Andhra Pradesh High Court · 2004
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 09 Sep 2004
- Bench
- V ESWARAIAH
Outcome
Dismissed
Following the said judgment, this writ petition is dismissed by and in
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 14, 21, 226
Judgment
Between: 1 G. Krishnaiah, s/o Dasaiah, Secretary, R/o D. No. 16-84, Balajinagar, Panagal Post, Srikalahasthi Mandal, Chittoor District 2 B. Chenchu Ramaiah, s/o B. Subramanyam Chetty, Clerk, r/o D. No. 3-441, Peerla Chavidi Street, Srikalahasti Mandal, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Cooperation Department, rep. by its Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad . 2 The Commissioner for Cooperation & Registrar of Coop Societies, Nampally Hyderabad. 3 The District Coop Officer, Chittoor, Chittoor District 4 The Dy. Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Tirupathi, Chittoor District 5 Empedu Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society, Srikalahasti Mandal, Chittoor District, rep by Person-in-Charge/Chairman. 6 The Chittoor District Cooperative Central Bank Limited, Chittoor, represented by its General Manager. (R-6 is impleaded as per Court Order dated 13.4.2004 in W.P.M.P No.
32599 of 2003) .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction particularly in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings issued by the 4th respondent in Rc. No. 336/2002-C Dt 20-7-2003 as illegal, arbitrary and hit by Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to pay the salaries to the petitioners as last drawn. Counsel for the Petitioners: Mr. V.S.K.RAMA RAO. Counsel for Respondents 1 to 4: GP FOR COOPERATION. Counsel for Respondent No. 6: Mr. P.M. Gopal Rao, Advocate. Counsel for Respondent No.5: None appeared. The Court made the following Order: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the subject matter of this writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in W.P.No.3171 of 2003 and batch dated 30-8-2004.
Operative part
Following the said judgment, this writ petition is dismissed by and in terms thereof. No costs. 9-9-2004 To 1 The Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Cooperation Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. ( with copy of order dated 30-8-2004 in W.P.No.3171 of 2003 and batch). 2 The Commissioner for Cooperation & Registrar of Coop Societies, Nampally Hyderabad. 3 The District Coop Officer, Chittoor, Chittoor District 4 The Dy. Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Tirupathi, Chittoor District 5 The Person-in-Charge/Chairman, Empedu Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society, Srikalahasti Mandal, Chittoor District. 6 The General Manager, Chittoor District Cooperative Central Bank Limited, Chittoor, 7 Two CCs to the Government Pleader for Cooperation, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad (OUT). 8 Two CD copies.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Following the said judgment, this writ petition is dismissed by and in
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 14, 21, 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 09 Sep 2004. The bench was V ESWARAIAH.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.