M/s. Sri Vasavi Kanyaka Parameswari Jaggery & General, Merchant v. The Station House Officer, Nelakondapally Police Station, Khammam
Case at a glance
- Bench
- C V NAGARJUNA REDDY
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 19(1)(g), 226
Judgment
M/s. Sri Vasavi Kanyaka Parameswari Jaggery & General, Merchant, Rep. by its Proprietor, Kanumarlapudi Venkaiah,,S/o. Ramaiah, R/o. Cheruvu Madharam, Nelakondapalli Mandal,, Khammam District., 4-5, Main Road, Painampally Village, Nelakondapalli Mandal, Khammam District.. AND ..... PETITIONER
The Station House Officer, Nelakondapally Police Station, Khammam District., .,
The Station House Officer, Kusumanchi Police Station, Khammam District.,
The Station House Officer, Mudigonda Police Station, Khammam District., .,
The Circle Inspector of Police, Kusumanchi Police Station Circle, Khammam District., .,
The Prohibition & Excise Sub-Inspector, Prohibition & Excise Station, Nelakondapalli, Khammam District., .,
The Prohibition & Excise Inspector, Prohibition & Excise Station, Nelakondapalli, Khammam District., .,
The District Collector, Khammam, Khammam District., ., 8. The Prohibition & Excise Superintendent, Khammam, Khammam District., .,
The Prohibition & Excise Asst. Superintendent, Khammam, Khammam District., .,
The Deputy Commissioner, Prohibition & Excise, Khammam, Khammam District., .,
The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Khammam, Khammam District., ., .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the Circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed therewith, the Hon'ble High Court may be pleased issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not allowing the petitioner to carry on business of Black Jaggery and alum and also the action of the respondents in placing restrictions upon the business of the petitioner i.e. sale and purchase of Black Jaggery, Alum, and Kirana as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 19(1) (g) of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the business of the petitioner in Black Jaggery, Alum, and Kirana. Counsel for the Petitioner :SRI. A.PRABHAKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent : GP FOR HOME The Court made the following ORDER To, //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Sd/-G. Singaraiah SECTION OFFICER
1. The Station House Officer, Nelakondapally Police Station Khammam District., .,
2. The Station House Officer, Kusumanchi Police Station, Khammam District., .,
3. The Station House Officer, Mudigonda Police Station, Khammam District., .,
4. The Circle Inspector of Police, Kusumanchi Police Station Circle, Khammam District., .,
5. The Prohibition & Excise Sub-Inspector, Prohibition & Excise Station, Nelakondapalli, Khammam District., .,
6. The Prohibition & Excise Inspector, Prohibition & Excise Station, Nelakondapalli, Khammam District., .,
7. The District Collector, Khammam, Khammam District., ., 8. The Prohibition & Excise Superintendent, Khammam, Khammam District., .,
9. The Prohibition & Excise Asst. Superintendent, Khammam, Khammam District., .,
10. The Deputy Commissioner, Prohibition & Excise, Khammam, Khammam District., .,
11. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Khammam, Khammam District., .,
One CC to SRI. A.PRABHAKAR RAO Advocate [OPUC]
Two CCs to GP FOR HOME High Court Of A.P. Hyd. [OUT]
Two CC’s to G.P for Prohibition & Excise, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT)
Two CD Copies Skm HIGH COURT CVNR,J DATE: 28-04-2011 ORDER WP. NO. 17155 OF 2009 DISPOSING OF THE W.P.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.