✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court

Judgment · High Court

G ROHINI3 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents not to

Judgment

Cause title

Post, Chinnaguttigallu Mandal, Chittoor District. 3 Mavaloori Srinivasulu Chetty, s/o late Mavaloori Venkatanartasimlu Chetty, residing at Door No.2/38, Bazaar Street, Bhakarapet Post, Chinnaguttigallu Mandal, Chittoor District. AND 1 The State of A.P., rep., by its Principal secretary, Department of Revenue, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Chittoor, Chittoor District. 3 The Executive Engineer, National Highway Authority of India, Ananthapur Division, National Highway No.205, holding office at opposite to Chennareddy Colony, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONERS

RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, or order or direction, more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring that the action of the respondents in not following the procedure laid down under the National Highway Act, 1956 and earmarking the properties of the petitioners for demolition to widen the roads in National Highway No.205, as arbitrary, illegal, unjust and consequently direct the respondents to pay compensation to the petitioners for the properties to be demolished for widening of roads in the National Highway No.205 by acquiring the same under National Highway Act, 1956. Counsel for the Petitioners: SMT.BOBBA VIJAYALAKSHMI Counsel for Respondents 1 & 2: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for Respondent No.3: Mr. S.S. Varma The Court at the admission stage made the following :

ORDER:

Operative part

This writ petition is filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not following the procedure laid down under the National Highways Act, 1956, and earmarking the properties of the petitioners for demolition to widen the roads in National Highway No.205, as arbitrary and illegal. The petitioners state that they are the owners and possessors of the houses bearing D.Nos.2/28, 2/39, 2/38 situated at Bazaar Street, Bhakarapet Post, Chinnaguttigallu Mandal, Chittoor District. It is stated that the respondents without following the procedure contemplated under the National Highways Act, 1956 (for short ‘the Act’) to acquire the properties of the petitioners, have earmarked the buildings of the petitioners for demolition, for the purpose of widening of roads in National Highway No.205. Aggrieved by the said action, the petitioners filed the present writ petition. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the National Highways Authority. Under Section 3-A of the Act a detailed procedure has been prescribed for acquisition of the land by issuing notification in the official Gazette. Section 3-D provides for declaration of acquisition. Section 3-E provides for taking possession of the property, and Section 3-G provides for determination of amount payable as compensation. Under the circumstances, I am of the view that the respondents are bound to follow the said procedure prescribed under the Act, and without following such procedure they cannot interfere with the possession of the petitioners. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners in respect of the premises in question without following the due procedure prescribed under the Act. No costs. _____________________ G. ROHINI, J. 3rd March, 2005 Js. To 1 The Principal secretary, State of A.P., Department of Revenue, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Chittoor, Chittoor District. 3 The Executive Engineer, National Highway Authority of India, Ananthapur Division, National Highway No.205, holding office at opposite to Chennareddy Colony, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. 4 Two CCs to G.P. for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. 5 2 CD copies.

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents not to

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226; National Highway Act, 1956; National Highways Act, 1956.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments