High Court · 2025

Petition under Articte 226 of the C{ nstitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fileL therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or Directi n in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondeni N 2 in transferring the services of the petitioner 480 Km away from Bhongir to Jagityal vide proc in Rc. No. TGSWREIS/Zo nestOl l2O2S Dated 02.03 025 by way of deputati on. The 2nd respondent is not competent authority to is ue deputation orders to the petitioner as she is not-having any Jurisdiction, ower or authority or duties of the secretary for transferring the services of t e petitioner by way of deputation as per the Bye Laws of the TGSWREI Society hich is amended in 2014 under Rule B (A) the competent authority is Vice Chair anlPrincipal Secretary. The action of the 2nd Respondent in Transferring the ervices of the petitioner by way of deputation posting at Jagityal without con nt of the petitioner which is 480 Kms away is illegal, arbitrary and vioration of principres of naturar justice and arso violation of Article '14,16 and 21 of the constitution of lndia and also violation of Fundamental Rights. Therefore the Hon'bre court suspend the operation of the 'lst Respondent Proceedings TGSWRE|StZonestoll2o25, Dated. o2.o3.202s consequently direct the 2nd respondent to continue the services of the petitioner as Principal at Principar , TSWRDC (women) Bhongir, Bhongir, yadadri Bhongir District. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the.petition, the High court may be preased to suspend the operation of the 2nd Respondent proceedings in Rc_ No. Rc. No. TGSWREIS/Zonesloll2o2s , Dated o2.03.202s and consequenfly direct the 2nd respondent to continue the services of the petitioner as principar at principar, TSWRDC (Women) Bhongir, Bhongir Yadadri Bhongir District petitioner pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KRUpAKAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI S. RAHUL REDDY, GP FOR SERVICES III Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI BHANOTHU HUSSAIN WRIT PETITIO NNO : 9406 OF 2025 Between: Nirupa, D/o: Narsiin (Women) Bhongir, B g Rao Aged About 45 years, Occ. princrpal, TSWRDC hongir, Yadadri Bhongirbistrict ' AND 1 2 The State of Telangana, Rep by its_prhciple Secretary, Schedule Caste Development Department Sbcr'etariat euiidhg, Hvd;ijbao Telanoana social werfare Residentiar Educqlionar lnstrtutions society, (.Regd), Rep by its Secretary, Masab Tank, tefugu"simsheta Af;v;i, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENTS the Hon'ble Court Orders er suspension it appears he petitioner because the Petition under Article 226 ol lhe Qonstitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit f iled therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or Dire ction in the nature of Writ of lVlandamus declaring the action of the Respo nq ent No. 2 in issuing proceedings TlDtsl2103t2o25-.1. Dated 2a-B_2o2s ptl acing the petitioner under suspension which violates this Hon'ble Hiqh Court d )rders in w.p.no. 6557 of 2025, dated 17.03.2025 wherein Hon,ble High Court dil rected the 2nd Respondent to continue the services of the petitioner as principal, fSWROC (W), Bhongir but whereas the 2nd Respondent instead of complyin the 2nd Respondent placed the petitioner un the 2nd Respondent is avenging and hounding petitioner already approached the Hon'ble High Cdurt for seeking Justice on her illegal deputation , though the 2nd Respond entl is not a competent authority to take disciplinary action as per the Bye_Laws of e TGSWRET Society under Rule 8 (a) the competent authority is Vice Ch rman/Principal Secretary. The 2nd Respondent exercised her ut having any Jurisdiction, power, powers with Authority or Duties of the Secretary to pla the petitioner under suspension which is illegal, Arbitrary, Violation of principles oif Natural Justice and also Violation of Article 1 4,16 and 21 ot the Constitution of I riOia anO also Violation of Fundamental Rights, placing the petitioner under suspinsion to demonstrate the vindictive attitude of the 2nd Respondent. Therefore his Hon'ble Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the 2nd Respon ent proceedings T/DtS/21 03/2025_1, Dated 24-03-2025 consequenfly direct th 2nd. Respondent to re-instate and continue the services of the petitioner as pri cipal TSWRDC (W), Bhongir. l IANO:1OF2 025 Petition under Section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the 2nd Respondent proceedings in TlDlsl21o3l2o2s-1 , Dated 24-03-2025, consequenfly direct the respondent to reinstate and continue the services of the petitioner as principal rswRDC (w), Bhongir pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KRUpAKAR Counsel for the Respondents: ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER - THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMA vilnepu RAJESH1VAR RAO tryRIT PETITION Nos .6557 nd 94O6 of2025 I COMMON ORDER: Since the issue involved in both tl rese writ petitions is one and the same and are disposed ofby way ofi :ommon order-

2. Heard Mr. Krupakar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. S.Rahul Reddy, arned Special Government Pleader appearing for the responden ,: Perused the material on record.

3. The case of the pdtitioner is tl Principal in the Degree College (Wome! hat she was appointed as r) in TGSWREI Societ5r vide Proceedings dated 12.03.2018 and po] sted to TSWRDC (Women), I Mahindra Hills, Shameerpet, Hydera ad. Thereafter, she was transferred to different Degree Colleges in respondent No.2-Society and has been discharging her duties wi out any remarks. While so, respondent No.2, without any au ority transferred her on deputation from Bhongir to Jagtial, w ch is 48O Kms away from Bhongir vide Proceedings dated O2.O3.2 25. Aggrieved by the same, she lrled W.P.No.6557 of 2025. This Co rt, vide interim order dated

17.O3.2O25, directed respondent No.2 continue the petitioner as Principal, TSWRDC (Women), Bhongir. respondent No.2 instead of complyi t is further submitted that g with the order dated I 2

17.O3.2O25, passed by this Court in W.P. No.6557 of 2025, placed the petitioner under suspension vide Proceedings dated 24.O3.2025. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner hled W.P.No.9406 of 2025.

4. This Court, on O3.O4.2O25 in W.P.No.94O6 of 2025, directed the learned Special Government Pleader to produce the proceedings relating to the withdrawal of the suspension order, failing which, respondent No.2 shal1 appear before this Court for clarification regarding the suspension order.

5. In compliance with the orcler dated O3.O4.2O25, the learned Special Government 'Pleader has produced proceedings dated

07.O4.2025 vide Rc.No.T/DIS l23Ot l2025 issued by the Telangana Social Welfare Residential Educational Institutions Societ5r, Hyderabad, before this Court, wherein it is stated that the suspension order dated 24.O3.2025 had been withdrawn and vide proceedings daLed 07 .O4 .202 5 in Rc. No.TGSWREIS / Z ones / O I / 2025, the petitioner was directed to report to TSWRDC, Bhongir, Yadadri District, to assume charge as Principal, relieving Smt. Ch.Sarada from in-chargc duties.

6. Having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and in view of withdrawal of the suspension order dated 24.03.2025, ernd issuance of proceedings dated 07.O4.2025 bv t ----------- 3 the Telangana Social Welfare Resid erttial Educational Institutions Society, Hyderabad, both the Writ Peti ons are closed. No order as 4i to costs As a sequel, miscellaneous appiications pending, if any, in these Writ Petitions, shall stand closed. //TRUE OPYII SD/. M. OSMAN ALI BAIG S TANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER 1 2 3 4 One CC to Sri Krupakar, Advocate Two CCs to GP for Additional Ad Telangana. [OUT] Two CC to The GP for Services-lll, Hyderabad[OUT] One CC to Sri Banothu Hussain, Ad Two CD Copies loPUCl ate General, rg h Court for the State of igh Court for the State of Telangana, at cate[OPUC] a To, TJ GJ HIGH COURT DATED:0810412025 1:: I ..r\ 'l'.\ ' 12AIJEM t. COMMON ORDER WRIT PETITION Nos.6557 and 9406 of 2OZs CLOSING THE WRIT PETITIONS WITHOUT COSTS & 9C