1. M.Ganesh v. 1. The State of Telangana

Petition Under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the 4th respondent in interfering with the civil dispute between the petitioners and the 5th respondent herein with regard to Registered Sale Deed vide Document No.1067 of 2017, dated 3.3.2017 on the file of Sub Registrar Office, Chevella, Ranga Reddy District as arbitrary, illegal and violation of principles of natural justice and violation of Article 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents particularly the 4th respondent not to interfere with the civil dispute between the petitioners and the sth respondent. |.A.NO:1 OF 2017 \ATVMP.NO:3884 OF 20171 Between L Bikshapathi S/o L.Komaraiah, Aged 65 years, lvladhura Nagar Colony, Block No tu21, H No B-3-222lC/115, Hyderabad. ....PETITIONERyRESPONDENT No.5 AND

1. M.Ganesh, S/o M.Venkat Swamy, Aged 44 yearc, Occ Business, H.No.3- 2-90, Hyde^rguada Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State.

2. Sardar Bhupender Singh, S/o Late Bali Singh, Aged 44 years, Occu Business, H.No.4-9-136/4, Sikh Chowni, Attafur, Blhadurpura, Tadbun, Hyderabad 64, Telangana State.

3. Jaligam Devener, S/o J.Lingamalah, Aged about 36 years, Occu Business R/o H.No.4-4-105, Attapur, Hyderabad-48, Telangani State.

4. Teegala Vishal, S/oT.Gnaneshwar, Aged 31 years, Occu Business, "iiXp"t, H.No.16-8-130/A, Kaladera . Colony, Nr.Adams High b"nooi f,rf Hyderabad, Telangana State.

5. K. Narasimha, S/o K.Chandramma, Aged 39 years, Occ Business, H.No.3- 3-701411, Hyderguda Temple, Erraboda, Rajendra Nagar, Rangareddy District, Telangana State.

6. M.Mahender Goud,, S/o M.Ramulu Goud, Aged 27 years, Occu Business H.No.1-65, Malakpur Village, Chevella lvlandal, Rangareddy District, Telangana State.

7. V.Narasimha Chary, S/o Late.V.Kalapa, Aged 52 years, Occu Business, H,No.2-1811 , Moinabad Moinabad Mandal,Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State.

8. Kumari Mahender, S/o K.Narasimhulu, Aged 33 years, Occu Business, H.No.1-1 13 Opp Girka Well, Hydershakote, Rajendra Nagar, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State.

9. Sidenthi Suresh, S/o S.Chennaiah, Aged 34 years, Occu Business, H.No.2-36, Chilkoor Village, Moinabad Mandal. Ranga Reddy District, ....-PETITIONERSM/RIT PETITIONERS

10. The State of Telangana, Rep By Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 1 1 . The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad, R.R.District, Telangana State.

12. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Shamshabad, R.R Diskict, Telangana State.

13. The lnspector of Police, P.S Moinabad, Cyberabad, R. R District, Telangana State. .....RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 1 to 4 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 28-08-20'17 passed in WPlt/P No. 35578 of 2017 in WP No. 28612 of 2017 and dismiss the said writ petition with costs. l.A.NO:2 OF 2017 (WPMP.NO:35578 OF 20171 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents particularly the 4th respondent not to interfere with the civil dispute between the petitioners and the 5th respondent, pending disposal of the writ petition. t I I I --7 Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI R.A.CHARY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : SRI M.SRINIVAS, AGP FOR HOME Counsel forthe Respondent No.5 : SRI T.LAKSHMI NARAYANA The Court made the following ORDER I I -r THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N,TUKARAMJI ORDER: WRIT PETITION No.28612 OF 2017 This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of lndia seeking the following relief: "...Io lssue an order, direction or a writ particularly one in the nature Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 4th respondent in interfering with the civil dispute between the petitioners and the Sth respondent herein with regard to Registered Sale Deed vide Document No.1067 of 2017, dated 3.3.2017 on the file of Sub Registrar Office. Chevella, Ranga Reddy District as arbitrary, illegal and violation of principles of natural justice and violation of Article 300-A of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents particularly the 4th respondent not to inteffere with the civil dispute befuveen the petitioners and the \th respondent and to pass... .. "

2. Heard Mr.R.A.Chary, learned counsel for the petitioners and [r/r. M.Srinivas, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents No.1 to 4.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause of action in the present writ petition no longer survives for adjudication and, therefore, seeks dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader raises no objection to the said submission.

5. Recording the submissions of both learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, pendingllg1y, shall stand glosed. \ //TRUE COPY// SD/- K. Bhavani SwamY - ASSIST T REGISTR -\ S ION OFFICER To SA 1 2 3 4 Two CCs to GP FOR HOtvlE, High Court for the State of Tel-ngana a Hvderabad. [OUT] iii,"-cti" Snt R A CHARY, Advocate [oPUcl il; d; i" Siii i.LAksuMl'NARAYANA, Advocate [oPUc] Two CD CoPies 4 t I I HIGH COURT DATED:1 011012025 ORDER WP.No.28612 of 2017 lHE S ( o(J * 0 5 f i:8 2fl1$ f .l I )! DISMISSING THE W.P AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS. coP''oJ K.t''*