The High Court · 2025

petition under A,.icre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus decraring the action of the respondent No.4 and 5 in conducting the survey and demarcation on the land of the petitioner in respect of the agriculture land in Sy. No. 1S97lA to an extent of Ac. 0.06 gts, Sy. No. 15991N1 to an extent of Ac. 1.01 gts, Sy. No. 1608/Kha to an extent of Ac. 0.23 gts' sy' No' 1611/AA to an extent ofAc. 0.14 gts, sy. No. 1612lA4 to an extent of Ac' 0'04 gts, sy. No. 't 624iUU to an extent of Ac. 0.03 gts and our said possession land to an extent of Ac. 1.00 gts in Sy. No. 1606, Ac.0.20 gts in Sy. No. 1607 of for the past 70 years which is situated at Arura Virage, Manchar Mandar, Ranga Reddy District, in rist pendenced rands in o.s.No.207 0f 2021 0n the fire of the Junior civir Judge court at rbrahimpatnam, without issuing any notice and without f1]fwinO the due process of law, by colluding with the respondent No.6 and others, is highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, unjust ,nO in ,iofrtion ot Principres of Naturar Justice and arso in vioration of Articres 14 and 300-4 of the constitution of rndia and consequenry direct the respondent ruo.+ ano u-;;,'a conduct the survey and demarcation on the rand of the petitioner in respect of the agriculture land in Sy. No. 1597/4 to an extent of Ac. 0.06 gts, Sy. No. 1S99/A,/1 to an extent of Ac. .t.01 gts, Sy. No. 160g/Kha to an extent of Ac. 0.23 gts, Sy. No. :;l; i I 1611/AA to an extent of Ac. 0.14 gts, sy. No. 16t2lAAto an extent o'Ac. 0.04 gts, sy. No. 1624lUU to an extent of Ac. 0.03 gts and our said possession land'to an extent of Ac. 1.00 gts in sy. No. 1606, Ac. 0.20 gts in sy. No. 1607 rlf forthe past 70 years which is situated at Arutla Village, Manchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, in list pendenced lands in o.s.No.207 of 2021 on the file of the Junior civil Judge court at lbrahirnpatnam, without issuing any-.notice and without following the due process of larn', by colluding with the respondent No 6 and others' IA NO: 1 OF 2022 t petition under Section 1Sl CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in supoort of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.4 and 5 not to conduct the survey and demarcation on the land of the petitioner in respect of the agriculture land in Sy. No. 1597lALo an extent of Ac. 0.06 gts, Sy. No. 1599/4/1 to an extent of Ac. 1.01 gts, Sy' No' 1608/Kha to an extent of Ac. 0.23 gts Sy. No. 161 1/AA to an extent of Ac 014 gts, Sy' No' 1612tAA to an extent of Ac. 0.04 gts, sy. No. 1624lUU to an extent of Ac. 0.03 gts and our said possession land to an extent of Ac. 'l .00 gts in Sy No '1606' Ac' 0'20 gts in Sy. No. 1607 of for the past 70 years which is situated at ,Arutla Village, Manchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, in lis pendenced lands in 1f.s.No.207 of 2021 on the file of the Junior civil Judge court at lbrahimpatnam, vrithout issuing any notice and without following the due process of law, by collr.rding with the respondent No.6 and 7 pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 TO 5: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 & 7: SRI V.M'KRISHNA REDDY' W.P.NO: 14093 OF 2022 Between: Bhootharaiu Yadaiah, S/o Late Ramulu aged about 46 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o Arutla Village, Manchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ...'ET'T'ONER AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenr.te Department, Secreiariat Building, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2, The District Collector, Ranga Reddy, Ranga Reddy District. Illir[:"""* Divisionat Officer, tbrah impatnam Divisio 3 4 5 6

7. 'no "" mrull**g,Nulg,p*,y'lg+,:** ...RESPONDENTS petition under Article 226 of the Constil r,,on of rndia praying tt,ut in tnu circumstances stated in the affidavit ,,,"0 ,n, t"*"n' the High court may be pleased tb issue an appropriate writ, order o,. o,n ,r";:I;J:::::ff:ilJ;::JJi: nature or writ or Mandamus dectaring conducting the survey and demarcation on the I: of the petitioner in respect of the agricurture rand in sy. No. 1597/AA ,o ,n lssTtANl to an extent or Ac. 0.10 sts, sy. *". ,u"JrT"lH" lllriT;: ,i: gts, Sy. No. 1599/E to Ac 1 ,8 sts, sy -" ,fl;ffi:#::J:::;:,,1:;:,:fi,J:",::;#:J to an extent of Ac' 3'12 gts and our said possession rand to an extent of Ac. 1.00 gts in Sy. No. 1606, Ac. 0.20 gts in Sy. No. 1607 r situated at Aruta Viltage, Manchat Mandat, _r'#t::ilrrrff::T"1,; pendenced lands in O.S.No.21 i of 2021on the file of the Junior civil Judge court at lbrahimpatnam, without issuing any notice a no *,,nort following the due process of raw, by colruding with the respondent n,,f arbitrary, unconstitutionar, unjust and in vioratio, j;t ill,r,L"T;l]jj,lljllll; and arso in vioration of Articres 14 and 300-4 of the constitution of rndia and consequenfly direct. the respondent No.4 and 5 n t no' to conduct the survev and demarcation on the rand ;:':",;:,^::-",_':o "o"n,ojrt[ lH,"j:; i::I:'J:::;riil:T ;i::l No r5e7lAA to ,n extent of Ac. 0.16 gts, Sy. No. .t6.t 1/RU1 to an er 1612tLU1to an.exent or Ac. 0.18 grs and ., ,".1T:fr1","r"1,t;il;I 3'12 gts and our said possession rand to an extent of Ac. 1 .00 gts in Sy. No. 1606, Ac' 0 '20 gts in sy' No' 1607 0f for the past 70 years which is situated at Arura Village, Manchal Mandal o.s.No.207 or 2021",;;::L^::llL:.,:,":;,in rist pendenced rands in --'' q' rvr ar rrlrrPatnam, without issuing any notice anrr withnr r+ r^r^..-:_ _ .. co,udins with the,",o.,o*,Tj.:ffi1;F;t"il:";:':'::::::llT1, - . lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumslhrces stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.4 and 5 not to conduct the survey and demarcation on the land of the petitioner in respect of the agriculture land in SV. f.fo 15g7lAA to an extent of Ac. 0.'t0 gts, Sy. No 1597/AA/1 to an extent of Ac. 0.10 gts, Sy. No. 1599/AA/3 to an extent of Ac. 0.16 gts, Sy. No. 1599/E to an extent of Ac. 0.16 gts, Sy. No. 161l/RUl to an extent of Ac. 1.18,gts, Sy. No. 16121LU1 to an extent of Ac. 0.18 gts 5nd Sy. No. 1624lull to an extent oI Ac.3.12 gts and our said possession land to an extent of Ac. '1 .00 gts in Sy. No. 1606, Ac. 0.20 gts in Sy. No. .l 007 of for the past 70 years which is situated at Arutla Village, Manchal Mandal, Fianga Reddy District, in lis pendenced lands in o.S.No.21 1 of 2021 on the file of the Junior civil Judge court at lbrahimpatnam, without issuing any notice and with cut. following the due process of law, by colluding with the respondent No.6 and 7 pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.l TO 5: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 & 7: SRI V.M.KRISHNA REDDY W.P.NO: 14156 OF 2022 Between: Maragoni \_api1ha, S/o Late Sambaiah Aged about S1 years, Agriculture, R/o Arutla Village, Manchal Mandal, -Ranga Reddy Didtrict. ' Occ AND ...PETITIONER

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue _ P.epqltment, Secretariat Building, Secretariat, Hyderadad. 2. The District Collector, Ranqa Reddy, Ranoa Reddv District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Otficer, lbrbhimpitnam Division, Ranga R.eddy 4. The Tahsildar, Manchal Mandal, Ranqa Reddv District. 5. The Mandal Surveyor,. Manchal Mandal, Rangla Reddy District. 6. Lalagari Yadaiah, S/o Venkaiah, Aged alout 42 years, Occ. Agriculture, F/o District. Arutla Village, Manchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

7. Animalla Narahari, S/o Narsimha, Aged about 50 years, Occ. Agriculture, R:/o Arutla Village, Manchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy DiStrict. ...neSpOXfietfS Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the ci.rcumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of ihe respondent No.4 and S in conducting the.survey and demarcation on the land of the petitioner in respect of the agriculture land in Sy. No. 1608/LU to an extent of Ac. 0.07 gts, Sy. No. 1 61 1/RU to an extent of Ac. 1 .05 gts, arid our said possession land to an extent of Ac. 1.12 gts in Sy. No. 1606 of for the past 16 years which is situated at Arutla Village, Manchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, in list pendenced lands in O.S.No.205 ot 2021 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge Court at lbrahimpatnam, without issuing any notice and without following the due process of law, by colluding with the respondent No.6 and others, is highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, unjust and in violation of Principles of Natural Justice and also in violation of Articles 14 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondent No.4 and 5 not to conduct the survey and demarcation on the land of the petitioner in respect of the agriculture land in Sy. No. 1608/LU to an extent of Ac. 0.07 gts, Sy. No. 1 61 1/RU to an extent of Ac. 1 .05 gts, . and our said possession land to an extent of Ac. 1 .12 gts in Sy. No. 1606 of for the past '16 years which is situated at Arutla Village, Manchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, in list pendenced lands in O.S.No.205 ol 2021 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge Court at lbrahimpatnam, without issuing any notice and without following the due process of law, by colluding with the respondent No.6 and others. lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.4 and 5 not to conduct the survey and demarcation on the land of the petitioner in respect of the agriculture land in Sy. No. 1608/LU to an extent of Ac. 0.07 gts, Sy- No. 1611/RU to an extent of Ac. 1.05 gts, . and our said possession land to an extent of Ac. 1.12 gts in Sy. No. 1606 of for the past 16 years which is situated at Arutla Village, Manchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, in tis pendenced lands ir o.s.No.205 of 2021 on the file of the Junior civil Judge Court at lbrahimpatnam, without issuing any notice and without folrowing the due process of law, by colluding with the respondent No.6 and 7 pend'ng disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.l TO 5: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 & 7: SRI V.M.KRISHNA REDDY W.P.NO: 14260 OF 2022 Between: Punnam Ramesh, S/o Late Chandraiah Aged about 32 years, Occ. Agriculture, Fyo Arutla Village, Manchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy l.)istrict. AND ..PET|TIoNER

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revent.te Department, Secretariat Building, Secretariat, Hyderabad 2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy, Ranga Reddy District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ibrbhimpatnam Division, Ranga Reddy District.

4. The Tahsildar, Manchal Mandal; Ranga Reddy District. 5. The Mandal Surveyor, Manchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 6. Lalagari Yadaiah, 5/o'Venkaiah, Aged abouti2 years, Occ, Agriculture, Rl/o

7. Animalla Nbrahari, S/o Narsimha, Aged aboui 50 years, Occ. A.qriculture, Rl/o Arutla Village, Manchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Arutla Village, Manchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ...RESpONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High C. ourt may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent \o.4 and 5 in conducting the survey and demarcation on the land of the petitioner in respect of the agriculture land in Sy. No. 103/AA3 to an extent of Ac. 0.02 gts, Sy. No. 1121A5 to an extent of Ac. 0.01 gts, Sy. No. 1597/C to an extent of Ac. 0.05 gts, Sy. No. 1599/D to an extent of Ac. 0.09 gts, Sy. No. 1608/44 to an extent of Ac. 0.28 gts, Sy. No. 1611/C to an extent of Ac. '1 .05 gts, Sy.No. 161211:to an extent of Ac. 0.01 gts, Sy. No. 1624iAA to an extent of Ac. 0.02 gts ilnd our said possession land to an extent of Ac. 'l .00 gts in Sy. No. 1605, Ac. 0 38 gts in Sy. No. 1606 of for the past 70 years which is situated at Arutla Village, Manchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, in list pendenced rands in o.s.No.209 of 2021 on the file of the Junior civir Judge court at rbrahimpatnam, without issuirig any notice and without following the due process of law, by colluding with the respondent No.6 and others, is highry iflegar, arbitrary, unconstitutionar, unjust and in violation of Principres of Naturar Justice and arso in vioration of Articres 14 and 300-4 of the constitution of rndia and consequentty-direct the respondent No.4 and 5 not to conduct the survey and demarcation on the rand of the petitioner in respeci of the agricurture rand in Sy. No. 103/AA3 to an extent of Ac. 0.02 gts, sy. No.112lA5 to an extent of Ac.:0.01 gts, sy. No. 1597/C to an extent of Ac. 0.05 gte sy. No. 1599/D to an extent of Ac. 0.09 gts, Sy. No. 1608/A4 to an extent of Ac. 0.28 gts, Sy. No. 1611/C to an extent of Ac. 1.05 gts, Sy.No. 16121F to an exteht of Ac. 0.01 gts, sy. No. 1624144 to an extent of Ac. 0.02 gts and our said possession land to an extent of Ac. 1.00 gts in Sy. No. .t605, Ac. 0.3g gts in Sy. No' 1606 0f for the past 70 years which is situated at Arura Virage, Manchar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, in list pendenced rands in o.s.No.209 2021 on the tile of the Junior civir Judge court at lbrahimpatnam, without issuing any notice and without foilowing the due process of raw, by coiluding with the respondent No.6 and others 'ot lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 15'r cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the respondent No.4 and 5 not to conduct the survey and demarcation on the land of the petitioner in respect of the agricurture land in sy. No. i 03/AA3 to an extent of Ac. 0.02 gts, Sy. No. 112lA5 to an extent of Ac. 0.01 gts, Sy. No. 1597/C to an extent of Ac. 0.0S gts, Sy. No. 1599/D to an extent of Ac. 0.09 gts, Sy. No. 1608/AA to an extent of Ac. 0.28 gts, sy. No. 161 1ic to an extent of Ac. 1 .05 gts, Sy.No. 1612iF to bn extent of Ac. 0.01 gts, sy. No. i624lAA to an extent of Ac. 0'02 gts and our said possession land to an extent of Ac. 1.00 gts in sy. No. 1605, Ac. 0.38 gts in Sy. No. 1606 of for the past 70 years which is situated at Arufla Village, Manchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, in lis pendenced lands in o.s.No.209 of 2021 on the fire of the Junior civir Judge court at rbrahimpatnam, without issuing any notice and ,without following the due proces;s of law, by colluding with the respondent No.6 and 7 pending disposal of the writ petitiori. Gounsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 TO 5: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 & 7: SRI V.M.KRISHNA REDDY w.P.NO 41956 0F 2022 Between: Punnam Ramesh, S/o Chandraiah, aged about 32 years, Occ Agriculture, Fl/o Arutla Village, Manchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. .,.pETlTlONER AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Building, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Chief Commissioner, Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, Telangana Hyderabad.

3. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy, Ranga Reddy District. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, lmbrahimpatnam Division, Ranga Reddy District.

5. The Tahsildar, Manchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 6. Boora Lalitha, W/o Subbaiah, aged about 60 years, Occ Agriculture, Fl/o H. No. 32-1 29/1, Shapumagar, Qutbullapur, Jeedimetla, Medchal-tt4alkajgiri District.

7. B. S. Grace, Wio Samuel S Ravindranath, aged about 47 years, Occ Agriculture, Rl/o H. No. 6-3-183, New Bhoiguda, Secunderabad, Hyderabad. 8. Lalgari Yadaiah, S/o Venkaiah, aged about 45 years, Occ Agriculture, Rl/o H No. 8-5-712, Shubodaya Colony, Saroomagar, Ranga Reddy District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 o't lhe Constitution of lndia prayirrg that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue'an appropriate writ, order or direction more particulerly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus the action of the Respondent No. 3 to 5 in non- considering the representation and Online application of the Petitir.rner vide No. LM2200035104 dated 10-08-2022 and non-initiating to cancel the illegal Pattadhar Pass Books of the Respondent No.6 to 8, which was issued on the Petitioners land to an extent of Ac. 1-33 gts in Sy. No. 1605 and 1606 which is situated at Artula revenue Village shivar of Manchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy Dislrict, is highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, violation of Articles 14, 15,21 and 300-A of the Constitution of lndia and also violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequentry to direct the Respondent No. 3 to 5 to consider the representations and online application of the petitioner and cancer the iilegar E pattadhaf pass Books of the Respondent No. 6 to g on petitioners rand to an to ar\ er:tent of Ac. 1- 33 gts in sy. No- 1605 and 1606 which is situated at Artura revenue Viilage shivar of Manchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct thd Respondent No' 3 to s to consider the representations and onrine apprication of the Petitioner and cancer the iilegar E pattadhar pass Books of the Respondent No' 6 to I on Petitioner's rand to an to an extent of Ac. 1-33 gts in sy. No. 1605 and 1606 which is situated at Artula revenue Viflage shivar of Manchar Mandar, Ranga Reddy District and pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the petitioner: SRI RApOLU BHASKAR Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 TO 5: Gp fOn HeVeftUe Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 TO g: _ W.P.NO:3 4521 oF 2024 Between: ' i1Vr,"+Jti'^tl 31"sffi#:i* tn":g# r,f;fi?o"s Business, R/o H No B- saroomagar' Ransa ^ 5;g;v.oiit,rit,'i"r"'ngrr" State-prN code_500 oi!:hut, z. Antmaila Narahari. S/o...{. N.aprlnha, Aged about 50 years, Occ. Agriculture, Arutta Viltage, Manchat fuanOat, n.n.bidiri"j, i-"'iung"na State. AND ...PETIT]ONERS District, at lbrahimpatnam. Hyderabad, Telanoand State.

1. The Principal Secretary,-Revenue Department, Secretariat Building, 2. The District coflector, Rang_a Reddy District, Terangana state at Hvderabad. 3. The Revenue Divisionat ofrri;, i#hirr;;il#'rjffi;;:R;;s; H#Eli*" 4. The.ThahasitOar, MancnJi Mandal, Ranga Reddy distrbt at Manchal. 5. Assistant Director, survey and t-ario ne3Jri.,h*inga Reddy district. " 9 9Spgt-y tnspector of Sulyey, tbrahimpat arn-,hlid neAov triiiriii. '"' 3 llpyTgl_9yry.fgr, ruanbnar ruan'oai, nJhb'a A'eaov o-idtnci. u. punnam Ramesh, S/o. Late Chandraiah, ageE about iZ VLirl, Occ. Agricurture, Rl/o. H.No. 1-24, Arura vittaeie,i,|ininir rvru-ntrT, iiing'i Reddy_, Telangana State.

9. Punnam^Raju, S/ o. Pochaiah, aged about 35 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o. H,No. 3-29, Aruila vittage, Mancliat Mandal, Ranga iReddy Oistiici, feilangina State. l0.Chindam Bheerappa, S/o. Late Musalaiah, aged about 40 years, Occ. Agriculture, _R/o. Arufla village, Manchal Mandal, Ranga R6ddy b,strict, Telangana State. l1.Adepu Narsimha, S/o. Late Anjaiah, aqed about 50 vears. occ. Arricurture _ R/o. Arutla vittage, Manchal Mandal, Ringa Reddy Otstricl, fetan,ia;; bi;t'e. - -*' l2.Bhootharaju Jangaiah, S/o. Late namutu,"aqeoitioui;6n;;;. o,ci.. Agriculture,_Fl/o. Arufla village, Manchal trrtaiOat, (anga {eddy'O-,itrict, Telangana State. l3.Maragoni Narsimha, S/o..Late Sambaiah, aged about 50 years, Occ. Agriculture,_Rl/o. Arutla village, Manchal tvtaiOat, nanga ieddy'Oistrict, Telangana State.

14. Bhootharaju_Yadaiah, S/o-. Late- Ramulu, aged about 42 years, Occ. . Agriculture, Rt/o. Arutla village, Manchal MSndal, nanga Fteddy Oi,#ict, i Telangana State. 15.Md. Jahangeer Babumiya, s/o.-Moinuddin, Aged s5 years, occ. Agricurture R/o. H.No. 3-26, Aruta Vilage, Manchat Mindat, narig;Rbddy Diitiiii'-'" Telangana State. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High cor_rrt may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the Official Respondents Nors. 3 to 7 in conducting Survey and fixing boundaries to the lands in survey Nos_ 6(15, 606 and 607, which are situated al Arufla Village, Manchala Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, as illegal, arbitrary and is in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the corrstitution of lndia apart from being in negation of estabrished judiciar precerdents and consequently direct the Respondents No. 3 to 7 to survey, Demarcate and Fix the boundary stones to the lands in Sy.Nos. 605, 606 and,607, which are situated at Arutla village, Manchara Mandar, R.R.District, by taking police aid, in rhe interest of justice. !A NO: 1 OF 2024 t Petition under section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preasr:d to direct the official Respondents tc Survey, Demarcate and Fix the boundaries cf the land in the survey Nos. 1 605' 1606 and 1607, which are situated at Arufla Viilage, Manchala Mandar, Ranga Reddy District with the aid of porice, pending above W.P. by. I Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V.M.KRISHNA REDDY Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 TO 7: Gp FOR REVENUE Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.g TO 15: _ The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDD]' WRIT PETITION Nos. 1O331 2022. L39O912o22, I 40931 2022. L41s612022, 14260 12022.4t956 2022 and3452ll2O24 I COMMON ORDER: The issues involved in these writ petitions are intrinsically interconnected and therefore, they are taken up and heard together and are being disposrxl of by this common order.

2. Writ Petition No. 1033 1 of 2022 is filed seeking to declare the action of respon<1t:nt Nos.4 and 5 in conducting survey and demarcation on the petitioner:'s agricultural land in Sy.No.1597/E to an extent of Ac.0.O5 gts, Sy.No. 1599 /EE to an extent of Ac.O.O9 gts, Sy No.1608/AA to an extent of r\,:.0.08 gts, Sy.No.161 1/E to an extent of Ac. 1.05 gts, Sy.No.1612/UU to an extent of Ac.0.01 gts, Sy.No.1624/AA to an extent of Ac.0.02 gts tot, admeasuring Hc.2.lO gts situated at Arutla Village, Manchal Mandrrl, Ranga Reddy District, as illegal, a:-bitrary and violative of Artic L:s 14 and 3OO-A of the Constitution of I ndia on the ground that said lands are subject matter of pending civil suit vide O.S. No.2O9 ol 2027 on the fi1e of the Junior Civil Judge, Ibrahimpatnam and for other ap])-opriate reliefs.

3. Writ Petition Nos. 13909, 14093, 14156, and 14260 of 2022 are filed by clilferert petitioners seeking similar reliefs, i.e., a direction restrarning the official respondents i.o- "o.du"ting survey and I ( 2 demarcation over their respective agricultural lands situated in Arutla Village, Manchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, which are the subject matter of pending civil suits. It is alleged that the survey proceedings were initiated without notice and due process, and were carried out at the instance of unofficial respondents who have no lawful claim over the lands.

4. Writ Petition No.41956 of 2022 is filed seeking a direction to the official respondents to consider the petitioner's oniine application and representations, and to cancel the Pattadar Passbooks allegedly issued in favour of respondent Nos.6 to 8 over the lands in Sy.Nos. 16O5 and 1606 of Arutla Revenue Village. The petitioner contends that despite his objections and the pendency of civil disputes, the passbooks were wrongly issued, ald the authorities have faiied to take any action on his grievance.

5. Writ Petition No.34521 of 2024 is hled seeking to declare the action of Resppndent Nos.3 to 7 in not conducting Survey and hxing boundaries to the lands in Survey Nos. 1605, 1606 and 1607, situated at Arutla Village, Manchala Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 2I of ttre constitution of India and consequently, prayed this Court to direct the Respondent Nos'3 to 7 to conduct Survey, demarcate and ltx the boundary stones to t1.e said Iands. ) ,,/, ,,,,

6. Writ Petition No.34521 of 2024 is taken up as a leacring case to decide the lis in this batch of cases

7. It is stated that petitioner No.1 is the owner and p,ossessor of agricultural landri admeasuring Ac.O-18 gts in Sy.No.1606/A, Ac.0-39 gts'in Sy.No.1605/AA, Ac.O-O2 gts in Sy.No. 1607 lAA, Ac.tl-O2 gts in Sy.No.1607lAA2, Ac.O-38 gts in Sy.No.1605/AA2, Ac.0- 8.5 gts in Sy.No.160/42, total admeasuring Ac.2-37.5 gts situateo at Arutla Village, Manchala Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, having purchased the same under regislered sale deeds. It is further stated that thLe petitioner No.2 is the ownr:r' and possessor of agricultural lands ailmeasuring Ac.0-37 gts in S1'.No.16O5 and Ac.0-23 gts in Sy.No.76t)7 /8, total admeasuring Ac.I -20 gts situated at Arutla Village, Manch;,rla Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. It is the case of the petitioners that ti e unofficial respondents i.e, Respondents Nos.8 to 15, who have no right, title, interest, or possession over the properties in Sy.Nos. 1605, 16O6, and 1607 situated at A:utla Village, Manchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, have been attempl ing to interfere with the peaceful possession of the petitioners by se--ting up false claims. Therefore, the petitioners submitted an appl,cation to the Respondent No.4-Tahsildar seeking to conduct and hx lxrundaries in the subject lands. In resporLse, notices were issued on multiple occasions i.e., lO.O2.2O2l, ..5.O7 .2021, 3O.O7.2021 and 1!,.O8.2O21, to the neighbouring landowners includins \ L. 4 the unofficial respondents. However, due to their non-cooperation and deliberate obstruction, the survey could not be carried out.

8. It is further case of the petitioners that the unofficial respondents, in furtherance of their false claims, got issued legal notices rlated

16.02.2021 and 28.07.2021 to the Tahsildar through their counsel, asserting ownership and possession in the subject lalds on the basis of inheritance and claimed mutation entries in their favour and they also sought to restrain the survey by citing pendency of civil suits i.e., O.S.Nos.217, 218, 221, 23O, 268 and 269 of 2O2O, which, according to the petitioners, have no bearing on the lands in question. The petitioners also instituted O.S. No.349 of 2O2l on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Ibrahimpatnam, seeking perpetual injunction against the unofficial respondents and obtained an order of status quo in I.A. No.783 of 2027 dated 15.09.2021. It is stated that the unofhcial respondents have hled several suits vide O.S. Nos.2O4 to 21 1 of 2O2l seeking declaration of title and perpetual injunction over lands which are not ielated to the petitioners' properties. It is further stated that the unofficial respondents frled W.P.Nos. 13909, 14093, 14156, 14260, LO33l and 41956 of 2022 on the file of this Court seeking directions not to conduct the survey in the subject lands on the ground that civil suits are pending. It is stated that subsequently, the petitioners hled an online appiication dated Oa.O2.2024 bearing Challan No.TTAODO224O0O59812 for conducting survey and fixation of ./" / 5 boundaries of th. subject lands. pursuant thereto, notices, were issued by the respondent No.7 fixing the date of survey as 29.02.2024. However, the respondent No.6 i.e., Deputy Inspector of Surrrey, failed to conduct the sun.ery on the given date and instiad submitte,j a report to the. Tahsildar ciring objections raised by the private respondents and pendency of civil litigation. Aggrieved by the inaction of the revenue authorities, it is stated that the petitioners preferred an aprpeal on the frle of respondent No.S-Assistant Director, Survey and Land Records, Ranga Reddy Districr in File No.A3/ 346 of 2024. Despite a :iesh survey being schedulecl cn 19.04 .2024, the Deputy Inspector agerin .failed to conduct the surv'ey and instead submitted a report citing obstruction due to pending ci',jl cases.

9. The learned ,lounsel for the petitioners contended that there is no stay from anv corrrt restraining the conducing of survey of the subject lands and that the survey is limited to demarcation anc boundary fxation which does not touch upon ownership or title. It is further submitted that despite the petitioners fulfilling all official respondents havc failed to act in accordance form,,ilities, the with law and conduct survey and demarcation of the subject lands

10. On the other. hand, learned counsel appearing for Re.spondents Nos'S to 15 submitred that the subject rands are the subjecr matter of I ) 6 pending civil suits ald hence no survey should be undertaken during the pendency of such disputes

11. Considered the submissions of learned counsel for both sides and perused the record.

12. On perusal of the record and in view of the fact that no stay has been granted by any Court restraining the conduct of survey of the subject lands, and that the purpose of survey is only to demarcate iand and hx boundaries and not to adjudicate title or possession, this Court deems it appropriate to direc[ the official respondcnts to carry out the survey of the subject lands.

13. It is settled Iaw that the Survey Department has the authority to conduct survey and demarcate lands in accordance with the provisions of the Telangana Land Revenue Act, 1317 Fasli (Act No. MII of 1317 Fasli), the Telangana Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923, and the Rules framed thereunder. The Government has issued various circulars speciflring the 'conditions for conducting surveys, particularly F-Line (freld measurement) surveys. Individuals requesting such surveys are required to submit specific documents, and if the conditions stipulated in the circulars are fulfilled, the survey and boundary hxation may be conducted. The Commissioner, Survey, Settlements and Land R€cords, exercising powers under the Telangana Survey ald Boundaries Act, 192!-z issued relevant circulars from time to time vide 7 Rc.No.N1/6543/9!t, dated 25.O7.2OO1, Rc.No.N1/14OBlt\7, dated

13.O7 .2OO7 , and Rc.No.N2 / 174l /2OlO, dated 18.05.201O r;tipulating the conditions for conducting survey of private lands and 'rs per the said circulars, if :he petitioners fullill all the-conditions cf the said circular, it is an otrligation for the respondents to conduct sur vey within the time specifrred in the said circulars.

14. In view of the above, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of W.P. No.3452 7 of '),1)24 with a liberty to the petitioners to merke a fresh F-Line application enclosing all required documents. Upon mzrking such application, if the Jretitioners are found to have fulfilled all conditions - under the circulars; mentioned above and also the provisions of the I I T"l..rg..r. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 2O2O, tlle ofhcial respondents shall issue notice to the respondent Nos.S to 8, adjacent pattadars ,lnd all the persons interested/ affec ted arrd conduct survey and demar<'aLtion of the subject lands within a period r:f eight(O8) weeks from the date of receipt of the application. In any event, if the petitioner has not hrlhlled the required conditions, the resporLdent No.4 shall pass reasoned order and communicate the decision ther eon to the petitioners.

15. In view of tl'rr: findings rendered in W.P.No.34521 of .2024, this Court is of the vievr that the relief sought in W.P.Nos.1O33. of 2O22, 139O9 of 2022, 7,+t)93 of 2022, 14156 of 2022, 14260 of ,2022, and, ( I 41956 of 2022, seeking to restrain the official respondents from conducting the survey, cannot be graflted. If the petitioners are aggrieved by the conduct of survey in terms of the directions issued in w'P'No'34521 of 2024, or if any third parties interfered with. their possession, it is open to them to pursue their remedies before the competent civil court in the pending suits, in accordance with law. 16. Accordingly, these Writ petitions are disposed of. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. No order as to costs. //TRUE COPYII SD/-T. TIRUMALA DEVI EPUry REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To 1 . The Principal Secretary, Revenue D Secretariat, Hyderabad, State of Tel . the District Collector, Ranoa Reddv 2 . I he Revenue Divisional Ofricer, lbr6 3 District. epartment, Secretariat Building, angana. , Ranga Reddy District. nrmpatnam Division, Ranga Reddy i,iii[*]!1,*AlSi,'tYfi iffl 6. Assistant Director. Survei unJLini itt;;dh;;;" Reddy district. 7. Deputy tnspector of Surviry, toranimpit":J,.ihilis5 neddy district. 8. one cc to SRt RApor u 6HAsKidnj"".'ri" idFucf e. Two ccs to Gp FoR REVENUE, riiiir,'cli,iii"lin" strtu of Tetangana, at J9.9n" CC to SRt V.I4.KR|SHNA REDDY, Advocate [OpuC] 1 1 . Two CD Copies ^[18"18",,",,1?B,JL"i,,=,n", Hyderabad. IOUTI PSK. BS w HIGH COURT DATED:1010412025 +o c. ?B rtfr ?!6 )i .f ,f, ,.) \ ', tr \:. . ORDER WP.Nos.10331, 13909, 14093, 14156, 14260,,41956 of 2022 AND 34521 of 2024 DTSPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITIONS WITHOUT COSTS \rl