N.Chandulal v. The Telangana Girijan Coop. Corporation Limited
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Permission is accorded 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with a liberty as prayed for. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed SDi. A.H.S. GOWRI SHANKAR $STANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER…
Judgment
Cause title
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO wRlT PETITION NO: 6474 OF 2025 Between: N.Chandulal, S/o Hari, aged 55 years Working as Junior Assistant, Girijan Primary Cooperative Marketing Society Limited, Utnoor, Adilabad District AND ...PETITIONER
1, The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary to Government, Tribal Welfare Department at Secretariat, Hyderabad
2. The Telangana Girijan Coop. Corporation Limited, represented by its Vice Chairman and Managing Director at Masab Tank, Hyderabad 3. The Project Officer, l.T.D.A./ Executive Director, Telangana Girijan Cooperative Corporation Limited, Utnoor, Adilabad District ...RESpONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or Writs, Order or Direction, declaring and setting aside the Order dated 19.2.2025 in Rc.No. 13120251D on the file of the 3rd Respondent, as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and violative of principles of natural justice, Award costs. lA NO: 1 OF 202s Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Order dated 19.2.2025 passed in Rc.No. 13120251D on the file of the 3rd Respondent, pending disposal of WP.No. of 2025. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES lll The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.6474 of 2025
ORDER:
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition with a liberty to lile a fresh case, if necessar5r
Operative part
Permission is accorded 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with a liberty as prayed for. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed SDi. A.H.S. GOWRI SHANKAR $STANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER 'l . One CC to SRI N.SREEDHAF. REDDY, Advocate DpUCI 2. Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES-I||, High Court for the State of Telangana, at ToV PSK. GJP Hyderabad. [OUT]
Two CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED:1610712025 ORDER WP.No.6474 ot 2025 1[tt: s ( Cr 2 4 JUL 206 \.- /\, -r1 ' . rr Y.-r i\-\/ 1.r , i\_ i._; ' ,: - -- - ---:? I z .c) -\ /r DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS 6
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.