Sri. Burugupalli Srinivasa Rao v. 1. The State of Telangana

.....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be ':-pleased to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second proceedings bearing No.18195/G1/2019dated Respondent in lTl}Gl2l2}confirrning the Order.of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.131 of 2019 dated 2111112019, in respect of the Plot No.157 in Survey Nos.36/AA/14, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 2610912013 inFileNo.E5/4733120131 Serilingampally/ Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.Bl322l2OO7, dated 0810912011 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 25l10t2O19,bear:ing Pending Document No. P75712019 executed in favour of the petitioner. t.A. NO:l OF 2021 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to receive and register the sale Deed dated 25.10.2019 bearing Pending Document No.P757l2019 in respect of the Plot No.157 in Survey Nos.36/AA/14, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without reference to the Notification dated 26.09.2013in File No.E5/4733/2013/Serilingampally/Gopanpally of the District collector and the letter bearin,; No.Bl322l2OO7, dated 08/09/2011 of the Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI BOTLA VENKATESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondents : Ms. OARA HARITHA KIRAN, AGP FOR REVENUE W.P.NO: 6920 OF 2021 Between: Smt. Cherukr:ri Prasunamba, W/o. Late Cherukuri Gandhi, Aged about 68 years, Occupation- House wife, R/o.7-'1-300, Green Park Residency, Flat No. 105, B.K. Guda, S.R. Nagar, Hyderabad, Telangana-s0O 038. .....PETITIONER AND 1 . The State of Telangana, Represented by its Special Chief Secretary, Revenrre (Registration and Stamps) Department, D-Block, 4th Floor, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana-500022.

2. The Di:;trict Registrar, Moosapet, Prashanth Nagar, IDA Kukatpally, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana-500072.

3. The Srb-Registrar, Serilingampally, 1-601301761134, 1-601301771134, Anjaiah Nagar, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana-500081. .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstance:; stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to is:;ue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature cf Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.18179/G1/2019 dated 17lOGl2O2O confirming thr: Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.77 of 2019 dated 1911112019, in respect of the Plot No.348 in Survey Nos.36lAN11, situated at Gcpanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on thrr alleged notification daled 2610912013 in FileNo.E5l4733l2013l Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B.132212007, dated 08/09/2011 stated to have been issued by the Tahsiklar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as be,ing illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Agreement of Sale Cum lrrevocable General Power of Attorney dated 0310712019, bearing Pending Document No. P43412019 executed in favour of the petitioner. I.A.NO:1 OF 2021 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to receive and register the Agreement of Sale Cum lrrevocable General Power of Attorney daled 0310712019 bearing Pending Document No.P434l2019 in respect of the Plot No.34B in Survey Nos.36lAN11, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without reference to the Notification dated 2610912013 in File No.E5/473312O131 Serilingampally/ Gopanpally, of the District Collector and the letter bearing No.Bl322l20O7, dated 08/09/201 1 of the Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal. Counsel forthe Petitioner: SRI BOTLA VENKATESWARA RAO Counsel forthe Respondents : Ms. DARA HARITHA KIRAN, AGP FOR REVENUE 2021 Between: U and A lnfra Projects, having its office at Plot No.7, Cyber Meadows, Kondapur Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy Distric! ,Telang_ana. State, represented by its Partner, Sri. P. Arogyam Reddy, S{o. Late P. Arlapa Reddy, Aged aSout 61 years, Occupation. Business, R/o.Villa No.7, Cyber Meadows, Masjid Banda, Kondapur, Serilingampally, Ranga Reddy, Telangana State. ETif{frlt{il D 1 . The State of Telangana, Represented by its Special Chief Secretary, Revenue (Registration and Stamps) Department, D-Block, 4th Floor, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana-500022.

2. The District Registrar, Moosapet, Prashanth Nagar, IDA Kukatpally, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy Diatrict, Telang ana-50007 2.

3. The Sr.rb-Registrar, Serlingampally, 1-60/301761134, 1-60301771134, Anjaiah Nagar Gachibowli, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy Distriet,-Telangana600081. .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to is:;ue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.591/G 1/2020dated 16/06/2020 confirming the Order of r.he Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.149 of 2019 dated 0911212019, in respect of the Plot No.52 in Survey Nos.36lAAl14, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 2610912013 in File No.E5/4733/20'13/ Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.Bl322l2OO7, dated 08/09/2011 stated to have been issued by the TahsilCar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articlesl4 anC 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and further direct the respondents t,r receive and register the Sale Deed dated OOl11l2O19, bearing Pending Docurnent No. P77 412019 executed in favour of the petitioner. |.A.NO:1 OF 21t21 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 0611112019 bearing Pending Document No.P77412019 in respect of the Plot No.52 in Survey Nos.36/AA/14, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without reference to the Notification dated 26/09/2013 in File No.E5/4733/2013/ Serilingampally/Gopanpally, of the District Collector and the letter bearing \lo.Bl322l2OO7, dated 08/09/201 1 of the Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal. Gounsel for the Petitioner : SRI BOTLA VENKATESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondents : Ms. DARA HARITHA KIRAN, AGP FOR REVENUE W.P.NO:7 1 Between: U and A lnfra Projects, having its office at Plot No.7, Cyber Meadows, Kondapur Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State, represented by its Partner, Sri. P. Arogyam Reddy, Sio. Late P. Arlapa Reddy, Aged about 6l years, Occupation.Business, Rl/o.Villa No.7, Cyber Meadows, Masjid Banda, Kondapur, Serilingampally, Ranga Reddy, Telangana State. D 1 . The State of Telangana, Represented by its Special Chief Secretary, Revenue (Registration and Stamps) Department, D-Block, 4th Floor, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana-500022.

2. The District Registrar, Moosapet, Prashanth Nagar, IDA Kukatpally, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana-500072.

3. The Sub-Registrar, Serilingampally, 1-601301761'134,l'-601301771134, Anjaiah Nagar, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana-50008'l . ...,RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.18197/G1/2019 dated 17.06.2020confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.121 of 2019 dated 21.11.2019, in respect of the Plot No.174 in Survey Nos.36/AA/'l 1, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26.09.20'13 in FileNo.E5/4733120131 Serilingampally/ Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.Bl322l2OO7, dated 08.09.201 1 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 0t.10.2019,bearing Pending Document No. P721l2019 executed in lavour of the petitioner. :1 OF 2021 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 01 .10.2019 bearing Pencing Document No.P72112019 in respect of the Plot No.174 in Survey Nos.36/AA/1 ' , situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy Distri,:t, without reference to the Notification dated 26.09.2013in File No.E5/4733/2013/Serilingampally/Gopanpally, of the District Collector and the letter bearing No.Bl322l2OO7., dated 08.09.2011 of the Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal. Counsel for ttle Petitioner : SRI BOTLA VENKATESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondents : Ms. DARA HARITHA KIRAN, AGP FOR REVENUE W.P.NO: 7407 OF 2021 T U And A lnfra Projects, having its office at Plot No.7, Cyber Meadows, Kondapur Village, Serilirgampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State, represented by its Partner, Sri. P. Arogyam Reddy, S/o. Late P. Arlapa Reddy, Aged about 6'l years, Occupation- Business, Rl/o.Villa No.7, Cyber Meadows, Masjid Banda, Konda6rur, Serilingampally, Ranga Reddy, Telangana State. .....PET]TIONER NII.] 'I . The State of Telangana, Represented by its Special Chief Secretary, Revenue (Registration and Stamps) Department, D.Block, 4th Floor, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana-500022.

2. The District Registrar, Moosapet, Prashanth Nagar, IDA Kukatpally, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana-500072.

3. The Sub- Registrar, Serilingampally,1-6013017$1134, 1-601301771134, Anjaiah Nagar, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana-500081. RESPONDENTS Petition tJnder Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the atfidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issur: an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.589/G1/2020 dated 1610612020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No. l51 of 2019 dated 0911212019, in respect of the Plot No.359 in Survey Nos.36/AA/1 '1, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 2610912013 in FileNo.ESl4733/20131 Serilingampally/ Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.8132212007, dated 0810912011 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers ';.r.from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articlesl4 and 300-A of the Constitution of lndia and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 06/1 1/2019,bearing Pending Document No. P776l2019 executed in favour of the petitioner. |.A.NO:1 OF 2021 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 0611112019 bearing Pending Document No.P776l201 9 in respect of the Plot No.359 in Survey Nos.36/AA/1 1, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without reference to the Notification dated 2610912013 in File No.ESt4733t2O13l Serilingampally/Gopanpally, of the District Collector and the letter bearing No.Bl322l2OO7, dated 0B/09/2O11 of the Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI BOTLA VENKATESWARA RAO Counsel forthe Respondents : Ms. DARA HARITHA KIRAN, AGP FOR REVENUE U and A lnfra Projects, having its office at Plot No.7, Cyber Meadows, Kondapur Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana Slate, represented by its Partner, Sri. P. Arogyam Reddy, S/o. Late P. Arlapa Reddy, Aged about 61 y€ars, Occupation. Business, R/o.Villa No.7, Cyber Meadows, Masjid Banda, Kondapur, Serilingampally, Ranga Reddy, Telangana State. PETITIONER AND

1. The State of Telangana, Represented by its Special Chief Secretary, Revenre (Registration and Stamps) Department, D-Block, 4th Floor, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana-500022.

2. The District Registrar, Moosapet, Prashanth Nagar, IDA Kukatpally, Hyderebad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana-500072.

3. The Sub-Registrar, Serilingampally, 1-601301761134,1-601301771134, Anjaiah Nagar, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana-500081. .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstancer; stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of lvlandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.588/G1/2020 dated 16.06.2020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.150 of 2019 dated 0).'12.2019, in respect of the Plot No.53 in Survey Nos.36lAAl14, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26.09.2013 in File No.E5/4733/2tr'13lserilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.8.132212007, dated 08.09.201 1 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a s,elective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 06.11.201g,beering Pending Document No. P775l2019 executed in favour of the petitioner. :t Petition Llnder Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 06.11.20'19 bearing Pending Document No.P775l2019 in respect of the Plot No.53 in Survey Nos.36/AA/14, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without reference to the Notification dated 26.09.2013in File No.E5/4733/2013/ Serilingampally /Gopanpally, of the District Collector and the letter bearing No.8132212007, dated 08.09.2011 of the Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mand al. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI BOTLA VENKATESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondents : Ms. DARA HARITHA KIRAN, AGP FOR REVENUE W.P.NO: 7603 OF 2021 Between: U and A lnfra Projects, having its office at Plot No.7, Cyber Meadows, Kondapur Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana S.tate, represented by its Partner, Sri. P. Arogyam Reddy, S/o. Late P. Arlapa Reddy, Aged about 61 years, Occupation. Business, Rl/o.Villa No.7, Cyber Meadows, Masjid Banda, Kondapur, Serilingampally, Ranga Reddy, Telangana State. .....PETITIONER AND

1. The State of Telangana, Represented by its Special Chief Secretary, Revenue (Registration and Stamps) Department, D-Block, 4th Floor, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana-500022.

2. The District Registrar, Moosapet, Prashanth Nagar, IDA Kukatpally, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telang ana-50007 2.

3. The Sub-Registrar, Serilingampally, 1-601301761134, 1-61301771134, Anjaiah Nagar, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana-500081 . .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.18198/G1/2019dated 1710612020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.123 of 2019 dated 2111112 019, in respect of the Plot No.176 and 177 in Survey Nos.36/AAJ14, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 2610912013 in File No. ESl4T33l20l3lSerilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B.132212007, dated 08/09/2011 stated to have bee,n issued by the Tahsildar- and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffe's from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of lndia and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 01l1012019,lrearing Pending Document No. P72212O19 executed in favour of the petitioner. |.A.NO:1 OF.,2021 Petitiorr Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit .Filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 0111012019 bearing Pending Document No.P72212019 in respect of the Plot No.176 and 177 in Survey Nos.36/AA/14, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddlr District, without reference to the Notification dated 2610912013 in File No.E5/4',33/2013/Serilingampally/Gopanpally, of the District Collector and the letter trearing No.8.132212007, dated OBl09l2O11 of the Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal. Counsel for t'he Petitioner : SRI BOTLA VENKATESWARA RAO Counsel for tlre Respondents : Ms. DARA HARITHA KIRAN, AGP FOR REVENUE W.P.NO:7787 oF 2021 Between: Sri Srinivasa llao Burugupalli, S/o. Narayana Murthy, Aged about 54 years, Occ- Retired Private Employee, R/o. Plot No.75, S.R. Mansion, Flat No.'|02, Road No.70, Jubilee Hills, Flyderabad-500033, Telangana State. AND

1. The State of Telangana, Represented by its Special Chief Secretary, Revenu,? (Regiskation and Stamps) Department, D-Block, 4fil Floor, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana-500022. .....PETITIONER

2. The District Registrar, Moosapet, Prashanth Nagar, IDA Kukatpally, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District, Tela ng ana-sOOO7 2.

3. The Sub-Registrar, Serilingampally,1-601301761134, 1-601301771134, Anjaiah Nagar, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana-500081. .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No. 9349/G1/2019dated 17 .06.2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing Refusal No.49 of 2019 dated 27.05.2019, in respect of the Plot No. 127 in Survey Nos. 36/AA/6, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26.O9.2013 in File No. Eil4T33lz}l3lSerilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.Bl322l20O7, dated 08.09.2011 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 27.O5.2019, bearing Pending Document No. P323l2019 executed in favour of the petitioner. toF Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 27.O5.2O19 bearing Pending Document No.P323l2019 in respect of the Plot No.127 in Survey Nos.36/AA/6, situated at Gopanpatly Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without reference to the Notification dated 26.09.2013 in File No.E51473312O13/ Serilingampally/ Gopanpally, of the District Collector and the letter bearing No.Bl322l2OO7, dated 08.09.201 1 of the Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BOTLA VENKATESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondents : Ms. DARA HARITHA KIRAN, AGP FOR REVENUE '' F Between: Sri Pendurthi Hare Ram, S/o. Sri Appa Rao, Aged about 54 years, Occ. Pvt Employee, Rlo. Plot No.30-265/20/H23, Officers Colony, Sainathpuram, Hyderabad, Telangana State, Pin Code - 500062. .....PETITIONER AND

1. The State of TelanganS, Represented by its Special Chief Secretary, Revenue (Registration and Stamps) Department, D-Block, 4th Floor, Telangirna Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana-500022.

2. The Dis;trict Registrar, Moosapet, Prashanth Nagar, IDA Kukatpally, Hyderaoad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana-500072.

3. The Sulr-Registrar, Serilingampally, 1-601301761134,1-601301771134, Anj Nagar,,3achibowli, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana-50008 1. .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature ol Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.4933/G1/2019 dated 23.O4.2019 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing Refusal No.26 of 2019 dated 26.02.2019, in respect of the Plot No. 9 in Survey Nos. 36lA 17, situaled at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy Di$trict, actingr on the alleged notification dated 26.09.20'13 in File No. E5l4T33l20l3llierilingampally/ Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.8,132212007, dated 08.09.2011 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a s€,lective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers rom jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and further direct tlre respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated

23.02.2019, bearing Pending Document No. P1 13/201 9 executed in favour of the petitioner. l.A.NO:l OF Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 23.02.2019 bearing Pending Document No.P113/2019 in respect of the Plot No.9 in Survey Nos.36/4A/7, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without reference to the Notification dated 26.09.201 3 in File No.E51473312O13/ Serilingampally /Gopanpally, of the District Collector and the letter bearing No.Bl322l2OO7, dated 08.09.201 1 of the Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI BOTLA VENKATESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondents : Ms. DARA HARITHA KIRAN, AGP FOR REVENUE w.P. 202'.1 Sri Srinivasa Rao Burugupaili, S/o. Narayana Murthy, Aged about 54 years, Occ.Retired Private Employee, Rl/o. Plot No.75, S.R. Mansion, Flat No.102, Road No.70, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500033, Telangana State. .....PETITIONER NIII,I 1 . The State of Telangana, represented by its Special Chief Secretary, venue (Registration and Stamps) Department, Block, 4th Floor, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana-500022. 2. The District Registrar, Moosapet, rrashanth N Kukatpally,Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District, agar, IDA Telangana-500072.

3. The Nagar, Gach Serilingampally, 1 -601301761 134, I -60130177 1134, Anjaiah Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana-50008'1. Irl:FIIENIII:IIIE Petition Under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No. 9347lG1l2019daled 17.06.2020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing Refusal No.47 of 2019 dated 27.05.2019, in respect of the Plot No. 117 in Survey Nos. 36/AA/6, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26.09.2013 in File No. 8.514733120',3iSerilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.8132212007, dated 08.09.2011 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a Selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of lndia and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 27.05.2019, b'earing Pending Document No. P321l2019 executed in favour of the petitioner. Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive and rergister the Sale deed dated 27.05.2019 bearing Pending Document' No.P321l2019 in respect of the Plot No.117 in Survey No.36/AA"/6, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without reference the Notification dated File No.ESl4733l2C,13/Serilingampally/Gopannapally, of the District Collector and the letter bearing lrlo.Bl322l2007, dated.08/09/201 1 of the Tahsildar, Serilingampatly

26.09 .2013 Mandal. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI BOTLA VENKATESWARA RAO Gounsel for thr-' Respondents : Ms. REVENUE AGP FOR n Sri Srinivasa Riro Burugupalli, S/o. Narayana Murthy, Aged about 54 years, Occ. $et!1ed.fri.vale limployee, R/o. Plot No.75, S.R. Mansion, Flat No.102, Road No.70, Jubilee Hills, Hy,jerabad-500033, Telangana State .....PETITIONER D

1. The State of Telangana, Represented by its Special Chief Secretary, Revenue (Registration and Stamps) Department, D-Block, 4th Floor, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana

2. The District Registrar, Moosapet, Prashanth Nagar, IDA Kukatpally, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District, Tel angana-500072.

3. The Sub-Registrar, Serilingampally, 1-601301761134, 1-601301771134, Anjaiah Nagar, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana-500081 .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.9346/G1/2019 dated 17lOOl2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing Refusal No.48 of 20'19 dated 2710512019, in respect of the Plot No. 126 in Survey No. 36/AA/6, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification daled 261O912013 in File No. ESl4T33l20l3lSerilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.Bl322l2OO7, dated 08/09i2011 stated to have been issued by theTahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of lndia and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 2710512019, bearing Pending Document No. P32212O19 executed in favour of the petitioner. 1 Petition Under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 2710512019 bearing Pending Document No.P322l2019 in respect of the Plot No.126 in Survey Nos. 36/4A/6, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without reference to the Notification dated 26/09i2013 in File No.E5/4733/2013/ Serilingampally/ Gopanpally, of the District Collector and the letter bearinly No.8,132212007, dated 08/09/2011 ot the Tahsildar, Serilingampally Iandal. Counsel forthe Petitioner : SRI BOTLA VENKATESWARA RAO Counsel for t:he Respondents : Ms. DARA HARITHA KIRAN, AGP FOR REVENUE W.P.NO: 9O7.5 OF 2021 n Smt. Sharader Reddy Kondakalla, W/o. Sridhar Reddy, Aged about 41years,Occ. House Wife, Rl/o. Plot No.'|, KPR Colony, Manikonda, Gandeipeta Mandal, R R District, Telan,3ana State, Pin Code - 500075. .....PETITIONER AND

1. The Slate of Telangana, Represented by its Special Chief Secretary, Revenue (Registration and Stamps) Department, D-Block, 4th Floor, Telangzrna Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana-500022.

2. The District Registrar, Moosapet, Prashanth Nagar, IDA Kukatpally, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana-500072.

3. The Sul)-Registrar, Serilingampally,1-60t30t761134, 1-6Ot3Ol771134, Anjaiah Nagar, {iachibowli, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana-500081. .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature o{ Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings hearing No. 18190/1/G1/2019 dated 13.O7.2020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing Refusal No.52 of 2019 dated 03.06.2019, in respect of the Plot No. 154 in Survey Nos. 36/AA/6, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, actinEr on the alleged notification dated 26.09.2013 in File No. Esl4733l2013llierilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B.132212007, dated 08.09.201 1 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a serlective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of lndia and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 01.06.2019, bearing Pending Document No. P338/2019 executed in favour of the petitioner. I.A.NO:1 OF 2021 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 01 .06.2019 bearing Pending Document No.P33B/2019 in respect of the Plot No.154 in Survey Nos.36/4A/6, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without reference to the Notification dated 26.09.2013 in File No.E5/4733/2013/ Serilingampally/ Gopanpally, of the District Collector and the letter bearing No.Bl322l2OQ7, dated 08.09.2011 of the Tahsildar, Serilingampally Manda l. Counsel forthe Petitioner : SRI BOTLAVENKATESWARA RAO Counset for the Respondents : Ms. DARA HARITHA KIRAN, AGP FOR REVENUE W.P.NO: 9099 OF 2021 Between: Smt. Sharada Reddy Kondakalla, W/o. Sridhar Reddy, Aged about 41years,Occ. House Wife, R/o. Plot No.1, KPR Colony, Manikonda, Gandeipeta Mandal, R.R District, Telangana State, Pin Code -500075. .....PETtTIONER AND '1 . The State of Telangana, Represented by its Special Chief Secretary, Revenue (Registration and Stamps) Department, D-Block, 4th Floor, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana-500022.

2. The District Registrar, Moosapet, Prashanth Nagar, IDA Kukatpally, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana-500072.

3. The Sub-Registrar, Serilingampally, 1-601?01761134, 1-601301771134, Anjaiah Nagar, Gach-ibowli, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana-500081. ..,..RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstancos stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a an appropriate Wr'it, Order or Direction more partieularly one in the nature of Writ of lVlandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No. 1O5261G1/2019dated 1410712020 confirming tlre Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing Refusal No.37 of 2019 dated 20.05.2019, in respect of the Plot No. 147 in Survey Nos. 36/AA/6, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, ac1:ing on the alleged notification dated 26.09.2013 in File No.E5i4733t,2}13/Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322l2O07, dated 08.09.2011 stated to have bee'n issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffe's from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of lndia and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 18.05.2019, lrearing Pending Document No. P295l2O19 executed in favour of the petitioner. !.A.NO:1 OF:2021 Petitiorr Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 18.05.2019 bearing Pending Document No.P295/2O19 in respect of the Plot No.1 47 in Survey Nos.36iAA/6, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy Distrir;t, without reference to the Notification dated 26.09.2013 in File No.E5/473312:O13l Serilingampally/ Gopanpally, of the District Collector and the letter bearing No.8,132212007, dated 08.09.2011 of the Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI BOTLA VENKATESWARA RAO Counsel for tthe Respondents : Ms. DARA HARITHA KIRAN, AGP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following COMMON ORDER -i.,. - : t,.+.:. ,::l: 'l t '' THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUI{ANTI WRIT PETITION Nos.S676. 61O7. 6122, 6129. 6765. 6920, 727 8, 7 399,7 407 . 7 4L2. 7 60,3, 7 7 87, 7 829, 7923. 8595,9O75 and 9O99 of2O21 COMMON ORDER: W.P.No.5676 of 2021 is filed seeking the follor.ving relief: "...to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of thc Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No. 18172/GLI 2OL9 dated L6.O6.2O2O confirming thc Orde r of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.98 of 2olg dated 19.11 .2olg, in respect bf 'tne Plot No.37 ii.r Survey Nos.36/AA/ 14, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26.09.2013 in File No.E5/4733120131 Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued b), the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/ 322/2OO7, dated 08.09.201 I stated to have been issued. by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from,.jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natuqal justice 4nd violative of Articles: 14 and 3OO=A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to recg-ive', apd regis-ter the Sale Deed dated 25.07.2Ol9, ",,.bEaring Pqnding Document No.P503/2019 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass such other order or orders..." / i.':. " ,lrl' '--"s+li : 1- :-fl .'11'lti' .i ? ,:r'.:#:1:4{ ': ;:, : 2 JAK,J,i W.P.No.5676 2021 & Batch

2. W.P.Nb.6lO7 -of 2O2L-is fitei[ seeking the relief: "...to issue an appropriate Writ, Ordcr or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second RcspondenL in proceedings bearing No. L8lZ3/Gl / 2OI9 dated L7.06.2020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.72 of 20L9 dated 19.1 1 .2OL9, in respect ol the plot No.23 in Survey Nos.36/AA/ Il, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notif-rcation dated 26.09.2013 in File No.E5/473312Ot3 / Scrilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter lrcaring No.B/ 32212OO7, dated 08.09.20 I I srated to have been issued .by the:.Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 3OO-A of the Constitution of lndia and further direct the respondents to rcceive and register the Sale Deed dated 19.06.2019, bearing Pending Document No.P377/2O19 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass such other order or orders...l

3. W.P.No.6122 of 2021 is filed seeking the following reIiel': "...to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second 'i t:'i: I : r .:. . . . .: :a.:::.:.. ..:. .--:J.'-'1 ,' ,,;,.l#,ij, : -:;' : :.t .:,-' J JAK,J W.P.No.5676 2021 & Ilatch Respondent in proceedings bearing No. t8174 / Gl I 2}lg dated 17.06.202O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.1O3 of 20L9 dated 19. 1 1 .2O19, in respect of the Plot No.26 in Survey Nos.36/AA/ 11, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26.09.2013 in File No.E5/473312OL31 Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B /32212OO7 , dated 08.09.20 I I stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 30O-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated i r.' 07,O8.2O'LT, ' bearing '' Pending Document No.P566/2019 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass such other order or orders..." ,,; i,

4. W.P.No.6129 of 2021 is filed seeking the following relief "...to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No. 18L76 / GL I 2}lg dated 17.06.202O confirming the Order of 'the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.71 of 2OL9 dated t9.ll:,2Ol9, in respect of the Plot No.18 in Survey Nos.36/AA,l'I4, situated at .'Gtlpanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandqf Ran$a Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26.09.2013 in File No.E5/473312OL31 Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been L. ' 1 i ' i,j:' t- 4 JAKJ W.P.No.5676 2021 & Batch issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/ 32212OO7, dated 08.09.2O11 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative o[ Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 19.O5.2019, bearing Pending Document No.P378/2019 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass s.13,,,,,,,,,,,,,,ch othcr order or orders..."

5. W.P.No.6765 of 2021 is filed seeking the foflowing relief: "...to issue an appropriate Writ, Order qp Direction more particularly one in the"hatrlre,..di-Writ of ' Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No. 1819S/G1/ 2Ol9 dated 17.06.202O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.131 of '2OI9 dated 2I.lL.2Ol9, in respect of the plot . No.157 in Survey Nos.36/AA/ 14, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26.09.2013 in File No.ES/473312OL3/ Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B / 32212OA7, dated 08.09.201 1 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a seleitive manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from juris{ictional errors and violative of the principles of ,natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 30O-A of the Constitution of India and. further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 25.10.2019, bearing Pending Document It. I I I : t: 5 .i r'' JAK,J W.P.No.5676 2021 & Batch No.P757/2019 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass such other order or orders..."

6. W.P.No.692O of 2021 is filed seeking the following relief: _',.i, -_. :ai;, "...to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particular$ on6 in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No. 18179 IGL I 2Ol9 dated 17.06.202O'confirming the Order. of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.77 of 2Ol9 dated 19.11.2019, in respect of the Plot No.348 in Survey Nos.36/AA/ 1 1, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, ac[ing on the alleged notification dated 26.09.2013 in File No.E5/4733120131 Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the lette.r bearing No.B / 322 I ZOOV; dated 08.09,20l'l stated', to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Maitdal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors, and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 3OO-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Agreement of Sale Cum lrrevocable General Power of Attorney dated 03.O7.2Ot9, bearing Pending Document No.P434/2OL9 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass such other order or orders..."

7. W.P.No.7278 of 2021 is filed seeking the following relief: "...to issue an appropriate'Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of ?_t . f-il 6 JAK,J W;P.No.5676_202 I & Batch Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.59 | lGl / 2020 dated L6.06.2020 conl-rrming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.l49 of 2019 dated 09.12.2019, ir-r respect ol the plot No.52 irr Survc-_v Nos.36/AA/ L4, situated zrt Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26.09.2013 in File No.BS/ 4T33l2Ot3/ Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector ancl the letter bearing No.B/ 32212OO7, dared O8.09.2O1 1 stared to have been issued by thc Ta$sildar and Deputy Collector, Seritingampally Mariilal in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers frorn jurisdictional errors and violativc of the principtes of natural justice and violative ol Articles L4 and 30O-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed date d 06. 1 I .2019, bearing pending Document No.P774l20L9 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass such othcr order or orders..."

8. w.P-No-7399 of 2021 is filed seeking the following relief: "...to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more parlicularly one in the nature of \[/rit of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No. LBtgT IGL / 2019 dated L7.0,6.2020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No-121 of 2019 dated 2L.IL.2OL9, in respect of the plot No.174 in Survey Nos.36/AA/ 11, situated at Gopanpally Village, Seritingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy,'District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26.09.2o1s in File No.E5/4733l2OtS/ Serilingampally/Gopanpally, saia to have been issued, by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B / 322|2OOT, dated Og.09.2O1 1 stated t. i i ! I I,' . :ii::s- .n:in""^t.;;-, r ..:l'!:i.J+i:. ' 't,+F: "',"ir-:' j l''i:1',1g;..i, ' ,1,,,i ; ";::ll 7 JAK,J W.P.No.5676 2O2l & Batch to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deput5r Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers lrom jurisdictional errors ancl violalive of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 30O-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 01.10.20i9, bearing Pending Document No.P72Ll2Ol9 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass such other order or orders..."

9. W.P.No.7407 of 2021 is filed seeking the following relief "...to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature 'of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceed 2O2O dated L6.O6.2O2O Third Respondent in 2Ol9 dated 09.12.2019, in respect of the Plot No.359 in Survey Nos.36/AA/ I 1, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notilication dated 26.O9.201.3 in File No.ES/473312OL31 Serilingampatly/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/ 32212OO7, dated 08.09.201 1 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and. violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles L4 a,nd 3OO-A of the Constitution of India and further 'direct the r""p".i"",s to receive and register th-ei,Sale Deed datld 06.11.2O19, bearing Pending Document No.P776l2Ol9 executed in favorir of the petitioner and pass such other order or orders.--" I :rr.:. .'., i :rj., .i-(Jt : 8 JAK,J W.P.No.5676_202 I & Batch

10. W.P.No.7412 of 2021 is filed seeking the following relief: , ,;l "...1o issue an appropriate Writ, Ordcl- or Direction more particularly one in the naturc of Writ of Mandarnus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent ih proceedings bearing No.588/G1/ 2O2O dated 16.06.2020 confirming rhe Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.i50 of 2019 dated 09.12.2019, in respect ol rhe plor No.53 in Survey Nos.36/AA/14, situated ar Gopanpaltysl Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on thc alleged notification dated 26.09.2Ot3 in File No.E5/473312013/ Serilingampally /(iopanpally, said to have been issuecl by the District Coller:tor and the letter bearing No.B / 32212OO7 , dated 08.09.20 1 1 srated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illega[, arbitrary, discriininatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles o[ natural justice and violative o[Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 06.11 .2O19, bearing Pending Document No.P775/20L9 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass such other order or orders..." il. W.P.No.7603 of 2021 is filed seeking the following relief: "...to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction one in the nature of Writ of us declaring that the order of the Second Resporident in proceedings bearing No. 18 198lGL / 20L9 dated L7.06.202O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.l23 of 2OL9 dated 2L.Ll.2OLg, in respect of the plot i i i I ,t 1:;, I JAK,J W.P.No.5676 2O2l & Batch No.176 and 177 in Survey Nos.36/AA/ 14, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy .District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26.O9.2013 in File No.ESl4733/ 2013/serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issuccl by the District Collector aud the letter bearing No.R /322l2OOT , dated O8.09.2O I 1 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative o[ Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India '*a}d further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 01.10.2O19, bearing Pending Document No.P722l2ol9 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass such othcr order or ord.ers..."

12. W.P.No.77B7 of 2021 is filed seeking the following "...to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.9349lCl/ 2OI9 dated L7.06.202O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing Refusal No.49 of 2019 dated 27.O5.2O 19, in respect of the Plot No.127 in Survey Nos.36/AA/6, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26.09.2013 in File No.E5/473312013/ Serilingampalty/Gopanpall,y said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/ 32212OO7, dated O8.09.2O11 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar a'-rtd"DeputY Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a ,'selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and I I l i I ! I i -! 10 JAK,J W. P.No. 5676=2O2 I & Batch violative of Articles L4 and 300-4 of the Constitution of tndia and fqrther direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Dced dated 27.05.2O19, bearing pending Document No.P323/2019 executed in ravour or the petitio*er and pass such otl-rcr order or orders...,, 1:'. w.P.No.7B29 of 2021 is filed seeking the follovi,ing re:ief: "...to issue an appropriate Wri[, Order or Direction morc particularly one in the naturc of Writ of Mandamus declaring that Lhe order of the Sccond Respondent in proccedings bearing No.493 3l(\I / 2019 dated 23.O4.20I9 confirrning thc Ordcr.ol'the Third Respondent in proceedings bearing Refusal No.2(> of 2019 dated 26.O2.2Ot9, in rcspect of the Plot No.9 in Suney Nos.36/AA/7, situatccl at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mzrndal, I?anga Reddy District, acting on the allegea nOtification dated 26.09.2OI3 in Fitc No.E5/4233/2013/ Serilingampally/Gopanpalty, said to have bcen issucd by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B /322l2OOT , darcd 09.09.20 1 1 srared to have been issued by the'l'ahsildar and Deput5r Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles t4 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 23.02.2019, bearing pending Document No.Pi 13/2019 executed in f.rour of the petitioner and pass such other order or orders..." .:,+:':: l4 W.P.No.7923 of 2021 is filed seeking the following relief: i J i ! ,.: ' ,l':r : , JAK,J W. P. No. 5676_2021 & Batch "...to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.9347 lGl I 2019 dated 17.06.2020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondcnt in Proceedings bearing Rcfusal No.47 of 20 19 datcd 27.O5.2O 19, in respect of the Plot No.l t7 in Survey Nos.36/AA/6, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acLing on the alleged notification dated 26.09.2OL3 in File No.E5/473312013/ Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District. Collector and the letter bearing No.B I 322 l2OO7, dated 08.09.2O1 1'''stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deput5r Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, sulfers frorn jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to, r999ive and register the Sale Deed datld' zr.a5,2Qi9, ' be'dring '' ''e'ehding Dabumettt 'executed in favour'of the petitioner No.P32I1201,9 and pass such other order or orders..." I

15. W.P.No.B595 of 2021 is filed seeking the following relief "...to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularl5r one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.9346lGl I 2OL9 dated 17.06.202O confirming the Order of 'the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing Refusal No.48 of 2;O19 dated 27.05.2019, in respect of the Plot No. L26 in Survey "Nos.36/AA/6, 'sitUated at Gopanpatly Village, Serilingarnpalty Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26.09.2OL3 in File No.E5/473312OL3/ Serilingampalty/Gopanpally, said to have been . i -:-l t ..' .:i= . ,-:, :iidt ],j,,i@ .,, ..1::::€:iI.8 ., t2 JAK,J w.P.No.5676 202 I &Batch issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322 l2OO7, dated O8.09.2O11 srated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Scrilingarnpally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, sulfers from jurisdictional crrors and violative of the principles of naturarljustice ar-rd violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed daLed 27.05.2OL9; bearing pending Document No.P322/2019 executed in favour of the petitioner and p:rss such other order or orders..." '16. w.P.No.9o75 of 2021 is filed seeking the follov'ing relie [: "...to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the naturc of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings hearing No. lglg} I L / GLI2O 19 dated 13.07.2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing Relusal No.52 of 2Ot9 dated 03.06.2019, in respect o[ the Plot No. i54 in Survey Nos.36/AA/6, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alteged norification dated 26.09.2o13 in Filc No.E5/4733/ 2013/Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said ro have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322 l2OO7, dated O8.09.2O1 I stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deput5r Collector, Serilingampally Mandal in a seleitive manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles L4 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further d.irect the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated O1.06.2019, bear:ing pending Document .:.1..,:1,,r;:.;: . 'i. i-.iii:+j:jii::l: , '.1.: i : -. ,".:i. i.:ib*iiri '' 'i':' li:*,ry4' ,i,ri. - jir,.l: '- ..' , i.ii.j,:, ..a{Hffi+il ..rtit:jt;i; I t- J I i t \ ,: 13 JAK,J W.P.No.5676 2A2l & Batch No.P33B/2019 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass such other order or orders..." L7 . W.P.No.9099 of 2021 is filed seeking the following relief, "...to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No. LO526lGL I 2019 dated L4.O7.2020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing Refusal No.37 of 20 19 dated 20.05.2019, in respect of the Plot No.147 in Survey Nos.36/AA/6, situated at Gopanpally Vitlage, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26.O9.2O13 in File No-E5/4733/201.3/ Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said Lo have been issued by the District Collector:,.and the letter bearing No.B l 322l2OO7 , ' dated CI8:O9.2O I 1- stated " to have been issued by the Tahsiltlar and Deputy' Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional crrors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles L4 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated , 18.05.20 19, bearing Pending Document No.P295/2OL9 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass such other order or orders..."

18. Heard Mr. B.Venkateswara Rao, learned counsel for petitioner and Ms. Da.ra Haritha Kiran, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration appearmg for respondents in all these writ petitions. \ t::_il 1 .:1 -. ,, ,.-,i,, ,,-: i j: . t...' , .j: 14 JAK,J W.P.No.5676 202 I &Batch 1'r :-r i'-. 1). Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the sr-rbject matter in this batch of writ petitions is identical to tlrc subject matter in w.P.No.4475 of 2o2t & batch, that by common order datcd 06.L0.2025, this court allowed the u'i'it petitions. Hence, similar orders be passed in this birtch of u,rit petitions.

20. For reasons a-like, as stated in the common order, d.tccl 06.10.2025, in w.P.No.44T5 of 2o2l & batch and in te-nrs thereof, the Writ petitions are allo,*,ed.,,qtta,,the u,rit petitioners, "que" the prayers. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// -A. SRINIVASA REDDY SISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER I To 1 2 3 4 5 6 SA BS s> ,|, :.:iri i. ii i,,,^ : i:i +,:!r l.:..i::. :..::|,., ::l;?:ir.. ::.i';iiEl{:i rHiEit#,i ri::idiffiWE HIGH COURT DATED t0711012025 I 1 i I W.P.NOS: 5676, 61 07, 6122, 61.29,67'65, 6920 , 7278, 7399, 7 407, 7 412, 7 603, 7787, 7829, 7923,8{i95, 9075 AND 9099 0 j 2t r$ts + t COMMON ORDER ALLOWING ALL THE WRIT PETITIONS WITHOIUT COSTS. q THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JI'KITNTI WRIT PETITION Nos.4475.

4494. 45,02.- 4s4rr. SO72- 5429 3681 5435. 5436. 5926,6234, 6238, s4+L. 5446. 6771. 6772. 6779. 6781,8331 and 88OO of2O21 -5415 145 1 COMMON ORDER: W.P.No.4475 of 2O2L is filed with the following prayer: "... to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.576/G I l2O2O dated L6l06/2020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.85 of 2019 dated lglll/2o19, in respect of the Plot No.65 in Survey Nos.36/AA/ 11, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26/09l2Ol3 in File No. E5 / 4 7 33 / 20 1 3 / Serilin gampally / Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.Bl322/2007, dated O8/O9l2OLl stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated lOlOT/2019, bearing Pending Document No. P455/19 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..." W.P.No.448O of 2O2L is filed with the following 2 prayer: 2 w.P.No.4475 of 202r"'*f;i "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction rnore particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.18l93lGl /2019 17 /06/2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.99 of 2019 dated L9/ll/2o19, in respect of the Plot No.303 in Survey Nos.36/AA/8, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26109 /2013 in File No.E5/4733 I 2o13/Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/32212OO7, dated O8lO9/2OIl stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articlesl4 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Agreement of Sale-Cum-lrrevocable General Power of Attorney dated 25/07l20 19, bearing Pending Document No.P504/2019 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..." W.P.No.4494 of 2O2L is filed with the following 3 prayer: "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.586/G | /2O2O dated 16/06/2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.199 of 2OL9 dated 2LILL/2O19, in respect of the Plot No.42 in Survey Nos.36/AA/7, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampalty Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated. 26109/2013 in File No.E5/4733 / 2Ol3 /Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by ttre District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated 08/09/2OLl stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, 3 W.P.No.4475 of 2021"'#;l Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner aq being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14.and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sa-le Deed dated 16 I 09 / 2ol9,bearing Pending Document No. P667 I 2OL9 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..." W.P.No.4502 of 2O2l is filed with the following 4 prayer: "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.1837/GL /20L9 dated 16.06.2020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Refusal Proceedings bearing No.104 of 2Ol9 dated Lglll/2OL9, in respect of the Plot No.181 in Survey Nos.36/AA/8, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26l09l2OL3 in File No.E5/4733 I 2113/Serilingampaily/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated OBIO9/2lLL stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deput5r Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrar5r to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articlesl4 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated O9lO8l2OL9, bearing Pending Document No.P576 of 2OL9 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..." W.P.No.4542 of 2O2L is filed with the following 5 prayer: '...to issue a Ern appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus 4 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No. 18186/G L /2019 dated 17106/2020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.97 of 2019 dated 19/lll20L9, in respect of the PIot No.1B6 in Survey Nos.36/AA/8, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26109 /2013 in File No.E5/4733 / 20i3/Serilingarnpally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/32212OO7, dated O8l09l20ll stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, is a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice mod violative of Articles 14 and 30O-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 25lOZl2ol9, bearing Pending Document No.PSOO of 2Ol9 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..." 6. W.P.No.5072 of 2O2l is filed with the following prayor "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.18185/Gl12020 dated 17106l202O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.10O of 2OL9 dated l9/Lll2o19 in respect of the Plot No.161 in Survey Nos.36/AA/6, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 2610912013 in File No. ES / 47 33 / 2 O I 3 / Serilingampally/ Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/32212OO7, dated OBlO9l2Oll stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrar5r, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of 5 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 3p0-A of the Constitution of India and further . direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 27 /07 l2ol9, bearing Pending Document No.P526/19 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass...1' W. P. No. 3 68 1 of 2O2 L is filed with the following 7 prayer: File o...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No. 18183 /Gl l2ol9 LT /06/2020 acting on the alleged notification dated 26.09.2013 No.E5/4733/2OL3 Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector, conftrming the Order of the Third Respondent in Retusal No.76 of 2Ol9 dated L9lLl/2OL9, acting on the alleged letter bearing No.B/32212OO7, dated O8/O9/2OLL stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in respect of the Plot No.287 in Survey Nos.36/AA/8, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, refusing to register the Agreement of Sale-Cum-Irrevocable General Power of Attorney dated 03/07 /20 19, bearing Pending Document No.433 of 2OL9 in a selective manner and contrary to the law laid down by this Honourable Court in W.P.No.19069 of 2014 as being illegal, arbitrar5r, discriminatory, contr.ary to law suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and also violative of Articles 14 and 3OOA of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Agreement of Sale-Cum-Irrevocable General Power of Attorney dated O3lO7/2019 bearing Pending Document No.433 of 2019 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..." W.P.No.3998 of 2O2L is filed with the following

8. prayer: 6 w.P.No.4475 of Zo2r*'*f;i "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No. iB 189/G | /2OL9 dated L7 /06/2020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.82 of 2019 dated in respect of the Plot No.73 in Survey l9llll2ol9 Nos.36/AA/8, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26109/2013 in File No.E5/4733 / 2O13/Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/32212OO7, dated OS|O9l2oll stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrar5r, discriminatory, contrary to law suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 3OO-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Agreement of Sale-Cum-Irrevocable General Power of Attorney dated O4/O7|2OL9, bearing Pending Document No.P442 of 2019 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass ..." W.P.No.508O of 2O2l is fiIed with the following "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.58 | lcl /2O2O dated 16/06/2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.1O2 of 2Ol9 dated L9lLl/2O19, in respect of the Plot No.L28 in Survey Nos.36/.AA/6, situated at Gopanpally Village, Seril.ingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26109l2OI3 in File No.ES/ 47 33 / 20 L3 I Serilingampally/ Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated O8/O9/2Oll stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, 9 pra]€:rl 7 w.P.No.4475 of 2021"'#;il Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated OT lOBl2O19, bearing Pending Document No.P565/19 executed in favour of the petitioners and pass..."

10. W.P.No.5O91 of 2O2l is filed with the following prayer: o...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.572/G L /2020 16/06l2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.75 of 2O19 dated L9.ll.2OL9, in respect of the Plot No.133 in Survey Nos.36/AA/6, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26.09.2013 in File No.E5/4733 I 2OI3 lSerilingampaliy/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated 08.09.20i1 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrar5l to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 27 /O6|2OL9, bearing Pending Document No.P416/19 executed in favour of the petitioners and pass..."

11. W.P.No.5118 of 2O2l is filed with the following prayer: "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus 8 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch declaring that the order the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.9O5/GL l2O2O dated 16l06l2020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.84 of 2O19 dated l9lll/2o19, in respect of the Plot No.14O in Survey Nos.36/AA/6,situated at Gopanpally Vi[[age, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26109 /2013 in File No.E5/4733 I 2o13/Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/32212OO7, dated 08109/20ll stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articlesl4 and 30O-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 06/07 12019, bearing Pending Document No.P446/19 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..." W.P.No.5145 of 2O2L is filed with the following t2 praye.: "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of M.andamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.571 IGI/2O2O dated 16l06/2020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.74 of 2Oi9 dated I9/LL/2O19, in respect of the Plot No.131 in Survey Nos.36/AA/6, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26109/2OL3 in File No.E5/4733 I 2OL3 /serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated OSlOgl2OLl stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deput5r Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrar5r, discriminatory, contrar5r to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of 9 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 27 /0612019, bearing Pending Document No.P4lsl 19 executed in favour of the petitioners and pass..."

13. W.P.No.5399 of 2O2l is liled with the following prayer o...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.1820I /Gl l2OL9 dated L7.06.2020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.130 of 20 19 dated 2L.LL.2OL9, in respect of the Plot No.l1l in Survey Nos.36/AA/ 11, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26.O9.20L3 in FiIe No.E5/47 33 I 20 13 / Serilingampally / Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/32212OO7, dated 08-09.2011 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrarJr to law, suffers from jurisdictional enrors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 25.7O.2OL9, bearing Pending Document No.P756/2OL9 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..." t4. W.P.No.5415 of 2O2l is filed with the following prayer: o...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No. 18 LgO /GL l2OL9 dated L7.06.2020 confirming the Order of the Third l0 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.110 of 2019 dated 19.11.2019, in respect of the Plot No.28 in Survey Nos.36/AA/ 14, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26.09.2013 in File No.E5/4733 I 2O13/ Serilingampally/ Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated 08.09.2011 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-4 of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the SaIe Deed dated 11.O9.2O19, bearing Pending Document No.P6a6 I 2019 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..."

15. W.P.No. 5420 of 2O2l is filed with the following prayer: "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.580/GI /2O2O dated 16.06.2020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.1O1 of 2OL9 dated 19.11 .2019, in respect of the Plot No.3O5 in Survey Nos.36/AA/8, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification File No. E5 / 47 33 / 20 L3 / Serilingampally I Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/32212OO7, dated 08.09.2011 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and DeputSr Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrar5r, discriminatory, contrar5r to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of lndia and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated

26.09.2013 l1 w.P.No.4475 of 2o2t&Jf i

27.O7.2019, bearing Pending Document No.P527 /20L9 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..."

16. W.P.No.5429 of 2O2l is filed with the following prayer "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedirigs bearing No.1835/Gl /2O2O dated L6/06l2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing L32 of 2Ol9 dated 2L/1L12O19, in respect of the PIot No.l10 in Survey Nos.36/AA/6, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26/09/2013 in File No.E5/4733 / 2Ol3 /Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated OS|O9l2OLl stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective martner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrar5r to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 3O0-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 28/ LO|2O19, bearing Pending Document No. P763/20L9 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..." L7. W.P.No.5435 of 2O2L is filed with the following prayer: "...to issue as Ern appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No. 18200/ GL l2OI9 dated L7 /0612020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Froceedings bearing No.117 of 2OL9 dated L9/L112O19, in respect of the PIot No.257 in Suruey 36/ AAILL, situated at Gopanpally Village, t2 w.P.No.4475 of 2o2r&Jffii Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26/09 /2OL3 in File No. E5 /47 33 I 20 1 3 /Serilin gampally / Gopanpally, said to h:rve been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.Bl322l2OO7, dated O8/O9l2oll stated to been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articlesl4 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 16l09 /20 19, bearing Pending Document No. P665/2019 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..."

18. W.P.No.5436 of 2O2L is filed with the following pray€:r: "...to issue a Ern appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.18I99lGl l2OL9 dated 17.06.2020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.116 of 2Ol9 dated 19.i1.2019, in respect of the Plot No.268 in Survey Nos.36/AA/ 11, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26.09.2013 in File No. E5 / 47 33 I 20 I 3/ SerilingampaUy/ Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated 08.09.2011 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and DeputSr Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-4 of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated L6.09.2O19, bearing Pending Document No.P664 /2OL9 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..." l3 . JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch

19. W.P.No.5926 of 2O2l is filed with the following prayer "... to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.18L77 /Gl /2019 dated 17 /0612020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.73 of 20 l9 dated l9/1Ll2OL9, in respect of the Plot No.80 in Survey Nos.36/AA/ 14, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26/09 /2013 in File No.E5/4733 / 2Ol3 lSerilingampatly/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/32212OO7, dated O8lO9/2Oll stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and viblative of Articles 14 and 3OO-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 2L / 0612019, bearing Pending Document No.P3B4/2019 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass ..." W.P.No.6234 of 2021 is filed with the following

20. prayer "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the natrrre of Writ of Mandamus declaring that .the order of tl:e Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.574/G 1/2020 dated t6/O6l2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.81 of 2OL9 dated lg/LLlzOLg, in respect of the Plot No.77 in Survey Nos.36/AA/ 11, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26/09l2ol3 in File t4 - JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch No.E5/4733 I 2ol3lSerilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.Bl322/2007, dated OSlO9|2OIL stated to hzrve been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective ma.nner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Agreement of Sale-Cum-lrrevocable General Power of Attorney dated 04l07 /20 19, bearing Pending Document No. P44ll2019 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass ..." 2l . W. P. No.6238 of 2O2l is filed with the following pray(:r: "... to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.18187lcl/2019 dated 17l06l2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.11l of 2019 dated I9lIl/2O19, in respect of the Plot No.188 in Survey Nos.36/AA/ 14, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26.O9.2O13 in File No.E5/4733 I 20 13 I Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No. 81322/2OO7, dated OB|O9l2O11 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Depugr Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated lL I 09 / 2019, bearing Pending Document No.P647 | 2OL9 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass ..." t5 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch

22. W.P.No.5441 of 2O2l is filed with the following prayer: "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.1836/GL /2020 dated 16lA6l2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.1 13 of 2Ol9 dated l9/lll2ol9, in respect of the Plot No.58 in Survey No.36/AA/ 14, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26/09/2OL3 in File No.E5/4733 / 2013 /Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated O8/O9/2OL1 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrar5r, discriminatory, contrar5r to law, suffers from jurisdictional etrors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 3OO-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 2L / 08 / 2019, bearing Pending Document No.P659/2019 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..."

23. W.P.No.5446 of 2O2L is filed with the following prayer: "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.587/Gl / 2O2O dated 16.06.2020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.120 of 2019 dated 2L.LL.2OL9, in respect of the Plot No.38 in Survey Nos.36/AA/7, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification File

26.09.2013 t6 W.P.No.4475 of 202 r"'ff;i No. E5 / 47 33 I 20 1 3 / Serilingampally/ Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.Bl322/2OO7, dated 08.09.2011 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deput5r Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles i4 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 23.O9.2O19, bearing Pending Document No. P689/2OL9 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..."

24. W.P.No.677l of 2O2l is filed with the following praycr "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.18l78lGLl2OL9 dated L7106/2020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.87 of 2Ol9 dated lglll/2olg, in respect of the Plot No.182 in Survey Nos.36/AA/ 14, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26l09l2OL3 in File No. E5 / 47 33 I 20 1 3 / Serilin ganpally / Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2007, dated OS|O9l2OLl stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deput5r Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Article 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register ttre Agreement of Sale cum lrrevocable General Power of Attorney dated LllOT /2019, bearing Pending Document No. P459/2OL9 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..." t7 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch

25. W.P.No.6772 of 2A2L is filed with the following prayer "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.592/GL / 2020 dated L6.O6.2O20 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.152 of 20 19 dated O9.12.2OL9, in respect of the Plot No.362 in Survey Nos.36/AA/11, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26.09.2Or3 in File No.E5/4733/2Ol3l Serilingampally/ Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.L3/32212007, dated 08.09.2011 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrar5r, discriminatory, contrar5r to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 3OO-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 06.11 .2019, bearing Pending Document No.P777 /2079 executed in f,avour of the petitioner and pass ..."

26. W.P.No.6779 of 2O2l is filed with the following prayer: "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.593/Gl /2O2O dated 16/06l2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.154 of 2OL9 dated O9|L2/2O19, in respect of the Plot No.98 in Survey Nos.36/AA/ 14, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26109/2OL3 in File 18 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch No.ESl4733 I 2O13l Serilingampally/ Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.Bl322/2007, dated OS|O9l2)ll stated to have been issuecl by the Tahsildar and Deputy Coilector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated lglIL/2OL9, bearing Pending Document No. P787/2OL9 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..." W.P.No.6781 of 202I is filed with the following 27 prayor: '...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.9352/G 1l2Ol9 dated 17106/2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing Refusal No.40 of 2OI9 dated 2010512019, in respect of the Plot No.82 in Survey Nos.36/AA/ 14, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26l09l2ol3 in FiLe No. E5 /47 33 I 20 1 3/ Serilin gampally / Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.Bl322l2O07, dated OS|O9l2oll stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deput5r Co[lector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective marnner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 20l05/2019, bearing Pending Document No. P301/2OL9 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..." l9 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch

28. W.P.No.8331 of 2021 is filed with the following prayer "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.14009/GI /2OL9 dated 08/07l2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing Refusal No.34 of 2Ol9 dated 02l05l2O19, in respect of the Plot No.S1 in Survey Nos.36/AA/11, situated at Gopanpally Village, Seril.ingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26.09.2013 in File No. E5/473312013/Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/32212OO7, dated O8.09.2O11 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrar5r, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 30O-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the SaIe Deed dated 02 / 05/2019, bearing Pending Document No.P262/2OL9 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..."

29. W.P.No.8BOO of 2O2I is filed with the following prayer: "...to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring:the action of the respondents in refusing to register the Sale Deed pending document No.878 of 2O2O submitted by the petitioner for registration with regard to the Plot bearing No.3 Part admeasuring244.44 sq yards in Shilpa Poineer Block-I in Sy.Nos.37 of Gachibowli village, Serilingampally Mandal, RR District vide refusal order No.217 of 2O2O dt.l7lL2l2O2O as highlyillegal, arbitrary and set aside the same and consequently direct the 3'a 20 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch respondent to receive, register and release the Sale Deed Pending Document No.878 of 2O2O submitted by the petitioner for registration with regard to the Plot bearing No.3 Part admeasuring244.44 sq yards in Shilpa Poineer Block-I, in Sy.Nos.37 of Gachibowli village, Serilingampally Mandal, RR District without reference to the proceedings of the District Collector dt.26-O9.2OL3 and pass ..."

30. Heard Mr. B.Venkateswara Rao, learned counsel for petitioners and Ms. Dara Haritha Kiran learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for respondents. 3 1. The subject matter in all the Writ Petitions pertains to PL>ts in various Sub-divisions of Survey No.36 situated at C'opanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. For reference, facts in W.P.No.368l of 2O2l are l>eing considered (Serial No.7 in the batch of writ petitions).

32. It is the grievance of petitioner that respondents are refusing to receive and register the Agreement of Sale-cum- Irrev<rcable General Power of Attorney dated O3.O7.2019 bearing document No.433 of 2019 in respect of Plot No.287 in Sy.No.36/AA/8 (Sub Division No.8 of Sy.No.36) situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddrr District. It is submitted that the document has been 21, JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch kept pending on the file of Sub Registrar on the ground that a notification dated 26.09.2OL3 in File No.E5/4733 / 2OL3 / Serilingampally/Gopanpally issued by District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322|2OOT dated 08.09.2011 of the Tahsildar. It is further submitted that Sub-Registrar, Serilingampally, refused the registration of document that the scheduled property is prohibited as per the list furnished by Tahsildar, classified as Poramboke.

33. Attention is invited to Ex.P3 a letter addressed to the Sub-Registrar by Tahsildar.

34. It is submitted that order of refusa-l of Sub-Registrar was carried by way of an appeal before the District Registrar and the District Registrar vide proceedings dated L7.06.202O (Ex.Pl) refused registration of the deed on the premise that property in Sy.No.36/AAl8 was included in the prohibited property list vide notification in File No.E5/473312013/Serilingampally/Gopanpally, dated

26.09.2013, issued by District Collector, Ranga Reddy District and as such the property could not be registered. 22 }AK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch

35. It is submitted that notilication relied upon by the Regis;trar in his order dated 17.06.2020 is in parimateria to the notification which was the subject matter of challenge before this Court and that this Court in W.P.No.19069 of 2Ol4 by its order dated 25.08.2014 had directed the Sub- Regis;trar to receive and process the deeds of conveyance subjr:ct to the condition that Sub-Registrar was at liberty to refuse to register the deeds by duly assigning reasons Placing reliance upon the judgment of the learned Single Judge, it is contended that the said notification annexed at Page No.26 being in parimateria to that of the notification under challenge in the W.P.No.19069 of 2014, the notification dated 26.09.2013 has to receive the same fate.

36. Learned counsel invited the attention of this Court to the ctocument annexed to the counter affidavit filed and subnritted that the list communicated by the District Collector to Commissioner & Inspector General vide letter No.E L/4478/2024, dated 07.04.2025, is a subsequent Iist and the same cannot be relied upon, as the order of the Registrar and the sub-Registrar are based on different 23 w.P.No.4475 of 2o2t&Jffii notification (earlier dated) and letter of Tahsildar. It is submitted that by letter dated 07.O4.2O25, properties are added to and a revised list of immovable properties is issued and the said survey number finds place in the said list. It is further submitted that reliance placed on a list dated 07.04.2025 is misconceived and is not valid in the eye of law as the rejection orders of both the Sub-Registrar and that of Registrar are based on different lists and the letter dated 07.04.2025 cannot have a retrospective effect.

37. Placing reliance on the Hon'ble Apex Court judgment in Commissioner of Police, Bombag a. Gordhandos Bhanjil, it is contended that orders once made, the purport of the order and content cannot be improvised and has to be read and understood on the contents of the order itself. It is further contended that any improvement made by way of counter affidavit or submissions cannot be added to change the purport of the order.

38. Basing on the law laid down by the Honble Apex Court, it is contended that notification dated 26.09.2013 of 'en tgsz sc to 24 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch the olfice of District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, fell for consi,leration before this Court and learned Single Judge of this Oourt by order dated 25.O8.2014 in W.P.No.19069 of 2014 directed the Sub-Registrar to receive and process the deeds of conveyance without reference to the Notification dated 26.O9.2013.

39. It is submitted that as the subject matter i.e., plots in various subdivided survey number(s) of Sy.No.36 are parcels of land in this batch of writ petitions which pertain to the notification, this Court may consider the order of learne,i Single Judge, unless different set of facts are borne out of record.

40. Ir- is submitted by learned counsel that as the facts are sir:r.ilar in nature, same order as in W.P.No.19O69 of 2OL4 be passed.

41. On the other hand, learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondents submitted that on the basis of a communication received, Tahsildar addressed a letter to Sub-Registrar, letter dated September, 2O11, that certain 25 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch properties 1n Serilingampally Mandal and the subject property of the writ petitioner was reflected as Government land(s) in the Khasra Pahani, hence prohibited from being registered. It is further submitted that District Registrar on appeal confirmed the order of the Sub-Registrar on the basis of notilication dated 26.09.2o-13 issued by the office of District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. That the properties in Sy.No.36/AA one in the prohibited list.

42. It is submitted that District Registrar has not erred in rejecting the documents and as such refusal to receive and register the documents presented by the petitioners in the writ petitions are in accordance with law.

43. Learned counsel relied on the judgment of the Hon'lrle Apex Court in Mohind.er Singh Aitl qtnd. another a. The Chief Election Cornmissioner, New Delhi and. others2, invited the attention of this Court to Paragraph No.8 of the judgment, wherein the observations of Honble Justice Bose in Cotnmissioner of Police, Bombag a. Gordhandas Blunji (L supra) were extracted, on the basis 2lnza; r scc 405 26 W.P.No.4475 of 202r"'ff;i of th: contents, it was contended that notification of the office of Coliector have to be construed on the basis of langtrage used therein.

44. It is submitted that pursuant to Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908 (for short 'the ActJ varlous notifications were issued across the State by the offices of Distr..ct Collectors. That one such notification issued by the office of District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, is dated

26.O9t.2013. It is further submitted that on the information and clata collected f gathered at the ground level, properties 1n ve.rious survey numbers have been included in the notifi:ation and the notification came to be issued on

26.O9t.2073. It is also submitted that Collector is empowered to issue notification under Section 22-A of the Act.

45. It is submitted that upon the exercise of powers under: Section 22-A of the Act, lands are included or listed unde:: any of the Sub-Sections of Section 22-A(1)(a-e) of the Act. It is further submitted that lands in which the State Government has "avowed" or "accrued" interest can also be 27 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch included/listed in the notilication under Section 22-A of the Act, that the notifications are issued. to protect the properties from being claimed as private properties, etc,. [t is submitted that the order of the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.19069 of 20 14 is pertains to set of lands situated in Hafeezpet and the order may not be extended to other areas, as the order is very specific to particular parcels of land. It is further contended that on 07.04.2025, the said parcels of land in various subdivided survey numbers of Sy.No.36 in Gopanpally Village have been notified. It is also contended that the respondents be given liberty to proceed in accordance with law as the said plots in survey numbers have been included in the notilication dated 07.A4.2O25 of the office of District Collector, Ranga Reddy District.

46. Heard learned counsels, perused the record, considered the submissions.

47. In all these writ petitions, petitioners are purchasers of various plots in the main Survey No.36 of Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. It is the specific case of all the petitioners that they presented i i I I 28 W.P.No.4475 of 202r"'ff;i sale deeds, development agreements, gift deeds and agre€ ment of sales before the Sub-Registrar, Serilingampaily on various dates for registration. That Sub- Registrar without assigning any reasons refused regis'.ration. It is observed from the record that Sub- Registrar placed reliance on a communication of the office of Trhsildar (Deputy Collector Cadre), Serilingampally Manclal dated Ni1.09.201 1, Lr.No.B/ 32212OL7 (Page No.2l], P3) and refused registration.

48. On appeal District Registrar confirmed the order of the Sub-Registrar on the basis of notification dated

26.0tt.2O13 issued by the office of District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. That the properties are in prohibited list.

49. It was contended that the Sub-Registrar and the Distr..ct Registrar on appeal could not have refused regislration of documents. It was further contended that the notification dated 26.O9.2OL3 was only a draft notifi:ation and the same cannot be relied by the office of Distrjct Registrar. 29 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2O2l & batch

50. It is pertinent to extract the relevant portion of the notification communicated to the office of Sub-Registrar The same is as follows: THE RANGA REDDY DISTRICT GAZET'TE EXTRA ORDINARY PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY Ranga Reddy District Serilingampally Mandal Rajendranagar Division R.R. No.86 File No. ES I 47 33 / 20 I 3 / Serilingampally / Gopanpally Dated: 26-09-2013 APPendix NOTIFICATION In exercise of the powers conferred under G.O.Ms. No. 863 Rev. (Reg.1) Dept., dated: 20-6-2007 and CCLA's circular Instructions No. BLl385l2OL2, dated: 29-5-2013. The following lands are notihed under Section 22-A {l) (a) for the purpose of section 22A(l), Notice is hereby given inviting objections and suggestions on the above proposal from all persons who are likely to be affected thereby for being taken into considering by the Government. All objections and suggestions should be in writing in English or in Telugu and should be addressed to the Collector (by designation) of Ranga Reddy District within whose jurisdiction the area lies, so as to reach the office of the Collector, Ranga Reddy District on or before the expiry of thirty days from the date of publication of this notification in the Andhra Pradesh Gazette.

51. On a perusal of the notification dated 26.09.2013 communicated which contains the list of prohibited properties, can at best be a notification calling for objections to arrive at a final list of prohibited properties. The notification cannot be termed as a final notification of prohibited properties upon which documents can be refused. for registration. The notification relied on by the 30 W.P.No.4475 of 202r"'ff;i District Registrar cannot be said to be in tune with the law laid clown by the Full Bench

52. A similar notification issued on 26.09.2013 fell for consideration before this Court in W.P.No.19069 of 2OL4, with the following prayer

26.09.2013, "... to issue a Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Ranga Reddy District, Gazette Notification R.R.No.86, Proc. No. E 5 I 47 33 I 20 I 3 / Serilingampally / Hafeezpet dt.26.O9.2013 by the 2nd respondent in so far as it relates to lands in Sy.No.78 and 80 of Hafeezpet village Serilingampally Mandal, R.R.District as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of the Registration Act and consequently set aside the same and grant such other order or orders as this Hon'lcle Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case." issued

53. A learned Single Judge of this Court by order dated

25.Ot\.2O 14 held as follows: Order: "lt is the case of the petitioners 1 to 3 that they are the owners of the land admeasuring Acs.5O.00 guntas in Survey No.78 of Hafeezpet Village. The claim of the 4th petitioner is that he is the owner and he is in possession of another extent of land admeasuring Acs.115.00 guntas in Survey No.80 of Hafeezpet ViIIage, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. The petitioners intend to sell the above extents of land and when they approached the Sub-Registrar, Moosapet, Hyderabad-4th respondent, they were informed about the District Gazette notification issued by the District Collector, Ranga Reddy dated 26-09-1913 in which the objections were called from the affected persons against the proposal to noti$r tl:e lands in Survey Nos.77, 78,79 and 80 of Hafeezpet ViILage of Balanagar and 3l JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch Serlingampally Mandals, Ranga Reddy District covered nnder C.S.No.14 of 1958 under Section 22-A of the Indian Registration Act, i908 (for short'the Act).

2. Learned senior counsel for the petitioners submits that the said notification is without power or jurisdiction. A notification can be issued concerning the properties which are mentioned in Section 22(A)(i)(e) of the Act by the State Government and the District Collector has no power to noti$r any properties covered by Section 22(A)(t)(e) of the Act as the registration of Government lands by way of deeds of conveyance were prohibited. Learned senior counsel placed reliance on earlier orders issued by the Government in memo No.28908/ JAI /2OO4-1, dated 05. 1 1 .2004 and memo No.59734/JA.ll2OO5, dated 18.05.2009, which inter alia disclosed that these lands are treated as private lands and directions were issued for mutation in terms of the orders in C.S.No.14 of 1958.

3. Learned senior counsel further submits that attempts made by the State Government in ttris Court and the Honble Supreme Court have failed and therefore, the above orders zrre issued. Learned senior counsel therefore submits that the preSent notification issued by the District Collector treating it as sarkari is contrary to the orders of the Government and the District Collector does not have competence and power to overrule the orders of the Government and noti$r the subject land as sarkari land.

4. The matter underwent few adjournments at the instance of the learned Advocate General. When t],e matter is called, the Advocate General produced a memo frled by the 2nd respondent, wherein reference was made to the order of status quo passed by the Supreme Court in SLA (C) No(s).t7362-17363/2914 and also orders passed by the Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy ' District in Case No.D5/541212014, dated O6.O8.20L4, suspending the mutation granted in respect of M/s.Savera construction.

5. Learned Advocate General submitted that in view of the order o f status quo granted by the Supreme Court and further orders passed by the Joint Collector suspending the mutation orders passed in favour of M/s.Savera construction, no further action can be taken. 32 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch

6. Learned Advocate General submits that the lands in Survey Nos.77, 78, 79 and 80 of Hafeezpet Village are Government lands and that the Government is taking appropriate steps in this regard.

7. As regards the rival contentions on various issues concerning status of land and Government right to assert its title that cannot be gone into in this case. B. 'I'he only issue for consideration in this writ petition is whether the notification issued by the District Collector amounts to prohibition of registration of lands mentioned therein concerning Survey Nos.77 to 80 of Hafeezpet Village in purported exercise of porver under Section 22(A)(1)(e) of the Act.

9. Learned Advocate General submits that the notifrcation in question is not issued under the above said provision and that it is erroneously mentioned and that the power is vested to issue a notification only in the State Government under Section 22{1.l(2lrof the Act. Further the State Government is entitled to call for the report from the District Collector and the notification issued on26.09.2013 is for the purpose of compiling the information and submitting a report to the State Government to enable it to issue a notification under Section 22(Al{21 of the Act.

10. In other words, learned Advocate General fairly submits that there is no notification issued as on today under Section 22(Al(2l,of the Act. It is further submitted that only after receipt of report from the District Collector and after examining the same by the State Government, appropriate action as warranted by law more particularly under Section 22{ l{21 of the Act would be taken.

11. In view of the submission of learned Advocate General, it is made clear that notification dated 26.O9.2OL3 is not a notification under Section 22(Al(2) of the Act and since, as on today, there is no such notification issued under Section 22(Al(21 of the Act, there is no restraint on the registering authority to receive and process the deeds of conveyance concerning the lands in Survey Nos.79 to 80 of Hafeezpet Village.

12. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Sub-Registrar to receive and process the deeds of 33 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2O2l & batch conveyance without reference to the District Gazette notification dated 26.09.2013 in accordance with the Indian Registration Act, 1908 and the Indian Stamp Act, L899. However, it is open to the registering authorit5r to refuse to register the deeds presented before him, if he has any other objection, by duly assigning reasons in support of such decision and communicate the decision to the petitioners. tt is made clear that mere registration of deed of conveyance does not confer titie to ttre property and it is made clear that this order does not preclude the Government to take appropriate steps as warranted by law and to assert its title. No costs."

54. This Court has taken note of the order of the learned Single Judge and the submissions made by learned Advocate General in the matter in W.P.No.l9O69 of 2014.

55. The notilication that fell for consideration in W.P.No.L9O69 of 2OL4 and the notification in these writ petitions is pari materia, it is apparent that the notifications issued are on the same day by the office of the District Collector. Having perused the order of the learned Single Judge, this Court is of the view that the contention, that, order in W.P.No.19069 of 2014, is applicable to the facts of the case is tenable and valid.

56. Be that as it rrlol the learned Single Judge at Paragraph No.12 held as follows: 34 JAKJ W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch "12. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Sub-Registrar to receive and process the deeds of conveyance without reference to the District Gazette notification dated 26.09-2013 in accordance witJ the Indian Registration Act, 1908 and the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. However, it is open to the registering autlrorit5r to refuse to register the deeds presented before him, if he has any other objection, by duly assigning reasons in support of such decision and communicate :he decision to the petitioners. It is made clear that mere :egistration of deed of conveyance does not confer title to :he property and it is made clear that this order does :rot preclude the Government to take appropriate steps as warranted by law and to assert its title. No costs."

57. 'this Court is not inclined to take a different view from ,vhat has been held in the order of learned Single Judge at Paragraph No.12, tlne same view is endorsed by this Court.

58. l, Full Bench of this Court in Viniannuri Raiagopala Chary and others a. Principal Secretory, Reaenue Department, Hgderq.bqd and others3, dealt with respect to the entire ga.mut of Section 22-A of the Act. Further a Division Bench of this Court in a batch of writ petitions, considr:red the validity of Section 22-A of the Act as incorpc,rated in the Registration Act, 1908 vide A.R. Amendment Act No.19 of 2OOT with effect from 20.06.2007. 3 2o15 SCo onLine Hyd,4o7 35 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch The validity of Section 22-A of the Act was upheld by the Division Bench in Inaecta. Technologies Priaate Limited and Others a. Goaerntnent of Andhra Pradesh, Hgderabqd and Others+. A combined reading of the law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court and the Division bench and various orders in writ petitions, it is evident that any refusal for registering a property by an office of Sub- Registrar can be only in accordance with the Act and as per the law laid d.own by the Fult Bench. The notification issued in not in accordance with law.

59. In Vinjamuri Rajagopala Chary and others a. Principal Secretary, Reaenue Department, Hgderabad and others (3 supra), the Full Bench summarised the conclusions at Paragraph No.158 (in the form of points from I to XV), the relevant points in the present context are as follows: "158. We, thus, summarize our conclusions and issue directions as follows : - (1) The authorities mentioned in the guidelines, which are obliged to prepare lists of properties covered by clauses (a) to (d), to be sent to the registering authorities under the provisions of Registration Act, 02023 scc onLine Ts 4565 36 W.P.No.4475 of 2021"'ff;i shall clearly indicate the relevant clause under which each property is classified. (ii) Insofar as clause (a) is concerned, the concerned District Collectors shall also indicate the statute under which a transaction and its registration is prohibited. Further in respect of the properties covered under clause (b), they shall clearly indicate which of the Governments own the property. (iii) Insofar as paragraphs (3) and (4) in the Guidelines, covering properties under clause (c) and (d) are concerned, the authorities contemplated therein shall also forward to the registering authorities, along with lists, the extracts of registers/gazette if the propert5r is covered by either endowment or wakf, and declarations/orders made under the provisions of Ceiling Acts if the propert5r is covered under clause (d). (iv) .....- v) No notification, contemplated by sub-section (21 of Section 22A, is necessary with respect to the properties falling under clauses (a) to (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 22-A. (vi) ..--. (vii) The registering authorities would be justified in refusing registration of documents in respect of the properties covered by clauses (a) to (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 22-A provided the authorities contemplated under the guidelines, 2S aforementioned, have communicated the lists of properties prohibited under these clauses. (viii) The concerned authorities, which are obliged to furnish the lists of properties covered by clauses (a) to (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 22-A, and the concerned Registering Oflicers shall follow the guidelines scrupulously. (ix) tt is open to the parties to a document, if the relevant propert5r/land finds place in the list of properties covered by clauses (a) to (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 22-A, to apply for its deletion from the list or modification thereof, to the concerned authorities as provided for in the guidelines. The concerned authorities are obliged to consider tJre request in proper perspective and pass appropriate order within six weeks from the date of receipt of the application and make its copy available to the concemed party. "x.....x\r.' 37 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch

60. It is submitted by learned counsel for official respondents that by letter dated O7.O4.2O25, office of District Collector communicated a list of prohibited properties to the office of Sub-Registrar(s) (through the office of IG) and authorities be granted liberty to initiate steps or act in the light of the new list dated 07.04.2025. Needless to state that authorities are empowered under law and are not precluded to act within the frame work of law. 6L. It is submitted that pursuant to interim directions documents presented were received, registered and released in the batch of writ petitions. In view of the submissions made, this Court is of the opinion that no further orders are necessary as far as registration of documents is concerned "qua'the petitioners in the batch of writ petitions.

62. Having considered the entire factual matrix of the case, the order of the learned Single Judge, the law laid down by the Full Bench, the Division Bench of this Court and the Act, this Court is of the opinion that the order of respondent No.2 bearing No.18183/G1 l2OL9 dated 38 JAK,}. W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch 17 /O,5|2O2O acting on the alleged notification dated

26.49t.2413 File No.ES/4733/2013 Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the [)istrict Coilector, confirming the Order of the Third Resprrndent in Refusal No.76 of 2019 dated L9llll2AL9, actini3 on the alleged letter bearing No.B/32212OO7, dated AB /O') l2}ll, are set aside.

63. Be that as it ffi&y, Authorities are not precluded from taking steps as warranted by law, in respect of the prohibited properties communicated uide letter dated

07.O4-.2025, by office of District Collector to the office(s) of Sub-ltegistrar(s) (through the office of IG).

64. F'or reasons aforesaid, Writ Petitions are aliowed "qtta" the writ petitioners, "qud the prayers. No costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this writ petiti,rn shall stand closed. Date: 06.10.2025 plp/qrt ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI, J