✦ High Court of India · 04 Mar 2025

1. Gaiiala Laxmi v. The State of Telangana

Case Details High Court of India · 04 Mar 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
04 Mar 2025
Length
1,061 words

Counsel for the Pelitioner : SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : SRI L.RAVINDER.AGP F(3R REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 & 5 : - The Court at the stage of admission made the following ORDER L TTON'BLD SRI JUSTICE C'V' BHASI(AR RTDDY WRIT PETITI ON No. 6224 of 2025 ORDER: ' It is stated that the pclltlotler ls the o$,ner and Possessor ol the house bearing No 8-1-68/3/62' situated at Jaihind Nagar Colony, Shaikpet, Hyderabad' having acquired the same through registered gift deed bearing document No'4914 of 2022 d.ated 29.07.2022. It is further stated that originally the petitioner,shusbandbynameGajjalaGopalReddyhad purchased the said property through registered sale deed bearing document No'2988 of 2013' dated 17'06'2013' It is further stated that the name of the petitioner also mutated in municipal records and she has been paying property tax and other taxes to the local authorities lt is further stated that there are disputes bet\t'een the petitioner and respondent Nos 4 ancl 5 anci respondent No 4' u'ho is the son of respondent No 5' liled a suit for specitic performance of contract alleging that the. husbandofthepetitionerhadexecutedanagreementofsale rvith possession, dated 23'O8'2OI} uide O S'No 498 of 2024 on thefileofthelVseniorCivilJudge,CityCivilCourt,Hyderabad. ItiSfurtherStatedthatpendingadjudicationofthesaidsuit, respondent No'S has filed a complaint before respondent No'2 \a. \ 2 CVBR, J \Vp-6224 -2025 invoking the provisions of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents €tnci Senior Citizens Act' 2OO7 (for short "the Act") The grievanct: of the petitioner is that pending adjudication of the saicl corr.plr'rint uncler thc provisions of thc Act' lrt tllc il.lst'll-lce of respcndent Nos 4 and 5' iespondent No 3 rs fl-ecluentll' interle ring into the civil disputcs in O S No 498 o1' 2O 2'l' 2 CorLsiclercd the submissions of the learncd col rlscl frlr lhe pgtitiontlr and Sri L Ravinder' learned Assistant (lovernment it"^d.. for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos l to 3 and dispose<l of at the with th eir consent this writ petition admissron stage. In view of the nature of reiief sought for in this u rit petition, issuance of notice to the unofflcial responrlents is disPensed with' IS ln view of the submissions made by the lear'ned counsel 3. for t1-rc rcspective parties' this Court' without expresslng anv opinrorl u'tth regard to thc inter se dispules llctr'r.ct t-t thc parrle s and sin:e it is stated that civil sr'rit uide o S No 'l 'tx ol 202-l is pencting belbre rhe lV Scrlic'r' Civll 'lLr(ls'c' Crlr Civil Court' Hvderalacl, clcems it appropriale to dtsposc of tl-rt i u rit pelition to 3 not lo tntericre $'itl'r the direcling resPondent Nos l peacefrLl possession of the petittoner over the 5grrject ProPCl't\' u* 3 CVBR, ] Wp,6224-2025 lt is made clear that this order does not preclude respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to exercise their powers ln disposing of the complaint, if any, made by respondent Nos'4 and 5' 4 with the above observations, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs As ar scquel, rhe miscellaneous petitions pending' if any' c shall stand closed ,TRUE COPY// SD/-A.V.S.PRASAD NT REGISTRAR AS S CTION OFFICER To

1. The Princrpal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Building, Secretariat, State of Telangana at Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Hyderabad, Hyderabad District. 3. The Tahasildar, Banjara Hills Mandal, Hyderabad. 4. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

5. One CC to SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD Copies SA GJP I HIGH COURT DATED:0410312025 ORDER WP.No.6224 of 2025 .t:-::__\ r. TnE i.( ;.,. -: \ 21 nrt' nn : ) i,sF4i6qf--l) * (, f' t o z\ {+ DISPOSING OF THE W.P AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION WITHOUT (]OSTS. W n

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments