High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 oI lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ Order or direction, particularly in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not rectifying entries in the revenue records by restoring the name of the Petitionei and not issuing new pattedar pass books in favou-r of the Petitioner in respect of the land admeasuring Ac. 1.'16 gts. in Sy.No. 449111214 (Sy.No.449/Pad and 449lPart), situated Artula Village,. Manchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District pursuant to the online Application submitted by the Petitioner vide Application No. 2200080616 dt.28-07-2022 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and violative of Art. 19, 21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents to rectify entries in the revenue records by.restoring the name and issue new pattedar pass books in favour of the Petitioner in respect of the land admeasuring Ac 1.16 gts. in Sy.No. 449111214 (Sy.No. 449lParl and 449lPar1), situated Artula Village, Manchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, forthwith lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to consider the online Application submitted by the Petitioner vide Application No. 2200080616 dt. 28-07-2022 for rectification entries by restoring the name of the Petitioner in the revenue records and.issue new pattedar pass books in favour of the Petitioner in respect of the land admeasuring Ac. 1.16 gts. in Sy.No. 449111214 [Sy.No. 449lPan and 449lPar1l, situated Artula Village, Manchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. BASETY KARTHIK Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASI{AR REDDY WRIT PETITION N o-6621 of 2025 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking to declare the action of the respondents in not rectifying the entries in the revenue records by restoring the name of the petitioner and not issuing the new pattadar passbook in favour of the petitioner in ; respect of the land admeasuring Ac' 1' 16 gts' in Sy.No.449l1/2/a (Sy.No.449 lPart and 449 lPart) situated at Arutla Village, Manchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District' pursuant to the online application submitted by the petitioner vide Application No.2200080616 dated 28'O7 '2022' as illegal ald arbitrary artd consequently prayed for other appropriate reliefs.

2. Considered the submissions of learned counsel for the respective parties and perused the record' It is - stated that the petitioner is the pattadar and 3. possessor of the agricultural land to an extent of Ac'0'23 guntas in Sy.No.449/Part and Ac'0'33 guntas in Sy.No.449/Part, total admeasuring Ac' 1' 16 gts' (new CVB&J wP 6621 2025 2 Sy.No.449l 112/4) situated at Arutla Village, Manchal \ Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. It is further stated that the petitioner's name is recorded in the_ revenue records as pattadar ald possessor in respect of the subject land. The case of the petitioner is that the extent mentioned earlier, i.e., land forming part of Sy.Nos.449/Part and 449/Part' is deleted from the revenue records without issuing any notice and for not issuing the e-pattadar passbook duly mentioning the earlier extent of the land, the petitioner u'as constrained to make an online application uide application No.2200080616, dated 28.07.2022. The grievance of the petitioner is that even after receipt of the said application, the respondent authorities did not consider the same. Hence, the writ petition.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently contended that issuance of e-pattadar passbook is only a consequential act of carrying the entries which have already been made under the provisions of the ROR Act, 197 1 ald the entries made in the pattadar passbook are only compilation of the survey numbers and the accounts for the CVB&J wP 662t 2025 3 extent being mentioned in a particular village and therefore, it does not take away the right of the petitioner in any manner unless the entries in the revenue records have been corrected by following due procedure.

5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents has not disputed the submission of the application by the petitioner seeking for issuance of e-pattadar passbook and if the said application fulfils all the requirements of circular instructions issued by CCLA uide circular No.l of 2021, dated 15.01.2021 and Circular No.l of 2024, dated 28.02.2024, the respondent authorities would consider the same.

6. Be that as it may, the grievance of the petitioner is that while issuing the earlier pattadar passbook, the extent has been correctly mentioned as Ac.O.23 guntas in Sy.No.449/Part arrd Ac.0.33 guntas 1n Sy.No.449lPart, situated at Arutla Village, Manchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy t I District, but the said entries were not carried on/mutated in the Dharani Portal -Bnder the provisions of the Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act,2O2O, and \- CVBR,J wP 662 t 2025 4 consequently, the respondents €rre not issuing the pattadar \ passbook and title deed to enable the petitioner to receive various incentives being salctioned by the Government as an investment subsidy.

7. In view of the above submissions, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing the respondent authorities to examine the online application uide application No.22OOO8O616, dated 28.O7.2022, submitted by the petitioner to ca-rry out necessary corrections in the revenue records and if he fulfils all the requirements mentioned in CCLA's Circular No.1 of 2021, dated

15.O1.2O2L and Circular No.1 of 2024, dated 28.O2.2024, tl:-e respondents are directed to amend the revenue records and issue e-pattadar passbook in favour of the petitioner. If the petitioner is not otherwise eligible, the respondents are directed to pass a reasoned order in accordalce with law and communicate the same to the petitioner within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. CYB&J wP 6621 2025 5

8. With the above observations, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. To, //TRUE COPY// Sd/. P. GOWRI SHANKAR EPUTY REGIST SECTION OFFICER

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, T.S.,Hyderabad.

2. The Di-strict Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Kongarakalan, Ranga Reddy. 3. Revenue Divisional Officer, Manchal Division, Ranga Reddy District. 4. Tahsildar, Manchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 5. One CC to SRl. BASETY KARTHIK, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

7. Two CD Copies BM i:.-: - =:::-- ,1 j. '., i4rt: :- -' ., _ 1l .'( 't. lr q \{,rI ls lji ,+..i HIGH COURT CVBR,J DATED:0 510312025 ORDER WP.No.6621 ot 2025 ,J $ * DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 5l a