✦ Telangana High Court

Salauddin Khan v. The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad lt4unicipal Corporation (GHIVC), CC

LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY3 min read

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Cause title

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in suppo( of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to interim suspension of orders in the Occupier Notice/Demand Notices passed by the Respondent No.2 (Deputy Commissioner, Circle 18, GHI\4C) in Demand Notice No OO1l2O19 & 0002/2019 dated 22.03.2019 for collection of property taxes with respect to the Premises No. 8-2-57711|C & 8-2-577111 Al1, in Road No.7, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, pending the disposal of the r rain Writ petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ABHISHEK REPRESENTINC :OR SRI MANOJ MAHARAJ GANJI Counsel for the Respondents: SRI M. ARUN KUMAR, SC FO t GHMC The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY WRIT PETITI ON No.679O of 2Ol9

ORDER:

This writ petition is filed seeking following relief "To declctre the orders in tlrc ()ccupier Notice/ Demrtnc) NoLices passec) by1 the respttndenl No 2 (DeputA Commr.ssioner, Circle 18, GHMC) in Dernartd 'Noiice-No.Ool / 20 19 and OOO2/ 2019 dated 22'03'20 19 for co ection of propertg taxes with respect to the 'pre^ises I 2-577/ 1/ A/ f in 'Road No.7, Banjaro Hilts, Hgderabad, as iltegal and No.S'b 577/ 1/ C ond arbitrary. "

2.

Mr. Abhishek, Iearned counsel representing Mr' G Mano'; Maharaj, Iearncd counsel for the pelil-ione rs on record and Nilr. M. Arun Kumar, learncd Standing counsel fot- resptlndcnt Nns. I and 2 are Prcsent. Learned counsel for Lhe petitioners seeks permission ol 3. this Court to rvithdraw this Writ Petition He also add ressed a le ticr clatcd 31. 10.2025 to the Rcgistrar (Judicial) to r,'ithdrau' this Writ Petition.

4.

Permission is accorde d. AccordinglS', the Writ Petition ls dismissed as withdrag'n. No ordcr as to costs Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall star-rd closed ! I I I I i SD/. K. MAOHAVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, I One CC to SRI MANOJ MAHARAJ GANJI' Advocate [OPUC1 2 One CC to SRI t\,4. ARUN KUMAR' SC FOR GHMC [OF I rC] Two CD CoPies BN PVL +r HIGH COURT DATED:1 111112025 ORDER WP.No.6790 of 2019 :i .t I t: b l/r. ( o i.) :\:. ';.-) ,\ I 1:tl n -17 |: -za * DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS 6?;A D u\ri)$ A_D\o

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Telangana High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments