.No.341 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals foi the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follciws

1. That the appeal be andrhereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ot 2015and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 316

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 5410 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there s;hall be no order as to costs in this appeal. SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR /,TRUE COPY'/ OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK ry/ \- A :.' i! T7 w *., i 3L7 HIGH COIJRT DATED:2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.329 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL o s 318 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR STIAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA - LAAS.No.33O OF 2025 A. Bal Raju, S/o. Chendrayudu, age 40 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in O.P.No.351 of 2009 on the file of the e,ourt of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 oI 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ot2015 and batch;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 319

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under ttre amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 5410 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPY// SD'. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER I To,

1.The Senicrr Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK hr 4 k# E 320 HIGH COURT DATED:2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.330 ot 2025 DlsPoslNG OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS g 327 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAO WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSANDAND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMARSI{AVILI .'\- AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA OEVI EAbA LAAS.No.331 OF 2025 Between G. Sreenu, S/o. G. Buchanna, age Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy 53 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in O.P.No.372 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the .Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows 1 . That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ot2O15 and batch;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 322 3' That the appellants shalt be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under thr> amended Land Acquisition Act; 4' That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to ctaim interest for the delay period o1' 5410 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shafl be no order as to costs in this appear. //TRUE COPY// SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK s?; w .Y 323 HIGH COURT DATED:2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.331 of 2025 ISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS eV 324 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR,SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No.332 OF 2025 Between: Q,. Raju. 9/o q Bheemudu, ag9 4_S. years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanapaithy Disirict. ' AND ...AppellanUClaimant The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, phase-ll, pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ..,Respondent/Respondent Appeal under section 54 of L.A. Act 1g94 aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03/03/2010 made in o.p.No.345 of 2009 on the file ofihe court of the senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the order and Decree of the Lower court and the material papers in the suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this .court in L.A.A.S.No.125 o12015 and batch;

2. Thal the Market value is enhanced by two more times ('l+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 7 325

3. That the appr:llants shall be entifled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entifled to claim interest for the delay period of 5410 days in preferring the appear as specificaily ordered by this Court while corrdoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPY// SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL TYREGISTRAR D CTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK W ,d I 1 i\ i 4H }tI} 326 J "/ HIGH COTIRT DATED:23i14412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.332 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS { 327 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMARSHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVT EADA AND -___ Between: LAAS.No.333 OF 2025 s....Satyanl?, p/-o, Mashanna, ag.g 55.ye.ars, occ : Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Didtrict. AND ...AppellanUClaimant The special Dy.collector, Rajeev Lift rrrigation scheme, phase-ll, pebbair, Wanaparthy District ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03-03-2010 made in O.P.No.339 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the ariuments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows : .1 1- That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 2T-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 201land batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 328

3. That the appellants shall be entifled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entifled to claim interest for the delay period of 5410 days in preferring the appeal as specificaily ordered by this Court wlrile condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPY// SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL UTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senio' Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK 4- I .,r 1;' i \.t', ts' ! l. t 329 HIGH COL'RT DATED:2310412025 DECREE A.S.No.333 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS I g 330 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENry THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSANDAND TWENry FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAKSHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI.E.ADA D LAAS.No.334 OF 2025 G. Gopal, S/o. Narayana, age 43 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant EIII' The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03-03-20'10 made in O.P.No.34B of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows : '1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 331

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 5410 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That therr: shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. /,TRUE COPY// SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL TY REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD C,rpies ADK fl".-|?.:,1 Alir- .l;-;i. ,i ' ":,:lIi'; , -,.4?u q 332 "/ HIGH COURT DATED |2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.334 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS I 333 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry F|VE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUM AR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUTI,IALA DEVI€ADA AND LAAS.No.33S OF 2025 Between M.Venkatgwamy, S{o M Ramanna, Age 63 years, Occ: Agriculture, Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. R/o. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03/03/2010 made in O.P.No.366 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arluments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 20't6 and atso the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times ('l+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 334 3' That r:he appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act; 4' That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 5410 days in preferring the appeat as specifically ordered by this Court rrvhile condoning the delay; and 5- That tl^ere shail be no order as to costs in this appear. //TRUE COPYII SD/- MOHD. TSMAIL REGISTRAR OFFICER To,

1.The Senicr Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2.Two CD tlsp;sg ADK 4!. u 4 ,fld f; (:t it, n 1 \ ") lr *ir ldl, 4" :;. , \ 33s t, HIGH COI.IRT DATED i2ill04l2025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.335 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUTCOSTS I Vr 336 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: OF M..Narasimhulu, s/o. M. Kistanna, fge^g0 years, occ: Agricurture, R/o. Nagarara Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparth! District. ...AppellanUClaimant The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, phase-ll, pebbair, District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in o.P.No.328 of 2009 onthe file of the court of the senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon.perusing the grounds of appeal, the order and Decrqe of the Lower court and the material papers in the suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri v Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows : 't. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 2Z -09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ot2015 and batch;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; -------7 337

3. That thr: appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 5410 days in preferring the appear as specificaily ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPYII SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER To,

1.The S_enior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK n { \ .Lr1j ,l t t^ 338 HIGH COURT DATED:2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.336 of 2025 DISPOSING OF ARPEAL WITHOUT COSTS \ x 339 IN THE HIGH COU RT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERA WEDNESDAY, THE TWENry THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FME PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA D N 7 M.Ramanna, S/o. Narasimha, ag9 9-5. years' Occ: Agriculture' Rl/o' Nagarala Viiidge, Peubair Mandal, Wanaparthy District' ...ApPellanUClaimant D The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme' Phase-ll' Pebbair' WanaparthY District. ...RespondenUResPondent Appeal under Section 54 of L A' Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in o.p.No.SOa of 2009 0rithe file of the court of the senior Civil Judge, at WanaParthY. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal' D""r"" oith" Lo*"' Court and the material papers in the Suit and the Order uponhearingtheargumentsofSriVManoharRao'AdvocatefortheAppellantand of GP for Appeals for the Respondent' "nJ This Court doth Order and Decree as follows t

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-Og-2O22 rendered by this court in L'A'A'S'No'4 ol 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27 -Og-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 ot2O15 and batch;

2. Thalthe Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 340

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4. That ther claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 5410 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR S OFFICER _< //TRUE COPY// To,

1.The Senio' Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2.Two CD Copies ADK W F {ri a. ,i:fj 341 HIGH COURT DATED:2310412 78 Il DECREE A.S.No.337 o12025 I C o WITHOUT COSTS . x,( 342 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDE WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE trliFFFIIfi THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUST]CE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between M. Ram Chandraiah, S/o. M.Kistanna, age 75 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Dishict. ...AppellanUClaimant D The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act '1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03/03/2010 made in O.P.No.326 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 ot 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times ('t+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 343

5. That the appellants shall be entitled to ail statutory benefits as stipurated unrler the amended Land Acquisition Act; That the claimant be and hereby is not entifled to craim interest for the deray per;od of 1054 days in preferring the appear as speci ficaryordered by this Cor_rrt while condoning the delay; and That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. sD/- //TRUE COPYII To, OFFICER

1.The Ser,ior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies ADK W d .1 I i. .i tr )! l:: / 1{r' i" ,.. 344 HIGH GOURT DATED:2310412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.338 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF D OUT COSTS g 345 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No .339 0F 2025 Between: A. Venkataswamy, S/o. Pedda Buchanna, 5]. years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o' Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND TheSpecialDy.Collector,RajeevLiftlrrigationScheme,/Phase-ll'Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ...RespondenUReiPondent AppealunderSection54ofL.A.Act1sg4aggrievedbytheorder-anddecree AateO oilbglzol0 made in O.P.No.352 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at WanaParthY. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal' the order and Decree of the Lower court and the material papers in the suit and upon hearing the aiguments of sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent' This Court doth Order and Decree as follows : 1 . That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 1s-og-zo2zrenderedbythiscourtinL.A.A.S.No.4ol2o16andalsothe common Judgment, dated 27 -Og-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch ;

2.ThattheMarketvalueisenhancedbytwomoretimes(1+2)thanthevalue fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 346

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

4.Thatt.reclaimantbeandherebyisnotentitledtoclaiminterestforthedelay period of 5010 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5.Thattrrereshallbenoorderastocostsinthisappeal. ,,TRUE COPY" SD'. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD CoPies M. ADK i 1- .s-fis. F., 1 \ .) s&B i,. - "7 -t: ,, 1i.t 347 / / HIGH COIJRT DATED i2:r10412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.339 of 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS 1 1v 348 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS.No;340 OF 2025 Between: G. Narayana, S/o. Pedda Gopanna, age 70 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase- ll, Pebbair, District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 made in O.P.No.347 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows :

1. That the appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 15-09-2022 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27-09-2022 renderbd by this court in L.A.A.S.No .125 of 2015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 349

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under ther amended Land Acquisition Act; .,

4. That the claimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 5010 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court whrle condoning the delay; and

5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. //TRUE COPY/' SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.The Senior Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2.Two CD Copies ADKM i -4!.,f: .{ ,t ! w 1 350 / HIGH COLIRT DATED i23t10412025 DEGREE L.A.A.S.No.340 of 2025 DISPOSING OF AP.PEAL WITHOUTCOSTS v 351 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KT'M}H, SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI€ADA AND \ -' LAAS.No.341 OF 2025 Between: G. Krishnaiah, S/o. G. Laxmaiah, age 55 years, Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala ..AppellanUGlaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of L.A. Act 1894 aggrieved by the Orderand decree dated O3iO3t2O10 made in O.P.No.343 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior ' This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the irguments of Sri V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the Appellant and of GP for Appeals for the Respondent' This Court doth Order and Decree as follows : t

1. That the-appeal be and hereby is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 1S-O1-2O22 rendered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and also the common Judgment, dated 27'09-2022 ren(ered by this court in L.A.A.S.No.125 o12015 and batch ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer; 352

3. That the appellants shall be entitled to all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act,

4. That the olaimant be and hereby is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 5410 days in preferring the appeal as specifically ordered by this Court while condoning the delay; and

5. That ther,: shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. sD/- iloHD. rsMAlL PUTY REGISTRAR ,/TRUE COPY'/ SECTION OFF]CER I To,

1.The Senicr Civil Judge, at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD C)opies ADK 353 / HIGH COIJRT DATED i2:110412025 DECREE L.A.A.S.No.341 ol 2025 DISPOSING OF APPEAL WITHOUTCOSTS {