The High Court · 2025

All plaintiffs N()s, 1 to 21 are represented by their Autho-izr,rd Signatories, Agreemenl of I e le- Cum - G.P.A. Holders, Dt.26-10-2015 and 24-01-2018 L R S rrendar Kumar, S/o. Late R. Laxmi Narayan a, ,\ged about 54 yearr, Occ. Business, R/o. H. No. 13-6-798,'fu15, Bapughat, L,ang: house, Hyderabad - 500 008. ll. R. S rnjay Kumar, S/o. Late R. Laxmi Narayarra, l\ged about 5.1 years Occ. Business, R/o. H. No. 13-6-79grfu13, Bapughat, L.ang :r'house, Hyderabad - S00 008. ...ptaintiffs 22.Anees Fathrm, r. Wo. late Md Sharfuddin, Aged aboLrt 4:i yssls, 6... Housewife. R/r B-1'13/6. Narsingi, puppalagudi, Rangaredd f"langrni-_ 500 089

23.Mohammed A Business. Rio. 089 f :zal. S/o. late IMd ) 11316, Narsingi, P Sharfuddin, Aged about 3.) years, Occ. uppalaguda, Rangaredcti Tt.lahgana - 500

24.Mohd Shahnawaj Uddin, S/o. late Md Sharfuddin, Aged abog!29 years, O_cc Business, R/o 8-1 13i6, Narsingi, Puppalaguda, Rangareddi, Telangana - 500 089.

25.lvlohammed Turabuddin, S/o. late t\/d Sharfuddin, Aged about 27 yearc, Occ. Business, R/o. 8-1 13/6, Narsingi, Puppalaguda, Rangareddi, Telangana - 500 089. Plaintiffs Nos. 22 to 25 are (1.R. of Md Sharfuddin) i.e., Plainttff No . AND "6

1. Y. Girija Rani, D/o. Late Y. Rama Rao, Major, Occ. Housewife, Rio. H. No. '17lA, Road No. 3, Film Nagar, Hyderabad.

2. T. Chittaiah, S/o. T. Kotaiah, Major, R/o. H. No. 7-12918, Begumpet, Hyderabad.

3. Smt. T. Jhansi, Wo. T. Venkat Rao, Major, Occ. Housewife, R/o. H. No. 18- 50615511 lE, Prakash Nagar, Begumpet, Hyderabad. Through her G.P.A. Holder, Syed Nazeer Hussain, S/o. Late Syed Gafar, R/o. H. No. 18-449/1 , Pattigadda, Secunderabad.

4. Smt. P. Nagamani, Wo. P. ltlahendra, Aged about 62 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o. Red Hills, Hyderabad. 5, TV Janardhan Rao, S/o. Kotaiah, Major, Occ. Business, R/o. Flat No. 102, Plot No. 150, Mahalaxmi Estates, Rajeev Nagar, Hyderabad.

6. Paruchuri Koteswar Rao, S/o. Paruchuri Suraiah, Aged about 82 years, Occ. Business, R/o. Peddapally, Karimnagar District.

7. SVR Prasad, S/o. Gangadhar, Aged about 60 years, IMajor, R/o. Nuziveedu, Krishna District.

8. Jayabheri Properties Pvt. Ltd, Having its Office at Plot No. 1, Jayabheri Enclave, Near Botanical Garden, Gachibowli, Hyderabad. Rep. by its Director, Kishore Duggirala.

9. Alekhya Paruchuri, D/o. P. N/ahendra, Major, R/o. H. No. 11-54-01, Second Street, Red Hills, Hyderabad, Through her GPA Holder, Mahendra, S/o. P. Hanumantha Rao, R/o. H. No. 11-54-01, Second Street, Red Hills, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to consider the prayer and to direct the Hon'ble Court below to take up the interim application in l.A.No.s 773 and 774 of 2020 in O.S.No.381 of 2020 on the file of the Hon'ble ll Additional Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at Rajendranagar. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRl. C HANUMANTHA RAO Counsel for the Respondents : ... The Court made the following: ORDER N RA E RI CIVIL REV IO ET s o E P.SA K FIY No 2 23' ORDER: The limitecl ellief sought for in the present Re,visi<rn is for an appropriate directi ln to the Hon'ble I Additlonal lunic'r civil Judge- cum-Xv Metropolitan Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District at Upperpally' seizedofO.S.No.-illof2020todecidetwoI'As'i'eI'''\'Nos'773& 774 of 2020 whicl- have been filed by the petitioners fc'r ,lranting Ad- Exparte injunction restraining the respondents from cre;itittg, changing the nature of the land and also third party interest or'er the suit schedule property, ;:t the earliest.

2. Heard Mr. (1. Hanumantha Rao, learned co ln sel for the t petitioners.

3. Upon perusa of the records, it appears that the original suit itself is that of the year 2020 and the aforesaid two I.As., !v(:r(: also filed in thesameyear.Troughmorethanfive(05)yearshav(rlapsed,the aforesaid LAs., h;,r,e not been decided and each day the development that is taking pl;'ce in the suit schedule property is c'ausing much detriment to the tetitioners. Therefore, the petitione's l'ave filed the present Revision r,ereking for an appropriate direction to the Trial court for an expeditious rlecision of I.As.

4. Upon due consideration of the facts and circumstances' this Court does not find any good reason available on record for the Trial Court in not deciding the aforesaid two I.As. expeditiously in spite of five (05) years having lapsed' Accordingly, the instant Revision stands disposed of directing the Trial Court to ensure that the two I'As' are duly consideredinaccordancewithlawasexpeditiouslyaspossible' preferably within a period of sixty (60) days from the next date of hearing.

5. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs' \ \ To, coPY// "TR,E SD'. N. SRI HARI DEPUTY RqGISTRAR l' SECTIOf.IOFFTCER ,/ The llnd Addl. Junior Civil Judge Ranga Reddy District at Rajendranagar One CC to Sri. C Hanumantha Rao' Advocate [OPUC] Two CD CoPies '1 . ) a DL/gh t I 4 f |,L $ \\ ,.,- HIGH COURT DATED:041O412025 ORDER CRP.No.722 of 2025 C.R.P IS DISPOSED OF ,n\<\1'5