✦ High Court of India · 29 Apr 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 29 Apr 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
29 Apr 2025
Length
1,920 words

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stakrd in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of f\4andamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not depositing compens ation amount for the acquired structures of the Petitioners situated at Marnidipally village, Raikode Mandal, Sangareddy District, (earlier Ivledak District) ar; per the order/decree dated O211112022, O311112022, 0411112022 and 04.11112022 passed by the Hon'ble Senior Civil Judge, at Zaheerabad, Sanga -eddy as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents to deposit enhanced compensation amount together with interest on s0latium and additional market value payatlle to the Petitioners in respect of total acquired houses covered by L.A. O.P. No.16 of 2008, LAOP No.17 of 2008, LAOP No.19 of 2008 and LAOP No.29 of 2008 on the file of Hon'ble Senior Civil Judge, at Zaheerabad, Sanga.eddy District (earlier ltiledak District), to the credit of E.P. No.10 of 2024 in Lr\OP No. 16 of 2008, E.P. No.8 ot 20114 in LAOP No.17 of 2008, E.P. No.9 of 2024 in LAOP No.19 of 2008 and E.P. No.7 of 2024 in LAOP No.29 of 2008 on lhe file of the Hon'ble Senibr Civil Judge, at Zaheerabad, Sangareddy District (Prayer is added as per C.O. dated 161412025 in lA No.212025) lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the Dircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to deposit the enhanced compensation amount in respect of total acquired houses covered by L.A. O.P. No. 16 of 2008, LAOP NO. 17 of 2008, LAOP NO. 19 of 20011 and LAOP No. 29 of 2008 on the file of Hon'ble Senior Civil / i.E essions Judge (Senior Civil Judge), at arlier [\iledak District) as per the order Judge, at Zaheerabad, Sangareddy District (e and decree passed by the Hon'ble Assistant $ Zaheerabad, Sangareddy District (earlier M{ of 2024 in LAOP No. 16 of 2008, E.P. No. B of 2024 in LAOP No. 17 of 2008, E.P. No.9 of 2024in LAOP No. 19 of 20OB and E.P.No. 7 of 2024 in LAOP No.29 of 2008 on file of the Hon'ble Senior Civil Judgp ,at Zaheerabad, Sangareddy District, in the interest of justice pending disposal of the writ petition ak District) to the credit of E.P.No. '10 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. l. RAVINDdR REDDY Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 1to3: S$l SROMU SRINIVASA REDDY, AGP FOR LAND ACQUISITION Counsel for the Respondent No.4: AGP FqR IRRIGATION AND CAD Counsel for the Respondent No.5: AGP FQR FINANCE AND PLANNING The Court made the following: ORDER n 5 THE HONoURABLE ST{I TUSTICE N.V.SHRA\/AN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.6209 of 2025 ORDER: Heard lc.rrnetl counsel tor thc pctiti<)ners and Sri.Somu Srinivasa Reddv, learned r \ssisLint Coverrnrcrrt ['lcae]e r lor Lancl a,:tlursition appearing for respondent Nos.I to 3, Iearnorl Assist.rnt Gover nrne nt Pleader for Irrigation and C rmmand Area L)cvclopntent appearing roi resporldent No.4 anrl learned Assistant Governrntnt for Irirrancc and Plaruring appearing for resporrdent No.5. With the conscnt of thc parties, the u rit pctition is being takcn up for disposal at thc admission stagc itsclf

2. This writ l)ctition is filed sceking tolkru,ing praycr "to dech tt thc nctiott ol llr ol tlu' lkspondents rtt rul lcpotting aontpetlst tittrt runount.for lln,rcquircrl slrLtctures of '1rc Pclitiottrs situnted trl MtrnrLliytolly t'illtgt, litilorlr' Mnttdut . Stngorctldy DrctrLcl, rcttrliar Madnlt [)t5!t'trt) ns pcr the orde,/decrae dnted 02.17.20..) 03.1-l.2022, 04 1!2022 rurd 01 1-l.2022, prssed bry thc Honble !t'ttior Cit,il ludgc nl lolttntltti, Sangoratirly, ns illagnl, ubitrury ttrLl t,ioLatiott oj Arltclr 300A ol the CottstitLttrort of India ttnd con;etluetttly direct tltc rt,spondants to deposit enhnnced contpens( tion amount togetlrcr ruilh interest on solntirLnr nnrl tuiditionrtl nnrktt pnlue pa.tltble tu tha Patitioners in ,.esptct of totnl ncquircd 'rcuses cot,ered by L.A.O.P No.'16 of 2008, l-\OI') No.17 of 2008, LA()P No.19 o.f 2008 atul LAOP No.29 of 200\ on tlrc f le o;f LIonbLc !tnittr Cipil ludy ut Zthuntbtd, Snnyr,,drly District, (earlier ltltdalr District) to tlr t'rcdit of [, I) N0.70 of .)024 n LAOP No 76 of 1008 E P r.^/o.8 oJ 2U.4 in I..AOI) No.17 of 20)8 F. P No.9 of 2024 in LAOP No.19 o.f 2008 tutd E P No.7 of 2024 tr, I AOP No.29 of 2008 c,rr lhe [ile of the Ilonblc Senor t)it,il ]ttdgc r,t Zthccrobad, Snngnre d lry Disl rict ."

3. Brief facts in this writ pctitr()n arL. th.tt the respon,-1t,nt authorities had actluired the petitioners' propertics situatecl at MamidiPalll, Villagc for the .r\**1 purpose o{ Singoor Project- Tirereafter r-espondcnt authorities under Section O - 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, iss ed notification clatecl 10.02.1989 and ,-l subsequently, an Award datecl 03.12 1q$9 rvas passetl, fixing the market value i_ of the land at Rs.6/- Per Sq.meter. Agglrievcd by the award dated 03.12.1989, petitioners made applications under S$ction 1B of the Land Acquisition Act and the matter was referred to Civil C$url .rlr(l rlumbered as I-.A.O.P.Nos 16, 17,'19 and 29 of 2008. The Sr:nior Civil Ju.1!,c. Zaheerabacl, Sangareddy, uide |udgment and Decree dated 02.11.2022i 03 I I 2022 and 04.112022, enhanced the compensation. Thereafter, the pititiorrers for realization of decretal amount, filed E.P.Nos.7, 8, 9, and 10

202.1, beforc the Senior Civil Judge, Zaheerabad, Sangareddy. Hovvever, til ate the samc is not dePosited bY the respondent No.1. Aggrieved by the Sar this u,rit petition is filed

4. Learned counsel for the Pctition s submits that wl'rile dealing with the similar circumstance this CourL in W P. No.246.15 of 2022 z'lde order dated L0.06.2022, passed the following order:- "Therefore in uiezo of the decisiotL of tfu Lrger Bench in BhinLidipati Annapoorna Bhaaani (200513) ALD 223 (LB) mtd order dt.15.0E.2021 in W.P.No.18867 r./12021, and for reasons nlike, the ot'fcial respondents are directed to leposit tlrc cottpensntiotl anlount ii terms oi order/decree dated 01.08J2016 md 18.08.2076 in L.A.O.P. No.1 of 2073 and L.A.O.P.No.2 of 2013 of the VII Adrlitionsl Distriit ludge, at Sangaredtty. to f/rt' , r'r'i/rt of EP No 157 of 2020 and EP No.i59 of,2020 on llt fitc gl tlr ,nir! Cotrrl. ,ts tt ytditiously as possible, prefiiably, ttit lri', , pr,lio,l oJ l,ro 1021 montln from the date of receipt ol a copy of tlti< ordei"

5. Learned counsel for thc petition rs submits that inspitc of the Judgment + and Decree dated 02.L1..2022, 03.11.202 7 I a Lrcl 04.11.2022 in L.A.O.P.Nos.16, 17, I tr"---'a It

7., 19 and 29 of 2008, the responc{errt authorities har.e not depositccl clecretal am()unt tilt toda1, anc pra\r this Court to c{ircct the respond:nt authorities hercin to clepttsit der rc.tal amount in E.p.Nos.7, 8, 9 ancl 10 of 2024 in L.A.O.P.Nos.16, 77, 79 ancl 29 of 2008, on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Zahccrabad, Sangarcdtl_y, in a timc bound period.

6. Leamecl Assist:rnt Government pleader appearing fo; respondents subrnits ihat appropria:c orclers be passed in tl-ris writ petition.

7. Recorcli.g the srrbrnission made by learned counsel appe,aring on either side and in terms of thr order dated 10.06.2022 passed in w.p.Nr.24645 of 2022, this writ pctition is dis:rosed of clir.cctirrg the respondent authorities to deposit clccretal amourlt ,r tcr.rs of tl're Judgernent and decree clareci a2.71.2a22,

03.77.2022 anc{ 04.11 20 12 in L.A.O.P.N.s .76,17,19 antl 29 of 20(rg, to the credit of E.P.Nos.7,8, 9 a.c1 1(t o12024 in L.A.O.P.Nos ."1,6,17,1.g and 29 of 200g, on the file o[ the Senior Civil Judge, Zaheerabacl, Sangareddy, as e>:peditrousiy as possible, at anv ratc within a period of tivo (02) months from tl.re date of receipt of a copv of this orelcr a td communicatc the same to the petifionrjrs.

8. Accordinglr., Lh is r,r,rit petition 1S disposed of. lt4iscelianeous 4pplica-tions, if in). penrlrng, shall stancl closed. No order as to costs SD/- P. PONNA KRISHNA SSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII To, SECTION OFFICER l The speciar Deoutv coflector, Land Acquisition officer, sirqoor proiect. sansareddv, triou[nnevenue' oiuirr'oniib?i;;r, -2r]ii;'";lrt""bnitEl""ji - Sangareddy Town a-nc Districi. 5iilS?il3t'&Iff lsl6,n:i'+Tj#q1".ffiqfl ",t1,_I;l,l?t:tf,L1lon,"u,, - '-" '""' . Namp_ally, Hyderabad. felangana Stai;. 4. .l he Principal Secrete ry, lrri-gation and Commanr Area Development - tr-ano Alqr,Isiio-rr-t. iJl;g"na secretariat, Hro"rrnlound 5. The Spediat Chief s;ecietiry--ro-ih;"G;'";;H;nt Finance Deparrment, Telanoana Secretariat. HvOerabaJ. I t" Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

6. one ic to sRt I. RAVINDER REDDY, 7. TWO CCS tO GP FOR LAND ACQUI B. Two CCs to GP FOR IRRIGATION AN g Two CCs to GP FOR FINANCE AND PL Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] Telangana, at HYderabad [OUTI te IOPUC] Advoca ,High Cou rt for the State of sfnoN 0 cAD, High court for the State of i NNING, High Court for the State of

10.Two CD Copies BM PVL ,t*:: ;1, HIGH COURT \ DATED i2910412025 ORDER WP.No.6209 of 2025 r1f- S1,r, f6 o A ;i zli [tts 26 i I i.'( I t ^--...---,,,!- DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT CC'STS 9A 8lu

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments