The High Court · 2025

l. B. Srisailam Sio. B.Yadaiah, Ooc- Govt Employee, R/o H.No AND Village, Madgul Mandal. Ranga Reddy District.

2. B. Yadaiah S/o B.Jangaiah, . Occ- Agriculture R/o H.No. Village, Madgul Mandal, I{anga Reddy District. I - 15, Appareddypally 1- 15. Appareddypally f

3. Smt B.Yadamrna W/o B. Yadaiah, Occ- House wif'e, R/o H.No. 1-15, Appareddlpally Village, Madgul l\,tandal, Ranga Reddy District.

4. Smt K. Indu (z) Alivelu Wo K. Parvathalu, Occ- Housewife, R-/o Plot no.500, Teachers Colonv, Phase-I, BN Red<ly Nagar, Sagar Road. Krrrmarl3hat Ranga Reddy l)istrict.

5. Dr.K. Parvathalu S/o. K. Beeraiah Occ- Asst.Profbssor R/o Plot no.500, Teachers Coloriy. Phase-I. RN Reddy Nagar, Sagar Road, Kamianghat Ranga Reddy District.

6. Thc State of l'elangana, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor High Court at Hyderabad. Ilespo;.r Cents/Rcspondents Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS. praying that in -he circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal l'etition, tht: Iligh Courl may be pleased to permit the parties to compound the case in DVC. )'Jo. l0 of 2022 on the file of the Junior CivilJudge-cum-Additional Judicial Nlagistrate of First Class at Amangal, Ranga Reddy District in the interest ofjustice I.A. NO: -l OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS, praying that in the cirr:umstanccs stated in the Memorandum ol Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court rnay be pleased to record thc tcrms ol compromisc between the parties and quash the proceedings against the petitioners/responclcnts No. 1 to 5 in DVC.No.l 012022 on the tlle c,f the Junior Civil .ludge -Cum- Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Amangal, Ranga Reddy District; This Petition coming on lor hearing, upon perusing the Momorandum of Grounds olCriminal Petition atd upon hearing the arguments olSri P Animi Re,Jdy, Advocate for the Petitionor, Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Iearned Additiona[ Pubtic Prosecutor for the respondent No. I and Sri G. Nagabhushana Reddy" Advocatc for thc respondent No. 2, The Court made the lirllorving COMMON ORDER: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI I.A.Nos .2 AND 3 0F 202s ln/And CRIMINAL P ETITION No.3074 OF 2025 COMMON ORDER This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS, 2023'), seeking quashment of the proceedings in DVC.No.10 of 2022, on the file of the Junior Civil Judge-cum-Additional Judicial [Vlagistrate of First Class, Amangal, Ranga Reddy District, against the petitioners.

2. The petitioners are arrayed as respondent Nos.1 to 5 in the DVC registered for the offence punishable under Section 12 of Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

3. Heard tVlr.P.Animi Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, tvlr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, representing the respondent No. 1 -State and I\4r.G.Nagabhushana Reddy, learned counsel for the respondent No.2/de-facfo complainant. I I I

4. Pending this petition, the parties have entered into the compromise and, accordingly, they moved l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 with the prayer to permit them to enter into compromise and by recording the settlement to quash the proceedings against the petitioners/respondent Nos.1 to 5 t! DVC No.10 of 2022. 2 Nltil/ 1,1.,\'ai-' tt;d i 01 2025 in/and L. i.L'}.No.)071 ol202i

5. This Courl vide order dated 17.03.2025 referred the parties to the High Court Legal Services Committee for identification anl to verify the voluntariness in arriving the settlement. The Secretsp'7, Hig;h Court Legal Services Committee, has submitted report dated 24.A3.20',25 stating that the parties are identified by their respective counsel and also on verification of Aadhar Cards/ldentity Cards and the enquiries reveal that the parties have willful and without coercion entered into settlemenucom promise

6. I have considered the submissions of the leerrned counsel and perused the materials on record

7. Having considered the allegations, the charged offen<;es, which are essentially matrimonial and inter-personal in nature and taking into account the amicable settlement between the parties and to restore peace among them, in the light of the dictums in Gian Singh v. Stafe of Punjab and anotherl and Anil Mishra y. Stafe of lJ.P.2; State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan and others3, this Court is of the considered view that quashment of the impugned proceedings in view of the settlement by exercising jurisdiction under Section 482 r)r.P.C.1528 of BNSS, 2023, would be in the interest of justice. ' 2012 (10) scc 303 2 2oz+ tttsc t89 r 2019 (s) scc 688 3 Nni"/ l-4.Nor2 and ) of 2025 in/ a Crl.P.No3074 of2025 B. Accordingly, LA.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, all proceedings in DVC.No.1O of 2022, on the file of the Junior Civil Judge-cum-Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Amangal, Ranga Reddy District, are hereby quashed against the petitioners/respondent Nos.1 to 5.

9. ln the above terms, the Criminal Petition is disposed of Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed 'l-o. //'IRt]E COPY// Sd/- P.PAI)MANABHA REI)I)Y DEPI.ITY RXGISTRAIT, / Iu- sl_crloN oFFl( t.R t. The Junior civil Judge-cum-Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Amangal, Ranga Reddy Distr{ct

2. Onq CC tq Sri P Animi Reddy Advocate [OPU(Il 3. One CIC'to Sri G. Nagabhushana Reddy, Advocate (OPUC) 4. 'Iwo CC to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State ofTelangana a1 Hyderabad(OUT)

5. 'Iwo CD coies Along with a copy olJoint Memo of Compromise 4- I I I III(;ll ( OLiltT \I'R.I DA'I'El):01/04/21)25 cot\tl\roN oRr)1,.t{ tA. NOS. 2 AND.l 01.'2{)25 IN CRLI'.No.-i07.1 of 2025 DISPOSIN(; OF TI]Ii (]RIMINAI- PETTTTON NNO AI,I,oWING IA. NoS. 2 AND.J OF 2025 @6 1 r,n .J f4 r5 o 11rPt M ,.. i-y -Cl, I I I I : 'rr.u HTGH COI'RT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDEfl'AtsAD Crl.P.No. of 2025 BETWEEN:

1. B.srisaiiam (++ucU-)) S/o.B.Yadaiah Age:42 years, Occ: Govt trmployee, R/o H.No. 1-15, Appareddypally Village, Madgul Maldal, Ranga Reddy District.

2. R.Yadaiah (e"flto -'," -t^',) S/o B.Jangaiah Age: 60 years, Occ: Agriculture R/o H.No. 1-15, Appareddypally Village, Madgul Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

3. Smt B.Yadamma (uoll,o-in-t *1 W/o B.Yadaiah Age: 56 years, Occ: House wife, R/o H.No. 1-15, Appa;eddypally Village, Madgul Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

4. SmtK. Indu @ Alivelu ( <i,t-.r-i^- ' ^,n) 'W /o K. Parvathalu Age:39 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o Plot no.5o0, Teachers Colony, Phase-I, BN Reddy Nagar, Sagar Road, Karmanghat Ranga Reddy District. Q+.^.u--a +*! 5. Dr.K. Parvathalu S/o. K. Beeraiah Age: 47 years, Occ: Asst.Professor R/o Plot no.500, Teachers Colony, Phase-I, BN Reddy Nagar, Sagar Road, Karmanghat Ranga Reddy District. , AND ... Petitioners/Respondent No. 1 to 5

1. The State of Telangana Rep. by the Public Prosecutor High Court at Hyderabad.

2. Smt B.Vijaya W/o B.Srisailam, D/o B. Dasaradham e',ii'"Jq 4] 6-fr 6at9 '1 I I t I t I 9i. w Age : 30 years, Occ: House wife, .. . R/o.H.No. 2- 1 O, Arkapally Village, Madgui Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. N t'' .:. ... Resrpon<lent/ Conrplairant JOINT MEMO

1. It is submitted that the respondeni no.2 have irl.d a DVC case against the petitioners before the Junior iivil .ludge-cum-Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Amangal, Ranga Reddy District and the same is pending vide DVC.No.lO & 2022.

2. It is submitted that as per the MOU dt. t2-Ol-2tO2S both parties are ', compromised the following pending cases betr.r,een thr:m. a. C.C.No.994 of 2022 on the file of the Junior..Civil judge Cum Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Amangal, Ranga Reddy District.( U/Sec. 49aA, 323,5O6 R/w 34 of IpC ard Sec.3 & 4 of DP Act). b. Crl.RC.No.53O of 2024 pendine before the Hon,ble High Court. c. Crl.MP.No.2B4 of 2024 in M.C.No.15T of 2Ot9 p,:nding before the Additional Famiiy Court-, Ranga Reddy District at LB Nagar. d. DVC.No.lO of 2022 pending before the Junior Civil Judge-Cum_ Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Amangdl, Ranga Reddy District. s"rijg", J, I | .'. 'r ,-\- o€,"5 ofaJ #(l*k-">4, . - e. FCA.No.65 of 2024 pending before the Hon,ble High Court. : 3' It is submitted that at the instance of erders uoi *"it wishers the petitioners no'1 and theiespondehL no.2 ditered into Mou dt.12-01- 2b25 as per MOU we both compcomised in all cases and agreed to get mutual divorce and the petitioner no. 1 agrebd to pay an amount of R*.,I2,O0,OOO/- as full and Iinal settlement and the petitioner no.1 alrreed to pay 3,OO,OO0/- by way. of D.D per each case it amounts to r 2,oo,oool- for alr four cases. Now the petitioner no.1 agreed to givd Rs.3,00,OOO/_ for compromising the present case by w-avrof p'!'{he original D.D will be handed over to respondent no.2.aL. the time of recording of compromise before the Hon,bie court vide D.D.No.46 1407 dt. tZ -O2-2O25.

4. The contents mentioned in the said Compromise petition is true and corre.etirp the best of their knowledge a,d belief, the said compromise is entered with free will and consent arrd without undue influence from anyone and the respondent no.2 have no objeitibn to illow the criminal petition. It is therefore prayed that this Hon,ble Court may be pleased to record the terms of compromise between the parties and quash the proceedings against the petitioners in DVC.No. LO/2022 on the Iiie of the Junior civil Judge-cum-Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Amangal, Ranga Reddy District and pass such

8.1)i9q lA oIp6 a4not 4* .'-.i. r , i ',1'.. ir:':'i , . . tr.,. - ,,;$ :\ other order. or orders as the Hon'ble court may deem fit aihd proper in the interest ofjustice. Hence this Joint.memo. Date:24-O2 2025 Hyderabad. L ,.t PIITITIONER No. 1 :>lrdaS! PIITITIONER No.2 PIITITIONER No.3 I "ryL*)u PI'TITIONER NO.4 PI'IITIONER NO.5 fif-'-"' COUNSEL FOF: THI' PETITIONERS tt,v[@ 2"4 RtrSPONDE COUNSEL FOR TH]] 2". RESPONDENT !',1t:: . :_ '\..\ ,t .':.