HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA IVIONDAY v. State of Bihar and anotherl scrupulously. However
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. ln view c,f re above, without going into merits of tle matter, this criminal petil on is disposed of directing the Police corlc(irned to proceed with rle i''rvestigation in the above crime after issLrin:1 notice under Section :]t l:i) of BNSS (Previously Section 41-A…
Judgment
Cause title
y. Lq[slrq?!,,9/o- Sri. D. Narasimha, aged about 42 yearc, Occ Business, No. 1 3-3-506/38 I 17 Bt2, Kesvaswamy Nagir, Jiyaguda ...PETITIONER
/ SOLE ACCUSED '1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its public prosecutor 2 Komarri Venkat. Reddy, S-/o K Thirupglhi .Reddy, Aged About 47, Occupation Agriculture, R/o H. No.2-65, Edira, lvlahbubnagdr,T6tangana AND Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Jvlemorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to quash proceedings in the F|R/crime No 10g of 2o2s on the file of Mahabubnagar Rural police station, Mahabubngar District, Telangana State. ...RESPONDENTS
l.A.No.2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS and 482 of Cr.p.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings against the petitioner including not to arrest petitioner in FIR No 108 of 2O2S in the file of Mahabubnagar Rural police station, Mahabubngar This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of
Sri Karakot Nagekar Sai Kumar, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri, Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State. The Court made the following: ORDER HON'B -E SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI C)tRII/IINAL PETITION No. 3015 ot 2025
ORDER:
Petitione", r rlro is arrayed as accused in Crime No ' 0B of 2025 of P.S M ari hubnagar Rural' registered for the offences under Sections 417 erd 'i20 of lPC, is seeking to quash the procer>dings against him
Hearcl IVlr ( arakot Nagekar Sai Kumar, learned ccursel for the petitioner err rl 1\,1r. Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned r\d'litional Public ProsecL t:r ;lppearing for the State and perused thr: 'e<'ord' t (
Though tri ; petition is filed for quashing the proceedings in the crime, dur r g 'he course of arguments, learned couns el for the petitioner has 1;c - ght for directions to the Police to pro'le(')d with investigation lt'/ '';suing notice under Section 35(3) of Bt'aratiya Nagarik Sura<sl:r Sanhita (BNSS) (Previously Sectior zi1-A of Cr.P.C ).
ln view c,f re above, without going into merits of tle matter, this criminal petil on is disposed of directing the Police corlc(irned to proceed with rle i''rvestigation in the above crime after issLrin:1 notice under Section :]t l:i) of BNSS (Previously Section 41-A of tlr P.C.) to the petitioner ilr:l they shall also follow the guidelines of Hon'ble 2 1 Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar and anotherl scrupulously. However, the petitioner shall submit his defense and co-operate with the lnvestigating Officer as and when required by furnishing information and produce all relevant documents/ material required for the purpose of the investigation and the lnvestigating Officer shall consider the same before filing appropriate report before the learned tVlagistrate concerned. l\tliscellaneous application pending, if any, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// Sd/- L. VIJAYA LAXMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION FICER
The lV Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mahabubnagar' 2. The Station House Officer, Ivlahabubnagar Rural Police Station, Mahabubnagar.
3. One CC to Sri. Karakot Nagekar Sai Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] 4. TwoCCstoThePublicProsecutor'HighCourtforthestateofTelangana, t' To, Hyderabad [OUT]
Komarri ventat ceddy, s/o K Thirupathi Reddy, occupation Agriculture,R/o H.No.2-65, Edira, Ma h b u bnag ar, Tela nga na
Two CD CoPies. PSK /plp '1zora; s scc zz: HIGH GOURI DATED:031031''t025 ORDER CRLP.No.3015 of 2025 --':' - -? r.t ) (. o^ ?3 rn 2025 ('( , C //._, /1< i() o I _i)6 ;1,,,1 \r-i.::= \:-r ^,.rgQ t DISPOSED OI THE CRIMINAL PETITION /2 /l I 1
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.