MONDAY v. UNION OF INDIA Following the said judgment & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Following the said judgment, this Writ Petition shall stand dismissed without
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 14, 19, 226
- Consumer Protection Act, 2019 s. 27
Judgment
Cause title
MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B. SUDERSHAN REDDY THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
WRIT PETITION NO : 16272 of 2000 Between: 1 Amitha Chit Funds Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by it's Managing Director, Gujjapalli Prakash Rao, S/o. Samma Rao, R/o.H.No.2-8-712, Bhavani Nagar, Hanumakonda, Warangal. 2 G.Venkatram reddy, S/o. Srinivas Reddy, C/o. Anil Sanitary Stores, Opp: B.Ed. College, Hanmakonda. AND ..... PETITIONERS
1 Union of India, Rep. by it's Secretary, Ministry of Food and Consumer Affairs, New Delhi. 2 State Commission of Consumer Redressal Forum, A.P., Rep.by it's Registrar, Khiratabad, Hyderabad. 3 K.Ramgopal Reddy, S/o. Sudhar Reddy, C/o. Sri Harsha Sanitary Stores, R/o.H.No.1-9-805, Behind Postal Colony, Subedari, Hanmakonda-506 001. .....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as arbitrary, unreasonable and violative of Article 14 & 19 of the Constitution of India and consequently declare the proceedings in P.P.No.50 of 2000 in C.D.No.176/1999 on the file of the District Forum, Warangal as void ab initio, null, void and nonest in the eye of law, and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.V.VISWANATHAM Counsel for the Respondent No.1: STANDING COUNSEL Counsel for the Respondent No.2: G.P. FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES Counsel for the Respondent No.3: None Appeared The Court made the following :
O R D E R:
Operative part
(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B.Sudershan Reddy) The subject matter that arises for consideration in this Writ Petition is squarely covered by the decision rendered by a Full Bench of this Court in C.V.RATNAM v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS. Following the said judgment, this Writ Petition shall stand dismissed without any order as to costs. ________________________ B.SUDERSHAN REDDY, J. _____________________ K.C.BHANU, J. Dated: 01.11.2004 gs/ks To 1 The Secretary, Union of India , Ministry of Food and Consumer Affairs, New Delhi. 2 The Registrar, State Commission of Consumer Redressal Forum, A.P., Khiratabad, Hyderabad. 3 2 CCs to the G.P. for Civil Supplies, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT)
Two CD Copies.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Following the said judgment, this Writ Petition shall stand dismissed without
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 14, 19, 226; Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — s. 27.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 01 Nov 2004. The bench was B SUDERSHAN REDDY, K C BHANU.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.